![Digital Theatre [DTheatre.com]](images/logo.png){kind=logo}
|
Starring on Dtheatre's Stage: Latest Movie News & Trailers, TV News and Productions,
Special Free Guides, Gadgets and Expert Reviews on Varity of Exciting Zones. We actually have a special expert responsible for every post series. Come back soon, you will always find new interesting things! |
By Rok$tar February 3, 2004 2:08 AM
Was the Peek-A-Boob an accident? Justin Timberlake wasn't in a hurry to cover Janet Jackson's boob after ripping her black bodice off. Janet was even prepared with decorative nipple jewlery! Who's responsible for it? CBS? MTV? The NFL? CBS got a flood of calls regarding the stunt which I'm sure they didn't have in mind. Because of all the young viewers, I don't think CBS had any intention of adding porn. I doubt MTV was OK with the stunt either. Would MTV give up future Superbowl appearences for this??? "We were extremely disappointed by elements of the MTV-produced halftime show," said NFL Executive Vice President Joe Browne, also saying, "It's unlikely that MTV will produce another Super Bowl halftime." Maybe Janet Jackson just wanted a publicity boost. She might find flashing her boobs to 135 million US viewers pretty tempting. What kind of boost in record sales is that?
Get More of Janet:
Damita Jo, "Her Sexiest Album Yet"
"Guys won't know what to do with themselves after this," producer Dallas Austin said, laughing at the prospect. "It's one of the best records she's made." Have It First at Amazon.com ?
| comments: 807
Re: 
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 3, 2004 6:41 AM
But who can honestly say they were offended by it?
Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 3, 2004 4:40 PM
Get a life. Only in North America (or maybe some rabid Muslim areas) do we have so little to worry about that a bare breast is news!
Bare breasts (and public nursing) is common in much of the world.
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2004 5:19 AM
wowwwwwwwwwww she is beautiful; the most gorgeous thing in the world.
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by nocash (JesterHere2@aol.com) on February 4, 2004 6:16 AM
I was watching the game at a friend's house. I was in the hot tub surrounded be 3 other guys,and 4 girls. We did not even notice the big boob fiasco. Then again we were all naked.
America gets too upset and over offended by the smallest things. Get over it. Every one in the world has either one type of body or the other....male or female.
really? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2004 6:24 AM
3 to 4 huh? I like those odds.
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2004 7:40 AM
If you think her saggy,old tit looks good your standards must be pretty low. She looks incredibly old and haggard...used up and needs to let the young Britneys and Beyonces have their turn now.
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2004 9:05 AM
What people need to think about is this all going to go too far. Spears kissing Maddona, Celebs coming half naked to any Damm Award Show, and now this with Janet. Whats next Open Sex for All. This is a sick World
plan ahead reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2004 9:41 AM
Ok here is why what happen happened, I know this because I also have a mind to figure out mystery novels before I am 1/4 the way done (never fails).
as we all know Janet flashing was no accident, how ever what people don't realize is why it happened. the whole segment before the half time show was a segment about "freedom of choice-vote-moral choice etc" as seen through the eyes of Hollywood (mostly commie bastards). ok, well we have a strange brew of entertainment "Janet and Justin as the main stream goodie - goodies and then the bow wow of the bow wow set with such "poke them from behind crowed like "pee ditty" and who ever the guy with the jock itch was on stage with him. so the crowed to watch would be both kinds (kid rock does not even deserve mentioning with his old drug butt, sum it up with trailer trash.) the left who would see ditty and itch and then families with young kids both young and pre-voting ages. why is that important is because seeing itchy and scratchy exposes them to low base values any way and then the aftermath "expected" reaction they wanted from the white house was "out rage" so they could play through various mediums to kids "see how repressive the republicans are? what's wrong with a women's body? they are trying to control your mind and choice etc."
they have what they wanted to a lesser degree in that parents in general are speaking out and can thus in loosely held together families drive a wedge further in because as long as they are speaking out on the Janet thing they of course are going to talk about the ghetto show put on by the rappers who need blistex down south.
I agree with a friend who said bush lied about seeing the show, lied like a fox to not take the most predictable of paths and try to fire up the moral majority(?)
its all political folks
Goddess Janet. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2004 10:44 AM
Those of you on here that have disputed the hotness of Janet Jackson are all on crack. Get your eyes examined!!!Janet Jackson is the baddest woman in the world. She has the face and body. She brings Halle Berry, Beyonce, Britney Spears, and a host of others are to shame. She is talented and is an international star.
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2004 10:46 AM
You have got to be white or a woman or simply jealous. Janet Jackson is the epitome of beauty and talent.
i love janet,she's a great singer! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2004 11:22 AM
it's a shame that everyone's so worried about that breast incident because not too long ago Cher said the 'f' word on television and it wasnt bleeped out and nobody was so worried about that
RE: plan ahead reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2004 3:25 PM
I started reading your article and then just had to stop. You say you have a great mind and then in the next sentence you misspell the word however. Ever think that maybe there isn't some science formula to figure out the reason of why this happened? Terrible, terrible article.
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2004 3:26 PM
are you gay?
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by kaleam (kaleamyote@hotmail.com) on February 4, 2004 7:00 PM
your totaly right its like geting horny by looking at michel jacklons cok
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by kaleam (kaleamyote@hotmail.com) on February 4, 2004 7:01 PM
i meen jackson
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by kaleam (kaleamyote@hotmail.com) on February 4, 2004 7:02 PM
your gay
janet jackson's boob reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2004 7:58 PM
nice there kinda saggy though but there were still iight
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2004 9:42 PM
I'm white and Janet is still beautiful. She still rivals Beyonce i think
Tits reply
Posted by Eddie (No Email) on February 4, 2004 10:06 PM
It was a good game, wasn't it.
(I hope my spellinng wos rite)
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2004 10:54 PM
cheap gimmick
I bet... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2004 10:59 PM
...Justin cracked a boner.
There's so much more to worry about reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2004 11:19 PM
I could care less about the super bowl and really am amazed at how people can want an investigation over someone showing off her breast while the U.S. goes down the toilet. The economy is shot, the military is losing people everyday in a futile and unnecessary war and occupation, people are starving here and abroad yet all we've got the think about is how terrible it is to see a woman's breast.
YUP reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2004 11:29 PM
hahahah
omg reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2004 11:34 PM
i tottally AGREE. its slightly patheatic that everyone cares so much about something so little. like COME ON!! u see body parts everyday on t.v or in public, like omg nooo no its awful. dont tell me that omg janets boob is going to kill you. like HELLO!! why do you care so much. whats it going to do. 3 mili seconds of seing it. i highly doubt its going to reck some little kid by seing something like that hello baby thats where you got the milk form your mom! like GET OVER IT! and think about something more useful like fixing ur economy. man u americans are such hipacrits. you can see ppl shaking there ass and then come around and shoot up somebody. its really rather patheatic
Couldn't reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2004 11:34 PM
You couldn't care less, you mean. If you could care less, that means you must care somewhat to be able to care less. And I really dont think Janet's hotness is an issue here. The issue is whether or not it was appropriate on public television with hundreds of millions of people watching. Although she is obviously hot, I still do not believe it appropriate.
RE: Couldn't reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2004 11:36 PM
maybe but why are ppl making such a ruge deal out of it. like whats done is done
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2004 11:36 PM
i think it was great
RE: Couldn't reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2004 11:39 PM
get a life, and like seriously. you dont see anything. you cant even see her tit. like whats everyone getting so mad about.
obviously a promo stunt reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2004 11:42 PM
check out that nipple tassle ppl.
she sooo obviously got put up to it.
this is silly... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2004 11:58 PM
It's just a breast.. who could care less!
While CNN and other international TV-stations broadcasts killing, suffering and misery as if it was just another sunday matinee..
Going off track? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 12:01 AM
Janet Jackson is beautiful. That's nice for her. The superbowl is watched by well over a hundred million people, most of whom are men. So that matches up nicely. But the problem here is the timing. The superbowl always FLIRTS with men's desires (usually mostly in the commercials), but this time they came right out and addressed the desire baldly--and it was a problem. SUBTLETY is a lost art! It seems that currently no one realizes the impact that subtlety can have. And having this stunt air at a time when no one was expecting it was just unfair to those people who still make some effort to monitor their families' TV viewing. OK, it wasn't the end of the world, but it was certainly unethical and inappropriate.
I finally found a picture reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 12:05 AM
I found a picture....know finally I can look at it EVERYDAY OF MY LIFE!!
Kids reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 12:16 AM
Bottom line, it was uncalled for on prime time TV. Let's not forget that young kids watched the super bowl and did not need to see that. I had co-workers whose children were watching and were like why did that happen. Kids need to be left as kids. If adults want to watch that kind of crap they can on their own time not with their children. It was obviously planned however you look at it. Why else the nipple decoration??? Maybe she wanted attention taken off her brother. Who knows.
Come on reply
Posted by spentrent (spentrent@aol.com) on February 5, 2004 12:19 AM
Come on guys, it was OBVIOUSLY a publicity stunt. Janet Jackson's boobie was all nipply clamped and sad-looking. 10 bucks sez she hired Paris Hilton's BRILLIANT PR agent.
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 12:20 AM
hell ya
my perky boobs reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 12:23 AM
If that is what my perky breasts have to look forward to in later years, i'm getting a boob job!!! sad thing is, she already did!!!
RE: plan ahead reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 12:23 AM
what did he say?
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 12:24 AM
Um, me, skippy.
Not offended.
RE: janet jackson's boob reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 12:24 AM
i love janet jackson saggy!
RE: I bet... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 12:25 AM
he stared right at it. ha!
RE: my perky boobs reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 12:27 AM
can i see yours?
sexy is sexy reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 12:32 AM
janet is the sexiest woman out there and always has been in time yeah she is getting older but look at whitney houston she was hot ONCE and now a crackhead but janet is still hot and if there was a fund to pay whatever fines she got for showing her bare skin then put me in on that cause id pay to see it again
RE: I finally found a picture reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 12:56 AM
well...we are just so happy for you. Now grow up.
RE: sexy is sexy reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 12:59 AM
You can see better down on Broadway and Main...and it will only cost you a 10 spot...
RE: Kids reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 1:05 AM
You don't think kids know what a breast look like?? Seriously I don't think they care much.. it only gets interesting when forbidden!
RE: plan ahead reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 1:09 AM
crowed is spelled crowd. For someone who states that he/she reads books, you can't spell or construct a sentence.
RE: plan ahead reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 1:10 AM
He's a legend in his own mind...
Some Americans Still Have Morals reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 1:10 AM
Was it a set up? Was it ?wardrobe malfunction?? No one will ever know the truth. But right now, both Justin and Janet are facing the consequences. The first thing asked was if there were any one "truly" offended. *raises hand* I was. I am a straight, married man and I know that I was offended. Is Janet a beautiful woman, yes she is. But, NATIONAL TV is not the place for that. There were children watching that show. Dispite what each of our moral values are, there are people out there that would like to watch something and not have to worry about will there be some unforseen nudity.
IMHO, no half time show will ever match up to the Aerosmith and friends version of "Walk This Way" from a few years back.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 1:12 AM
Personally...I think she should do garbage like that in a strip bar...then again, she isn't that good.
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 1:13 AM
You posted "wowwwwwwwwwww she is beautiful; the most gorgeous thing in the world."
You need to get out more.
Isn't it really Justin? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 1:14 AM
It is funny how no one metions anything about Justin, the person who actually committed the deed. The question is who are we to blame? Janet for allowing herself to be exposed or Justin for actually ripping Janet's top off. I think we still live in a very patriarchal society and and unfortunately women are the ones who suffers most at society's indescretions. I am fully aware that Janet is to chided for allowing herself to be exposed.But Justin is as much responsible as she is. Sex sells!!! and our women are being constantly degraded because of the dichotomous view that our societies hold as truth. It is time that we wake up.
typical America reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 1:26 AM
This is typical America! you are the worlds largest producers of violence and porn movies and now you are offended. Get alive!
Holland
RE: typical America reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 1:35 AM
I totally agree!
Denmark
Breasts more dangerous than guns.. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 1:44 AM
This only is shocking news in the US of A, the rest of the world has a chuckle.
Kids can carry guns, schwarzenegger kill half a town in the movies, but a breast on tv would be dangerous...
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 2:05 AM
shut your ass u fool. JJ's dits are the bomb
justin reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 2:12 AM
Everyone who's offended always states "its national TV, children were watching". Well there is nothing wrong with breasts, and everyone has nipples. They are only offensive because we choose to get offended by them. What?s next, suing national geographic for topless Africans?
justin.. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 2:24 AM
omg stop bickering! janet should be honoured to have her chest exposed by the ever sexy justin timberlake! i'd volunteer anyday!
oooohhh yeh reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 2:25 AM
at the time of the janet boob fiasco, me and my boyfriend were getting jiggy in my parents bed! we hardly noticed what was going on on the television! i' never forget that day...oooohh
Janet Jackson's boob reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 2:29 AM
"Land of the free". I don't think so. You Americans are so repressed when it comes to nudity. Is it really that offensive ? You go on a beach in Europe topless and no-one would bat an eyelid, kids included.
JJ's Breast reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 2:30 AM
Too all you anal retentive A__Holes, Get a Life. The world is going to hell in a hand basket and all you worry about is a breast. So what if kids were watching, there is not a child in the world who has not seen a breast(unless they are Blind)!
Janet Jackson's "accident". Superbowl reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 2:50 AM
I'm writing from europe. Here we all know that night were the Superbowl game, that millions of people were about to see the match (most of them from the US). Till here everything's as usual. But on the night news (every channel: prime time) there was a JJ brest. NOBODY would make such "scandal" from that here. Is the US society such puritane (I don't know if this is the right word) that a single brest can cause all that? Please, children know far much than that, trust me!
RE: typical America reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 2:53 AM
I totaly agree too.
Spain.
RE: typical America reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 2:54 AM
And I.
Portuguese
RE: plan ahead reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 2:59 AM
Get a life!
RE: typical America reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 3:02 AM
and i again
Portugal
RE: Kids reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 3:05 AM
You made me cry
With your sic comments
RE: Some Americans Still Have Morals reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 3:07 AM
Try the Sex Pistols
Good for Moral!
RE: Janet Jackson's boob reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 3:11 AM
Good in Europe
And so bad in America!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by Pure Aussie (kevin.worgan@cba.com.au) on February 5, 2004 3:38 AM
Damn man! An Aussie saying is 'show us your tits!' Top marks Janet, you have a great rack!
WOW reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 4:00 AM
Brittany and Janet go to such lengths to get publicity when they already have the fame! Kinda pathetic. I love Janet, she is cute and talented and she doesnt need to expose any more then that.
ll
RE: really? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 4:02 AM
add it up, he was with 3 others, doh, he+3=4, no wonder
RE: I finally found a picture reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 4:04 AM
No wonder you believe Bush....
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 4:07 AM
How you kidding!!!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 4:08 AM
Now I know why service at CBA is so shit, a load of idiots watching internet all day.
And the old thought, "how do you make 4 pounds of fat look attractive?" Put a nipple on it
Janet Jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 4:16 AM
War and kiling is ok to be shown on American television but if a naked breast is shown, America turns upside down! Get a life you puritan Americans!Here in Europe we don't make such a big deal about nudity. We are born naked. A naked body is natural.
RE: typical America reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 4:16 AM
And I, Australia and Great Britain, two of the mislead "allies", suppose we need yor money or something.
Seems to smack of hypocracy when TV has nudes all the time, and suddenly a saggy black tit offends "God Bless America", well the saggy bit offended me too, but not the principle.
Rike Lake and Springer are clean???? Who do you guys think you are, no don't tell me, "God", except you can't put the name on public stuff.
RACE CARD reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 4:21 AM
I see it does not take long for the average negro to start with the race bullshit. The comments "You must be a white girl" and shit like that is why there is so much prejudice and hate in the world. So play your race card somewhere else. You iggnorant pile of shit!
Muck Muck reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 4:26 AM
Ooola bunga bunga chinguiwa, mekka dungo bleetsy. That is how much sense it makes to bring race into this. Farikahn and Sharples are extremist assholes and if they died the world would be a better place!
RE: Isn't it really Justin? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 4:26 AM
do you feel a bit silly now that Janet's owned up? Degrading isn't it!
RE: Breasts more dangerous than guns.. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 4:28 AM
They really are children with guns aren't they?
How did they get where the are??
Maybe I would be richer if I was more stupid
RE: There's so much more to worry about reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 4:37 AM
Futile and unecessary war huh? The US is in the toilet? I fight everyday so you have to priveldge to say that... and so Janet can show her boob... if i was her i would have shown them both.
For the sake of the children reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 4:53 AM
"... but there were children watching..."
The more I hear this crap, the more it sounds like a cop-out as desperate as the stunt was that sparked this whole thing. I'm really curious, how many people had kids in the room and were offended, and how many had kids in the room and were "offended" (ie, scared to death they may have to talk to their kids and explain something uncomfortable) With all the Limbaughs, Sterns and anyone else with a microphone and an opinion, pepole seem to only want to talk anymore when they have an opinion to express, not a thought to convey. Talk to your kids, the world gives you chances like this everyday. And yes, that's my opinion!
P.S. I wonder how many kids were offended and ran screaming to their rooms, and how many asked "Why did they do that?" and offended their parents?
janet jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 4:58 AM
it made me whip it out and beat it.
get real reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 5:05 AM
Americans will find any reason to sue anyone and everyone! Get real people! It was no worse than seeing a woman on the beach with a very skimpy bikini, and you don't hear people complaining about that, now do you? For those who are complaining about children seeing it, there are cartoons out there that you allow your children to watch that are worse than this whole fiasco. If it is that big of a deal, why not just get rid of your tv because you will never get away from the profanity, sexual exploitation, etc! Grow up and get a grip on life!
suck a tit reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 5:13 AM
dude, women get cliterectomies in some countries. Shouldn't we be worried about that more? This is where sexual oppression starts, boobs are BAD. Breastfeeding is BAD. Give them formula, make them allergy prone!
No ONE Really Cares reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 5:16 AM
Most people in the U.S.A Don't really care what happened or they dont even know. I myself watched the game and didnt really notice what happened til 4 days later in watching the news. Its Not the Americans that need to get over it, The Media does.
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 5:27 AM
Come on It's just boobs you cant see anything due to the huge star!! If shes gonna flash she should makie sure people are gonna see what shes got!
RE: Goddess Janet. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 5:32 AM
R U mad how the hell can you believe that Janet Jackson is better looking than Halle Berry????????? watch that James Bond Film with Halle then U will know what I mean!!!
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 5:32 AM
Umm Well SHe looks just like micheal JAckson
RE: Kids reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 5:35 AM
I agree with the guy at the top if adults wanna see tits then they should subscibe to Playboy!!!!
RE: sexy is sexy reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 5:38 AM
come to Amsterdam it is free!!! all ya can see for under 1 cent
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 5:38 AM
AMEN!!! I agree 100%. Cheap shots at publicity instead of natural and honest talent. I am sick of all the nudity and language!
RE: Breasts more dangerous than guns.. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 5:41 AM
Can some one tell me the last time some one died when they saw a breast on TV???? coz as far as i can see guns tend to be a little more dangerous than boobs
janet at superbowl reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 5:43 AM
i enjoy it...
but she needs to sex up again her tits
RE: For the sake of the children reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 5:44 AM
as you can see from the picture at the top there was nothing to see!!! if you have a problem with (Covered UP)nudity should you be out alone in public???
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 5:45 AM
years are passing for her...
she needs to sex up again her tits
RE: janet at superbowl reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 5:54 AM
She needs to sex up again her tits? WTF is that? and i think her rack is pretty sweet, *drule*
RE: janet at superbowl reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 5:56 AM
HER TITS ARE LIKE..... DAAAAAMMMMNNN! She needed to bust outthe other one though. Thumbs up JT for busting one out... Should have taking the other out though bro...
RE: janet at superbowl reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 5:57 AM
YEAH!! I'de do her too!!
Oh and porno, sure anytime Janet, call me *wink wink*
RE: Re: reply
Posted by delirioclub (no) on February 5, 2004 5:58 AM
years are still passing dear Janet!
Your tit needs to be sexed up again!
RE: I bet... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 5:59 AM
Can you blame him?
tits reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 5:59 AM
nice tits but blatent implants. got it out as a publicity stunt
tits reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:00 AM
black tits turn me on oh yeah baby
RE: There's so much more to worry about reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:00 AM
Think she swollows?
RE: I bet... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:02 AM
So did 149 million others
RE: tits reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:03 AM
NIPPLES AND TITS, NIPPLES AND TITS, GOTTA HAVE NIPPLE AND TITS
RE: tits reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:04 AM
Like you really care if they were implants. If those little black beauties where in your face you would be sprung bitch
RE: I bet... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:04 AM
stared at it, I mean.
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:05 AM
are you an idiot?
none reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:05 AM
I liked it I thought it was a publicity stunt though.
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:07 AM
Obviously your entertained by trash, this doesn't say much for your character, and that is a direct reflection of your parents.
RE: plan ahead reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:10 AM
Have to wonder about your grammer ......
RE: plan ahead reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:12 AM
lol .... your ...you're
RE: Come on reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:12 AM
lol lol lol lol lol!
RE: I bet... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:13 AM
you said boner
RE: typical America reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:14 AM
The phrase is "Get a life"
RE: Going off track? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:16 AM
I believe this makes her a ho ......
Janet Jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:16 AM
It was simply uncalled for. I knew I was going to miss a good game, but after the half-time show I turned the game off. If I didn't, on what grounds could I teach my daugther prudence and purity? Ms. Jackson should have thought twice before agreeing to what was an obvious plan stunt. So here I stand...Contra Mundum!
RE: I finally found a picture reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:17 AM
you lead a sad existance ....get a job
RE: Kids reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:18 AM
and this way you wouldn't be seeing nasty old saggy ones ...
RE: typical America reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:18 AM
Not everyone from America is in agreement with the media's choices, nor do we all have the desire to participate in some bad choices that people make. And as for porn, I would much rather do completely without it thank you.
You can't always judge America as one voice, althought we try we are not quite united.
my opinion reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:19 AM
I really dont see why this is such a big issue. The boob isnt even fully exposed. All this discussion about the whole hting only gives her exactly what she wants, attention. Creating all this fuss will only give an incentive to other actors who want a quick claim to fame
RE: typical America reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:20 AM
unlike third world countries like holland, what has holland done for the world? ...wooden shoes? lol
RE: Breasts more dangerous than guns.. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:22 AM
I died for a second when I saw Janets, Nasty ......
RE: Janet Jackson's boob reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:24 AM
yah, and you see nasty hairy underarms ...cig hanging from the lip ....oh yah, I want to see that ...lol
RE: JJ's Breast reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:26 AM
If your so brillant then why are you in here discussing the subject?????
RE: Janet Jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:28 AM
Then why are you even reading from this forum? Why did you pick this web site? Makes me wonder if you are so much better than we are, then why would you even put yourself in a dispute between Americans who liked what they saw and Americans who didn't find it appropriate? You would have passed this issue right up if it didn't matter to you, so why concern yourself?
Seems like you are doing the same thing that Janet Jackson did, looking for something to use as a platform. Makes me wonder?
RE: RACE CARD reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:29 AM
Ignorant?
RE: janet jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:31 AM
First you had to find the little thing ..
RE: get real reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:32 AM
A life like yours ... responding to janet jackson forum posts ...lol
yuk reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:34 AM
She looks too much like Michael for me to get aroused. Actually come to think of it, you never see the two of them together.
Jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:34 AM
OMG a TIT!!!, sory was too busy watching chearleaders asses wen they where bending over!
RE: janet at superbowl reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:34 AM
you really are a hard up loser! Ignored by your parents?
RE: my opinion reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:36 AM
Funny thing is ...no one asked for your opinion.
RE: yuk reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:37 AM
Interesting thought.
RE: No ONE Really Cares reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:39 AM
I agree, the media is what usually starts it all, and continues until the subject becomes old or they find something better. Seems like Janet Jackson and Justin got what they wanted though; publicity. People from all over the world is talking about a stupid stunt, while they sit at home and laugh.
I don't care what they did, I don't even care if is goes on in the media. What I do care about is that it is one more thing for everyone to argue, fuss and fight about. So much divison in this world. We love to fight don't we? Why?
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:41 AM
I was offended, especially since my 10 year old, my 12 year old, and my 14 year old were watching.
Besides, my wifes breast is much better
:-)
RE: my opinion reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:43 AM
But if Janet has the right to her opinion; plooping out her boob, then why not listen to everyone's opinion?
Seems fair to me!
RE: Jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:44 AM
oh almost forgot those (oh so sexy jstring) budweiser commercials.
A TIT WITH COVERED NIPPLE, OH SO SHOCKING!!
HINT HINT.
J Jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:45 AM
STOP WHINING !!!
janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:02 AM
i loved it and i love janet
RE: There's so much more to worry about reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:06 AM
I have to agree, mangled bodies, gunshot deaths , and violence ad nauseum all night on the tube. But a bare breast? Get a life folks. Kids won't be harmed by this.
Slut reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:09 AM
..... *twitch* It's so pathetic.
american boobs reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:15 AM
simply put the whole episode was 2 careers racing the american economy and moral down the toilet, that tried to make a comeback, and you idiots by publicizing it are going to make it happen.
Janet's Boob reply
Posted by AHH SHAD UP (RTHORN) on February 5, 2004 7:17 AM
Please like most of these "womens lib" Marcy Darcy damn movements are so offended. Its alright to be bent over and reamed by George W. Bush II and lied to but some would rather spend their energy on giving Janet and Justin the blues. If I were Janet I would simply apologize and tell the world-oops my mistake the U.S.- if you don't believe me then kiss my other tit. Bet she'd get more albums sold just from that statement there. Ha Ha
Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:21 AM
I think she's jeolous of her freakshow brother getting all the media attention. She probably figures she needs to do something to boost record sales because it certainly wouldn't be talent doing it.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:22 AM
was that singular or plural?
tits and nude guys in the interval reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:23 AM
what is the problem with the false u.s morality?
even the t.v coverage chooses to ignore by "tilting" away the camera from the scenes...
and then the morality of the tv series and motion pictures characters is disgusting!
Not a fan now reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:24 AM
Dang Janet your tit's aren't that great!!!!
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:26 AM
In response to the idiot who wrote..."only in the U.S. and some Muslim countries is a breast news," They aggressive and degrading sexual manner in which it was displayed was completely inappropriate. We weren't exactly watching someting beautiful and sexually neutral like a mother's breast while nursing her baby.
WTF reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:33 AM
I think the biggest thing is that a lot of parents believed her to be "good" and "morally correct" and all that crap, but is there such a thing? im so tired of all the hipocrites in this country, especially parents. Sure there are dangers in the world, but you act like everyone is out against your kids. I understand being protective but you have to realize that you had the same problems when you were a kid or teenager. It really pisses me off when I see parents freaking out about something like this, and while they are out protesting a tit, their teenager is at home downloading porn. I think people should stop being crusaders, and start trying to actually know there kids and let them make there own decisions. Has everyone forgotten that we are still occupying Iraq? Or is everyone bored with that now? Time to find something else to get involved in, right? That's America for you, everyone likes to be involved in something, but never for too long. Besides, no one's even offended by this, they are all just trying to gripe about something because they are bored. Its like letterman said, "[Janet] is pretending to apologize to everyone who is pretending to be offended."
Get over it.
Janet Jackson BOOB Show reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:36 AM
Inappropriate!!!
She NEEDS some reconstruction. GROSS, SAGGING TITS!!!!
RE: WTF reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:36 AM
And I dont even like janet
~Big C
disgusting reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:39 AM
everything has its place and the superbowl was not it.next thing you know michael will be wanting to show his little LULU
Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:39 AM
The moral majority needs to calm down... this is progress, evolution of television....If this offends you....man, I'm sorry... but your life sucks....
RE: Janet Jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:40 AM
Europeans need to worry more about themselves and not America. Take a bath, trim your nose hair, shave your underarms and legs, and then interject freely. Until then,keep it quiet.
ya reply
Posted by Big C (Immortalbattousai@hotmail.com) on February 5, 2004 7:41 AM
I think most of the ppl complaining about it have nothing else to do.
Neither do those who are defending it, but at least we arent hypocrites.
RE: my opinion reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:42 AM
That would be plopping not plooping ...learn to spell, then add your comments.
RE: ya reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:45 AM
Europeans need to worry more about themselves and not America. Take a bath, trim your nose hair, shave your underarms and legs, and then interject freely. Until then,keep it quiet.
Janet Jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:46 AM
I don't think that it's that big of a deal, however, it does desensetize the public to nutity. Clothes were made for a reason, and so were little pasties for nipples. I agree that it shouldn't have been shown on public access television, but honestly it's not that terrible. Also, i think that Janet Jackson looks like Michael Jackson when he was black, she's not in the least bit pretty, her face looks fake, and her nose is pinched. Whoever thinks she's *the most georgeous thing ever* needs to get out more. Also, people, im a 14 year old, and you old people need to grow the hell up and getlives instead of posting messages on online web pages. I'm home sick, so i have an excuse, what's yours?
RE: Janet Jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:49 AM
Your Fourteen, you have no business in a forum regarding boobs. When you grow up we will accept your opinion, until then, we will give you your opinion when we feel it is necessary and not a minute before. Why are you not in school????
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:50 AM
We act as if JJ did something terrible. Most kids today have already seen bare breast on TV or at any PG 13 Movie. Too much false morality. Next, In God We Trust will come off of U.S. currency.
RE: Janet Jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:50 AM
well spoken LMAO
RE:Janet's Breast reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:54 AM
You are offended by JJ on TV, your wife has better breast. Do they offend your children
She did it because of her brother reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:54 AM
She did it to take the attention away from her Brother Michael and it worked. I have not heard anything about Michael after Sunday's tit show.
RE: She did it because of her brother reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:58 AM
Just another example of a jackson involved with a little boy
violence vs. nudity reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 8:01 AM
Hmmmm let me see... In the middle of hours of an ultra-violent event, a small part of a woman's body is exposed for a second and the uproar is about that brief moment? Our culture is very troubled.
RE: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 8:04 AM
typically Americans, you can buy a shotgun everywhere, violence on tv all day long. but when a boob comes on tv, the whole nation is crying. what's wrong with a boob, you need one after you're born. when will America grow up? It's one big pubic country, this is just another prove... :(
Janet Need To Be Ashamed reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 8:07 AM
Its not only fact that Kids have seen this....
She knows her family is going through enough drama involving her brother Michael...and then to go and do this is senseless this was no accident ..if it was an accident why was her breast decorated I dont have any decoration on my breast....she also didnt move immediately to cover her self up this was a publicity stunt. Justin really needs to check himself as well. He says he didnt know and he was so appalled oh yeah right from his facial expressions my guess was if anything he definitely wasnt appalled if the public had cheered her on and was glorified upon what she did he would be trying to gobble up the credit behind it...to finish on one last note I feel Janet didnt need to be in the half time performance anyway let the younger generation have their fun she should have been sitting down with the other stars who were there this is what she feels she has to do to sell a new album I loved and respected her she didnt need to take off her top to gain fans..one last thing about Justin why was he so appalled to see her breast when she divorced her ex I heard they were an item for a brief time anyway so im sure hes seen it without the jewelry.
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 8:09 AM
what the hell does being white have to do with anything, and they say white people are prejudice oh please, ya know what thanks to a remark like that im proud to be prejudtice , and allways will be! so it was a tit big f****** deal man , Get over it!
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 8:21 AM
her tits is the best!!!!!!!!!!
flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 8:24 AM
i don't care what any one say her tits was the shit!!
RE: violence vs. nudity reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 8:27 AM
Having your clothes ripped off is a violent act, short of rape and molestation. Music is Sh*t today!
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 8:29 AM
to those who are offended I ask: Do you watch NYPD Blue where they show about nude scene per episode, or by every other show where nudity has become commonplace. It kills me the things that get people in an uproar... Get a life
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 8:38 AM
it is about white and black! but not on a rac-ist level.
in the 70's and 80's you would be hard pressed to find a 'black' tv show or even blacks on tv.
so janet was who every black teenage boy growing up in that era - wished was his 'girlfriend'.
she is to middleage black men what marilyn monroe is to older white males
lol reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 8:43 AM
i was happy that it was not micheal (...)
-_-''
RE: Janet Jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 8:46 AM
what's wrong with people having hair on their bodies again? all you "dudes" who keep telling the europeans,etc. to shave their armpits...well, are your armpits shaved? then shut the fuck up before you embarass yourself even more. people have hair, get over it! dumb-asses.
Lil Kim reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 8:47 AM
I understand the point of that it was her boob, BUT it was not all the way bare.. Does any one recall Lil Kim's outfit? she did the same thing her outfit at some awards show that tons of people where watching and she had her whole breast exposed BUT the nipple but that was ok? Plus she was on for a longer period of time, she was standing poseing for camera and video! What difference does this make. It was not BARE!! It had her nipple covered. there fore making it not nudity. And how in HELL can the 1 second that is was shown offend anybody, they only way the LITTLE CHILDREN know it happend was because of the parents making big deals of it. Turn on any show or commercial! you see more boobs, clevage for a longer time frame than that split sec. at the superbowl. People need to get new hobbies, if it was my parent that called up CBS and complained i would so feel embarassed. GET A LIFE!!
Janet Jackson breast reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 8:48 AM
Grow up, everyone! Sex is natural and it's why there are so many of us.
War and other violence is obscene and we're shown that all the time.
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 8:54 AM
In god we trust should be taken off the currency, seperation of church and state!
RE: RACE CARD reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 8:57 AM
I like the way you say "average negro", then say don't play the race card! And then spell ignorant incorrectly!
primetime after 8:00 p.m. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 8:57 AM
22 men on the field hitting each other and breaking bones,and you're affended by a breast. your children were watching men brawl for points but that is ok. did you see a toys"R"us commercial? "NO" That is because it was prime time. prime time is called that because it is prime time for selling to the public. ADULT public that is. Janet was doing just that, selling to the adult public(men) anyway
re primetime reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:01 AM
exactly!!!!!
RE: violence vs. nudity reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:03 AM
Consider the type of people watching football, beer guzzling, pot bellied, big screen tv watching losers. (no offense)... lol
RE: re primetime reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:04 AM
Consider the type of people watching football, beer guzzling, pot bellied, big screen tv watching losers. (no offense)... lol
RE: primetime after 8:00 p.m. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:05 AM
isn't that prostitution??
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:08 AM
Seperation of state isn't what you believe it to be. It doesn't say you can't have religion in government, it says the government can't create or run it's own religion. It's amazing how many people get this wrong simply because they follow the false publicity.
RE: Breasts more dangerous than education.. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:10 AM
If society would focus more on literacy maybe we would seek more than just a boob shot. Janet and Justin were doing what the majority of Americans want to see and this is proven by the ratings of shows like Springer and Elimidate. The end result of this stunt will be higher record sales and fatter wallets for both entertainers. America needs to get a life and realize how our reactions influence what we see.
re primetime reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:13 AM
but still there were not many children watching TV at that time.
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:15 AM
Why do you have to take 'In God We Trust' off our own currency. Its been there for years...removing it would weaken the dollar more. So shut up you leftist trash. Don't forget that our forefathers were christian...dillhole
janets boob reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:16 AM
so what big deal..football players hitting and making each other bleed to death and you all are worring about a boob?
find a life and join it
RE: There's so much more to worry about reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:19 AM
The public will take their victories over injustice the easiest way they can. We can't do anything about the war, or the whitehouse, or any of those situations that are out of reach. This one is right here, up close and personal. Let's punish Janet for the other things in our life that we can't control. "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush"
WE NEED OUR VICTORIES ANY WAY WE CAN GET THEM.
RE: plan ahead reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:19 AM
Not to mention it's grammAr
RE: plan ahead reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:20 AM
Not to mention it's grammAr
Don't get bent out of shape reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:20 AM
there is a time and place for everything, and I could care less that she did it or if I saw it. But that was not the right place infront of people of all ages. that something just for late night tv and channels like mtv...not cbs...
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:21 AM
fuck u
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:21 AM
Spoken like a true politician, next remove the church's from the state, JJ did'nt offend me or anyone else, You can catch a TIT SHOT on any cable channel, people just want to bitch about anything.
loved it reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:23 AM
i am so gay and i loved it wish it was in my mouth
they're not that good... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:27 AM
Idon't think they were even nice, did she do it for publicity maybe? old songs and stuff?
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:28 AM
If it hadn't been for EVE and that darn apple, we wouldn't even be discussing this now.
RE: loved it reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:29 AM
you said gay
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:33 AM
what does in god we trust have to do with currency?,do your kids think your wifes breasts are better than jj's?
In your face. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:35 AM
It was in our face. I guess our culture is somewhat anal and not ready for this. It was still not the right time or place. Europe is much more liberal for these stunts. I also think it was an attempt for the two of them to create a scandal similar to the Madona, Britney Kiss. For nothing more than publicity and for shock value. It got them headlines and publicity. I guess it worked.
RE: Janet Jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:35 AM
Which is exactly why you will never find a mate, and you probably smell (no offense)
1* better quality footage here! reply
Posted by roorda (*****) on February 5, 2004 9:36 AM
1* I got better quality film and pic's of Janet Jacksons ?here [: spam, deleted :]
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:37 AM
Brillant comeback ... usually what is said when one can't think of anything intelligent.
chichis reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:39 AM
not a nice tit at all janet is a old has been with flapjack titis
offensive superbowl reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:41 AM
the boob wasnt near as offensive as the jerk wearing the flag over his head like a poncho
RE: 1* better quality footage here! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:45 AM
Porn site, don't go ..
RE: offensive superbowl reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:46 AM
you mean kid rock...with that nasty pamela germ thing
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:47 AM
The problem is that a rating of TV-14 is placed on the screne before NYPD blue starts.That signals parents to get the kids out of the room. There was no warning before the half time show. Not cool.
Another Boob On TV, Whoopie! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:47 AM
Nobody Cried Foul When Madonna Flashed Her Nipple In Her "PAPA DON'T PREACH" Video. Sure, We Had To Go Frame By Frame To See It Two Or Three Times, But All That Did Was Make Madonna Richer. Guess Janet Will Have To Cry All the Way To The Bank Too. It's The American Way, Profits Above All.
Janet Jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:48 AM
First of all, your article said she was "prepared with nipple jewelry." The jewelry she is wearing is common for someone with a nipple piercing. It's called a nipple shield and I honestly don't think Janet Jackson had this prepared particularly for this event. Secondly, I don't see what the big deal is about this event. It's a breast. It's not a dead body being dragged through the street like on the 5 o'clock news. I would much rather my child see a breast that people getting shot. Take for instance an issue on Los Angeles television a few years ago when they interrupted children's programming for a police chase in which they showed a man commit suicided on the 101 freeway. Very little controversy was made over the incident even though it was perfectly clear the man was taking out a shotgun and placing it in his mouth. All I have to say is GROW UP AMERICA and get your priorities straight! This is why our country has astronomically hight teen pregnancy rates, teen drug and alcohol abuse, etc...you people expect the government to raise your children with organizations like the FCC.
Janet Jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:50 AM
First of all, your article said she was "prepared with nipple jewelry." The jewelry she is wearing is common for someone with a nipple piercing. It's called a nipple shield and I honestly don't think Janet Jackson had this prepared particularly for this event. Secondly, I don't see what the big deal is about this. It's a breast. It's not a dead body being dragged through the street like on the 5 o'clock news. I would much rather my child see a breast that people getting shot. Take for instance an issue on Los Angeles television a few years ago when they interrupted children's programming for a police chase in which they showed a man commit suicide on the 101 freeway. Very little controversy was made over the incident even though it was perfectly clear the man was taking out a shotgun and placing it in his mouth. All I have to say is GROW UP AMERICA and get your priorities straight! This is why our country has astronomically hight teen pregnancy rates, teen drug and alcohol abuse, etc...you people expect the government to raise your children with organizations like the FCC.
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:50 AM
all mothers' breasts aint beautiful or appetizing!!!so you can stop that right now!! that fact that you and others have an opinion is part of the reason she did it; for the most part ,yeah there were kids watching,but most of the kids that were watching werent half-as phased as the adults because we have been soooo desensitized by media for soooo long it was like nothing ever happened.(to the kids that is) but for the adults(men)who say her breast,or any breasts are offensive;i have yet to hear of any man say "get out of my bed","or life","because your breasts are sagging"....and that goes for janet jackson especially....wich one of you men prejudiced or not would kick her out of your car,house,or bed??? keep it real guys!!
RE: Another Boob On TV, Whoopie! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:51 AM
Oh Yea, The FCC, They Don't Have Any Bite, Just A Lot Of Bark Like A Toothless Dog. Ummm, Here's A 25,000 Fine, While You Make 60 Million Off This Event.
Peanuts For The Peanut Gallery.
RE: Goddess Janet. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:55 AM
yeah man i agree janet is more beautiful then halle berry, in the bond films there were alot more beautiful bond girls then halle. the do not even give halle the spinoff...SO hahahahaha janet would have gotten it.
Janet Jackson BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:59 AM
Where is the other BOOB
One is not enough
Next time show both BOOBS licked by two boob suckers
RE: Goddess Janet. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:59 AM
yeah halle berry's tits are saggy as well. who has a nice set of tits is SALMA HAYEK SHE IS BAD 2 DEF!!!
RE: Goddess Janet. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 10:02 AM
i dont know about bringin anybody to shame,but janet and all the others you named are good looking girls. why does it have to come down to who looks the best? remember that old joke where the bull tells the two young ones "not to run","lets walk down","and screw em all"? well............
Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 10:05 AM
Janet is a woman you still can dream from!
Everyone of the doublemoralists should think of the fact that every one sucks at mothers breast ( I wish I could suck janets)! everybody knows how they look like! what a scandal! now i know why the usa have the biggest porn-industrie in the world!because of the biggest DOUBLEMORALITY in the world! your?s janet-fan ernst from germany
JJ boob and USA is crying ! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 10:40 AM
Hi American's ! looks like you still not have enter the 21th!! hihi you make us laught in Europe, take a look at your way of life !!! a boob = an extremely disappointed nation !! you should grow up as it was said. Your politicians must be happy with such electors ... There's enough dramatic real thing !!!!!
May the force be with you...
Marco
get over it already reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 10:51 AM
quit being so prudish. european countries are making fun of america for being so up in arms about this whole boob on tv issue. Get over it already. People in this country let their children watch violence on tv, let them play with toy guns, and the message they are getting is that violence is ok and making love is bad. they think they should be ashamed of their bodies because of this kind of represion.Gow up america and get over it.
RE: Goddess Janet. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 10:51 AM
She and fucking crack whore!
boobs reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 11:07 AM
I LOVE BOOBS. I LOVE BOOBS!
What a bunch of hypocrits reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 11:39 AM
Offended by a tit; come on now, who are they trying to kid. I see a lot more of those at the beach everyday
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 11:40 AM
your wife probably doesnt have any tits you homo
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 12:27 PM
Um... sadly you are on this site commenting about it... so obviously you didn't mind much
Janet and her boobie reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 1:07 PM
okay why are people having a cow over a boob there is alot worse on regular tv and commericals so get over it people and the tv stations are just wrong on every level because had they planned for that to happen it would be okay but because they didn't they bash Janet well then they need to take all of the sex and drugs off of the shows they play and get a life
get over it reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 1:10 PM
I watched the Superbowl and turned my head for two seconds and missed Janet Jackson's bare boob. I got to see it a thousand times though all over the news. If I wouldn't of watch the news I wouldnt of even know about it. I live in Houston and that very night people were actually e-mailing the D.A. wanting to arrest her. It is not illegal to show a womens bare breast in public. Her nipple was covered up so it wasn't even bare. I wasn't offended by her boob being exposed. I am however sick of it being the main news topic on every channel. If that offended you I highly suggest you shouldn't watch tv anymore. You might see a Herbal Essence commercial where the women is having an orgasam from her shampoo. To me that is more offensive. And for the NFL if the Superbowl is such a "family event" maybe you shouldn't let Budwiser sponser it anymore. Every other commercial you saw was a beer commercial. but that wont happen because they give the nfl too much money. I rather my kid see a boob then try beer. I think it's rediculous to not allow janet to present a grammy. Doesn't everyone remember lil kim's outfit a few years ago. Or being able to see J-Lo's nipple through her shirt. I think if it was Brittany Spears up there and the same thing happend it would of been a completely different story. It's a boob, all women have them. I'm sure most kids have seen their mothers boobs. It's a boob. It's not like justin exposed himself. And if that offended you maybe you should of sent your kids out of the room when everyone was bumping and grinding. Or maybe you should just get rid of your tv if you are that easily offended.
Nipplegate reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 1:40 PM
The networks didn't add porn, Janet just revealed nature's beauty, albeit by coincidence. There's nothing to be ashamed about, except of the few hypocrites who are trying to make a fuss of this non-event. I think the hours of violence on TV are a major problem instead.
Christel & Michiel
www.intimi.com
RE: whatevers reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 1:47 PM
Ladies & Genitalmen (you know who you are ya pervs) (and yes i spelled that wrong on purpose) and the Gorillas that think Janet is hot, granted she's better looking then MJ, but she looks too much like MJ, and MJ looks too much similar to the female ape from the newer version of The Planet of the Apes, so something is seriously wrong there, as for the spectacle blob of fat on tv, it was hardly noticable, and I'm sure there's not a single guy that was offended, least a normal guy. As for the women they cant complain , they have tits so they cant be offended at all. Last but not least, I'm sure we saw better images of half naked and way better looking girls in the commercials then Janet's pathetic flesh flash.
FOR ALL THE HATERZ reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 1:56 PM
Yyo all yah haterz who was offended by this stunt can suck ma mothaf***in d**k. We need more sh*t like dis done meh.Life aint no fun without sex. And I hope other h0es can and will do the same cuz Im loving it.
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 1:58 PM
It took him 6 minutes to add these last 5 letters... :)
our bras stay up :)
stuff reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 1:59 PM
I'd love to dry fuck that bitch in the ass, shes one hot chick
RE: Isn't it really Justin? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 2:08 PM
How would that reflect silliness on my part? Even though she has "owned up" as you put it it, does not negate the fact that our societal values, or lack there of is what has perpetuated problems of such nature. In fact, the notion that she has "owned up" should raise within you questions regarding the nature of exploitation and its implications on the role of women in our soiciety. Stop and take a look around you!!! More so than man, women are exploited on a daily basis in the work place, on the streets, in schools, everywhere. With the aid of the media and under the mask of entertainment, some these images are brought into our homes while we (men) sit back and encourage this kind of behavior why? because we love it, can't get enough of it. Think about it. Women who expose themselves are seen as Hos but the men who exploit these women are are looked at "Dons", gaining society's respect. How does that make you feel. It is a sad sad thing.
And of course what kind of values are we instilling in our kids. we live in a sick twisted duallistic world.
Janet jackson's titteh's reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 2:08 PM
Look, Americans should grow up and go stick religion and house-mums up their asses. PORN = good .... Janet Jackon's tit's aren't exactly porn... u didnt even see all of it, crap show, but nothing to get "offended" over u hippocrites
RE: get real reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 2:15 PM
Suing already in Tennessee. How convenient.
Some people still care about raising kids reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 2:18 PM
Might come off as a news flash to some of you people, but some people still give a damn about what their kids do, what they're allowed to see, and what they're exposed to. My 5 and 7 year old boys were glued to the TV the moment Janet decided to become a slut.
The superbowl is perhaps the most widely televised sporting event of the year in the USA. My boys and I follow the games through the season, and finally, sit down with more snacks than we can ever consume to watch the big show. As a concerned parent, I don't see the superbowl as something I have to censor from my kids.
In any other context, I might welcome (hell, I'd LOVE) to see what I saw that day, but simply put, it is NOT appropriate for a medium that attracts so many children.
Yes, Dumba$$, they know what a breast is, but do they need to see it at 5 and 7? No. and I hope they throw the book at her.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 2:26 PM
I applaud your response!! Thank you I couldn't have said it better! Keep it in the Bedroom Janet!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by MEMPHISBR (No Email) on February 5, 2004 2:42 PM
well, I think that Janet has been out of the spotlight for a while and merely wanted some attention...with so many people watching Natl' TV...heck, there is no better way!
RE: Isn't it really Justin? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 2:53 PM
i'm so proud of you baby!!!!
RE: Isn't it really Justin? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 2:53 PM
i'm so proud of you baby!!!!
teats are for babies. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 3:06 PM
hmph. I wanna see some ass.
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 3:48 PM
Actually, if you check your history, the founding fathers were not all or even a majority of them were Christian. Look up the history on Franklin and/or the many Masons amongst them. And I'll give you one clue, the Masonic lodge did not start out Christian but it has become that way in the recent years...
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 3:55 PM
Our forefathers may have been "Christian" (yeah slave owners really showed God's love there) but from the way you replied back, I wonder if you are. Ghandi once said that he loved our Christ, just not our Christians because we have a tendancy to confess Christ but not live the values that he set up for our lives.
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 4:51 PM
She has nice tits thats agiven. But how does her tits get an uniformed Masonic Basher to write something that he obviously knows nothing about!!
RE: Kids reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 4:52 PM
I feel your point is valid, however, everyone knows that the Super Bowl targets men.
So are the humerous beer commercials and medications for erection problems considered quality family tv?
This happened so quick. At first I thought she had that material on that looks like skin, because the picture was blurred and it went by so fast. It will only be an issue to children if parents make it one. That could've easily been dismissed with, it's just a part of the act.
I just feel it went right along with the theme of commercials. Beer, suggestions of sex, and nudity.
In the end, it just happened so quick most people missed it. Good thing we have the media to keep bringing things up.
RE: For the sake of the children reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 5:35 PM
As I replied earlier, do you care about the commercials the kids were exposed to. I was more offended by the medication for an erection than Janet. All four of my girls were watching and one thought it was funny(12), two didn't care(15,10), one didn't notice (4). It wasn't an issue because I never made it into one.
Kids know more than you think and they're not as nieve as you think. They learn more from friends at school than they'll ever let you know about. I have an open relationship with my girls and I don't cover up reality. You can't shelter them their entire life. Bring them up right and be there to support them and they'll turn out ok. Stop the drama.
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 5:39 PM
How did you turn a topic about Janet's tit into a topic about religion??!!
RE: Re:JJ reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 5:49 PM
I don't see why anyone would be offended by this. So what you seen a tit that was covered with nipple jewelry, big fucking deal. You can see just as much on regular TV now adays. My kids are younger but it did not offend me, I think its immoral to make kids ashamed of the human body, because so many hipocrits are so self centered that they think its wrong or immoral for someone to show a breast....GET OVER IT>>>>ITS A NEW MILLENIUM!!!! And no one should be ashamed by something so stupid as a breast...get for real. I myself am proud of JJ she isn't afraid to express herself like many prudish women these days are. And yes I am a women but I am not in anyway ashamed of the human body. People just need to get over it already.
Attention! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 5:50 PM
She needs to do something to get attention, her music sure aren?t!
Just look at her brother, better know as "that thing"
RE: Some people still care about raising kids reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:13 PM
Let me ask you this..... when the commericals for beer came on with young attractive people making drinking look good did you get offended? If you're such a good parent why didn't you sent your children out of the room when they were freak dancing on stage?? What do you do when an offencive commerical comes on the television?? If your such a good parent Im sure you would have the controll to unglue your children from the tv
RE: Re:JJ reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:38 PM
If you are so unashamed of the human body then post a pic of your tits! yea that's the ticket. lol matter of fact give us a full frontal..
Come ON! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 6:59 PM
What the S$it! is going on with all you people? If a tittie at the halftime show of a violent sporting event where people replay the breaking Joe Theismans leg over and again offends you, I'd love to her your political views. I wish I had the time to care more, but I can't so Grow the F up America, there is more to bitch about.
doyourthing reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:22 PM
Let Janet be Janet, Ms. Jackson if you nasty! BIG UPS to J.T.
Justin Timberlake is responsible,too reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:37 PM
JJ didn't tear the thng off herself, Justin could have chose not to do it! He needs to man up and take some of the responsibilty. The media should hold him equally responsible. It's just another explotation of the Black Woman by the litlle d84ked whit man. If you look at Timberlakes face when those to white hoes kissed, he looked upstaged!
RE: Re:JJ reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:50 PM
...you use that mouth when you kiss your kids? Oh yeah, you said that this is a "New Millenium" and you're not ashamed of anything! . Well, as demonstrated by the overwhelming negative response, mostly from families with children, the majority of Americans don't share your "New Morality" or lack thereof. As for the shows on TV that promote this stuff, that's a good place to start looking when you don't understand why your kids have no respect for women, or shoot up their class mates, or back talk their parents. They've been liberated too, in this "New Millenium" of anything goes, as long as you feel good about yourself. When your daughter is making money in a strip bar someplace because she's not "ashamed of her body" like women of the "new Millenium" and she grew up being proud of Janet Jackson, don't go blaming society.
There's a difference between shame and decency. There are plenty of guys that are real proud of their penis. Should they show that on TV too? We can supress freedom of speech if we say something in the work place that offends somebody, but it's okay for those same folks who may be offended by that to do whatever they want, even if it offends others? I'll tell you what, just advertise that the Superbowl (mind you, not a rated "R" movie, but a sporting event!) will have frontal nudity, and watch how the viewing population declines. If you doubt this, then why did ER pull a scene that contained a breast shot tonight?
tits..big deal reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 7:57 PM
Well,I dont get it, big deal, a breast, so what!why this country has some problems with nudity, a human body its a human body, a tit its just a tit....
RE: She did it because of her brother reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 8:02 PM
I TOTALLY AGREE, SHE MIGHT OF DONE THIS TO TAKE THE FOCUS OF HER BROTHER MJ..ALSO Y WOULD HER NIPPLES BE COVERED IN JEWLERY**NOT UNLESS JUSTIN AND JANET HAD AN AFTER DATE*THEY WERE AN ITEM ONCE*LOOK OUT CAMERON DIAZ**JUSTIN IS NOT SUCH A SAINT**
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 8:12 PM
Everyone has seen breast even infants who feed. So every should be use to them in our faces. Furthermore only white people are offended by a black woman showing a breast on national tv, when Madonna kissed the white trash Briney Spears on tv it was all good.
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 8:41 PM
I agree have you seen american pie 12&3
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:02 PM
What is the real issue here people? Is it that JJ exposed herself or is that we are too shallow of a country? There are countries that allow nudity in there commercials and on cable access TV and there rape statics are a whole hell of a lot lower than the USA. I think that because we make such a big deal out of the little things that happen in life is why the world has exploded into chaos. Someone stated earlier that it is stuff like this that has caused violence and yadda yadda yadda. I hate to tell you that it is parents slacking on their duties that has created problems such as these. No teaching you kids the difference between right and wrong and real and fake is not the responsibility if society or teachers or your daycare providers. It is the responsibility of the parents and when parents slack off as role models that is when children start pulling those kinds of things. I am sure you people are thinking that i do not have kids or i would not be saying things like this however i have 5 children. I have a 4 year old who knows the difference between real and fake on TV. The issue of JJ tit being shown is just another thing for irresponsible parents to blame. It is the USA's prudence that has created this society and it needs to stop. We need to be more like Britian and let natural be natural. Their rape and sexual offenses is alot lower than ours. So you do the math on that one. One more thing, CBS panned away so fast that you could not even tell that her full breat was exposed. My husband and children were sitting here watching it and the kids did not even realize what had happened or what they saw. My husband and i did but with as fast as they panned away from the shot we thought that she had a pastie on that covered the entire nipple area. So for you people that CLAIM you say it all either you had really big fricken TVS or were sitting to damn close to the TV. (we have a 46" tv so it had to be a whole hell of alot bigger than that)
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 9:09 PM
it amazes me that you can turn janets tit into a religous battle, thats whats wrong with this country , EVERYTHING has to revert back to religion! good grief, can you people not act like mindless drones, and think with anything other than the bible? before you speak of the bible in ANY context, make sure you have read it and understand it fully, or else your just another idiot with a sentence!!!!
Who cares reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 10:03 PM
Who cares. And those of you that were offended, get a life. And for the fellow who's wife has bigger breast. Who cares, probably because she is a fat cow
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 11:01 PM
yes, you are right in saying that "separation of church and state" is where the government cannot create/run is own religion. But isn't the government allowing "under god" and "in god we trust" in our schools and currency just the same as running a religion. think about it, the government is printing and forceing kids and adults to say and see the word "God" everyday. They are putting religion's mark, which would be an almighty being in which we put our trust into daily (this is mainly christianity), on government property, which is one way of running a religion. So please think about what you are about to post before you post it. And think about "god" before you blindly devote your life to some imaginary folk lore.
RE: Kids reply
Posted by A MOM (none) on February 5, 2004 11:27 PM
As a young mother I have to say that kids are forced to grow up way too fast anyway. If a dad sits his child down on his only day off to watch o good old fashioned football game they JJ breast does not belong anywhere on the screen. Why hasn't anyone questioned Justin's involvement anyway he pulled the fabric off!
janet jackson (peek a bo) reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 11:32 PM
america is too hung up on sexual matters. the religious (right) would turn our nation into one big assembly of god, no thanks. People pleeze! I see more breasts in public places, women breast feeding, women sun- bathing, ect. maybe those so easily offened at the site of the human body should just lock themselves up in a church building for life and leave the rest of us alone.
RE: janet jackson (peek a bo) reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 11:50 PM
I think you are all fucking faggots and im glad i got to see her tit fucking virgin fucks fuck you
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 11:53 PM
So Janet Shows her Tits, I was raised in a catholic School and if we even took the name of God in Vain, we were beat with wooden pointers on our calves and you call this OK. The state of our nation and the way we were raised is absolutely deplorable... But it was OK for the Catholic Nuns to beat children... What has happened to our world and what is Justice, in the fact that janet can show her Tits to millions of children and that is supposed to be OK. I believe that MTV knew about this and should be brought down by the masses, but in the World today it seems like anything goes and our 13 and 14 year old children can carry semi automatic weapons and kill people, just for the thrill of it says a lot about how far our society has degraded and how far the morals and upbringinging of our children is bringing our society to its knees. Its the parents of these children that really have no real love or care for there children that these kids can just kill each other for the fun of it and it seems to be accepted in the world today. I am afraid we are getting close to the end times when the Taliban and the Moslem Nation can execute 2,000 or more people, in the terrorist acts of Sept 11, with the World Trade Center Killings..and they do it for there "Religion" What is this world comming to?
Janet's boob at Superbowl reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 11:56 PM
You people just don't get it...?! It doesn't matter wether the stunt was offensive or not, the REAL matter of the situation is WHO MADE THE MOST MONEY FROM IT!!
If you consider the whole sordid tale, EVERYBODY benefited from the gig... Justin, Janet, the NFL, CBS, MTV - The WHOLE crew!!
In marketing terms, "There's no such thing as bad publicity!", especially when you have MILLIONS of viewers AROUND THE GLOBE watching your add...
Then again, if Janet was sleazy enough to pull such a stunt, then all those involved have to ask themselves just where their values - and intere$$$$$ts lie?!
titty lover reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2004 11:59 PM
i love her tit
i am jacking off to it everyday now
.... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 12:02 AM
It's a fucken boob... everyone has them...
get over it ya cry babies
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 12:08 AM
Shut up you ignorant bastards
attention reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 12:11 AM
YOU ALL ARE A BUNCH OF IGNORANT BASTARDS
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 12:15 AM
Why weren't you offended watching a video of a song about "getting naked before the song is over" with your kids. Or did you even hear the words? Maybe you should start listening to the words of the songs your kids listen to. That is more deplorable and damaging than Janet Jackson showing a tit. Our kids are subconsciously getting the message through lyrics of songs that getting naked is OK. Which dose more damage, a tit or a constant subconscious message or sex?
RE: Some people still care about raising kids reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 12:18 AM
Why weren't you offended watching a video of a song about "getting naked before the song is over" with your kids. Or did you even hear the words? Maybe you should start listening to the words of the songs your kids listen to. That is more deplorable and damaging than Janet Jackson showing a tit. Our kids are subconsciously getting the message through lyrics of songs that getting naked is OK. Which dose more damage, a tit or a constant subconscious message or sex?
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 12:38 AM
You guys are fucked up man. All Americans are fucked up
RE: Idiots reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 12:44 AM
You people that have a problem with Janet showing her tit need to get a fucken life. Stop worrying about her shit and worry about your own. You bunch of jealous prudes.
Have you had sex at some point in your lives? You've seen tits... build a fucking bridge and get over it. Retards.
spelling reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 1:18 AM
People,
You can't make a credible argument if you can't spell. Please go back to school. This country is full of idiots.
RE: typical America reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 1:25 AM
Me too.
Thailand
janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 1:29 AM
I 'd like to fuck Janet if I could, she is so hot!!!
RE: typical America reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 1:32 AM
Stayed out of invading other countries on a whim
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 1:41 AM
justin doesn't look offended, so why should we? When does the lines start being real and not distorted by the press!
The Reality Is... reply
Posted by The Reasoner (tunj7@yahoo.com) on February 6, 2004 1:44 AM
Janet Jacksons' decision to reveal her jewelry clad breast on National Television with over 19 million viewers watching was done for shock value. It was not so much the bearing of her breast that fueled the shock, it was the way it was presented, with an unexpected, aggressive rip from Justin Timberlake, to the tune of "I'll have you naked by the end of this song". Personally, I had no problem with it, the shock felt good. But I can understand that to many others, it was too much to handle. These are the same people that would like to forget that blowjobs have been given in the white house, and that church leaders fondle little boys. I don't know if Janet's flash will serve as a moral wake up call or a simply sign of what is yet to come...but I hope her album sells.
Oh my god!!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 1:59 AM
Some of these people who are bitching about jj tit should never travel to Germany or most other European countries because they may have a stroke! I was just in Germany for military purposes and they treat nudity as a normal everyday part of life. It's on billboards, public television, and most public places. Hell, they even have legal prostitution (25 euro for a threesome! can't beat that) Most of these whiners just need to grow up. I mean come on already. So what if a little kid sees a naked woman, I know I did when I was young, and I'm not physcologicaly disturbed, or damaged. Quit being ashamed of your body. You weren't born with clothes, so quit being so worried about cover yourself up.
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 2:04 AM
"In God we trust" is what makes America. U take that away, what have you got left? You're crazy. Stop talking boll*cks and worry about something important, like the homeless or those in poverty. Yes, you, sitting there in your comfortable chair, typing away on your expensive PC in your nice safe house.
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 3:59 AM
when madonna kissed britany spears it was on mtv, a cable channel which is known to have sexual content. Janet Jackson's tits were on cbs in front of millions of unsuspecting fans including children. If Janet had pulled this stunt on mtv I don't think it would have offended hardly anyone.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 4:49 AM
you have many issues my friend.
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 4:55 AM
I trust in God and I know he does not need the state.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 5:10 AM
You are a fucking loony.
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 5:13 AM
Rubbish. Separation of church and state should be absolute. Period. No arguments.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 6:35 AM
The female breast is a beutiful thing made for feeding babies and for the viewing pleasure of people. Why does no one get upset about the violence of a football game, but, they do about a breast?
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 6:52 AM
A lot of people on here think that JJ baring herself is OK. I am a high school teacher, and sending out that message to today's extremely troubled teenaged girls is WRONG! Did you know that most 14 year old girls talk about getting pregnant as if it is a trophy to them? Did you know that most 12 year old girls have so much peer pressure on them to be sexually active, mainly from other girls their age - to be "popular"? Clothing manufacturers hone in on this selling tight-fitting, low-cut, skin-showing clothes to children that are not even acceptable in school. I can't believe the number of people that say it's ok to expose yourself on national tv like that, knowing it is a FAMILY oriented event that people watch together - what kind of values are you sending out to teenage girls out there struggling to fit in? You're sick and need help.
RE: Oh my god!!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 7:01 AM
ok people!! it was only one tit... people are like going crazy over it.. its like they have never seen one before.. GET OVER IT PEOPLE!!!!
RE: Oh my god!!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 7:04 AM
ok... its me again.. YOU GAY COCK SUCKING BASTARDS GET OVER IT!!
me the man reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 7:07 AM
the janet jackson thing was cool and people who think other wise are faggets and really are stupid and need to get a life
janet jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 7:08 AM
janet jackson has a nice tit so shut up
RE: Oh my god!!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 7:09 AM
ok the guy that said that the Janet Jackson thing was cool.. i know him hes not cool ignore him ok.. if you people wanna look at tits go and rent a porn movie at the rental store.. like come on.. like when i was watching it.. you could not even see it.. well thats all i got to say later people
From: The Students of Opeongo High School!
RE: me the man reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 7:11 AM
you the man you the fag
RE: Oh my god!!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 7:12 AM
hey u little punk ass bitch get a life u mutha fucka
Cartoons reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 7:13 AM
IS THAT WHY YOU CALL IT THE BOOB TUBE?
From: Opeongo High School. Ontario Canada!
janet's tits reply
Posted by Efini (trash@yahoo.com) on February 6, 2004 8:26 AM
nah, im not even close to offended with this tits, seriously weather its a wardore malfunction or a stunt watever u stoopidos says it is, i think this is trash, im sure we all seen better. and justin timberlake is just nothing but crap, he even got dumped by britney spit. careful with janet, or u'll be whacked by the jackson5. and seriously! we ALL shud get back busy with michael's NOSE inSteaD! :) peace! FREE Saddam!
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 9:18 AM
So you shouldn't remove something that's been around for years? Like four hundred years of slavery? How ridiculous to suggest that something shouldn't be changed because its been around for too long to change it. Nothing will ever get done that way. Noone is willing to recognize the fallibility of this "land of the free," a nation that goes and kills innocent children for oil and claims to be liberating people when people are dying of starvation and ignorance right in its own territory. And I don't know who said this, but don't talk to me about the horrible culture we live in when you got the crap be out of you by nuns. Nuns! They are supposed to be more connected with God than any other women in the country! Is that not a problem in itself? Why is everyone acting like this sexual culture is new? Janet Jackson exposed one of her breasts (not even the nipple). It is a breast! The eyes of the children we are trying to protect... some of them have breasts! And some of them let other ten-year-olds touch their breasts because it's such a bad-ass thing to do! People are always trying to protect their kids from the things they don't want to explain to them. It is a breast! It feeds babies everyday! Tell your child what a breast is and stop blushing! I can't believe with all that is going on in the world, people can be so upset about this; something as natural as the female anatomy should not cause this much uproar. How can you have sex, have a child, and not explain to that very child what sex is because it's too awkward? Or they don't need to know? Are you kidding? So, please, just step away from your PC's and go read a book or something. Stop making bogus judgments about people. If you don't like what television has to offer, turn it off. People in this country spend too much time watching that damned thing anyway. And CBS has a lot of nerve being upset when Drew Barrymore flashed David Letterman on national television! But that's ok, because she had her back turned. Give me a break, please. The media, the very tool by which people are brainwashed and socialized everyday, can tell me nothing about discression.
janets boob reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 9:52 AM
so what lets see some muff or booty next time
Immorality in the Country reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 11:38 AM
We, the Christians, and the small majority are looked at like we are nuts. Then we hear about the Jackson episode and confirms that our decisions are right on and the majority is really got some serious problems. This is entertainment? It is sad that we can't take our children to sporting events because of the profanity and drunks and now we can't even watch them in the comfort of our our homes.
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 11:44 AM
Do you know what separation of chuch and state is? We have freedom OF religion - not freedom FROM religion. Read the Constiution and Dec of Independence before opening your mouth. You are as ignorant as most kids coming out of the government schools today and is why many more of us are Home Schooling each day. So our children know what the government is supposed to do and what separation of church and state means.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 11:51 AM
Well my friend you know they didnt do spt 11 for "religion". They did it because our insanely religous leaders support a terrorist state to steal their land, destroy their homes, murder their families. And why they support?? Because they -in catholic schools just lkie yous- learned that such support will bring Jesus back..Yeah Jesus the lord of love will come back alright..And then our "religous" leaders will wipe his feet with tear and blood of innocent children that they murdered..
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 12:03 PM
who really cares and most people didn't see it anyway
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 12:07 PM
Puritanian American Shame Off Your Own Body. The country with the world's biggest Porn industry! People offended by a two second video of a woman's breast? Children harmed?
Get real, teach real values, it's the year 2004!
what the hell reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 2:10 PM
Ok.... all i saw was a boob. no different that lil kim on the awards a few years back.. JJ had a star pastie on her tit just like lil kim.... no one threw a big fit over that! whats the deal?
janet's boob reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 2:49 PM
America is the most hypocritical country - home of corruption and scandal, and yet people go screaming at someone's breast. Nudity is nothing to ashamed of in most other countries; in fact, naked people appear regularly on television. America is so sexually repressed that one breast is going to make everyone crazy for weeks! Get over it.
So much hate. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 3:33 PM
I've read through these posts and... you are all obsessed with who or what is better, or wrong. Yes, some things I'll admit are wrong through common sense. But after stating an opinion with so much passion, someone has to ruin it, can we not all just accept our differences? Is it that hard for all of you to do? I'm appalled by all the hate and resentment brought on by one incident. I'd like to let America know, that if you think we are failing as a nation, then it's all our own fault. I mean, gawd, I'm 16 and I'm more mature then most adults on this site... I hope America takes this all in.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 3:54 PM
You obviously don't have a single clue about what you're talking about! Sept. 11 happened not because of religion, but because mindless individuals who were brainwashed, and, were most likely crazy. The United states has never supported terrorism of any kind, nor will they ever. Sorry to hear that you were beaten in school. But, that was then, this is now. Live in 2004! Things are different! Speech is more free in this day and age! And let me ask this, since you seem to have such higher morals than the rest of the world, why is showing a breast for about 2 seconds considered to be so horrible, where looking at paintings or sculptures of completely naked men and women is considered art? It's the human body either way! Other countries have learned to embrace their bodies. We just live in a society where that is considered taboo.
janets titi reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 4:04 PM
you know its pretty ridiculous how everyone is spending so much time and effort on something that has always been a part of our lives.entertainment.chill the fuck out ,and go teach your kids some semiotics about life, and stop riding the bandwagon,waste all this energy on matter of real importance ,not all this "goyim" hype.
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 4:04 PM
In God we Trust doesn't make America! In fact, the reason everyone left Europe in the first place was to get away from binding religion. Freedom--that's what makes America what it is. Oh, by the way, how does your comfy chair feel?
unethical and inapproprate? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 4:05 PM
The only real problem with the exposure of Janet's boob is that the companies paying 1.5mil per second for commercial time are not getting any attention because 'everyone' is talking about Janet.
To call the boob exposure "unethical and inappropriate" is a sure sign that the speaker(s) have not noticed the sexually explicit commercials nor have they considered the ramifications of two groups of grown men beating each other to a pulp on the football field.
In fact, it seems many of the posters are saying it is 'ethical and approprate' to have grown men beat each other up and to have sexually explicit commercials.
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 4:13 PM
I'm white, and it didn't bother me any! Yes, it did bother some people. And they weren't just white! They were white, black, brown, red, purple, green....
RE: Re:JJ reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 4:24 PM
Hey, moron, she said she wasn't ashamed of her body, not anything. YOU ARE TAKING A SIMPLE BREAST WAY OUT OF PROPORTION! It's a breast, a boob, a tit, half a rack, the right jug, whatever you want to call it! You feed children with it! Women have them! Big deal! Get over it!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by i dont know (direoswald@hotmail.com) on February 6, 2004 4:44 PM
wat da hells a catholic skoool,the world trade centre got to do wit janet jacksons boobs?
most children have already seen naked women already anyway! it waz only 2 seconds u poof!
RE: So much hate. reply
Posted by i dont know (direoswald@hotmail.com) on February 6, 2004 4:46 PM
shut up. nerdy hillbilly loser!
The Boob of Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 5:47 PM
Maybe next time we get to see her beaver?(Hopeing)
RE: Re:re reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 5:49 PM
yo, i think that is was a great thing that justin did i love free porn especially Janet Jackson
RE: Re: Honestly who was really offended reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 6:03 PM
Yea, I mean gosh. Did any body think about that man streaking or the fact she could have just did that to take the media off her brother. It wasn't like the kids really so anything. I mean my little 8 year old brother saw it and he like "I've seen bigger"
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 6:03 PM
Janet is unattractive - she looks too much like Michael
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 6:12 PM
Amen!! The only people who actually saw the breast shot long enough to become offended are the ones surfing the web to see what all of the controversy is about!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 6:12 PM
just when her brother is charged with perversion with children...she has to show her perversion to millions of innocent children watching a family game .The whole halftime show was filled with perversion.If its gonna be like this in the future...i wont even watch the games!!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by i dont know (direoswald@hotmail.com) on February 6, 2004 6:15 PM
WATS SO LOONY ABOUT THAT? JUST CUZ UR FAMILYS LOONY DOESNT MEAN OURS R LOONEY!
RE: Immorality in the Country reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 6:18 PM
You need to get something real to worry about. Your children have proberly seen more on regular tv.
WHO CARES reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 6:18 PM
I don't see the big deal with a flash of a boob. Everyone is putting this way out of porportion. Its not like people nor kids don't see worse on tv..Weither it was purposly done or not people need to find other things to talk about, bigger issues. mad love goes out for justin and janet great show.
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 6:19 PM
If people got this upset about issues that really matter, there would be no child abuse, famine or homeless left in the world!!
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 6:24 PM
THANK YOU!
You really have no clue do you? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 6:25 PM
This is great! Here in the UK the best selling newspaper has a bare chested woman on page 3 EVERY F*****G DAY (which any kid can see). Oh my Lord we must be so degenerate! Our society must be collapsing through emotionally damaged children. In fact, us Brits must be so deranged by this that we pick up the nearest gun and shot the 1st person we come across. The murder rate here must be the highest in the world - no wait, hang on ......
I love the outraged comments - especially the "you gay ...." whatever ones. Do you people actually have a vote and the right to reproduce?! THATS the real outrage, that so many stupid people are polluting the gene pool. Oh, I know, I need a bath and a shave to have a valid opinion. hmmmm ok. done. now you can take me seriously....
(They make you take a test before you can have a car, but whats the requirement for a gun? a baby? a vote?)
RE: plan ahead reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 6:25 PM
it's all just one big conspiracy!! PLEASE!
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 6:27 PM
I think it was more offensive seeing Madonna kiss Bittney trash!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 6:31 PM
I am a teacher too. She showed less than what children see on an average tv show. Get a life!
Cannot it PLEASE be over! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 6:32 PM
Seriously people, lets get over it!!!! We have more important things to worry about then a covered boob on national telivision. I am so sick and tired of all these parents blaming the media for there children being little brats... YOU HAVE THE CONTROL!!!! Teach them what is right and wrong and STOP blameing Britney and Christina and Janet for things they make their own choices about! They are adults let me remind you! In the begining of the Super Bowl Half Time Show the dancers we all dancing provoctivly... you should have averted the youngins eyes then. Be parents and stop wasting your time complaining! You should be teaching your kids right from wrong instead of bickering and wasteing your time with stuff that has already happened and you cant do anything to change it! And lets be honest, like your kids havent see or even heard worse they may be young but they arent dumb! So can we please just STOP the whole thing... it is really pointless.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 6:34 PM
not offended by someones boob-in other countries boobs are OK-I see men with their shirts off all the time, and performers grabbing their junk-who cares! Why does a nipple have to be such taboo, its not like we don't all have them. Maybe the context of the dance and the clothes being ripped off the woman may offend some. But lets face facts here, she did it for attention just like the maddona brittany kiss, just like J-los barely there dress, You could see more of her in that dress than of Janet with that big silver thing on her nipple. Really don't we have other things to worry about, like the coming election and all our jobs going oversees!!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 6:38 PM
yes, End of days is at hand! Remember how it was in Sodom and Gomorah? People living pervertedly, having sex with anyone,anywhere?
partying, drinking rampid sexual content...ect..? God destroyed it, didnt He?This world is teaching children not to have good morals.The violent video games and tv shows
and songs on the radio all degrade what God intended to be good. But the world will get worse and worse until the "final Ultamite battle between Good and Evil." ARMAGEDION...
read the book of Revelations. All who are not written in the Lambs book of Life,will be cast into everlasting lake of fire to be tormented forever with weeping and knashing of teeth.
So it is written...
so it Will be Done!Blessed are those who keep Gods Commandments and teach others to do so, For great is thier reward in the Kingdom of Heaven!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by bonsoirelleestpartie (No Email) on February 6, 2004 6:46 PM
i'm agree with you, there was nothing too see anyway, here in Quebec, it's like a blow in the wind, Come at the Pere G?d?on, you can see more than Janet can show !!!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by David23451 (leo6001@aol.com) on February 6, 2004 6:46 PM
I have never heard such nonsense in my life. The rest of the world are laughing at America a land where it is ok to see people blown up on TV but where the masses need to be protected from a semi naked breast. Perhaps that's why so many people get shot here and so many people have hang ups about sex. Go to Europe for a while where the beaches are full with topless women and the streets are relatively free from crime. I have lived in the US fro almost 10 years and it never ceases to amaze me how srewed up the moral fiber is here. Most amazing of all is the writers ability to bring September 11th into the debate about Janet Jackson's right breast. You cannot be serious.
David
RE: Immorality in the Country reply
Posted by David23451 (leo6001@aol.com) on February 6, 2004 6:49 PM
you're mad
RE: Re:JJ reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 6:49 PM
Another person out of touch with reality.
Get a clue.
My favorite of all time, Miss Janet Jackson reply
Posted by Mizzjifunasty (kjj9021994@yahoo.com) on February 6, 2004 6:53 PM
I have been of fan of Janet's for over 15 years and I LOVE Janet. What happened at the Superbowl was nothing more than we see on T.V. everyday, it just caught us off guard. Nobody spanked Lil Kim's hand when she came to the awards with that purple outfit on with her boob literally hanging out...and to make things worse, Diana Ross tapped it. People are justy making a big deal out of nothing. If we need something to discuss, let's talk about "Carlie" The young lady who was missing and found dead. That is a much bigger issue than my girl Janet. Leave her and Justin alone!!!!!!!!!
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 6:54 PM
In God We Trust...
leave it on or take it off...it dont matter,but one things for sure...you can TRUST
that God Will put evil to DEATH !!! Watch and see when all knees will bow at the Great day of His return! Great day of Judgement is at hand.Evil blood will spill in the streets for the birds of the air to fill thier bellys and angels will rejoice at the site of the wicked to be destroyed. All you who love evil will be destroyed!!!!Time is getting closer, Repent now while you still have time.Pray for mercy and keep the commandments of God your creator, lest you be destroyed!
No, this is not only about Janet but to all who delight in evil. Your time is at hand.
Oh come on, folks. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 6:56 PM
It was just 2 seconds of a right breast, it doesn't mean our children are going to become rude and vulgar drunks sexually harrasing everyone he comes across, I mean, your children are gonna watch porn when they hit puberty anyways, and I'm pretty sure that they're gonna see breasts when they finally have sex. I don't see how this debate came to be about 9-11 and religious warfare.
JJ and JT reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 7:04 PM
This convesation has gotten way off subject... come on now what does janets boob have to do with armagedon!
I think people just want somthing to be upset about and something to "fight" about... if janet wanted to show her boob then let her! the people who say they are christians and say that it is wrong need to get over themselves because the bible said that adam and eve were naked in the garden of eden and it was ok... when got kicked out it was their minds that felt ashamed to be naked so they clothed themselves with leaves!
if you dont want your children to see this stuff then get off of your "human nature" and let them experience the world! seeing a boob will do no harm!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 7:13 PM
Thank you David!
The US needs to stop pretending that nudity and sex dont exsist! It is ignorant for us not to think that things like this are all around us and sooner or later everyone finds out about it. If you dont like what you are seeing, TURN IT OFF!
Janet's Civil Rights reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 7:15 PM
The controversy surrounding the events in the NFL halftime show borderlines on the ridiculous. However, it does raise an important issue in women?s rights. For centuries in Western culture it has been acceptable for a male to show his bare chest. This double standard is an insult to women everywhere because it sexualizes their anatomy. Women?s breast, unlike men?s serves a biological purpose and yet there are those that take issue with women breast feeding in public. Janet Jackson bared one breast on national television, whether it was on purpose or by accident is irrelevant. What is relevant is that men have been allowed to dictate whether it is acceptable or not for women to show their breast, while holding that they have some sort of divine right to mow the front lawn shirtless with their pants hanging half way down their derrieres. If the FCC, CBS and the NFL continue this groundless persecution then all Americans should be made to carry this burden. We as citizens should no longer accept seeing males parade around on television or in public shirtless and if they are found doing so they should be penalized as their female counterparts are, to the fullest extent of the law.
Rikest1342@aol.com
Special Education Teacher and Licensed Vocational Nurse.
wtf reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 7:19 PM
damn people chill out...why u all making a big deal bout this dumb crap? Get over it..she isnt hot, she looks just like her brother michael, the pervert. just put boobs on him and you can see the same shit...whatever its all stupid. get over it already
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 7:33 PM
no such person as GOD.
Janet's boob reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 7:38 PM
I want half my money back. I only saw one tit!
blood ok human body not?? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 7:40 PM
CBS will show the planes smashing into buildings, people jumping from those buildings, real life violence and heartache, etc. Now they claim to be upset by a breast??? It makes me sick! Yes, it was inappropriate for the 1/2 time show that kids were watching, but everyone is making too big of a deal out of it in light of all the horror that is shown on the news every single day!!!
Allison G.
the media reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 7:42 PM
The media should get over it, after all we all have nipples, its all a stunt and I must say it has out done the Madonna / Britney kiss maybe that was to taboo to talk so much about for america. We all need to realize that we are what we are. People.
Janet Jackson Superbowl Peek reply
Posted by egub (esg) on February 6, 2004 7:49 PM
Frankly, I don't see what the fuss is all about. Even after the so called "wardrobe accident" she was still showing less flesh than many a Academy Awards diva. And what, you're telling me the football watching population is a sensitive audience? For Pete's sake. This was a contrived publicity stunt. I rank it up there with the Madonna/Brittany kiss: somewhat tacky and way too obvious. Unfortunately (for them) it doesn't work on me: I'll only buy their cds when I like their music, not because of any stupid stunts, no matter how titilating (sorry, couldn't resist!)
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 8:13 PM
I THINK EVERYONE IS MAKING TO MUCH OF THIS
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 8:18 PM
I THINK EVERYONE IS MAKING TO MUCH OF THIS. I THINK THAT JUSTIN SHOULD BE HELD RESPONSIBLE JUST LIKE JANET HE'S THE ONE WHO EXPOSED THE BOOB.
RE: Re: janet's accident reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 8:34 PM
I think that the only people who are offended were the old people who work at the FCC..they still think that it is still the 1900's where a womans bare ankle was too erotic
boobs reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 8:36 PM
Every human being on this planet either has boobs or has (most likely) had one in his/her mouth. So why is it wrong to see one on TV? The '..oh so offended..' parents must not have breast-fed their children.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 8:39 PM
ALL I HAVE TO SAY IS GOOD VERYGOOD
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 8:54 PM
wow who cares its not like they were havin sex cmon everbodys into everyone if u dont want ur kids to c it then dont let them watch it
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 8:55 PM
wow who cares its not like they were havin sex cmon everbodys into everyone if u dont want ur kids to c it then dont let them watch it
half time show of the superbowl reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 8:56 PM
my comments on the matter.as i watch the super bowl game, i do recall a man running out on the field with no clothing on and not one word has been said about that, when thousand of children was watching that. now people want to make a big thing out of janet breast. when the nfl hired mtv they knew what mtv is all about.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 9:09 PM
WHAT THE HELL!!!! How did you go from boobs to killing??? She showed some skin..... GET OVER IT!
RE: half time show of the superbowl reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 9:34 PM
All I know is that millions of men out there have wondered what Janet Jackson's tits looked like. However, because they were viewing with their families or they attend church deny that it was cool to finally see Janet's tit. Live and in living color baby.
Janet's Anus reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 9:53 PM
I see her anus. It looks like a smiley face! Her boobie is fakie fakie =-X
so reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 10:01 PM
So thats what a black one looks like?
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2004 10:22 PM
Hear...hear! What a strange society we have become! Violence is perfectly okay for kids, but a womens beautiful breast is not? Buy your kids a computer and fill it up with games of graphic violence, turn on the news and see and hear all the coruption, violence, and brutality your kids can stomach? Or 'shit-coms' and cartoons that portray men and women as stupid, ignorant, back stabing, baffoons? Go to a movie that glorfies lieing, breaking the Law, violence, drugs and sex? That's all perfectly okay? Turn on the radio or play a cd of kids music. LISTEN to the words. This is all okay and accepted for them? But a NATURAL part of the womens body is somehow wrong? Huh? I don't get it? Talk about "morality" and "Family Values"? Very strange "values" if you ask me? And since when do "kids" watch the Super Bowl? Getting you beer or something while you sit on your ass and cheer someone getting hurt? My boys cared less about the S.B. till they were teenagers. And then they had already seen all the sex acts possible and every part of a womens body on the internet. This hypocritical outrage by the so-called conservatives is why I fear the right wing as much as I fear the left wing! Seems like we have a lot of maturing as a race of people to do yet?!
country gone mad reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 2:15 AM
us europeans think it's such bizarre behavior the way you americans react to nudity. I live in a country where people wouldn't give it a second thought if a boob was shown even on basic tv.It's ok if violence is shown on your television but if a booby is shown it's the end of the world.
Oh and why are americans so offended by janet jacksons nipple but not offended by pres. Bush blowing up thousands of children in Iraq ???
I really don't know what to make of that
RE: wtf reply
Posted by i dont know (direoswald@hotmail.com) on February 7, 2004 2:24 AM
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
RE: country gone mad reply
Posted by i dont know (direoswald@hotmail.com) on February 7, 2004 2:31 AM
loser. no, really ur a loser. hillbilly jackass nerd fag geek freak mommas boy prostitue petifile A.D.D idiot fool asshole gay dumbass no balls sex changed maniac racist shit eater bookworm crazy phsyco mental patient child raper indian bum scratcher!
RE: RE:Janet's Breast reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 2:55 AM
We finally gave the troops something to fight for.... Thank you Janet
Janets boob reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 3:12 AM
When does the a-sexual reactions stop? The US is the biggest provider of porn and sex-sites, but some of us/you have a problem with some body-parts on TV?
How do this people get children then?
Stop acting like saints!
I DNT GET IT reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 3:42 AM
wot i dnt get is how jj flashin her boob woz offencive, how could sum1 get offended by sum1 else flashin her boob, ppl do it all da time. i can admit i dnt fink it woz a good idea 4 jj 2 do it on tv coz kids were watchin n shit but still i dnt get how sum1 can b offended by dat. CAN SUM1 PLZ TELL ME!!!!!
Janet was wrong! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 5:23 AM
It's things like this that will eventually lead to porn on public TV. She had no right to push the envelope THAT far!
RE: JJ boob and USA is crying ! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 5:36 AM
You stupid idiot, this is America, and WE AMERICANS have the right to protest something that isn't right!
Worry about your OWN country!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 5:40 AM
excellent point
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 5:43 AM
how would u feel if your daughter flashed the world her pussy in front of everyone? would u be offended?why not? every lady has a pussy? everybody who was born came out of a pussy. so lets start flashing pussy to the children of the world.
who cares?
here we go... reply
Posted by tripperMM (earth@universe.gal) on February 7, 2004 5:54 AM
1. janet made the dicision to show her "stuff", so she should be responsible. wheather or not MTV or CBS should or would ever admit guilt at this point is moot. and anyone suing for being "injured" by janet's sunny boobage is just looking for their 15 minutes.
2. the 911 "stunt" had been playing out since sadam was put into power by bush classic when he was in the CIA durring the nixon administration and they have tried to stay in power ever since, so there's a consperacy theory to chew on...
3. "the end times" have been coming soon to a planet near you since i can remember seeing my first enquirer cover in the 70s, so if you're waiting for that to happen any time within our life times, you are in for a boaring sitting.
3. if there is a god, he probably isn't too happy with the fact that mere infantile humans have taken a good idea and made a religion out of it. not just one, but several! and not only that, we argue over who's "right" when we all basicly have the same idea - be excellent to each other.
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 6:32 AM
yeah, maybe next years superbowl , we can see some penis flashing.
why not? every man has one. That would be educational for our children, wouldnt it?
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 7:20 AM
i think they were trying to distract us from micheal by throwing janet in the pot
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 7:27 AM
It is hard to take seriously the comments of anyone who is only partially literate. Try learning to spell, then maybe I will pay attention to you.
janet jackson @ superbowl reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 7:52 AM
Big damn deal---I can't believe all the controversy about that flash-o-tit. I have a son in Baghdad--I have a lot more to worry about than this trivial bullshit. Please.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 8:45 AM
I agree!!!!!!!!!
zzzzzz... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 8:47 AM
change the bloody record
RE: spelling reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 8:53 AM
AMEN!
RE: JJ boob and USA is crying ! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 9:45 AM
and ass
janet's superbowl halftime show reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 9:51 AM
i guess its such a big deal b/c the superbowl is one of the most family viewed shows. i dont think this was a publicity stunt for janet b/c shes already so famous and would not need to go to extremes to promote her new album. although i dont think it was such a good choice for her to do w/ all of the allegations against her brother micheal she should be out their trying to salvage whats left of their family. of course it wasnt an accident who just so happens to have nipple jewlry under their bodice. that was such a bitch move of justin to appologize and leave all of the blame on janet, he wanted her naked by the end of the song!!!!
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 9:55 AM
TOO not to douche
Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 10:07 AM
I was more offended by the blatent lying! Ooooh it was an accident... Clearly, it was not! She made NO attempt, whatsoever to cover her exposed self, and that would be an automatic reflex, unless it was planned.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 10:27 AM
I agree
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 10:44 AM
Television, unfortunately, often contains nudity. The way a child will react to seeing nudity depends on how their parents handle the situation. Children cannot be protected from everything. And why has this turned into such a political forum? ?The United States has never supported terrorism of any kind, nor will they ever?? Please open your eyes. September 11th was a horrible tragedy but the US is not an innocent victim. In the 1980s, American companies provided Saddam with materials to produce chemical and biological weapons. What about the Iran-Contra scandal where the States was funneling weapons and intelligence to Iran? I am surprised at how much emotion has been invoked by Janet Jackson?s breast. What power! And why is seeing a breast viewed as perverse? For all you religious fanatics?..weren?t Adam & Eve originally naked and only later shamed by their nakedness as a punishment from God for eating the forbidden fruit?
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 10:46 AM
Well said David!
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 10:50 AM
Was that movie with Brad Pitt "SEVEN" based on you????
Janet's Boob reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 10:51 AM
I'm impressed with this discussion.
I can't believe that in 21 century a boob can start a "censorship wave".
I live in Brazil in a place where a Boob nude is so normal that do not cause any impact.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 10:53 AM
All this over a little tit...
RE: Re: No God? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 11:02 AM
How are you sure there is no God? Do you know something I don't know?
RE: Re: just a little tit reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 11:10 AM
literally a "little" tit, and a rather unattractive one at that
RE: There's so much more to worry about reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 11:26 AM
How stupid. The economy is growing faster than at any time in 40-plus years. Save your lying political comments for the political sites. God, can you haters just lighten up a bit.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 11:26 AM
Teacher #1, you got my vote and can teach my twin daughters anytime!
Teacher #2, you're opinion is #2! Shame on you for not trying to set a good example. Just because kids may see that stuff on TV, doesn't mean they should or do. I for one, won't let my kids watch the shows that you describe. Prime Time is for adults, not kids. (and yes, a 12 or 14 yr old is still a kid, mentally and emotionally, no matter how physically developed!).
Teacher #1 has a life. Teacher #2 needs to get another job and stay away from our kids!
Familycentrism reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 11:44 AM
I'm fascinated by the double standard surrounding "family entertainment" in the United States. The Superbowl halftime show was riddled with overtly sexual performances, and the lyrics of the song (as many have pointed out) were unquestionably sexual. Yet this all counts as legitimate family entertainment, and no US viewers would have complained... until JJ's breast was exposed.
From this, I must conclude that anything is valid family entertainment (no matter how lewd or violent it might be) until nudity is involved. That seems to me to be rather underestimating the intelligence of youth. I think even a 10-year-old can figure out that someone can still be sexual/provocative without being naked.
As an outsider (I'm from Canada), I look at US culture and think it is ridiculously familycentric. The idea that children must somehow be "protected" from adult ideas and images is a relatively new one, and the US has taken it to obsessive extremes. Maybe education, instead of censorship, is the best way to raise well-balanced children.
I've enjoyed seeing all the various issues that have come up in this discussion (religion, censorship, 9/11, racism). I think it's important to acknowledge that all these issues are connected.
RE: typical America reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 11:48 AM
Holland couldn't invade a grocery store! Hell, Rhode Island could kick your a**!
Besides, you seemed pretty glad for America when we freed your country in WWII. ...or have you forgotten what it's like to be occupied by a facist dictator?
That goes for the rest of you ungrateful Euro-trash that always have your hand out when you need something (like protection, freedom, MONEY!) but cuss Americans every chance you get.
Someone tell me, we have hurricanes, floods, and natural disasters in America: when was the last time you saw any aid from a foreign country here? Maybe we should close our boarders to all, stop sending troops and $$ to your aid and defense, and keep out tax dollars here where they belong. But, you see, that's not our way. We are by majority, Judeo-Christian. And as such, our values teach us to help others that are in need. For that, we get planes flown into our buildings and foreigners from countries we liberated talking trash about us.
Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 12:11 PM
Yeah, we really wanted to see Janet's breast....NOT!!!!!
RE: Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 12:14 PM
You are so right!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 12:17 PM
You believe in creation of man only a few thousand yrs ago? then explain this " Dinosours" where in the Bible are they mentioned? Nowhere, does the Bible mention dinosours. Why dont you try using your Puny little brain for once and look outside the box that the church has crammed down your throat, claiming that God created the earth and all that are on it, Dont you think if there actually was a creation God would want "Everything" mentioned in the Bible? A Tit is one of the most natural things on earth, all Women have them, in fact all female animals have some sort of Tit to feed their young with. Get a life
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 12:21 PM
I myself was not offended by a peek at her breast. I feel as though she were looking to take some heat off her brother, if even for a minute. Get over it, it was just a breast.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 12:25 PM
if it offended you so, what are you doing coming to this site to take a peek yourself you pervert!!!
america reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 12:39 PM
America was founded by the puritans.
"People so uptight, the English kicked them out" - Robin Williams
breast reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 1:23 PM
Why in our society is it a crime to so the beauty of the human body but ok for CNN and other news channels to show the results of bomb dammage to the same human bodies in their daily news cast?
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 1:48 PM
My name is kent smith, im a pervert and i love every minuit of it. So did my wife and my 3 other girlfriends.
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 1:57 PM
I loved what I saw girl I LOVE YOU for that
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 1:59 PM
I loved what I saw girl I LOVE YOU for that. you turned me on.
Janet Jackson Superbowl reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 2:12 PM
found this on google :)
http://www.janet-jackson.ws
boobs reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 3:33 PM
my only question is it ever going to happen again i would love to get my plasma screen all centred for excelent veiwing
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 3:36 PM
Though, The bible did not say that God created the Dinosaurs. In Genesis, God took 7 "days" to finish all creation. These 7 "days" does not literally mean Days or 24 hours. The Hebrew term used in Genesis, for day, have no definate time structure. The Herbrew term for "day" could of meant, a long period of time, or even and Era. So if you put it in to thought, God did create the Dinosuars, But didnt Write it literally down as "Dinosaurs" So Please use your fossilized brain and think for once, before it becomes extinct!
RE: Janet looks like michael reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 3:40 PM
I have a theorey: Janet jackson and Michael are the same person...what do you think?
RE: Immorality in the Country reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 3:54 PM
For myself, I don't really care one way or the other about sports. But if you really think that the superbowl is wholesome family entertainment, well, you have some definate conflicts with your religious and personal beliefs. If a breast shot of less than half a second causes you to go into religious fits of moral outrage, what do think about all the players beating each other up for four quarters of football on television? I'll bet you would call that family entertainment wouldn't you?! Nice and wholesome isn't it?! Before you go and cry about the sad state of world affairs you should try looking in a mirror and seeing what's wrong with the person staring back at you. Fix yourself before you tell me what's wrong with me!
RE: offensive superbowl reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 4:05 PM
This I gotta agree with, I like Kid Rock but I thought that flag as a poncho thing was totally out of line. Especially for him.
RE: Some people still care about raising kids reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 4:29 PM
Perhaps children at the age of 5 and 7 shouldn't be watching the superbowl at all, ever think of that? No, probably not. Apparently you don't have any problem with letting those same children watch a bunch of men beat on each other for money! Which you whole heartedly support, after all you said you watch with them all season long! Maybe, as a concerned parent, you should try to teach your children that the world is not now and never will be perfect. So take some responsibility and put any blame that exists on YOUR shoulders, for allowing them to watch it in the first place. As far as when they NEED to see it, just when is that? 16? 18? 21? After someone gets pregnant or a disease? Get real people, kids need to know about these things before they experience them. Why do you think there are so many teen pregnancies and people with aids? Because someone else decided that they weren't ready to know about it and they found out on their own. After that, it's just too late
Boobs, Tits, Breasts? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 4:41 PM
Janet Jackson. What difference does it make, she had a tassle on her nipple. They show more on a regular television show. As for the guy who mentioned the game itself and how rough is was, family sport, yeah right. For the religious right, get a life and look in the mirror. No family is a perfect family, or you wouldn't need to go to church, duh!! Get a life everyone, we will get over it.
Janets tits reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 4:47 PM
She showed her tit who cares like kids cant see more on tv
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 5:13 PM
i was peein........
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 5:15 PM
This is a world wide event of celebrity pornography you can't not make a big deal about it but people who get offended by a bit of tit are pathetic, get over it. If all you mothers think that is so bad look under your kids bed I'm sure that will be a slight eye opener.
half time show reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 5:30 PM
i think it was the worsdt part of the super bowl. I think if the FCC goes after anyone it should be MTV and janet jackson as well as timberlake.
JANET'S BOOBS reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 5:44 PM
Listen everyone. This is another phase that this woman is going thru. She enjoys showing off her body, and unfortunately, she is enjoying it at her own and Justin's expense. Janet probably thought that noone would make such a big deal out of it, I mean why would they. When we have witnessed on tv, Madonna and Brittany kissing, Lil Kim and Toni Braxton and their outrageous outfits. And, let's not even mention J.Lo, so why would people freak because Janet flashes her tit during the Superbowl halftime. We've seen and heard worse then this.
Maybe after this event, America and its artists will get back to exemplifying two words "Self Respect." Without it, we are in for a lot worse than this.
This issue is old and dead. Let's move on.
Janet Jackson "superbowl" reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 5:47 PM
I was not offended personally, but for exposure in front of children of all ages, and for it to be a family event--Im a bit concerned......
RE: Janet looks like michael reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 5:50 PM
YEAH... THEY BOTH DIG ON YOUNGER BOYZ =)
janets boob reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 5:53 PM
I could stare at he all day, naked!!!!!
janets boob reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 5:54 PM
I could stare at her all day, naked!!!!!
RE: JANET'S BOOBS reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 5:58 PM
she is hot!!!! look at her tits!!!!!
RE: Immorality in the Country reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 6:18 PM
uhhhhh....... sorry hun but christians happen to be the majority , and not the other way around
RE: Janet looks like michael reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 6:43 PM
pity
RE: Re:"tits" reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 7:22 PM
Acctually lots of males have them too. dogs, cats, humans...
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 7:23 PM
Today, what we see on National Television is celebrities like L' Kim exposing her boob, in a dress at an awards show, and Diana Ross touching and shaking her boob on stage and on National Television...and Jennifer Lopez showing her chest in a beautiful gown...why are we criticizing Janet for this?? So what? We have accepted it on TV before...why is it a problem now? Because it is the Superbowl? We see this on TV all the time. Why are we criticizing two celebrities now for doing what happens every day in TV? Whether we agree or disagree that this is acceptable is not the issue...we are tearing apart two celebrities who are simply doing what any other celebrity does...and you know what? We love it overall and we eat up.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 7:33 PM
has anyone noticed how white her boob was?
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 7:37 PM
the superbowl stunt was celeberty power being wielded by justin and janet because they could . what point were they trying to make? obviously michael's lifechoices has personally effected janet in some way and caused her to react like she did. In today's society, children are forced to get some type of explanation or an excuse, so use your own value system to help them understand.
Peep Show reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 7:49 PM
Honestly, as a mom, I was more disturbed by the Beer drinking "Cat fighters" Miller Lite commercial last year during the playoff games. I watched this year's half time slop and was very disappointed by it. Each year, you look forward to the commercials and the half time shows of the Superbowl. This year was horrible. The football game was more exciting. Get back to real performers.- Crotch grabbin, boob flashing, jive talking rappers just don't cut it.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 8:07 PM
It was not her fault... NO one taught that this could happen..
outrage? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 8:14 PM
we should not focus so much on a breast that we all know of anyways. why isn't the public outraged about what BUSH is doing in the white house?!?!!! if we all focused on what really matters we will all be better off!!! VOTE!!!
RE: Peep Show reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 8:42 PM
Breastfeeding of babies are done publicly around America. So why be so hypocritical about a few seconds of breast display?
RE: Janet Jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 9:27 PM
A bit concerned? Looks to me that we've just told every adolescent out there who craves their MTV hit that it's OK for men to rip off women's clothing. Am I the only one to have a problem with that?
Get Over It reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 9:37 PM
I keep hearing the superbowl is a family show!! What is a family show?? Boobs are shown everyday on TV. If you have kids maybe they should be reading a book!
RE: Janet Jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2004 9:44 PM
For all the little girls who are Avril, Pink and Britney Fans...I guess it's ok for them to kiss their girlfriends as it seems that America quickly got over that!! Janet's breast showing should have been a celebration for women over 35-Get the point..Good Let's Dance
RE: breast reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 12:09 AM
I think you're right mate, how can we just focus on what americans are afraid of: sex....but dead people and violence is so much purer!!!!
boobs! reply
Posted by raghu (goodboyraghu) on February 8, 2004 3:22 AM
in india such shows donot exist.though i am from the land which gave this world kamasutra,we are hypocrites.imagine what a boob show would have donewhen a mere peck on the ccheek given by a social activist(shabana azmi0 to Nelson Mandela raised a huge storm.
Anyway she is beautiful but lacks a sense of resposibility & grace.
RE: Janet Jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 3:35 AM
it's a boob for god sakes. all women have them all men (and some women) desire to see them, get over it. the kids you are worried about did
listen reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 6:12 AM
all she did was show her tit, you can see that anytime on movie stations, and for kids, who gives a crap, girls know what they look like and little boys like it, so what's the problem?
I think people are overreacting, and people who are filing lawsuits are freaking crazy. They just wanted an excuse to get a quick buck(welfare trailer trash and ghetto trash), there was no damage done by this, if it were up to me, I'd let em do that again just to show those christian crap heads a that it wasn't a problem.
no one got hurt, so why the lawsuit? tell me, besides trash wanting a quick buck.
And even a real religous person would just shrugg it off and go on with the game, it is insecure people who want to act like there offended so they dont look like they are not being christian enough.
Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 6:17 AM
Now I know what a superbowl is !!!
Thank you, Janet
You people should get over porn reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 7:56 AM
Kiss my Fist Sucka!!!
Get over the porn She is hot
Gotta Problem!!!
RE: Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 10:00 AM
I didnot mind seeing it, but all the young kid's did not have to see
Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 10:02 AM
I think she should of shown both of them, that's the only problem I have!
janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 10:55 AM
The other night, while channel surfing, I happen to see a latina singer in a hispanic channel. she was wearing a thong and no top. the only thing covering her nips were some little round material. She was singing and dancing in front of a live audience plus the camera for about 5 minutes. Janet's flashdance was very tame compared to this latina singer.
Janet and Justin reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 11:08 AM
If Justin had given Janet the high hard one on stage mabye there would be something to talk about, as it is it was just theater. Get over it.
janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 11:37 AM
ever notice that michael and janet never appear together?
RE: Janet Jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 12:02 PM
Concerned?...I hardly doubt that every little boy is runnung around just ripping girls' clothes off!!..Grow up a little if anyone watching the superbowl had never seen a nearly naked breast before...it was about time anyway!
RE: Peep Show reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 12:06 PM
ummm...excuse me Miss!...I thought the half time shows done by MTV are the best ones...how bout no one wants to see old country singers or canadian women belting out how they can't go on anymore...hip hop, pop, and rap is the hot thing...and I like it!!
Perverts reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 12:18 PM
Most of you are just perverts commenting on how you wanna see more. But if you were a parent would you want this image and message diplayed to your children. A imature stunt enjoyed by imature people
RE: JANET'S BOOBS reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 2:16 PM
I Like boobs
RE: janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 2:30 PM
What's yur point
Parenting 101 reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 3:16 PM
Is it ever to late for Michael and Janets parents to take a basic parenting class? Its incredible how they failed miserably with regard to morality of their children.
Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 4:01 PM
Now we got a chance to see what Jermaine Dupree sees every night
Nice Tits reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 4:02 PM
That was a nice boobie. Shut up and enjoy it.
Janet Jackson's Breast reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 4:40 PM
God Lord, people, it's a breast, not a car bomb! Isn't Bin Ladin still at large? I think our priorities are a little confused.
RE: Perverts reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 4:55 PM
I am a parent and my children saw the show. They are less affected by seeing the flash of a womans breast than by the blood shed and violence thats on tv and childrens programming. The breast is natural and nothing to be afraid of. GET OVER IT !!!
nice tit reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 4:57 PM
I love it
janet jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 5:19 PM
I personally was'nt offended more so disappointed in ms. jackson .There is nothing wrong with a little clevage,fitted jeans showin the curves in your ass.But when you have to show a whole titty to millions of people for attention its really very sad or was it a act of desperation. All I have to say is GET IT TOGETHER !
janet jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 5:21 PM
I personally was'nt offended more so disappointed in ms. jackson .There is nothing wrong with a little clevage,fitted jeans showin the curves in your ass.But when you have to show a whole titty to millions of people for attention its really very sad or was it a act of desperation. All I have to say is GET IT TOGETHER !
Jannet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 5:36 PM
if i was a guy i would probubly have to say.. congrates.. but speaking form the womans point of view i think jannet should take herbig black sausage nipple somewhere lese
Desparate for publicity reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 5:39 PM
It is not understood why they asked Janet to perform, being that she hasn't had a new song in awhile. I think she took advanage of the situation and used it for publicity to "regain her fame!" Cheap shot! (Although the men seemed to enjoy it). Now, if J-Lo or Britney would have shown their tits, it would be better accepted by the viewing audience- I'll bet!
P.S. It was shown so quickly that I don't think kids would have noticed if their parents didn't point it out to them- Not saying that it was right because it is a family-oriented show.
dumba** people reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 5:47 PM
I'm commenting to all the dumba** people who are complaining about Janet's tit. As for the women, yall are complaining b/c yall don't have tities to show or cannot find a man to grab your tit. For the men who are complaining, either your gay or your just jealous that you can't get your hands on nice tities like that. For those not complaining, I think that women should walk around showing their tits all the time because you know damn well all of these complainers probably tour gentlemen's clubs on a weekly basis.
janet jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 5:51 PM
I think that people shouldnt make such a big deal out of it because it wasnt like she was naked but i think that she kinda had something to do with it because where is the bra and what was that red think for if it wasnt a bra but yall need to stop talkin about the kids because i really dont think that a child is damaged from seeing a titty
RE: boobs! reply
Posted by Bldrnnr (No Email) on February 8, 2004 6:00 PM
I really don't see anything wrong with what happen, I've seen a lot worse.
janets tit reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 8:51 PM
i loved the shot myself and for them tohave taken it to this exstreme is stupid.shes great.
tha boobie reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 9:07 PM
children weren't damaged or affected in any way. anyone ever think what was one of the first things you learned to do? suck a tit! :D
Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 9:14 PM
Americans shouldn't be so incredibly prudish. The only way we can get over this as a nation is to show MORE nudity of the human body. . . male or female.
The human body is nothing to be ashamed of, and it shouldn't be considered a huge deal that Janet Jackson showed her breast off on television.
janets tit reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 10:41 PM
Has anyone thought that maybe she did it to take some heat of her child molesting freak of a brother.For some reason people seem more offended my her tit than her micheals need to touch little boys. What is that all about anyway? I think if a tittie popped out every superbowl halftime show more people would watch the production instead of flipping the channel to the mtv half hour crap-o-rama.
Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 11:32 PM
Stop being such hypocrites ,if you have enjoyed it, which I bet most of you have. Just SHUT UP and ENJOY, please don't discourage people in the near future who intend to surpass Janet.
Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2004 11:36 PM
Stop being such hypocrites ,if you have enjoyed it, which I bet most of you have. Just SHUT UP and ENJOY, please don't discourage people in the near future who intend to surpass Janet.
RE: Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 9, 2004 8:11 AM
You can't even see her nipple and therefore you arn't seeing the entire breast so I can't see what all the fuss is about.
RE:GROW UP! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 9, 2004 2:48 PM
Did your wife blindfold your children every time she breastfed them, as not to offend them, God I hope so? Hope you scored some points with the wife watching you type the thing about her tits being better, because anyone with three kids and no plastic surgery budget would tell you that you are full of shit. ?Oh Honey, you are so sweet, but you know that we don?t use words like ?breast? in front of the children?you might offend them.?
Give me a break?let me know when the book burning party is, you Nazi freak, I?ll bring my porn and teach the kids that it is ok to not be terrified by tits?and that, you know what?tits are really kind of cool?it?s sheltered kids like yours that end up pregnant by the age of 16 because parents like you never taught them anything useful about?ewwww?gasp? ?GIRLS?.
Fucking grow up?your kids are?
Love SNC-
Hey catholic reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 9, 2004 4:25 PM
People like you give Catholics a bad name. I was raised Catholic as well, went to Catholic school and the whole bit (our nuns didn?t beat the hell out of us incidentally, confront your feelings about that particular priest from your past for god sake). People like you are why I am just vaguely Christian now. It is the puritanical arrogance of the devout Christian masses that buy the whole ?the bible knows everything? horseshit.
The Holy Bible is nothing more than the worlds most successful and best selling novel of all time. It is a collection of stories, most fabricated, some blatantly untrue, written to get a primitive, uneducated populace to play nicely with each other. Like the whole Santa thing, (which I am assuming you still believe that a big fat guy in a red suit gives a shit if you are nice or not) it is a bogus story with real roots manipulated to keep kids in line.
As for the whole Jesus thing, he was a cool guy with a great message, (which is remarkably similar to every other major religious figure in history) ?be nice to others, don?t be selfish, believe in something bigger than yourself, and have some integrity?there you go?there is the Cliff?s Notes for the New Testament.
Most intelligent people these days outgrow Christianity and seem to tend to come back to it later in life once they have defined their own spirituality and can appreciate the ritual and community that organized religion provides.
Others, like you, have their spirituality not so much retarded, but lashed to a tree and left for dead by the mindless repetition that is most organized religion. You are a drone, another blindly tithing bottomless pit.
You don?t seem like the ?Opiate of the Masses? is working too well for you. Most people that work as hard as you to damn those around you to hell for their beliefs are usually terrified that their own beliefs might be wrong. Don't forget, Hitler was a devout catholic.
Do yourself a favor?learn why Buddhism, Hinduism, hell Judaism (seeing how you worship a Jewish carpenter, that one seems especially appropriate), Taoism etc. are all such beautiful traditions, before you claim yours is the only way to ?salvation?.
PLEASE GROW UP!
Love SNC-
I love her breast reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2004 12:12 AM
I wish i could have her nipples in my mouth.I actually masterbated on it.
hakeem
lawal11111@yahoo.com
quick pic reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2004 12:37 AM
does the other one look the same, let's see!!!
RE: RACE CARD reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2004 2:54 AM
Average negro? I wish there would be a race war. Let some of us out of prison, and the rest of us out here, and you would see "average negro." Your ass would be one of the first I would count coup on. Hope to see you one day in your town you f@#K.
big deal reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2004 7:28 AM
Yeah, with all the shooting and beer and viagra advertising, what's the big deal about a quarter-naked woman? The multi-trillion dollar American advertising industry is almoist exclusively based on female nudity anyway. It's not as if she was having sex with anybody...
And yeah, like most people, I missed the thing completely (as did the 50 other people in the room with me). It only lasted one second, and was easily missed. I would never have known about it if it wasn't for the endless news coverage.
still Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2004 8:50 AM
Please, visit Brazil's Carnaval. They have more than Janet Jackson!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2004 9:02 AM
When the U.S. kills thousanands of people they call it an "operation". When these nations fight back Americans call it terrorism.
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2004 9:18 AM
TV is making to much of this I have seen much more on TV ie. the grammies.
RE: still Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2004 10:14 AM
Frankly if some would like to see more, fantasize about or do erotic things to Janets tts... well nobody would really care much! ....as long as this is done in private and not shared to those who would like no part of it.
The whole point of this "America is Upset Syndrome" is that in a very public event the responses to a particular action, attire or language will be as numerous as the grains of sand. And everyone has the right to his own opinion or reaction. What may offend one will not the other. However, the former does not have the right to impose his value on the latter and vice-versa.
That is why in general public events the middle ground is taken....avoiding the extremes which more often creates the controversial reactions from varied sectors. This way it is assumed that both extremes of the spectrum will generally accept the middle ground. What happened in the Super Bowl was definely not middle ground American behaviour... and many felt it was intentional rather than accidental.
To resort to labeling the extremes of the spectrum as fools, prudes, maniacs, catholics etc... reflects the lack of tolerance for the rights of others and the emptiness of one's arguments.
Of course, public events which are focused for a particular segment like a rock concert by a heavy metal rock band or the Mardi Gras or the Carnival in Rio... do not fall into the category. The very nature of these events require acceptance of some nudity,"profanity" and drunkeness. These are not events for puritans or prudes. However to label these as acceptable to the general public as these are middle ground behaviour will be taxing too much the trait of tolerance to the point of permissiveness.
BY;;;; the Asian
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2004 11:11 AM
I would not have had I known it was going to happen.
Janets boob reply
Posted by Rector Magnificus (leofrot@hotmail.com) on February 10, 2004 12:10 PM
I cannot understand why some people are offended by this. If they show tits or bush in a movie it's ok. Show a tit on a show and youre a witch, ready to be burned at a firestake.
If you go (or look Discovery channel) you can see tits with tribes. A kid get's to see and feed on a tit when its 3 day's old. Why for the love of god can people be so ignorant and shallow.
I say more tits less bulldroppings
Greetings
Rector
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2004 12:47 PM
it never actually says in the Bible that is was an apple...it states that it was a fruit...why does everyone get the impression that it was a fruit?
RE: plan ahead reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2004 12:58 PM
actually, its your
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2004 1:26 PM
i think shit was hot open your eyes dammit
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2004 3:34 PM
i really think that could be why she did let herself be exposed
its great reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2004 4:25 PM
wish this woulda happened when janet was younger and had fuller more desireable breasts. id still do er tho.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2004 5:13 PM
it's nice to see that you are so well grounded in reality. How you got from a nun wacking your calf to child beating nuns to 13 year olds with semi automatics and then 9/11 all from Janet flashing a relatively unattractive boob is amazing. You have some serious issues!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2004 5:51 PM
you idiot!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2004 7:31 PM
dd
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2004 7:33 PM
Can we see your wife's tits?
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2004 7:36 PM
First of all, I hate to be the one to tell you this. But the terrorists were not brainwashed. they ARE extreamists. Can I say you're brainwashed because you're preaching so heavily about God and how we live in a shameful world? No I think you'd be offended. But by you're own definitions you to should be considered "brain washed". The sad part about any war, is this, both sides think they are correct. Don't preach about what you yourself have had no experience in. Ask yourself how desperate a person must be to agree to strap explosives to their bodies and blow themselves up. That tells me two things, one; they believe in what THEY are fighting for...and two; they must feel pretty cornered. Humans like any other animal will come out fighting with claws bared if it feels trapped. I'm not justifying what happened on September 11th, but i do make an attempt to walk in their shoes even for just a moment. My boyfriend is an american soldier over in iraq, I'm a Canadian citizen. Secondly, as for Janets boob, get over it...it's a boob...a piece of flesh on a womans body. A peice of flesh that every woman has two of. It's a peice of flesh used for giving sustenence to babies and driving pleasure out of when having good sex. Get over it...it's a bloody boob...I mean really. It's not like you can't see naked boobies in school text books. And don't give me bs about how there isn't I could pull out any standardized text book and show you illustrations of roman artwork where ~Gasp~ They show nudity..they SCULTPED NUDITY OMG WE'RE GONNA BURN IN HELL! No we're not, if you're a god believing christian, and there's nothing wrong with that, remember this..god made man in HIS image...God made man because he thought man was beautiful. So for christians to condemn a boob is to say that gods work is not beautiful. The body is a work of art. Whether it was intentional or unintentional..it's just a boob...The only people making it out to be anything other then a boob...a peice of flesh is the world.
RE: its great reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2004 7:49 PM
omg, u r a perve!
stupid petifile!
( i like janets breast when she waz younger!)
get a life,and get a girlfriend while ur at it!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2004 8:20 PM
I don't think anyone even noticed it was hanging out there until some idiot made a comment about it on tv about 10 minutes later
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2004 8:34 PM
You must be gay or a lebian if you think Janet is not attractive. I bet you are white and Jealous.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2004 9:14 PM
HEY WHERE'S THE VIDEO ON THIS? I'd like to view it up close.
THIS IS SO STUPID reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 12:35 AM
WHY DO WE AS AMERICANS DONT WANT TO TALK TO OUR CHILDREN ABOUT SEX OR SEXES. WHATS WRONG WITH US. WE SEE IT ON TV EVERYDAY AND OUT BUT REALLY DONT WANT SO SAY ANYTHING ABOUT IT. I NEW ABOUT SEX WHEN I WAS 7 OR 8, BUT NOT FROM MY PARENTS. KIDS ARE NOT STUPID THEY ONLY LEARN HOW TO REACT TO SUCH THINGS FROM OUR PARENTS. PARENTS NEED TO TELL THERE KIDS ITS JUST A BREAST.
Apple & Bare Breast reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 1:01 AM
Actually it was an apple, but it was Newton, not Eve, who sat under it, per De Vinci Code. The reason breast baring in public is offensive is because not all breasts are beautiful. Some are flacid and sagging like cow duds, and would shock the hell out of kids and adults alike. To prevent this from happening, we banned all breast baring, even if it means sacrificing free peeks at the beautiful ones.
Rofl reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 1:33 AM
You people get so upset about the stupidest things... Does it have to be someones fault? rofl if you people get this freaked out by a tit you must go ape shit for two tits... teh Logo
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 3:43 AM
What's with all this Sept 11 crap anyway. Gey over that stuff and move on, this is about Janet Jackson's boobs and they are wonderful. Let's see more of them.
re: Janet's Boob reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 4:56 AM
I'm offended that we only got to see one, and that I don't look nearly that good! People who are that offended by a boob probably need to get out of the house more.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 4:58 AM
yes, she looks great though!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 5:01 AM
David -
You seem so well grounded. I'll look at boobs all day long, and never worry about my daughter getting assaulted at school if I could. Thank you for a rational reply!
RE: Kids reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 5:09 AM
brilliant!
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 5:20 AM
If you go to the beach you also see naked boobs. What's the deal about this. It's just a tit. I've seen more on TV than this.
RE: Janet Jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 5:22 AM
How are you teaching your daughter "prudence and purity" by exposing her to that kind of gratuitous violence in the name of entertainment? Was the JT song pure BEFORE Janet's exposure? Is your daughter learning chastity by watching the Rolling Stones, P. Diddy, and Justin Timberlake all singing about sex? You knew what you were exposing her to when you turned on the game. I was offended by none of it, but if you are trying to teach your daughter "purity", you should not be advocating "gonna have you naked by the end of this song". How are you planning on "protecting" your daughter from bare breasts when she goes through puberty? Are you going to play some Ludicrous songs, then forbid her to take her own top off? Grow up, and take responsibility for your own decision to allow her to view the game!
Wake up, people! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 6:07 AM
Hey, it's just a tit!!
So what? So, those parents and adults have not seen a tit before?
Yup, those people who go hoo ha ha about this issue should get out of their house more often.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 6:30 AM
Actually in the book of Job. It does descrbe an animal that sounds very similar to that of a brontosaurus. It also describes this same gigantic animal throughout the bible and many believe that
it is, in fact, descrbing a dinosaur. Note: There are many animals in the un-
talked about in the bible. That doesn't mean that they do not exsist.
I for one believe that the dinosaurs did walk with man. And I have many other validations for my theory other than the bible and maybe one day the world can hear of my research. I have been studying dinosaurs almost my whole life. I hope to prove the masses wrong someday. I believe I am close. If you ever want to know more on this please reply.
P.S.
As far as Janet is concerned, She shouldn't have showed her boob for the simple fact that it is pissing mom's off. I don't really much care and I'm sure it has not polluted children's mind's anymore than modern day television or our crappy school system's. I went to a private school until I was in fifth grade when I transferred to a public school and there were plenty of teachers, kindergardner's,
and students all alike,
cussing and talking about sex. I was shocked but I guess that is just a reality check that all mother's need to realize as I had to at one time.
Never-the-less, Janet should not have done it for the simple fact that it did offend some people and it got the network, Justin, and the
NFL in hot water. It just isn't very nice to offend people or get other industries in trouble for your screw ups. I love Janet and I love GOD the Father, God the Son, And God the holy Spirit,
But I do not Love to offend people. I personally was not offended but some people were
RE: Immorality in the Country reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 6:51 AM
Please people, can't we all just get along instead of attacking each other. Peace be unto all of you. I am a christian I am not here to judge for that is not my place. I will not cram my beliefs down your throat like some christian crusader back in the puritan days who burned people at the stakes accusing them of being witches. That is the problem with the church today. They are turning people away from God which completely defeats the purpose. I do not believe in denominations or organized religion. It is to modernized and political. We have lost sight of what God is supposed to be all about. I may not attend a church but you can never convince me that I am not holy. I have been judged my whole life my "Christians" I have been hurt in the worst ways by "christians" and you are right. They are being naive and ignorant but not in the ways you are thinking. They have just lost sight of the true messege. The church is in my heart and I will forever praise His Name. People, you must learn to love one another. If you do not believe in God, that is your choice. I will not hate your or turn my nose up at you like some snob. I will open my heart to all people and I would hope that you would do the same for me even though I do not believe the same as you. Peace be unto all of you. Please forget this hate that lies in all of us.
Janet is a satan whore reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 7:43 AM
It's because of people like Janet Jackson flashing their breasts that the worlds such a terrible place! What about the children won't somebody please think of the children!?
RE: Janet reply
Posted by Michael Jackson (Prison@hotmail.com) on February 11, 2004 8:08 AM
I'll be happy to abilge.
I am a parent! Listen reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 9:01 AM
i have 2 girls and a boy and they both saw what happened and we are all a church going family, but all we did was laugh and smile, it was not a big deal to us, my 4yo girl new what it was, so did my 13yo girl, my 8yo boy new what it was, he even told me later he liked it, but I dont think it hurt anyone, because you can turn to other channels where people are having sex, but they only go wild when janet has her breast with jewelty on it hanging out of her shirt. sounds fishy, I'll tell you this, I dont mind my kids seeing what happened at the super bowl, but i do mind the other stations that have people having sex all over the place.
so dont be a bunch of over reacting, imature babies and just let it be, everyone knows what a breast looks like.
crazy reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 10:05 AM
hey, people in America, whats the problem? Do you never saw naked woman, why in America brutality in TV is OK but naked boobs not, what is more danger, where is the evil?
Janets Tit reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 10:08 AM
Whats the big deal its just a boob i'm sure everyone has seen one before, u cant be offended by somthing like that its just a part of nature
jj reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 11:08 AM
This all would be fine if the future of our children's morality would be stricktly dictated by Hollywood. I guess I want a say. Is that so bad?
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 11:55 AM
if you're going to quote scripture, at least spell all your propaganda right. such startling ingnorance shouldn't surprise me considering your response, but hey....i keep expecting the best from people....even when they're stupid.
RE: Janet looks like michael reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 11:57 AM
you are an idiot...
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 12:00 PM
You are totally off the subject here, how do we from boobs to national terriorism??? Just pray more that this never happens again!! LOL Good Job Janet!!!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 12:02 PM
no such person as GOD. You say. Don't bet your life on it!
Janet is a smart successful women reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 12:02 PM
No one is to blame for this. No tv networks, no sports orginizations, no individuals. Janet is a smart successful entertainer/buisness women who is old enough to make her own decissions and i am sure she knows when a mistake is made and has enough dignity to acknowledge her misjudgments. No one else has the right to judge her or anyone about what happened at the superbowl when 90% of those same people who are quick to pass judgement on others support their own president in a mass murder that took place over seas. you wanna fuss and cuss about something that is imoral and disrespectful to adults and children alike? start at the source of all the corruption in that country - The White House - And yes i am A canadian citizen as well as American, I am also A black man too. now say what you will about me and my country/people but i will forever hold this opinion and remeber we all are intitled to one.
"To each it's own"
RE:at least spell all your propaganda right reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 12:10 PM
If you are worried about spelling perhaps you should use proper upper and lower case.
RE: Janet is a satan whore reply
Posted by jade60 (No Email) on February 11, 2004 1:12 PM
Janet Jackson is not a real reason why the world is a worse place....there are alot more real and concrete reasons why the world is the way it is. It was just a 2 sec breast shot. Nothing that should be made a big deal out of and to call someone a Satan's whore. You seem to have some real issues about the human body. Its people like you who scare me and make me afraid for my kid's future.
RE: crazy reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 1:23 PM
There is a time and place for everything. Lets look at it from a family point of view. Most parents watch the superbowl with their underage children. In tis day and age of Porn all over the net can we not even have a non-porn football game? I am sure most of the parents who witnessed that with their underage children were none too happy with that. It doesnt matter whether it was for 1 second that was not the time or place. Now my view. Mr. I mean Mrs. Jackson LOL absolutly did it as a publicity stunt for her carrer or whats left of it. But the main reason was to take some of the attention from her child molesting Bro. We all know it and you people who dont are way OUT OF TOUCH WITH REALITY. Most of you people are cattle anyway grazzing your way through life oblivious to the real world and whats really going on. And in conclusion the tit was saggy and down right un appealing. And yes I am a male, straight and whtie SO WHAT....
stop wasting your time reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 3:15 PM
I can't understand why ppl waste their time over this issue. Obviously americans are way too immature to handle such a situation. There are some ppl who seriously need to grow up. Obviously this stunt was pulled for attention, and JJ and folks wanted to see how dumb ppl like all of you would react. Guess what? Their plan worked. They are all sitting there laughing there asses off at all of you dumb-asses. Yes, it was a booby, now can we all be adults about this? By the way..all you parents need to know how to parent your kids properly, so situations like this don't turn into a big deal. Now for the last time, drop the issue, and grow up America.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 3:34 PM
Wow, if you think that the government has never supported terrorism against other nations, you are one naieve brainwashed SOB (ie. the Taliban, East Timor, etc.). Also, no one in this entire group can string together a sentence to save their lives, let alone spell properly. And critical thinking seems to have become obsolete, especially in the self-analysis department. Oh yeah, also, it's just a boob people, and we all spent the first 6 months of out lives with our mouths clamped around one, or don't you remember. Besides, pop music is lame anyways, guys, so let them strip, it's the only interesting thing they've got going for them.
IiiiTTTTSSSS NNNNNOOOOOOOTTTTT PPOORRNN reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 4:06 PM
PPPPPPLLLLLLEEEEaaASSSEEE RRRRREEEEAAAADDDD
my kids have seen breasts, and i think everyone has seen breasts, yes even my 4 year old twins.
to them they are protruding things off a body, and to most underage kids, they look like protruding male breasts. and to the other kids, they are something they have seen alot before, so why are all you people calling it porn? Porn is people having sexual intercourse with them selves or others....
a woman showing a breast is just been made out by christians to be a terrible thing, its not, its a part of a body, just like and arm or a hand, those aren't considered a porn!
now i am a believer in god to, but i believe people's bodies are just living things, i mean you see most animals naked, and people dont mind, but humans are just animals to.
a female's breast is a breast, everyone has em, its just womens protrudes, why is that different enough to cause histaria, im not worried about the kids seeing breasts, but im worried about all the killing and death shown on tv these days, that is what is causing the downfall of society, not a breast!!!!!!!!!
Just think About It!!!!
RE: my opinion reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 4:18 PM
Wow, did you just say nobody asked for you opinon??? What are you talking about, this is a forum. Without peoples opinions it would not exist. I'm sure you are always right about everything, but other people have opinions too, and more importantly the right to express them. Quit being so self centered and start listening to other people for once in your life.
RE: Janet Jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 4:34 PM
I thought the main problem with Janet exposing her breast is that it suposidly demoralized our children. Now, a kid states their honest opinion and your the one who gets offended, funny how that works, huh?
RE: Re:boys like it! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 4:51 PM
I think that people need to get over it! I bet some people think that it's gross, attractive,or disturbing but you people need to get over it!
RE: Re:Dude! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 4:55 PM
I loved it so much that i wanted to milk it!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 4:58 PM
R U attracted 2 her? you looney?
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 5:00 PM
I think the whole point of Janet's little "stunt", was to take some attention away from her brother, Michael's, current situation with his sexual harassment charges. Therefore, her stunt was proven successful.
RE: crazy reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 6:07 PM
Whatever happened to common decency in this country? What is this country coming to?
Not long ago, sexuality was considered something that we kept behind our bedroom doors, not something that we flash in public. We also thought that bloody violence was morally wrong and should not be depicted on television. What has happened to us?
For those who went nuts over the Super Bowl half-time show, you should realize that what others have been arguing is true, that this was not an isolated incident. You look at TV these days and what you see is even worse. Look at the dating shows, the sitcoms, the wrestling shows? pretty much EVERYTHING save some. The majority of these shows are tainted with negative influences. The worst thing about it is that much of it we don?t seem to see, because we have become accustomed to it all. Take Friends for example. I am very sick about the entire casual attitude towards sex, that they all sleep around as if it was O.K. You see my point? If you don?t, then watch ?Saturday Night Live? or ?Blind Date? or ?Boston Public? or ?The O.C.? or ?Big Brother? or any of the sitcoms and see what they broadcast. The Super Bowl half-time show was merely a culmination of this open attitude towards sex that we have been building all these years. And it sickens me, despite the fact that I am only 18.
What kind of values are we teaching to our kids these days? That it?s O.K. to sleep around? To wear provocative clothing? To swear? To commit violence? I look around at elementary school girls these days and see them dressing like Britney Spears or Christina Aguilera. I see the boys wearing ?gangster? clothing, swearing everywhere like the rappers they listen to.
You say that they should realize what the world really is? But they?re young kids, for God?s sake! When I see them, I?d like to cry because of what the entertainment industry has molded them into.
Take some responsibility for your actions.
We live in a country of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. We have so much more freedom than every other country in the world. If you don?t believe it, then I ask you, how many countries legally allow their citizens to burn its flag? What we do with all this freedom is up to us. Either we be a beacon of light to the rest of the world, or what our Founding Fathers have created is all for naught. We fall down into depravity like the rest of the world. Look at the Middle East. It?s ruled by oppressive, corrupt, immoral dictators. The people are illiterate, and cannot even interpret their own religion for themselves, but are forced into dependence upon their religious leaders who are kooks, and in cahoots with the oppressive regime. My mother has a friend who came from Iran. Her daughter made a friend in school, but the friend did not know that she was a Baha?i, not a Muslim. When the friend found out, she took a knife to school. She asked her what she thought of Mohammed, and fortunately, Baha?is believe that all prophets are holy, and was spared her life. Scary is an understatement.
I am sure there are millions of similar stories. And the problem is that the people are so forced into this brainwashing. It?s not the religion, it?s the people who dictate it. If the people were able to read the Qu?ran, they would realize that those ?leaders? are liars. This is why America is so intent in bringing these regimes to an end. It?s because it is the right thing to do.
But that comes back to the question of our own culture. If we are to live up to bringing liberty to people in the world, we must first live up to a higher ideal. If we are to be corrupt, wretched, sinful, what hope is there to humanity? Certainly not the Middle East, and I don?t have to tell you that. And it all starts here, at the Super Bowl half-time show, and our future generations. Take responsibility for your life, for your children?s. If I were you, I?d toss the TV in the trash, because that is what it broadcasts, and so that is where it belongs. But I am not you. You make your own decisions. You can either let entertainment control you, or you control entertainment. It?s Fahrenheit 451.
Do something reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 6:09 PM
Whatever happened to common decency in this country? What is this country coming to?
Not long ago, sexuality was considered something that we kept behind our bedroom doors, not something that we flash in public. We also thought that bloody violence was morally wrong and should not be depicted on television. What has happened to us?
For those who went nuts over the Super Bowl half-time show, you should realize that what others have been arguing is true, that this was not an isolated incident. You look at TV these days and what you see is even worse. Look at the dating shows, the sitcoms, the wrestling shows? pretty much EVERYTHING save some. The majority of these shows are tainted with negative influences. The worst thing about it is that much of it we don?t seem to see, because we have become accustomed to it all. Take Friends for example. I am very sick about the entire casual attitude towards sex, that they all sleep around as if it was O.K. You see my point? If you don?t, then watch ?Saturday Night Live? or ?Blind Date? or ?Boston Public? or ?The O.C.? or ?Big Brother? or any of the sitcoms and see what they broadcast. The Super Bowl half-time show was merely a culmination of this open attitude towards sex that we have been building all these years. And it sickens me, despite the fact that I am only 18.
What kind of values are we teaching to our kids these days? That it?s O.K. to sleep around? To wear provocative clothing? To swear? To commit violence? I look around at elementary school girls these days and see them dressing like Britney Spears or Christina Aguilera. I see the boys wearing ?gangster? clothing, swearing everywhere like the rappers they listen to.
You say that they should realize what the world really is? But they?re young kids, for God?s sake! When I see them, I?d like to cry because of what the entertainment industry has molded them into.
Take some responsibility for your actions.
We live in a country of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. We have so much more freedom than every other country in the world. If you don?t believe it, then I ask you, how many countries legally allow their citizens to burn its flag? What we do with all this freedom is up to us. Either we be a beacon of light to the rest of the world, or what our Founding Fathers have created is all for naught. We fall down into depravity like the rest of the world. Look at the Middle East. It?s ruled by oppressive, corrupt, immoral dictators. The people are illiterate, and cannot even interpret their own religion for themselves, but are forced into dependence upon their religious leaders who are kooks, and in cahoots with the oppressive regime. My mother has a friend who came from Iran. Her daughter made a friend in school, but the friend did not know that she was a Baha?i, not a Muslim. When the friend found out, she took a knife to school. She asked her what she thought of Mohammed, and fortunately, Baha?is believe that all prophets are holy, and was spared her life. Scary is an understatement.
I am sure there are millions of similar stories. And the problem is that the people are so forced into this brainwashing. It?s not the religion, it?s the people who dictate it. If the people were able to read the Qu?ran, they would realize that those ?leaders? are liars. This is why America is so intent in bringing these regimes to an end. It?s because it is the right thing to do.
But that comes back to the question of our own culture. If we are to live up to bringing liberty to people in the world, we must first live up to a higher ideal. If we are to be corrupt, wretched, sinful, what hope is there to humanity? Certainly not the Middle East, and I don?t have to tell you that. And it all starts here, at the Super Bowl half-time show, and our future generations. Take responsibility for your life, for your children?s. If I were you, I?d toss the TV in the trash, because that is what it broadcasts, and so that is where it belongs. But I am not you. You make your own decisions. You can either let entertainment control you, or you control entertainment. It?s Fahrenheit 451.
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 6:37 PM
Do you think kids should see such things?
RE: Re: janet's accident reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 6:39 PM
There's a huge difference between a breast and one's ankles, mind you.
to boob or not to boob reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 6:39 PM
well... at least i got off on it
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 6:44 PM
What values are you talking about? That kids should toy with sex? Just because it's on TV doesn't mean it's right.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 6:47 PM
Only idiots and lunatics do not believe in God.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 6:49 PM
Thank you. Finally, someone with a functioning brain!
RE: Immorality in the Country reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 6:49 PM
I don't know about your children, but I don't let my 5 year old watch pornography, even if it is on public TV.
Big Whoop! NOT! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 6:50 PM
I hardly saw it myself. I think its made worse by all this media attention to it. Thats probably why this specific scene is being searched online now. Big WHOOP! And ppl need to just ignore it and not comment so it would NOT have been a big deal in the first place!!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 6:51 PM
You think that children should see pornography?
RE: Big Whoop! ?NOT! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 6:53 PM
Of course we should make a big deal out of it. It's about our culture, our future, for goodness sake! It's about what values we should be teaching kids, and that's everybody's responsibility!
RE: Immorality in the Country reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 7:05 PM
Umm, world-wide, Christians are NOT the majority.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 7:09 PM
fuck you all *n-word*s are sick
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 7:11 PM
fuck nigers
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 7:18 PM
you all are fucking retarded talking about religion and in god we trust its just a fucking tit do u know we were all born naked and a long time ago no one even wore any cloths
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 7:39 PM
you're reading a hell of a lot into janet's nipple exposure, it's not the end of the world, nor is it the end of morality as we know it. get a grip.
RE: Hey catholic reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 8:29 PM
That is blasphemy! You cannot call yourself Catholic and say such things you hypocrite. The Bible is the book that GOD gave us to grow in our walk with him and you dare to talk about it like a fairytale book?!
Just look what we are saying, it's absurd. The SuperBowl Halftime show was nothing less than unacceptable. Nudity, cursing, and violence have become more and more tolerated in our corrupted world because we are leaving God out of it. You sick people that found it acceptable, think about what you are saying. The SuperBowl isn't the place for this, that's what all those ungodly porn sites and stores are for. I wish there were some way to put God back into the US instead of trying to squeeze him out of everything.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 10:51 PM
not everthing is writen in the bible alot of it is being hide stop and thing BEhold the the lamb of God that takes away the sins of of the WOLRD.GOD has ten commandments mans got ? only i commandment says to remember BUT they want to break it.SUNDAY after the socalled sun god
RE: RE:at least spell all your propaganda right reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 10:58 PM
and your so perfect speling as long as you understad.spel the way u Want
RE: Immorality in the Country reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 11:04 PM
i dint let them watch tv its was and is to trashie There grown now they can make the choice now i watch discovery etc. thats what children should be watching
RE: Immorality in the Country reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 11:08 PM
right on people beatting each other up how boring
RE: janet jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 11:16 PM
yea school what they learn with all those kids that the parrents dont care about thts where they learn it from there parrents keep sending them to public schools ye ye they love you for it your kids are in there control
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 11:30 PM
if you cant walk in public that way it shouldnt be on public tv.....
RE: Hey catholic reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 11:33 PM
only one way least you be born again everyone will be.Born to die to be born again.
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 11:34 PM
yea the public school is trash.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 11:39 PM
if you cant walk in public that way you shouldnt see it on public tv
RE: Goddess Janet. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 11:42 PM
yea at least you know it when they run you walk when they walk you run
RE: Re:JJ reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 11:46 PM
if you can walk in public that way you shouldnt have it on public tv let you kids walk around that way and see and you to and see what happends
RE: plan ahead reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 11:52 PM
speling hs nothen to do with a great mind no on this planet has a great mind except in there mind jst cause u cn spl make you hv a grt hind
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 11:54 PM
were all not like you keep it real real real
RE: Re:JJ reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 11:57 PM
right on the 1000 points of light and the knew world order has hit us yet
RE: sexy is sexy reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2004 11:59 PM
yea poor boy like 90% of the people you could pay 1 cent
RE: Do something reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 12:02 AM
if you cant walk in public like that shouldnt be on public tv get real real real
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 12:28 AM
The *n-word*ization of America continues!!!...So what else is new?
RE: to boob or not to boob reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 12:34 AM
If you got off on looking at that sorry Flapjack, imagine what you could do with the palm of your hand...
pectoral reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 2:17 AM
Why is it wrong for women to bare their breast in public, but not wrong for men? Isn't men's breast more offensive than women's?
yes reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 4:10 AM
Well, if you're talking about disgusting obese men's man boobs then yes I do find that offensive.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 6:54 AM
You are Racist YOU MAKE ME SiCK IM white but i like african americans so you can just shut your big white mouth
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 8:16 AM
drop the n-bomb one mo tyme so it can come bacc on you 10 fold
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 9:16 AM
suck me balls
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 9:21 AM
after i saw the superbowl i started to jack off and i was thinking of my mothers boob when she used to breast feed me than i notice that i had a wierd feeling on my balls that started to burn well thats all i have to say about janet
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 9:38 AM
I think it's sad that celebs..think they have the right to decide what a 6 yr old should see.
JANET reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 9:56 AM
I feel like it was degrading for this to happen. But I do not feel like it is such a BIG issue. My goodness looks to me like she was as shocked as everyone else but yet she is still criticized. Justin on the other hand is being patted on the back "Thanks Man". Just like everything else. Men and women are together intimately. Women are called whores men are congratulated. I do not personally like Janet but she is not the only one at fault. So GET OVER IT!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 10:06 AM
shut up you commie!!we live in the good ole USofA and I mind you am very proud to live in a contry where millionares can bare thier breasts in public if they really really want to.and also what wuz up with the rant about our children with guns & the muslim nation. yeah us people who know how to spell spell it a U DUMASS . in closing all I have to say is GOD BLESS AMERICA (MY) HOME SWEET HOME!
It's scandelous reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 10:12 AM
This incident should have never happened in the first place, someone tell me why she was even AT the superbowl and not the kitchen sink where all women belong?
FCC rules reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 10:19 AM
I think most people can handle seeing Janet's boob, but that's not really the issue. The issue is that she and Justin and MTV and CBS violated an FCC rule for broadcast television content standards. If you break rules, you need to be punished. If people don't like the rules, or think that the rules are out of date, they need to change them. Until the rules are changed, violators should suffer the consequences.
MYOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 10:26 AM
MYOB
Wouldn't the world be better off if you (and everyone) would just MYOB?
nice cup reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 11:23 AM
Ok here is why what happen happened, I know this because I also have a mind to figure out mystery noels before I am 1/4 the way done (never fails).
as we all know Janet flashing was no accident, how ever what people don't realize is why it happened. the whole segment before the half time show was a segment about "freedom of choice-vote-moral choice etc" as seen through the eyes of Hollywood (mostly commie bastards). ok, well we have a strange brew of entertainment "Janet and Justin as the main stream goodie - goodies and then the bow wow of the bow wow set with such "poke them from behind crowed like "pee ditty" and who ever the guy with the jock itch was on stage with him. so the crowed to watch would be both kinds (kid rock does not even deserve mentioning with his old drug butt, sum it up with trailer trash.) the left who would see ditty and itch and then families with young kids both young and pre-voting ages. why is that important is because seeing itchy and scratchy exposes them to low base values any way and then the aftermath "expected" reaction they wanted from the white house was "out rage" so they could play through various mediums to kids "see how repressive the republicans are? what's wrong with a women's body? they are trying to control your mind and choice etc."
they have what they wanted to a lesser degree in that parents in general are speaking out and can thus in loosely held together families drive a wedge further in because as long as they are speaking out on the Janet thing they of course are going to talk about the ghetto show put on by the rappers who need blistex down south.
I agree with Bruce who said bush lied about seeing the show, lied like a fox to not take the most predictable of paths and try to fire up the moral majority(?)
its all political folks
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 12:22 PM
nasty
RE: nice cup reply
Posted by biggerandontop (bob@dylan.com) on February 12, 2004 12:56 PM
wow, you're a fucking dumbass
RE: Re:replying to you statement reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 1:06 PM
how dare you judge any religion or for that matter anyone the catholic religion not to long ago faced a sexual situation that made millions of people think twice about their society. You seem like the type of person that is a looker instead of a listener. Before you grace us with your opinion AGAIN please by all means pay attention to what exactly the topic is about. p.s. I would not brag about going to catholic school or what the nuns or priest did to you.
RE: Re:replying to you statement reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 1:07 PM
how dare you judge any religion or for that matter anyone the catholic religion not to long ago faced a sexual situation that made millions of people think twice about their society. You seem like the type of person that is a looker instead of a listener. Before you grace us with your opinion AGAIN please by all means pay attention to what exactly the topic is about. p.s. I would not brag about going to catholic school or what the nuns or priest did to you.
RE: JJ boob and USA is crying ! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 1:26 PM
The ironic thing about Marco's comment is that if it were not for the AMERICAN blood shed to liberate Europe and the AMERICAN money spent to rebuild Europe; he probably wouldn't be making these comments. The best of Europe left it behind to build AMERICA. The leftovers there now are weak, pathetic, boobs. Speaking of boobs ? Janet Jackson should join?um? AMERICA ROCKS!
RE: typical America reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 1:37 PM
Well said!!! Most of the Euro-trash bastards I see march around in NFL T-Shirts while they are bitching about AMERICAN influence - by the way, Soccer sucks!
RE: nice cup reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 1:50 PM
i want to fuck u in the ass 4ever cause u turn me on
RE: I am a parent! Listen reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 1:56 PM
bang on the point
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 2:04 PM
Why call someone a homo just because his opinion differs from yours? Are you not grown-up enough to allow another person to say whay ge/she wantsas long he is not attacking you?
Big Whoopty Doo reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 2:14 PM
People get a LIFE. Look, I'm A parent just like the rest of you. IT's A BOOB. Lil Kim runs around wearing nipple cups ALL THE TIME. Do U let ur kids watch her ,or let them listen to her misic?? It's a boob. Who cares!! I'll bet half the people gripping about this, are the very ones who use to watch NYPB Blue. Get a life ,and for everyones sake,if your going to complain, don't ever breast feed your child.(don't want to plant the image in your kids head)
this shouldn't be a big deal reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 2:21 PM
First of all, kids need to be taught how to handle the real world these days. Parents need to introduce their kids to things like this at young ages, so that they aren't a big deal when a situation like such arises. If things like pornography are kept secret from kids, the kids will think it's a huge deal when they see a booby, or whatever. It is absolutely ridiculous. It's not like she was showing her vagina or putting on a strip show. It was a funny joke, if you ask me, and if ANYBODY was offended by that, than you need to seek some professional help, and learn how to deal with the real world these days. I MEAN COMMON PPL...WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOUR PROBLEMS??!...GAIN SOME MATURITY AND MOVE ON!!..as ppl have mentioned before, there is pornography all over tv these days, and subliminal messages are being sent out, and not a word is said. JJ pops one boob, and look what happens? It is because who she is and the manor in which it was presented. AMERICA NEEDS THINGS LIKE THIS TO GIVE THEM A GOOD KICK IN THE ASS TO WAKE UP AND SEE REALITY! LETS MOVE ON
Boob reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 2:23 PM
Ya'll are asslickers! Janet cand do whatever she pleases and if you are offended, then don't watch the superbowl, capesh? It's just a gland on her body that is for breastfeading a child. Get over it, all women have them and so they will until I'm dead. bye
show your kids reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 2:26 PM
I did not see the stunt, nor did my kids. I looked it up on the internet, and I showed it to my kids. I did this so that they can learn properly how to be mature. My kids are 6 and 10. They laughed. Guess what, when something like this happens again, it won't be a big deal to them, because they are used to it. Learn how to be good parents ppl.
boob reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 2:26 PM
I think janet can do what ever the hell she wants to.If she wants to have a cow lick it,she damn well can. All I can say about her titty is let it show let it show let it show. And for the little star on it, let it shine let it shine. be against breast cancer!
RE: Boob reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 2:57 PM
boob could you move your death time up then
RE: this shouldn't be a big deal reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 3:00 PM
fuck you. you dont make the rules for what other parants need to expose their kids to nor does she you. why dont you grab some jesus juice and go pass out in your own pee
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 3:18 PM
hi i find what u are saying intreststing the latest evidence points to early hominid excistence later and later
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 4:49 PM
I was very offended by her nasty titie!
JJ's Boob reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 4:49 PM
I live in the UK..and reading all this is funny. All the chruchies have come here....what just to post? I think not, you all came here to look at JJ's boob.As many have said, it was a boob and not even a complete one at that, the nipple was covered, and you go on and on about it, talking about christ and the damage it has done to our kids and the morals of family, yeah right! So kids have not seen worse on TV or even on the news, what about school? A 3-4 year old would not have taken any notice of it and a 6-10 year old would have giggled about it a 11-13 year old might have said something about it and a 14-20 year old would have said my girlfriend has better.
Would like to say one thing about wars....90% of wars are about religion, so don't come that god piece love thing with me...look at your history and tell me how many people have been killed in the name of god...any god??
I'll give you a clue...it has at least 9 numbers in it.
Long live the page 3 girl..naked boobs in a national newspaper from Monday to Saturday!!!
boob reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 4:51 PM
What was with that thing on her nip?? Makes me think it was planned!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 6:44 PM
I THINK ITS COOL
boops, I did it again! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 9:22 PM
The whole purpose of the stunt was to sell her new album. The sale volume speaks for itself.
boobs reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 9:46 PM
get a boob job girl
there ugly
RE: get over it reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 10:28 PM
I wathched the Superbowl. I saw the boob. Ever since thats all I've heard about. PR stunt this, morality issue that. Blah, blah, blah. Was it staged? Wasit an accident? WHO CARES!!! It was a one second tit shot. What really pisses me off is that in all of this is that FOOTBALL BECAME AN AFTERTHOUGHT AT THE FREAKIN' SUPERBOWL!!! All the hard work of the players, the coaches, and the NFL took a back seat to an exposed breast at the single most important football game of the year!!! I'm a die-hard NFL fan, and I'm offended by all Superbowl half time shows. Not because of a bare boob, but because I have to sit through 30 minutes of crappy music before the second half kickoff!!! With everyone talking about "The Boob", everyone has missed the whole point of it being on TV in the first place...THE SUPERBOWL!!! By the way, the New England Patriots won.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2004 11:53 PM
Good grief! Do you read what you write? Folks discuss Janet's boob exposure & you go into a spill on kids with guns? There's no relation there at all. So she's an exhibitionist, is this news to some? No surprise here.
Boobs & Gods reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2004 12:35 AM
Who's this person coming to a site with people chatting about Janet Jackson's boobs quoting all this religeous bullshit? Let's see, you must be here to see Janets tits? Or are you here to try to "school" folks on your religeous beliefs? Amen to the person stating so many wars are due to religeous differences. How true & stupid! And nuns beating kids, hello McFly! What parent would allow that-think about it, they must have serious mental issues! So you quote the Bible, well it's just a book of people's opinions. Try having a mind of your own.
And the comments about spelling on this site... Get a life, it's a sounding board. People abreviate & write however they want here, it's not an English exam for God's sake.
Personally I was cooking for my family when Janet did her show, I missed it. So I wanted to see what all the fuss was about. I won't be back here...I spend my free time mostly outdoors having fun in healthy ways. It's been fun to see the comments here & also that some folks have some common sense, unlike the one who's spending far too much time on the Net quoting religeous opinions to others who honestly don't care to hear it. Try going for a walk, drinking water or something that's REALLY healthy for your body & mind.
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2004 12:40 AM
Obviously you're a very shallow-minded individual who thinks everyone should think like you do. They don't.
() reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2004 1:15 AM
she should have worn a better outfit. that dress squeezed her breast to high. I like it to hang and shake.
RE: Boob reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2004 1:45 AM
I think that JJ's exposure has helped to identify a huge problem in America today. Everybody is tripping over everybody to highlight that this is what is wrong with Amreica today, in-fact the problem is that everybody is trying to blame someone else for thier ineptitude as a Mother; Father; Son; Daughter; Aunt; Uncle or Grand parent. You can all see that the good ol US of A is in one hell of a state so you blame Maralyn Manson; Eminem or Jackson's right tit.
Neither is it a religeous matter but it is a moral one. Not a love thy neighbour moral - but an I want what I want and I want it now moral issue. You have sold the world the American dream yet for huge numbers of people in your own country this dream is unattainable and just drives envy, which drives crime, which drives fear - that's a bad cycle to be on and you're spiralling out of controll!
Here in England we aspire to be American and hold it's values and we are heading along the same path, only here we don't blame the mammory gland for this. We blame greed. Well done Janet, you got the publicity you saught so ravenously, enjoying the ride Justin?
RE: nice cup reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2004 1:55 AM
How many Americans actually take the time to study the communist manifesto? What have you Americans ever added to truly great political debate? The world is full of great thinkers with great ideologies and what do we get from the Americans? COMMIE BASTARDS? Yeah why don't we just blow JJ up for the big flash, bang and awe the US way! we'll show anyone who doesn't think like all 260 million of us. Start studying political theory before adding you well rounded argument "commie bastards", you don't have to agree with it but at least show that you know what hell you are talking about. silly twat.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2004 2:10 AM
I am not a church goer at all, but I think all those decrying an entity that was a creator should just hod back a little. Just because the churches have corrupted God and the Bible doesn't automatically lead to the logic that there is no God.
More and more members of the scientific community are begining to voice thier opinion that there may be a creator after all. As they answer more question they actually raise even more that lead them to question thier beliefs.
If you don't beleive in the churches vision of god then don't go to church, however don't assume that ther isn't a God just because it offends your lifestyle - And remember the simple law of energy - ENERGY NEVER DIES IT SIMPLY TRANSFORMS. I don't go to church and I don't affiliate with any church whatsoever but I do beleive in God.
And what this has to do with a female gland I don't know.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2004 2:15 AM
So no one needs to go to church on Sunday as this is simply a misinterpritation of what was actually meant. I can go once in an Era, that's okk with me. Lets not forget the thousands of scriptures that don't fit into the propoganda of the bible, you know the one's that are locked away by the churches o we cannot have access to them and think for ourselves - beleive in God but not in religeon.
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2004 3:48 AM
Better to see Boob than violens in tv, don`t you think ;)
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2004 3:55 AM
GOD DIDN`T CREATE SHIT
TRY TO UNDERSTAND THIS.
What I Can't Figure Out Is... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2004 5:32 AM
...how, exactly, Justin Timberlake has managed to become so well connected, and so "well-liked" by so many of his fellow artists in the music industry (artists with such diverse musical styles)? If anyone watched the Grammy's on Sunday, did it seem like Justin was everywhere? He won for "Best Male Pop Singer", he performed alone, I think he sang with some piano playing great (can't remember who), he played piano and sang with master trumpeter Arturo Sandoval, and he even sang back-up with the Black Eyed Peas. The boy must be extremely talented, (guess I missed the N-Sync train), but why does it seem that so many different people, rappers, R&B;, rock/pop, & jazz artists, just can't wait to partner up with an ex "Boy Band" lead singer? And, if that isn't enough, the guy almost started crying when he got Punk'd by Ashton Kutcher!
Oh, yea! This is about Janet Jackson!
Well, there's one good thing that I got out of this whole Superbowl "World Crisis", and that is, that until then, I was convinced that Janet and Michael were really the same person! Think about it. Have you ever seen the two of them together at any event?
And, I do have one last
Question for ya'all: What's worse - hiring Michael Irvin as one of the 4 on-air, play-by-play sportcasters
for the Superbowl, or Janet's ten second
long "National Geographic Cover" momement?
ANSWER: Who cares?!!
So What? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2004 6:12 AM
Janett showed a breast for a few seconds, I can simply not imagine how this should realy hurt someone. Perhaps you don't like it, well there is a lot more I don't like, and in the end a female breast is something completely natural.
On the other side we don't care about violence in the news.
For some people it might be tasteless, I have seen nicer breasts, but the jewellery was nice, anyway this does not matter.
We have used a lot of media bandwidth even here in Europe for this incident, and we ignore other much more important problems which will have a greatly bigger impact on the lives of our children. I think here of human cloning, global warming, but also surveillance by the governments (read Orwell 1984 once again!), crime and war.
It was amusing, but no lets get serious again!
RE: So What? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2004 7:52 AM
money in France:
http://cgi.ebay.fr/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item;=2221259673&category;=17360#ebayphotohosting
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2004 9:00 AM
If Janet wont to show her boobs lit her I see nothinh wrong
Boobs are natural reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2004 9:02 AM
If you didn?t suck on a boob when you were less than 2 years old, you?re probably less healthy than someone who did (most of this planet). So almost everyone who reads this has sucked on a boob. What do conservative, puritan Americans have against seeing baby-food organs? Are they really so uptight?? Tell me it isn?t true
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2004 10:20 AM
actually the united states has supported many terrorist states in the past in order to prevent the spread of communism. the united states gave both afghanistan and iraq an arsenal of weapons, which were of course used against us in recent wars.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by SX600 (No Email) on February 13, 2004 11:11 AM
I am so glad you weren't my high school teacher. You are an ignorant moron if you think JJ was a bad thing. Haven't you read the Posts or are you turning your head the other way. Nudity is common in England and France and their rapes / crimes are way lower than ours here in the US.....this is not a blind statement, it is FACT. I hope you teach something like math because if you taught Health I am sure you would censor it when it came to the human anatomy. As other people have already said.....it's a breast, part of the human ANATOMY. Viewing such a thing will not turn you into stone, nor will it condemn you to the pits of hell. Not to mention I have a DVR, we rewound that scene over and over again to see if we saw what we thought we saw. Guess what......even though we own a 50 inch TV we could not determine if her breast was exposed. It's not like the camera crew were zoomed in on her breast and it filled the TV, plus it was only a couple of seconds. The only way we were able to verify was by accessing the internet, there we learned the truth. So get of your high horse as there are more important issues to address than a fuzzy long shot of a woman's natural body part!
RE: Kids reply
Posted by SX600 (No Email) on February 13, 2004 11:15 AM
By the way.....Prime Time TV ends at 9pm.....the halftime show was on past 9 so your kids should have been in bed....idiot!
RE: Kids reply
Posted by SX600 (No Email) on February 13, 2004 11:41 AM
By the way A random shemp, I just noticed you are about 80% of these postings. In some postings you are for Janet, in others you are against Janet. Obviously you have some sort of multiple personality disorder and too much time on your hands which should be addressed. I would suggest you seek professional help asap before you become a danger to yourself as well as others.
RE: Kids reply
Posted by SX600 (No Email) on February 13, 2004 11:51 AM
PLUS, you are answering your posts and fighting with your posts.....that is a really scary thing....GET HELP NOW SHEMP because you are a RAVING LUNATIC!
RE: What I Can't Figure Out Is... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2004 12:08 PM
You're a dumbass. I can't believe you actually think they are the same person. Yes, I have seen them together, I was watching Entertainment Tonight, and I saw them both in court when Michael was accused of fucking little kids.
RE: this shouldn't be a big deal reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2004 12:10 PM
you obviously dont know what the fuck you are talking about
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2004 1:20 PM
homo
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2004 2:06 PM
looks good. thanks janet
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2004 2:21 PM
Amen! I couldnt of said that better myself!
not a big deal! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2004 2:51 PM
I live in france and this sure doesnt mean anyhting here. go to the beach if you want to see some tits! she did it for puplicity and its pretty obvious it was on purpos, did she rush to cover it up or anything? FORGET IT and GET OVER IT! who cares kids see their mothers tits when they ARE BORN whats the big deal kids wouldnt even think anything of it!
Who Care's Anywho? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2004 4:45 PM
Come on people, Justin Timberlake is a horny little bastard, so what can we say? And I think that we should have seen the other one too!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2004 6:26 PM
IF U THINK JANET IS NOT FINE U MUST BE A FAG
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2004 8:36 PM
I AINT NO FAG
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 14, 2004 2:06 AM
Everybody should get over this trash it wasn't jenets fualt so stop blaming her.
Conan the Barbarian reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 14, 2004 2:43 AM
What's more offensive - A puppet calling Canadians gay queers, or Janet flaunting her boob?
bum love reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 14, 2004 3:06 AM
you all like bum love
RE: bum love reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 14, 2004 3:07 AM
i would agree. whats wrong with these people? they do all like bumlove!!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 14, 2004 4:13 AM
You Americans are sick. I mean it, realy big-time sick. A female boob is a female boob is a female boob. Nothing more. C'mon, U are starting a discussion on moral decay, God and racism out of a showbiz whim. Showbusiness is meant to be provocative. They got you!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 14, 2004 10:05 AM
you just hating on janet with real boobs she's pretty attractive and has millions of dollars how much do youall who is hating on her has? ZERO!
youall know you want janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 14, 2004 10:10 AM
Straight girls wants her gay guys also wants her married white women wants her and married white men wish they can have her Dang i'm not a lesbian but i wish i could meet her duh she is just too talented
RE: Re:janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 14, 2004 12:09 PM
they are makin toooo much of this situation. janet doesnt deserve all of this. i have witnessed way more on tv. they weren't sayin all of this when britney and madonna kissed?!?!?! so they should just shut up and deal. life moves on!!!!
HEY, I LIKED IT... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 14, 2004 12:53 PM
It would'nt hurt if Britney or JLo did something like that once in a while...Right??!!
JANET'S NEED FOR ATTENTION reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 14, 2004 1:09 PM
If Janet Jackson needs the attention so much and if the perverts need to see this kind of entertainment, let them go to a strip club. We were watching THE SUPER BOWL, not a porno movie. We have the right to choose what we want to watch. We have a right what we want our children to watch. This was the most childlike action I have seen . I think she should be held accountable for her lack of taste, as should Justin. The comments are right, Michael isn't the only wacko Jackson.
what's next?
RE: Re:YOUR STUPID COMMENT reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 14, 2004 1:36 PM
YOUR SIX YEAR OLD SHOULD HAVE BEEN WATCHING SPONGE BOB INSTEAD OF THE SUPERBOWL WHILE U AND YOUR FRIENDS SAT THERE DRINKING AND PROBABLY CURSINE IN FRONT OF THEM. GET A LIFE GO DOWN TO THE LOCAL STRIP CLUB ON AMETURE NIGHT AND GROW A SET
RE: Re:YOUR STUPID COMMENT reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 14, 2004 1:50 PM
REALIZE THIS YOUR KIDS ARE NOT THE ANGELS U THINK THEY ARE AND IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH JANETS RIGHT TIT. WHEN YOUR NOT AROUND YOUR KIDS LOOK AT YOUR OLD MANS PORN STASH. TRUST ME JANETS TIT WAS NOT THE FIRST TIT THEY SAW AND IT WONT BE THE LAST
? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 14, 2004 1:54 PM
What porno movie?
what boob? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 14, 2004 6:43 PM
Would a gay queer be stright?
I like bum love..I love my wifes bum..whats wrong with that?
I also live in the UK and would like to know why...when someone in the US gets shot you say nothing or very little...but JJ shows part of a boob and the US is up in arms? Intresting that..sort of says something about the US people....
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 15, 2004 12:26 AM
janet is fuckin hotr and i would fuck her in the ass. and that is know lie look at her she is so fine
RE: ?janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 15, 2004 6:22 AM
every man know they love you janet unless their gay.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 15, 2004 6:43 AM
WHITES NEONAZIS HAS BLACK BUTT HOLES KNOW WHY?......
BLACK FUCK 'EM ALL TH TIME
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 15, 2004 7:19 AM
i am more offended that Justin Timberlak performed at the superbowl that the fact that Janets tit was bared.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 15, 2004 7:22 AM
i am more offended that Justin Timberlake performed at the superbowl that the fact that Janets tit was bared.
Fuck all of you shit hole suckers reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 15, 2004 4:09 PM
fuck everyone who believes this is a big deal.
f
fu
fuc
fuck
fuck a
fuck al
fuck all
fuck all o
fuck all of
fuck all of y
fuck all of yo
fuck all of you
shit sucking quires who are acting offended about this shit.
Its a fucking tit, yeah i'd fuck her, but this shit is nothin compared to da shit i've seen in my life.
fuck all of the shit suckers.
RE: Fuck all of you shit hole suckers reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 15, 2004 6:50 PM
u mean uve seen better things in ur life?
like ur mum 4 instance!
god,get a life, nerdy loser geek!
RE: F*** all of you s*** hole suckers reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2004 10:14 AM
"get a life"
hum, sounds like you are jealous of my superiority as a living carbon based life form, please don't tell me to get a life, I have a life, I cannot get one.
Do not ever correct me again, ass licker.
So why don't you post your opinion of the matter, what you think she is evil for this, I think not, nut brain.
And if you think i'm stupid for using colorful metaphores and sadistic comments towards stupid people, well you are very wrong. I use them, because I feel , people only listen if you are an asshole about it.
So before you start shittin around with me, learn to shut the fuck up.
Also remember, the comments were only casted towards people who thaught this was a bad thing.
Good luck in
life, I will
not be posting
here anymore.
Your Friend,
Alexander Lawson
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2004 11:22 AM
i am not an african american but i can surely tell you tou fuck you, damn-stil in the closet-faggot undenied-sucker that thinks that is better than others just -cause your stepdad wnet into your bed whn you were 8, so fouck yourself homo
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2004 2:18 PM
This is not porn. I seen porn. Its Mrs. Jackson if ya nasty!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2004 3:27 PM
i agree to the fullest
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2004 4:03 PM
You must be gay or lesbian? Lesbians are usually attracted to WOMEN that is why they are lesbians? Further more what does race have to do with anything? The music industry has gone into trend of shocking viewers and potential consumers to persuade them into buying albums..... I think the whole thing classless. Hot or not, what ever happenend to musical content?
RE: Re:Nazi comments reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2004 4:06 PM
If you are so superior why don't you know how to articulate your thoughts???? so much for white supremacy..... losers
RE: youall know you want janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2004 4:10 PM
Are you even speaking English?
RE: Re:N-words are sick reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2004 4:17 PM
Again with the racism, people such as yourself need to figure out where all of your hostile feelings towards people are coming from. Maybe you feel inferior and use the reverse attitude to hide your insecurities. Maybe you weren't given the chance to form your own your ideals because you've been brain washed by other peoples opinions from a very young age if either are the case I think your the one who is sick.... ever thought about reprogramming?
RE: Re:burning balls reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2004 4:22 PM
you should get that checked I don't think it's janet....I think it's an S.T.D
RE: Re: propoganda reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2004 5:49 PM
What in the world are you talking about? Children killing children with semi-automatics? These acts of violence are a huge problem in the american society, but what of the child soldier who is forced to fight because of foriegn policies. I am sorry that you were beaten by nuns , however you cannot draw any conclusions on the superbowl peep show by using the death of two thousand people on sept. 11th, to say that your society is deteriorating. To say that the suicides of the two taliban extremist were based on the Islamic religion is a fallacy, you have been terribly misinformed.These people died because the americans have a foreign policy that leaves millions of children and poor families starving. The policies of the american government propegate war between neighbouring countries who are trying to monopolize resources so that they can be higher up on the capatalist ladder - in other words I'd rather your country starve then mine. I am not a muslim but I can understand the desparation that people in the middle east must be forced to experience. The Two thousand deaths that americans have seen are no where near the millions of people- Arabs and isreali to name a few ethnic groups - who are now burried in mass graves or under occupation.There are mothers who have watched there sons and husbands executed by gorilla forces and or soldiers.Children motherless and in the case of soldiers fatherless, people including children getting shot in the streets. Americans have a lot of blood on their hands, your country was built on blood and you wonder why your children deviate and kill their parents and peers? look at your leaders and the ideals that keep your government running. vigilante groups such as the KKK and other extremist groups are allowed to flaunt their hatred proudly without being penalized. The oppression of foreign policies that the americans spread across the globe has left many countries war torn and your worried about Janet's boob? This is superficial
RE: Immorality in the Country reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2004 6:11 PM
I agree with you on that they have lost sight of the message and the meaning of Christ - it's sad in the midst of trying to save everyone else christians themselves don't know that they are lost
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2004 6:28 PM
And you call the muslim extremist??? I love god to but the purpose is not to condemn but to model yourself after love like the christ you fanaticize. This is not a dooms day message it's a breast
RE: Re:Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2004 6:35 PM
Hey, in canada women have won the right to walk around topless in the streets- freely so we have no idea what all of the fuss is about??
Northern neighbour
RE: Isn't it really Justin? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2004 6:57 PM
Here, here, beautifully written. Although no one has commented on the propoganda article
RE: typical America reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2004 7:01 PM
your ignorance baffles me !!! america is so great tell that to the orphans
RE: Muck Muck reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2004 7:04 PM
your just as bad hun what of the kkk hatred and ignorance need to die then the world would be a better place
RE: F*** all of you s*** hole suckers reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2004 7:23 PM
hahahahaha
omg, u are one big nerd!
im just here waiting 4 my girl 2 pick me up to go and watch a movie!
im just here to piss u off!
get a life. as in, get friends,a gf and a job!
god,u sound like a geek!
im defending everyone here cuz dis guys gonna blow up soon. (not literally!)
so when i say get a life, i mean GET A LIFE! instead of typing all day!
that damn jackson thing reply
Posted by Shavpookie (No Email) on February 16, 2004 8:39 PM
Mine God! the first time I've seen this thing. Was expecting a star but looks more like a Brog infection,please call Captain Picard!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2004 9:16 PM
Janet doesn't look anything like Michael. And if you think she does, then I question your vision and your sexual preference.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2004 9:24 PM
Not offended!! After the "Superbowl" they aired "Survivor". I had not seen to many show of this. I again was not offened when the guy Richard stripped naked doring one of the games. They had control over this but did not have control over the Janet flash. That's why CBS is pissed off. No control!!
janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2004 9:37 PM
Oh my god, people it isnt a big deal, and no one should be making it a big deal, a boob is a boob, most people have them! and you see them in the movies all the time they are everywhere, stop talking shit all the time. and GET OVER IT!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2004 9:43 PM
Uneducated, not only shows with those comments, but also with your spelling and grammer. Racism is too easy to fall back on. That was not about race when I happened. If it were you could easily say, "A white guy trying to rape a black woman on stage." This was plained together by the two of them, both black and white. No racial facture.
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2004 10:25 PM
I have an eight year old son, nine year old daughter. All watching the game. When the flash came up, I was not sure myself and had a Tvo rewind moment. Asked them to leave the room. I found out it was true she did flash the camera. I call to let them know they could return. And they stayed in their rooms. I continued through the end of the game. And went to check on them. I found they were both online with better video's and photo's than were showed on t.v. I want to know how they learned this. Both said for school. Everytime they tell us in school not to do it. Everyone would do it at home to find out why they are telling us not to do it. So if you don't think your kids are, think again. P.S. Both "A" students. Sex and nudiy have not worped their minds. Maybe that will happen in they teen years. But now I know and hopefully I can keep their mind in the books, as they get to they teen years. Good luck with your kids, I believe mine are not so fragile now. I also believe this has strengthened my family because I found out that they are well aware of sex nudity. And they way they sat down and talked to me about this, I trust them more and I talk more.
RE: Perverts reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2004 11:02 PM
I have an eight year old son, and a nine year old daughter, all watching the game. When the flash came up, I was not sure myself and had a Tvo rewind moment. Asked them to leave the room. I found out it was true. She did flash the camera. I call to let them, to let them know they could return. But they stayed in their rooms. I continued through the end of the game. I went to check on them. I found they were both in they rooms online with better videos and photos than were shown on t.v. I want to know how they learned this. Both said for school. Every time they tell us in school not to do it. Everyone would do it at home to find out why they are telling us not to do it. So if you don't think your kids are, think again. P.S. Both "A" students. Sex and nudity have not warped their minds. Perhaps that will happen in they teen years. But now I know now, and hopefully I can keep their mind in the books, as they get to they teen years. Good luck with your kids, I believe mine are not so fragile now. I also believe this has strengthened my family because I found out that they are well aware of sex and nudity. And the way they sat down and talked to me about this, I trust them more now, and I talk more.
RE: Re:JJ reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 17, 2004 1:57 AM
This is so sad... we have a frickin catholic preaching retard trying to make a connection between public nudity and high school shootings. You must be one of those people who have never been outside this "immoral country" of yours and seen the rest of the world. For example, if you went to any place in Europe you would realize that nudity on public television is more accepted by the masses. At the same time, average murder rates in Europe are close to 1/60 of those in the United States. Finally, you should have realized a long time ago that football is for rednecks, and in general public television is for idiots, so instead of complaining about how your kids were flashed for a mere second suggest that your kids read a book you goddamn turrrd.
RE: plan ahead reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 17, 2004 2:15 AM
This is in regards to "as seen through the eyes of Hollywood (mostly commie bastards)." You dumb, ignorant mothafucka... if the US were communist today more than 70% of its population would currently be more wealthier. I hate when retards blaim communists for their own retarded society.
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 17, 2004 12:24 PM
whats wrong with violens ... i love music
RE: big deal reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 17, 2004 12:28 PM
that is exactly it...you are bang on the point
RE: plan ahead reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 17, 2004 12:31 PM
your grammar and your spelling sucks
RE: Kids reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 17, 2004 12:35 PM
EXACTLY!
RE: Kids reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 17, 2004 12:44 PM
you know, that is an excellent point. I saw the incident on the news after the fact, and i also thought that she had some sort of material on her breast. it only came to my attention that it was actually her breast when the news played it constantly for a week after, and i had gotten a chance to get a good look at it. and thats the only reason how i knew, because ppl go on about it. i had thought that it was just part of the song (which is all it was), like a move or something..you ppl make too big a deal outta this
you all stupid reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 17, 2004 3:06 PM
anyone, including me, that would be spending time here talking about this shit are all stupid, and yes I meen myself to.lol
its a tit, everyone has seen them.
men and women have em, just women's poke out a little.
so get over it.
janet jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 17, 2004 6:28 PM
how could she let justin timberlake do that ? thats just aweful ! but i gotta comment janet on her breasts ! heyell yeeeaaaaaaaaahubba hubba hubba
Have you ever seen a breast? reply
Posted by Skullfire (hulacete@ubbi.com) on February 17, 2004 7:19 PM
What if it was both boobs? Will you guys register a site just for them?
www.janetboob.com
"Greatest forum ever"
Gay Marriage reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 17, 2004 11:48 PM
What God has put together; let no man (gay or straight)put asunder.
nice tity for hosea williams reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 18, 2004 12:05 PM
I love you Janet you are so Sexy holla at me 6'2 210lbs black n puerto rican light skin sex machine 804--306--7821
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 18, 2004 3:56 PM
i say it was all a freakin flook cause then she would't of had that star on her boob.
Bitch reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 18, 2004 11:30 PM
Janet jackson is so fucking ugly, I hate her face, I think her face is just as ugly as michael jacksons face is. I swear to god you have to be messesd up to think she is Hot. She is one ugly *n-word*
? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 19, 2004 4:29 AM
You mean n!gger?
it dont matter today! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 19, 2004 1:14 PM
calls us nigros and see if we care.it dont bug me one bit.and i think janets boobs r great lookin!
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 19, 2004 2:39 PM
well you are a fuckin bastard
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 19, 2004 5:33 PM
Just a little note -
Friends of mine of African descent who aren't from the US get kind of offended when people call them African Americans. It's not worth it to reply to someone using racial slurs, because it's generally pretty obvious that they're not too high on the intellectual food chain. Responding just seems to agitate them more.
Regarding Ms. Jackson, well, she's a striking woman and has done a magnificent job of stirring people from their apathy. She probably also caused parents to chat more with their children, which is never a bad thing. Just my two cents...
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 19, 2004 7:26 PM
Yeah, sure, I read the posts, but if "JJ was not such a bad thing" and those who oppose are "ignorant morons" then why the uproar? (moron!). One thing's certain, whomever your high School teacher was, they must have forgotten to teach you the difference between ANATOMY and decency. Your likeness, the human anal sphincter, is a part of the anatomy shared by all: does that mean we show it in public or on public TV? (Actually, you show it on internet chat forums...but that's you...) How about genitals? Everybody's got 'em, why not show 'em? That's your argument! You see, it's about the dumbing down of morality; the air of permissiveness that seems to permeate everything in the media. We're all made from the very natural act of procreation. It's a beautiful thing, and a miracle in itself, but do you want that on public TV? That's the point. It's not just a "boob shot" (you boob!) it's the attitude that says we should accept it that is wrong. It's an awfully slippery slope. What's next, a penis shot from Kid Rock?
For those of us who found it offensive, we're allowed to be offended and voice our opinion as such, just as so many in society are offended by Religion, comments, etc. When you defend something that you had nothing to do with so fervently, you not only condone, but you remind us that the truth hurts (you) and that misery loves company: you're morality has gone to Hell, so you voice your support for others when theirs has too! (Kind of like not wanting to drink alone..) So go to work tomorrow with your breast out if you think it's so great, and see how long you keep your job, unless you're a stripper...or a hooker...or you work for one...
RE: typical America reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 19, 2004 7:44 PM
Orphans? Which ones: the orphans from 9/11 or from the soldiers that died on foreign soil protecting someone elses rights and freedoms?
If we have so many "orphans" here, then why do so many Americans spend 10's of thousands of $$ to apopt orphans from Russia, China, Czechoslovakia, etc.? Their orphans are treated so poorly that they cannot walk at 18 months and have never seen a toy (I have had three close friend apopt orphans from each of those countries, so I know this to be fact.)
You just better be careful, Euro-trash, because the next time you need aid, protection, money, or political assylum, the good ol' US of A might just reward your kind words with a hearty one-fingered salute! As for us, the rest of the world has proven time and again that they don't have the resources, nor the balls, to help the US when we need it, so why even bother with you.
RE: typical America reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 19, 2004 7:54 PM
Yeah! And when was the last time you saw people die from a riot at a football game? Happens all the time at soccer games in those "oh-so civilized because we allow frontal nudity" Euro-trash countries! Soccer's not a bad sport, if you're a skinny, short little pecker whose so afraid of being hit that you spend the entire game running away from people. That's why my daughters play it, and not football. (Actually, they're neither skinny, short, nor little peckers, but I don't want them to get injured, so they play...soccer! my son plays football.)
RE: Janet Jackson's boob reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 19, 2004 7:57 PM
yah, and stinky BO too! European hairy pits with big American cig on lip, and bad teeth, and BO. Blah! No wonder they like JJ tit so much.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 19, 2004 10:08 PM
Why aren't dinosoars mentioned in the bible? Perhaps it's because these prehistoric creatures were extinct! Only fossilized bones remain, and often hidden underground! The fellas who wrote the bible studied mostly religion, not archeology, and so they had no knowledge of these great beasts! Which brings me back to Janet Jackson, she had full knowledge of the bare breast that lay hidden behind her tear- away bra because she studies entertainment!
FINAL NOTICE reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 19, 2004 11:17 PM
Due to the on-going profanity and abuse of this chat line, no further messages will be posted. This webpage is now officially closed. You are the weakest link - Goodbye!
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 20, 2004 11:37 AM
ohhhh les pauvres petits americains ! ils sont choqu?, ils ont vue un sein ... c'est pas eux qui nous ont pondue les britney ,Xtina ,Jlo et autre pouf et maintenant ils se plaignent pour leur petite anet qui fait des siennes...
Notice he DOESNT LOOk reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 20, 2004 3:34 PM
look at the video justin notice right when he rips off he fucking looks away hmm waht does that tell us HES A COCK-SUCKER
Notice he DOESNT LOOk reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 20, 2004 3:34 PM
look at the video justin notice right when he rips off he fucking looks away hmm waht does that tell us HES A COCK-SUCKER
RE: Re:janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 21, 2004 8:27 AM
janet does not deserve this ur right they don't say anything about lil'kim
Janet is Innocent reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 21, 2004 9:29 AM
For all u people that really think that an Icon like Janet would humilate herself like that are wrong. And why is all the spotlite on Janet Justin is the one that pulled her shirt off. It isnt right especially if she is getting all of the blame when people like Christina Aguleria and Britney Spears dress half naked or when they both kissed Madonna its okay but a accident like Janets was a mistake.. SO GET OVER IT!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 21, 2004 9:33 AM
What is this world coming to? What kind of question is that you act like its okay for Madonna to kiss 2 girls on stage..or for Xtina and Britt to walk on stage half naked because they think its cute..Heres somethin got think about its was a ccident why would she do somethubg like that on purpse.. Its coomon sense!
RE: Re:JJ reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 21, 2004 9:45 AM
Hey "sad", not only do my kids read, they are in the gifted program, have won the citizenship award many times, and are on the top of the advanced reader list, averaging over 1000 minutes each per month. Before you go spewing trash, and cuss words, get the facts.
P.S. If football was "just for rednecks" then every major university (Ivy League included) wouldn't have a football team! (you know, what's really sad is that when someone expresses their opinion, and it differs from yours, you have to resort to name calling and stereotypes. That's a sure sign of diminished mental capacity,... and having lost the argument.
RE: Janet is Innocent reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 21, 2004 10:00 AM
Zymergy.
(I wanted to get the last word.)
P.S. Look it up....
RE: offended? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 21, 2004 11:56 AM
to be frank, I was not offended by this, or britney's kiss or just about anything that adds to the conglomeration of whatever it is that refines, or defines the image of a public image, regardless of who it belongs to. being a canadian resident, and visiting many of canada's beaches (where toplessness is legal), we see breasts often. it's not a big deal. femininity is a beautiful thing, but should not be exploited to such an extent. desensitization has taken it's place, replacing leagues of tradition with what seems to be a new thing... well, it's not, and people are going to have to get over it.
Janets Boob reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 21, 2004 1:15 PM
I think she is beautiful.. (I am white)
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 22, 2004 12:33 AM
"n-word"? OOOOOOOOO! big tough guys. if you have something to say, then say it you chickenshits! you are on-line! nobody's gonna get you! if you're lucky you dumbshits! and for you other racist, learn how to spell. *n-word* has two g's you ididots! oh, by the way, i'm white just to piss you all off some more!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 22, 2004 12:37 AM
ok so my first time on here and it wont print the "n-word" spelled correctly. anyway youre still DUMBSHITS! it'll print that!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 22, 2004 12:42 AM
THAT SEEMS LIKE A LITTLE CENSORSHIP DOESNT IT. BESIDES, I THINK WE ALL KNOW WHAT IS MEANT WHEN IT SAYS "N-WORD". I DONT THINK THAT PUTTING IT IN THAT FORM MAKES IT ANY LESS OFFENSIVE IF ITS CONTEXT IS OFFENSIVE.
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 22, 2004 12:24 PM
You think breastfeeding babies are scarred for life??
Do you think children who are brought up in cultures where nudity is a fact of life are somehow turned into crazed lunatics?
This is NOT porn. Porn involves people having sex. Suggestive - yes; provocative - yes; but not porn.
I would rather my kids have watched this than a TV killing ANY day.
Here's a question: for those that were offended (probably not here, as the image is scrolling at the top) were they offended by the broken bones on the football field? Were they offended that a drunk driver killed a person and injured several others in the Super Bowl parking lot that same day? Do you know the dead mans name? No? Do you know what kind of nipple piercing Janet was wearing?
Get
Over
It.
janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 22, 2004 4:00 PM
i like boobs but janet looks kinda ugly
janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 22, 2004 4:00 PM
i like boobs but janet looks kinda ugly
RE: Apple & Bare Breast reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 22, 2004 8:20 PM
That might be the funniest thing I have read in the last year. And I agree.
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 22, 2004 10:00 PM
I agree 100 percent. Such a brief exposure of nudity should not shock anyone. Anyone who is shocked by it probably has some issues to work through. Anyone who would label something like this as "pornography" needs to take a moment to look up the word in the dictionary. I certainly don't think I'm engaging in a pornographic act everytime I take a shower, nor am I engaging in child pornography if I change my baby's diapers with my eyes open. We all experience some form of nudity on a regular basis. It's perverted to suggest that there's anything nasty or unnatural about it!
Come on! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 23, 2004 3:18 AM
Come on guys, we're almost up to 1000 posts, don't slow down now! I'll get us back on track: Janet's boob flash is directly responsible for 9/11 and Vietnam.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 23, 2004 7:17 AM
stop hatting. u know u want a bite that..hummm
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 23, 2004 7:23 AM
sooner or later ur kids well do something bad. no one is perfect. u know what teen go through (sex and other stuff) so if they saw janet boob. u should talk to them about it. u don't have to ruin a childs life because of something they didn't do. and kids learn alot of things at school. and there is nothing no one can do about it... sorry that is life..
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 23, 2004 7:28 AM
finally someone is thinking straight. read the artical on top of my thing
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 23, 2004 7:41 AM
Heh heh
Vice ass stupid american, go to churc`s and pray that god won`t punish you for being asshole.
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 24, 2004 4:29 AM
ur a looser
BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 24, 2004 6:35 PM
MY PENIS LOOKS MORE LIKE A BOOB!
yea! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 25, 2004 7:09 AM
That's the spirit!
coolguy reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 27, 2004 10:56 AM
It was fucking good i loved it
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 29, 2004 12:26 PM
It's spelled grammar.
peek-a-boo/janet jackson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 1, 2004 12:29 PM
I do belive it was a accident, she is avery private person unlike her brother.so she made mistake.Jastin was as much to blame as Janet
but did he get kick of the grammy?noooooo that
a man
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 1, 2004 5:07 PM
i like your tits
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 1, 2004 5:08 PM
show me more breasts
AMERICANS reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 1, 2004 8:42 PM
I read all these and then they tell me "dont make fun of them, its not their fault, they have room temperature IQ". You started from a boob, then went over to religion, then to 11/Dec, then about values, then even teachers(my ass) jumped in the discussion. You dont even know why exhbition of boobs, genitals, etc are considered wrong and immoral blah blah. Yes your cable TV has boobs and dicks floating in your screen but then... what the fuck? Why cant we find the reason that out society is so fucked up? A lot of controversies in your arguments and little enlightment. You wanna find out y you have the highest crime rate? You wanna find out y you have so many perverts? Y you make wars all the time, and your President convinces you that you "fight for freedom"(by dropping bombs and killin innocents)? Its so fucking SIMPLE!!! Leave religions aside, if you make any research anyway, u ll find that all of them are the same shit. What might enlighten you is a)Read some (un)biased American history b) Watch "Bowling for Columbine" by Michael Moore a true American(a patriot as you, americans, like this word). Then come back, since u ll have done your homework and discuss again.
P.S. I m not a muslim just christian(orthodox), and I am not proud for anything I did not choose to be.
P.S.1 Have nothin against americans per se, only their moronic govmt.
P.S.2 Watch "Bowling for columbine" and see why the rest of the world questions the IQ of American people.
P.S.3 Flame me but prepare for not gettin a responce
my english suck!
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 1, 2004 10:19 PM
er...don't you mean that you are euro-american or are you just a blobby white person with no heritage?if you are going to use that term for black people then at least be equal about it with whites...
Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 2, 2004 5:10 AM
Yes it certainly does.
good lord reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 2, 2004 2:48 PM
I managed to get through only a small part of this absurdly long "discussion" and I can only say that each and everyone of you would benefit from getting a life. I mean, come on, listen to yourselves. The idiots, the racists, the incompetent, the religious fanatics....what is going on here? Close your browser, pull your computer's plug, and leave the house. Please, for the good of society. If you choose not to do so, then I only hope that natural selection takes care of you and your offspring.
AMERICAN POWER reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 2, 2004 9:37 PM
So what do you propose the United States governement be like? A monarchy? Communist? Democracy is the way we live and feel secure. Crime rates will exist no matter where you're from.
I do not feel that Janet Jackson's boob has anything to do with our government nor religions.
RE: good lord reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 2, 2004 11:52 PM
three people did most of the postings, they don't speak for everyone.
... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 3, 2004 8:42 AM
And anyone who uses the phrase 'get a life' should definately get a life.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 3, 2004 8:55 AM
hello I like to play zombiemud
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 4, 2004 7:40 AM
Does anyone really know what NAACP stands for?
It stands for "*n-word*s aren't always colored people."
Think about it.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 4, 2004 7:47 AM
I agree that Janet looks nothing like Michael,,,Michael looks more like Latoya.
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 4, 2004 4:57 PM
CANI SEE IT AGAIN?
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 4, 2004 5:00 PM
FOR THE PERSON WITH THE " KIDS" ITS YOUR FAULT FOR LETTING THEM WATCH THE SUPERBOWL.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 8, 2004 2:08 AM
Seeing Janet's Boob makes me sick.
Can I SUE ???
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 8, 2004 2:19 AM
Seeing Janet's boob makes me SICK. Can I SUE ??? Where's the F*CKIGN LAWYER that can help me.
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 8, 2004 7:52 AM
Most people missed the whole thing and if the media had not made a big deal out of it ,it would have never gottten blown out of control.Lets move because time delay will assure that it want happen again.
Hey Loser! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 9, 2004 7:53 PM
Three cheers for misspelling definitely. That was a fairly short post...would it have been so difficult to not make an error in that one short sentence? You do make a compelling point about the overused phrase "get a life". Perhaps it would have been more effective if you had not, say, continued on to use the phrase yourself? You could have said "And anyone who uses the phrase 'get a life' should defin[I]tely [get out more]/[reevaluate their use of the English language]/[think before they speak]." But no, you, the smartest person alive, chose to reuse the same phrase you were condemning. Congratulations, you are my new favorite dipshit.
Here comes Captain sarcasm reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 11, 2004 4:06 AM
That's you're big come back? "You misspelt a word!" Why are you so uptight about one little word being spelt wrong? Why don't you just 'get-a-life?'
Oh, and you're a gaylord too.
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 11, 2004 4:36 AM
now that's just freakin' stupid. "I think you must be gay or lesbian if you think janet is not attractive" I'll start by saying yes, I think Janet is freakin hot, and I am certainly not complaining about seeing her breast on TV (except that is was for so short a time) but here's why your statement is stupid. First, not everybody has the same opinions about who is attractive and who isn't. I think Drew Barrymore is one of the most beautiful women there is, but alot of people disagree with me, but I don't think they're gay for it. Second, "must be gay or LESBIAN"???? Do you even know what that word means, it means, in shortened terms, chicks who dig chicks, last I checked, Janet was a chick, so, how would a chick not digging Janet make them a lesbian, if anything, a chick digging Janet would make that so.
Finish Junior High before you make any more posts... please
RE: Here comes Captain sarcasm reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 13, 2004 3:15 PM
r u all enjoyig urselfs?
RE: Re: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 14, 2004 12:00 AM
yeah
RE: Here comes Captain Sarcasm reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 15, 2004 8:22 AM
Yes, Very much so.
lol reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 16, 2004 8:09 PM
hey, im here 2 piss the guy callin the other guy gaylord off
Scribe take it serious, various artist delirious, suffering from a lack of hearing us. Got my rhythm sussed for those who don't give a fuck, I do, and my whole crew is out to get you, and wreck you, disrespect you, disconnect you, left in seperate components in a state to complex to, ever step to what I consider intellectual, fuck you, wack rappers always sounding sexual. I rock, acapella, beat box, instrumental, when in your mental, I invade like oriental, move with ninja steps, online like internet, the phunkrepublic, hiphop, I'm loving it.
i rapped from 2001, my story's just begun, uh, You never hung in the streets where I'm from, We get ill with the lyrical, rela- individual, Every syllable, every metaphorical visual.
Scribe original next level shit for you to listen to, lyricism is vision, what I'm spitting is peripheral. Not the stereotypical type of individual, 8 bars, 8 flows, suppose I had tentacles. Rip the mic like I'm meant to do, come off like Imperial Mint fresh, my aerial view keeping me ahead of you, instead of you they're picking the Scribe, live, incredible, unforgettably phat, yo suckers looking edible.
You ain't got the feel, your shit just don't appeal, to the underground, had to be feeling when it's real, so [why's if he Scribe survives???], check it, are we live? Put me on your tape, I'll take a minute just devour. Off my mic, I like to ignite, philosophy, you're dead like old battery, naturally, I disagree with the purpose of your whole anatomy, had to be, want to battle me, come in packs of three, you can witness first hand my style, stabbing you rapidly. Reactively we, break MCs from Anthony to Zachary, and if you're not backing me, you're lacking me, constantly distracting me, trying to cause anarchy in my faculty, got beef? I eat it like pork, snap it like crackling. Picture like curves, you won't even know whats be happening, rhyme reflect reality, some MCs still imagining, so don't blame me why your style never changed, I stayed dope, lyically killing the cells in your brain.
huh? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 18, 2004 4:46 AM
Who R U here 2 piss off? And what was with all that other stuff?
RE: huh? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 18, 2004 7:02 PM
im here to piss off da retard thats mockin u
? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 23, 2004 7:33 AM
Why?
RE: ? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 26, 2004 2:55 PM
because its fun
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 6:40 PM
i dont no what ur problem is. janet is soo hot and i would fuck her on the spot. better let the kids no that stuff now better then later. i say. let the kids get laid and let them live there own lives
RE: Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 30, 2004 12:16 PM
Ok, if you say so. How old are you?
RE: get over it reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 31, 2004 11:44 PM
After sifting through post after post for 2 and a half hours, I finally know who actually won!
I am a die-hard cowboys fan, ever since they won XXX (no pun intended) - If they ain't playing, I ain't watching...
My only question now is, "who was the big loser?"
My 2 Cents on this issue... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 1:14 AM
Let me put my two cents in...
I have come to the conclusion that I am very offended at what actually HAPPENED, not what people saw. Justin Timberlake is a horny, selfish, insensitive scum of a man. First off, he breaks open Britney Spears, and then brags about it on national TV (I first learned of this through a mutual contact, whose identity will remain strictly confidential). Now, he pulls this other media stunt, by going up on stage and deliberately snatching off a portion of Janet's garb in front of 135 million viewers. For a woman to be publicly chastised and humiliated in the manner that Janet has, is nothing short of having one's reputation RAPED! This is very clearly evident in the distraut look upon Janet's face for the brief few seconds of shock, before she frantically tried to cover herself back up with her hands.
Too late. In the brief ten or fifteen seconds after that had transpired, pics and images of her "magic boob" (as it was referred to in a subsequent issue of "Weekly World News") were already being dispersed and swapped about on the world-wide-web. Her only mistakes were not suing his butt for every single cent he owned, as well as allowing herself into being cohearsed into admitting she was at fault.
And as for the nipple ornamentation: Suppose my wife/girlfriend/fiance were to wear something of that nature underneath her blowse as she went to a job interview, WITH THE INTENT OF SURPRISING ME WITH IT when she got home later that afternoon and peeled off her clothes as she entered the door. If, during the interview, she dropped her pen or something onto the floor, and the Boss-Man got a good eye-full as she leaned over, then does that give him the right to assume that it is his?
ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!
So niether, then does this little nipple ornament give the American Public & Media the right to assume that the scandal was staged, or that it's sole purpose was to provide a focal point for this "dashing" display of flesh (although a close-up Polaroid would make one hell of a conversational piece!). Basically, the truth of the matter is this one little private spot on her nicely-matured body that once belonged only to her is now up for grabs by anyone with an Internet connection. And although I am aware of the fact that she has posed nude before (aka people have already seen it - the one with the two hands grappling her from behind on the "Janet" album is one of my favs), that is a completely different issue entirely: Janet CHOSE to pose because she felt HAPPY & CONFIDENT with her body, however being stripped away as she was brings nothing but HUMILIATION & RIDICULE.
THIS IS WHAT OFFENDS ME: THAT THE MEDIA HAS MADE SUCH A HUGE ORDEAL OVER AN EVENT THAT WAS COMPLETELY OUT OF HER CONTROL. Sometimes it makes me sick the way celebs are exploited - they are human just like us, you know.
I am in no way acting as an attourney, nor am I going to debate this enormous plethera of arguments that has come to transpire as the result of this fairly insignificant issue - people could discuss the various ins & outs of philosophy until Hades freezes over and the Polar Caps melt. I am a non-conformist as well as a born-again believer in CHRIST, and so I do not consider my self bound either by the standards of society nor to the individual practices and customs of organized religion. I am a college student majoring in Art and Engineering, and unlike certain individuals who post on this site, I actually use what I learned in Freshman English.
Have a nice day; please feel free to comment as you see fit.
Hey! reply
Posted by i don t know (direoswald@hotmail.com) on April 1, 2004 11:25 AM
Your just saying that because she's black.
RE: Hey! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 2, 2004 11:09 PM
lol
im 13. im da guy mockin da guy dat was mockin u. wat a long post! dats longer than my ones! u agree aye direoswald?!
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 3, 2004 7:26 AM
zaaalige foto!!! Hier heb ik lang op gewacht, janet's borst(en) bloot.
Mooie tette trouwens, die zou ik wel eens willen bepotelen zu.
huh? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 3, 2004 7:54 AM
Wait, so yur mocking the guy who was mocking the guy who mocked the other guy who called his mom a fat ho?
Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 3, 2004 11:21 AM
Very nice at least I can read your posting.
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 3, 2004 5:15 PM
no, freek
yes i am the guy reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 3, 2004 9:50 PM
yes i am the guy mocking the guy who was mocking the guy who mocked the other guy who called his mom a fat ho.
itss fun.
How much mock could a mock mock mock? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 6, 2004 6:39 AM
But what if the guy who was mocking the guy who mocked the other guy who called his mom a fat ho decided to mock the mocker of the guy who was also mocking the other guy and his mom who's a fat ho and she then decided to mock the mocker of the mocker of the mom?
huh? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 6, 2004 10:03 PM
my head hurts
well... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 7, 2004 10:02 AM
Let me put it another way: How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
RE: well... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 7, 2004 9:00 PM
it still hurts
RE: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 8, 2004 3:53 PM
Lie down for a while.
RE: RE: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 14, 2004 4:42 PM
wat the heck does ne of this have 2 do with her boob. god u all r idiots! and fuckin freaks
RE: Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 15, 2004 3:35 AM
So what does that make you?
RE: Janet reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 20, 2004 3:36 AM
it makes him a lost idiot tryin 2 find a excuse not to shoot himself every morning cuz hes got no friends
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 23, 2004 10:57 PM
I love not only Janet but I love her titi more than anything
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 24, 2004 11:22 AM
yeah i agree
RE: Immorality in the Country reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 15, 2004 12:20 PM
LMAO! Christians are the VAST minority. Believe it. Christians are uniquely talented in the area of utter denial, however, so you probably wouldn't be capable of even perceiving how much of a minority you're in.
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 16, 2004 7:53 PM
she is the sit
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 28, 2004 8:21 PM
it was good
RE: Re:JANET'S BOOB reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 31, 2004 1:40 PM
I want to see it
trel reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 6, 2004 2:20 PM
People need to get it together. They wanna flex and run ther dick suckers when a black sister is doing her thang and just so happen her titty pops out on purpose or mistakenly and everybody wanna cut off there husbands dicks.Oh but as soon as those white hoers Brittany disfunctional face,Madonna confused dont know if she want dick or not and last but not least Christina need to eat more food and stay off that atkins diet ass tongue kiss, peck or how ever you wanna consider it smooches every one is Okay. Fuck off I'm speaking for Janet when I say this go eat what flies blow on. And thats a list 1.shit,2.shit,3.and more shit
RE: Big Whoopty Doo reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 12, 2004 10:40 AM
i like your titie
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 13, 2004 1:06 PM
Bitch
RE: Jackson's flash reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 26, 2004 3:59 PM
who can tell me the meaning of life
Janet's Generocity reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 6, 2005 4:39 PM
I LOVE YOU JANET...
The Boob reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 29, 2005 7:42 AM
Ok I thought it was a chance in a life time to see Janets boob. But I also think we have a time and place for that kind of stuff, and that was not it. she needs to get with Playboy and show us some more :) On t.v. where my 10year old and 8 year old was watching I dint care to have them watch a boob come flying out just like I dont care to have them look at Playboy books.
its over reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 15, 2005 9:53 AM
GET OVER IT!!!
Janet's Boobs reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 15, 2005 10:01 AM
it was very entertaining and for all those who are hating, Fuck off!!! you are just jealous. She might be old but she still has it.
RE: Janet's Boobs reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 31, 2005 5:39 AM
She looks like a cat-human but why did that balloon not burst when they pierced it?
Oh yeah, and why didn't the ugly man next to her not get arrested after harrassing her?
RE: IiiiTTTTSSSS NNNNNOOOOOOOTTTTT PPOORRNN reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 13, 2006 5:38 PM
you are all gay fucks
you guys are gay exepect that last person reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 21, 2006 10:34 PM
i think me and you are a bit late dude gezz i am glad you where here last mounth tho to bad you will never read this
RE: IiiiTTTTSSSS NNNNNOOOOOOOTTTTT PPOORRNN reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 18, 2008 2:06 PM
I agree completely our society seems to be coming to being nudists anyway and like you said it's just a part of the body, really we should just be naked all the time. if animals don't have clothes neither should we!
RE: IiiiTTTTSSSS NNNNNOOOOOOOTTTTT PPOORRNN reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 10, 2010 7:52 PM
boobs boobs yah yah ha ha
 CONAN THE BARBARIAN |
 CAPTAIN AMERICA |
 CRAZY, STUPID, LOVE |
 THE SMURF |
 COWBOYS AND ALIENS |
 BAD TEACHER |
 MR. POPPERS PENGUINS |
 GREEN LANTERN |
