Digital Theatre [DTheatre.com]
 SPONSOR
Search for  

NAVIGATION
HOME
CHAT
SUBMIT NEWS
RESOURCES
HELP
COMPANY
GALLERY
STOCK PHOTOS
TIPS ARCHIVE
AWARDS/REVIEWS
CONTACT



Quote of the day:

"There is a large element of me in every role I do. Actors who say they can dive inside a character are either schizophrenic or lying." -- Bruce Campbell

NETWORK
find books, dvds and movies:
  aigc.net
  dark horizons
  wonko.com
  IMDB
  badass mofo




Topic: Film Review: The Patriot
By Acheron on June 30, 2000 11:49 AM

As most know, Mel Gibson's new film, The Patriot is remenicent of his earlier work in Braveheart, but this time set in the American colonies during the American Revolution. Gibson's character, Benjamin Martin, is a war hero raising all his children on his own. He doesn't want to take part in the rebellion against King George, but after ruthless actions inflicted by the British Army, he joins the cause. That's all I'll spoil...

Though not quite as good as Braveheart, there is really very little that was wrong with this film. The cinematography was brilliant. The acting was great. The story was moving. It had a little bit too much of a Hollywood touch to it, and it was a little long(around 3 hours). Those were the only bad things about it -- and I hesitate to call them "bad." It was apparent throughout the movie that the director was trying to keep the Braveheart tones suppressed, but I think he did a good job of it. It's well worth seeing. It ranks up there with Gladiator on my list of great movies.
Conclusion: Great movie. A little violent and a little long, so keep that in mind before taking your kids. I'd give it a 8.4/10.0.

[ comment on this story | comments (1) ]
Reader Discussions:
 RE: Review: The Patriot   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 2, 2000 7:12 AM

Yah vell . . the problem is that, unlike The Gladiator, this film takes a historical period and creates a tale that fits very snugly and comfortably INSIDE convention, not wandering for a second outside the lines to try something new. I thought the whole thing felt very canned - the whole film felt like it was made BEFORE they made it, if you catch my drift. It didn't suck, but it was so utterly unambitious in terms of style & story that I left disappointed. And John Williams needs to get back to the land of memorable melodies . . . . 

 
Discuss this story


LOGIN
Username: Password:
Need an account?
Sign up Now!
Note: Logged in users do not have pop-ups and pop-unders.
More Options
User Utilities
Help
WIN STUFF!
DEMI'S BACK!!!Win a copy of Striptease!
RECENT HEADLINES

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre Stills

Eat These Short Clips

Jeffrey Jones Pleads No Contest to Porn Charges

Congratulations T-3 "He's Back!" Contest Winner!

Britney Spears Admits She is Not a Virgin!

RIP: Hepburn, Hackett, Buddy Ebsen, Barry White

Weekend Top Ten Box Office Films

Upcoming Loch Ness Documentary by Werner Herzog

SENSELESS SURVEY
How bad will Tomb Raider II be?
It Will Rule
Meh/Could Be Worse
I Pray For Death
Almost-Tolerable


[view results]

LINK US!

dtheatre.com
dtheatre.com

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the poster. The rest © 2000 Digital Theatre, an Ai Graphics (AIGC) Production.