![Digital Theatre [DTheatre.com]](images/logo.png){kind=logo}
|
Starring on Dtheatre's Stage: Latest Movie News & Trailers, TV News and Productions,
Special Free Guides, Gadgets and Expert Reviews on Varity of Exciting Zones. We actually have a special expert responsible for every post series. Come back soon, you will always find new interesting things! |
By Wind(up)bird November 10, 2004 5:51 AM
Check these new character pics from the Tim Burton remake. ?Depp looks little, dainty compared to Gene Wilder's Wonka. ?Is that an Umpa? Images posted on Aintitcool.com until they were recently pulled down, but we've still got'em!
NEW!! Check out the New WILLY WONKA Trailer!!!
Charlie and The Chocolate Factory is due to be released July 15th.
Johnny "Not Gene Wilder" Depp as Willy Wonka.
I have no idea who this is. (Ooompa Loopma?)
Philip Wiegratz as Augustus Gloop.
Julia Winter as Veruca Salt.
Annasophia Robb as Violet Beauregarde.
Johnny "Any Movie's Saviour" Depp as Willy Wonka.
If you haven't already seen it, click for the Charlie and The Chocolate Factory poster.
| comments: 492
Willie Wonka 
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 10, 2004 6:46 AM
THAT'S an Umpa Lumpa? Where's his green hair? He looks more like the guy who owns my local corner shop.
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 10, 2004 9:33 AM
no no...that's one of the dudes that works in the tv room.
asfa reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 10, 2004 7:36 PM
dszf
You stole these Pics from AICN!!!!!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 10, 2004 7:37 PM
You didnt even give them credit!!!
So gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 10, 2004 10:03 PM
Depp looks more like Willy WANKER. What a poof!
RE: So gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 11, 2004 6:33 AM
How long did it take you to come up with that?
Tim Burton's Willy Wonka: reply
Posted by NoraMae (noral@c-zone.net) on November 11, 2004 6:55 AM
*I'm* looking foward to this movie. I've seen the original Willy Wonka and I absolutely love it - it's a CLASSIC!
I really think Tim Burton will do this movie justice. He's an excellent director!
And if you consider all of the different styles of characters that Johnny Depp has played, then you'd realize that he'd be great for the role of Willy Wonka. He's not just some bland big-name actor with no depth. He actually has talent!
I really think this will be a good movie. If anyone could pull it off, it would be Tim Burton.
You cant beat Perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 11, 2004 9:05 AM
The older movie was awesome. You cant fix perfection.
RE: You cant beat Perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 11, 2004 10:53 AM
"Depp looks more like Willy WANKER. What a poof!"
Sorry but I have to comment on this.
The minute I saw the thread link Willy Wonker I knew that somewhere even with only one comment the word Willy Wanker would appear. I was even prepared to write it myself if horror of horrors it didn't appear itself. Just goes to show that some names will always be mocked regardless of context. What possessed Dahl to give the main character a name with such easy derision attached to it. he might as well have called it Burt Forker. I am childish I know.
Anyway the film looks like it will keep fairly close to the book so good luck to I guess.
yay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 11, 2004 1:34 PM
i really cant wait for this movie!! its gonna be amazing!!
www.depp.ca
You can't fix perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 12, 2004 4:10 AM
I totally agree. The classic movie was absolutely amazing. There can only be one willy wonka, and Gene Wilder was IT.
Johnny Depp looks like a transvestite. Doesn't bear any resemblance to the desciption of him in the book. He just looks like he's in drag!
Not going to see this film, just going to get the original and best out, and watch it over and over.
There can be no other.
Yay, Depp! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 12, 2004 7:15 AM
I think this movie will turn out to be great. I can't wait to see Johnny as Wonka. The pictures are just so amusing. ^.^
-Diem
RE: Yay, Depp! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 12, 2004 8:42 AM
You have to admit, a name like 'Willy Wonka' kind of sticks in the memory.
.... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 12, 2004 10:31 AM
"The older movie was awesome. You cant fix perfection."
Nobody is trying to fix anything. If you really are true fans of the original, you should appreciate the creativity and work of Tim Burton. He's a genius, and so is Johnny Depp.
hmm, reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 12, 2004 11:15 AM
i think willy wonka was written in a simpler time, when children were innocent and didn't get any masturbation connotations.
But they *really* should have followed the description in teh book. not convinced by the costume, Wilder was good, but Depp has the potential to be better
the new movie reply
Posted by whennachosattack (no) on November 12, 2004 4:07 PM
the new one is the darker version, like the book, not the happy version.
RE: the new movie reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 13, 2004 3:06 AM
Yea, because we all know that the chocolate was just a metaphor for death and the way that society eats itself up with greed.
RE: So gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 13, 2004 6:09 AM
Man whats wrong with you its depp for christ sake dont look at it as gay (which means happy) but look at as pure genius
RE: the new movie reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 13, 2004 9:04 AM
the original was happy?!? what family did YOU grow up in that a sinister man like wilder's wonka is happy?? and the "punishments" to the kids were not happy or amusing. that boat ride was the most sinister thing going, as well.
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 13, 2004 11:09 AM
Try reading the book...Oompa Loompas dont have green hair, they have brown hair!
READ THE BOOK reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 13, 2004 11:11 AM
If everyone read the book they would know there are many differences between it and the original movie. I think Burton is tring to make it more like the book, which is a good idea.
RE: .... reply
Posted by lollylollylolly (lollyx34769@yahoo.com) on November 13, 2004 12:22 PM
Look, I regard myself as a Wonka traditionalist. I am beside myself that Burton is making a remake. By the way, it's okay to resent that, and still think that Burton is a genius - which I don't, and still think that Depp is a genius - which I REALLY don't. They are talented, but genius? Come on! Orson Welles was a genius, Elia Kazan, another genius. Let's not go crazy here.
Gene Wilder is, and will always be Willy Wonka. End of story!
Charlie and The Chocolate Factory reply
Posted by MClite (No Email) on November 13, 2004 7:17 PM
You have to keep in mind that this remake isn't a musical. This movie is following the Roald Dahl novel more closely than the first one and it will not be like the Gene Wilder movie was. Also keep in mind that it's being directed by Tim Burton so it'll be a little darker. Don't expect it to be like the original because it won't be.
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 14, 2004 6:58 AM
Ask anyone what an Umpa Lumpa looks like and they'll say an orange midget with green hair. It might have been different in the book but the movie version is what everyone remembers.
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 14, 2004 7:02 AM
So can we expect to see loads of CGI squirrels pushing Veruca Salt down the nut hole rather than her falling down a golden goose egg shoot?
Look, I regard myself as a Wonka traditionalist. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 14, 2004 7:42 AM
"Look, I regard myself as a Wonka traditionalist."
Without refering to the book or movie could you use this sentence in any other context without sounding odd.
Family Guy reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 14, 2004 7:45 AM
Any one see the Willy Wonka spin off in Family guy that was was one of the funniest ones.
"Where's the green hair?" reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 14, 2004 11:20 AM
Whoever left one of the first comments about the oompa loompas, have you actually read this book? What totally ruined the first version of this movie way back when was the stupid midgets with orange skin and green hair singing crap limmericks. They, thank god, were not in the book. Tim Burton stayed as true to the book as possible, name and all. This movie will be so much better than the original.
The TV room guy in the second picture reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 14, 2004 1:51 PM
The TV room guy in the second picture is Deep Roy. He was in Planet of the Apes, and Big Fish.
RE: You stole these Pics from AICN!!!!!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 14, 2004 4:57 PM
dont b stupid at least they r there
Manson should have been Wonka!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 14, 2004 9:36 PM
MANSON!!!!!
They should have left off with charlie reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 15, 2004 2:40 AM
running the place. Johnny Depp is a grea actor but why change a masterpiece. They should have had him play Charlie in the Factory and maybe a new contest if they can not come up with new ides. I should have wrote the damn thing myself.
pfff reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 15, 2004 3:59 AM
you negative pessimistic morbid munted people ALL SUCK PENIS AND VAGINA
RE: You can't fix perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 15, 2004 4:33 AM
Johnny Depp will transform this version into THE version. He does it every time, and if you dont know this, then prepare to find out. Take a look at a handfull of his other roles - Sam in 'Benny and Joon' for example, or Agent Sands in 'once upon a time in mexico'. Dont knock Depp. He's the most talented actor around, and he's a lovely lovely guy.
Both sides of Depp. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 15, 2004 6:23 AM
I loved the original and its demented/twistedly innocent nature, however it strayed very far from the book in so many ways. I hope this new one steps a little closer to the story and includes some of the tibits that were originally cut out in the first one. Depp is a very talented actor although at times he can't ALWAYS save a movie. (Once Upon A Time In Mexico wasn't THAT great.) Tim Burton is a directorial genius. I have no doubt in my mind that together again, they will recreate Willy Wonka into a masterpiece. Personally, I hope they make the lesser known sequel book into a movie as well "Charlie and the Great Glass Elevator" where the elevator went into space, Charlie and family ran into Vermicious Kinids, and they travelled deep underneath the factory to a place called Minusworld, I believe. Gosh Dahl was awesome!
RE: Both sides of Depp. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 15, 2004 8:59 AM
Lesser known? I thought everyone knew about the sequel?
Book vs Movie reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 15, 2004 10:16 AM
Some of you people seem like the type that watch the movies instead of the reading the books, then complain when your professor calls you on it by failing your essay.
I absolutely love the original movie, and I read the book years ago before I had even seen it. The first movie was based _loosely_ on the book. Yes, the movie was great, but it tore the book apart, and made it much lighter so that some song and dance could be added to make it a little kid's movie.
I'm confident Tim Burton and Johnny Depp are going to do the book plenty of justice, and I hope that more of you will realize the difference in the two movies. I'm looking forward to seeing a movie _of_ the book, not a musical _about_ the book.
Re: Both Sides of Depp reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 15, 2004 10:18 AM
Well I guess it's just my friends who didn't know about the book. ^_^
RE: The TV room guy in the second picture reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 15, 2004 2:06 PM
if the seccond pic is deep roy then... the guys an oompa loompa! to bad i was expecting more from tim B, but maybe thats how the book describes them...?
RE: .... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 15, 2004 2:20 PM
i have to admit that even though i am a huge johnny depp fan and love the origanal movie, and i have alot of faith in tim burton. i am very worried about the new movie...depp looks ridiculus and i dont think you can compare depp to gene wilders "willy wonka"
Too pale, Too straight reply
Posted by sjustice (No Email) on November 15, 2004 2:42 PM
Depp's hair is too straight and his skin is too white. He looks more like wilma wonka.
depp is so fucking gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 15, 2004 2:48 PM
Depp is the main source of evil for this movie. Tim burton took the book to the extreme, thus in turn ruining the orignal feel of the first movie. Depp is a homo anyway!
RE: depp is so fucking gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 15, 2004 2:50 PM
Damn right and manson would have made a better wonka, and depp will ruin the name of burton and willy wonka. I dont even want to eat the candy anymore, because of Johnny Homo.
Veruca Salt reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 15, 2004 4:18 PM
Wow, Julia Winter is a cute Veruca Salt! Nice tights!!!
Depp looks like he has a 2 by 4 stuck up his ass reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 15, 2004 4:39 PM
Depp's face is white. he looks like he's been taking crazy pills. his hair looks like he's crwaled out of a toilet.
PS: Hi Mum!! :>
from Mr.Black
to Mr.Depp from Jackson.M reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 15, 2004 4:42 PM
jesus.....even i look better than u. wanna get together? meet me a neverland!! :>
XXXX
OOOO
johnny depp reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 15, 2004 4:54 PM
he looks like a drag queen crossed with michale jackson
he needs a sun tan and he straightend his hair way to much
Oompas reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 15, 2004 5:43 PM
Well the reason that Oompas dont have green hair is because that's not how they were in the book. They can't blatently copy the first film, but they can't have african pygmi slaves like in the book either as that's a lil un PC ;)
THE BOOK reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 15, 2004 9:58 PM
the reason that none of the pictures look like the old movie is because burton is going directly from the book!!! when he had the person write the script he told him to just read the book and not watch the movie. when has burton ever let us down? not with the first two batmans or beetlejuice and not with BIG FISH!! when did depp let us down?? not in edward scissorhands or ed wood and DEFINITELY not in pirates of the caribbean...how can looking at pictures give any sort of justice what these professionals are creating???
Marilyn Manson vs. Depp? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 16, 2004 5:47 AM
Alright. Who was it that started this strange notion that Manson could ever act, let alone play the part of Willy Wonka?
Depp is one of the best actors of our time, and you're saying that Manson should play the role instead?
Also, yes Depp looks a little fruity, but that's no reason to curse or toss around the term 'gay' so freely. Surely you have enough brains to express yourself without cursing or personally insulting a person who's just doing his job. Honestly, it's just a movie! (A movie that I'm very much looking forward to, but just a movie nonetheless.)
RE: Marilyn Manson vs. Depp? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 16, 2004 6:15 AM
Where's everyone getting the idea that the book was really dark and disturbing from? Ok, it was a little politically incorrect by todays standards but not nearly as creepy as some parts of the film.
RE: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 16, 2004 6:45 AM
Geez, there are a lot of "Willy Wonka" fans that don't realize that the book was written before the movie. How can you be "beside yourself" that there this new movie is going to be more faithful to the book? Before complaining about who is cast and who the director is, read the book and watch the original movie. You will see discrepancies and realize that Depp is a much more faithful looking Willy Wonka than Gene Wilder was. Willy Wonka was a thin, eccentric, wiry man... not a blond-haired, round-faced vocalist. Also, the Oompa-Loompas did sing songs in the book.
Willy Wonka MSN Display Pictures reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 16, 2004 9:15 AM
Someone created cool MSN Display Pictures for MSN Messenger from these sneek peak photographs.
Oompa loompa? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 16, 2004 12:05 PM
My guess is that guy in orange is an oompa loopa for the WonkaVision scene... which could explain the criss-crossing Vs on his suit. Except there are four and only should be three.
some of you are so damn stupid reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 16, 2004 2:00 PM
THE FILM IS NOT A REMAKE. I REPEAT: THE FILM IS NOT A REMAKE.
It's clear who isn't a REAL fan and who is a real fan. The ones who aren't real fans are the ones saying it's a remake of a masterpiece and whatnot.
Any REAL Willy Wonka fan knows that Johnny's version is actually following the book. This is the version Roald would have wanted. I bet some of you fake fans didn't even know that Roald actually hated Gene Wilder's version.
RE: some of you are so damn stupid reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 17, 2004 4:49 AM
That's already been said by someone. Anyway, why's everyone getting so angry about who's the bigger Willy Wonka fan? "Oh, I've read the book so I'M a bigger fan than you and my opinion matters more!" Why don't you all grow up a bit?
Okay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 17, 2004 5:24 AM
Marilyn Manson tried out for Willy Wonka and him and Johnny Depp were the last two choices for the part.
Obviously Burton wanted Depp for some unknown reason...maybe its Manson's rep that didn't get him the part...
Im sure the movie will turn out fine, some will be disapointed but Burton tends to follow the story, not the movie made before it so it sohuld prove very interesting.
Come on reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 17, 2004 7:31 AM
Come on plz, the original movie kept to the book and did it more justice than anything could....
I just wanna see Tim Burton gothic the fuck out of it and make it bizzarre and trippy, Dnt care if he doesnt have charlies grandad jumper the right colours. he can put him in a gimp outfit...i really wanna know though is danny elfman doin the score?????? cas then id love it :)
RE: Come on reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 17, 2004 7:33 AM
me again lol, marilyn manson did not try and pull off willy wonka, if u refere to the smells liek children art work hes trying to be the gimp outta chitty chitty bang bang . the child snatcher... but tbh i think hed make a more twisted willy wonker. i just hope johhny can freak ppl after his recent movies.
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 17, 2004 12:58 PM
Um. this looks like such a sorry group of characters. even johnny depp, who normally is awsome.. first off, people have to understand that willy wonka was about the hair do's. no one has hair like gene wilder. it was his hair alone that made willy wonka so bad ass.
This movie reply
Posted by mamabear70 (mama@mamabear.com) on November 18, 2004 6:30 PM
Is going to be so fucking COOL!!!! WooHooooooo! I cant frickin wait for it to come out!!!! I LOVE Willy Wonka!!!! Rock On!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BTW reply
Posted by mamabear70 (mama@mamabear.com) on November 18, 2004 6:35 PM
How the fuck yall gonna say it suck...it gonna be da bomb biotches, watch
RE: BTW reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 19, 2004 4:44 AM
You can't judge a thing from a couple of photos, give it a fucking chance.
wake up reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 19, 2004 1:24 PM
Damn people, get it through your heads that it's not a remake of the film...if it was it would be called Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory. This is Charlie and the Chocolate Factory...from the book...that thing with pages and words...that you have to read...
>. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 19, 2004 3:19 PM
First of all, before you all get your heads shoved too far up your asses and run around saying "they aren't following the book, they're making parts of the movie creepier than they should be"... READ THE BOOK.
Second of all, how can any of you make a judgement that "parts of the movie are too creepy in comparison to the book" when YOU HAVE YET TO SEE THE MOVIE. That's like saying "man the year 2005 was great, except when my Grandma got hit by a tractor". You just make yourself sound even more like someone who should have been an abortion.
Thirdly, Burton and Depp have already publically stated that it isn't there intention to try to upstage the original, because it's obvious that the original, and Gene Wilder, are classics.
Now pull your little panties out of their bunches and find something more worthwhile to do than get online and whine about a movie based on a book that most of you probably didn't even know existed.
RE: >. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 20, 2004 9:20 AM
What the fuck are you talking about? Have you been reading a different forum?
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 20, 2004 11:29 AM
ok, this movie is NOT the remake of the classic movie Willy Wonka and the Chcolate Factory, in fact, this movie is based on the BOOK. If you watch the movie and then read the book, they are very different. I think this movie is going to be great, more dark like the book, and Tim Burton is going to do an awesome job!
rhinos are not color blind reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 20, 2004 12:04 PM
is his stick full of candy or what?purple gloves!
It will b gr8 reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 20, 2004 12:25 PM
I am a kid nd i think this film will b gr8 no matta how much its been changed
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 20, 2004 4:46 PM
Well, he doesn't have green hair, but neither do the Oompa Loompas in the book- they've got long blond hair.
RE: They should have left off with charlie reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 20, 2004 6:35 PM
So why didn't you write it yourself, you smart arse !!!!
RE: Too pale, Too straight reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 20, 2004 6:38 PM
Well if you followed either the book OR the movie, he was a recluse and stayed shut up inside all the time. Tell me where he would have got a sun tan from ???
... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 20, 2004 10:59 PM
ok, i know it's been said in someway, but burton actually read the book before working on the film. he saw the 1st film and concluded that his was much darker. oh and as a side note, those of you calling depp gay, are real a-holes. the man is a super talented actor and a really nice guy.
not sure reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 21, 2004 12:02 AM
I loved the original and the book even though they are different in many ways. i'm sure fi I am going to be able to watch the Burton version without picturing gene wilder as wonka. and many of the other characters. however, I am a huge fan of burton and depps work so I am intersted in seeing his take on the movie. Hopefully it will live up to the hype its getting.
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 21, 2004 12:40 AM
Ooompa Loompa's didn't actually have green hair OR Orange faces. This was a book first, remeber, and in the book, Oompa Loompas had white faces with golden brown hair. which this guy still doesn't look like.
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 21, 2004 3:17 AM
Look, we all know that this whole thing was originally a book, it's just that regardless of that many of us enjoyed the original film's interpretation of the Oompa Lumpas. Why don't you all get off your high horse about it?
Book vs Movie 1 vs Movie 2 reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 21, 2004 5:47 AM
If you saw the Gene Wilder version without reading the book, it's likely that you consider it to be "the" authentic version. If you read the book first, you may have been disappointed with the movie. I consider the book to be "the real thing," but have grown to appreciate the movie as well.
I think that Burton is brilliant, that Depp is unbelieveably talented, and that therefore it's impossible to predict what the new movie will be like. For the most part, I'm expecting the unexpected, expecting only to enjoy it hugely -- on its own merit, not in competition with the book or the first movie.
RE: Book vs Movie 1 vs Movie 2 reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 21, 2004 1:27 PM
Couldn't have said it better myself.
I enjoyed the book AND the movie...I think this is going to be great as well.
~B~
Be openminded!!!!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 21, 2004 8:03 PM
Who cares if it's not the "original"? I LOVE the original too, but this movie is not a cheap imitation at all. It will be totally different in most aspects. Any sorry Gene, Johnny's shown way more creativity in his acting, and Tim Burton and he are both GENIUSES as other posters have said.
RE: Be openminded!!!!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 22, 2004 4:49 AM
I think alot of people here have been creating an argument when actually we're all thinking along the same lines.
RE: Manson should have been Wonka!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 22, 2004 9:51 AM
Charles or Marilyn?
RE: some of you are so damn stupid reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 22, 2004 10:22 AM
The problem with Hollywood today is that the studio heads are too chicken-$#!t to try something new. This film may not be a remake in your eyes, but A) the story line, title, and characters have already been captured on celluloid. B) CATCF already has a fan base. C) CATCF was originally a book therefore, a ?remake? - not an original script.
I have learned not to second-guess a Depp performance; no matter what role he creates. He can be in one of my movies any day. You can?t go wrong with a Burton-Depp-Elfman-Neill or Owen (makeup) combination. Guys that make fun of the very talented AND beautiful tend to be lashing out because they are jealous.
And in conclusion: THANK GOD IT?S NOT A MUSICAL!!! Not that Depp could not pull it off, because I have all confidence in him, but I tend to squirm while a single thought is being repeatedly dragged out for 3 & ? minutes.
Looking forward to the release!
Jesus, calm down, all of you! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 22, 2004 10:45 AM
I hve a few things to say...
One) You cannot go into the film expecting it to be better, no one could do that, you have to expect difference, it will be different, still good, still entertaining, but different, Burton did not go out and try to make it better, it has been said by himslef and Depp they could not make it better, just different...now that you have that understood...
even though he is following more closely to the book, it does not mean he is going presicely by the book...so what if the oopma loompas arent exactly the same, so what if willy wonka doesnt look like the books description to a t...the whole story in general will be closer to the book than the original...so stop complaining about how it isn't ever going to be better than the first, or how it isn't exactly as the book...it is a film made by a talented man, with many talented actors which will be a very good movie...just let the complaining rest, and shit, the movie isnt even out yet...nor is it even done filming....
mmmmmm Chocolate...mmmmmmmm reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 22, 2004 12:31 PM
Look just give me some chocolate and alcohol and ill watch any movie :P
RE: Manson should have been Wonka!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 22, 2004 11:06 PM
manson rocks
Is it Manson!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 22, 2004 11:11 PM
I have a song sung by manson. This song is off wily wonka. The song that is sung in the tunnel. How the hell can you explain this? Is it manson? or is it johnny fag?
RE: Is it Manson!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 23, 2004 3:33 AM
It's a song that Manson did ages ago and he was just ripping off the film.
charlie? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 23, 2004 6:05 AM
yes all this is brilliant.....but who the hell is playing charlie??????????!!!!!
RE: charlie? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 23, 2004 9:57 AM
Johnny Depp is, he's playing every part like in a Mike Myers film.
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 23, 2004 7:39 PM
yes very odd.
wonder how this movie is going to do .. love Tim burton.. Just very curious...
RE: charlie? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 23, 2004 9:35 PM
the kid who played peter [not peter pan] in finding neverland. depp recommended the kid after working with him in finding neverland. check out imdb.com
RE: charlie? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 24, 2004 11:27 AM
That sounds like an unhealthy relationship if you ask me.
RE: Jesus, calm down, all of you! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 24, 2004 12:45 PM
I'd just like to say well done to you for telling everyone to bloody well calm down. People started to get a bit over the top on some of their remarks especially to do with the Willy WANKER stuff *yawn*. Nobody expects remakes to be better than the original, different directors just want to try it their own way and alter the look. Any fans of Tim Burton's work like myself will be eager to see what he has done with this film. I do have to agree with some people that Johnny Depp does not look his best in this film but that's one of the reasons I admire him, he is an amazing actor and not afraid to act the weirdo of the film like in Edward Scissorhands or Benny and Joon for example. Oh and also, some of you people writing your own comments should learn that everyone has their own opinions and you can't force your own onto someone else, no one can be right when are expressing your own thoughts.
I'm so excited!!!!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 24, 2004 3:04 PM
And I just can't hide it!.....
Lol oh my god I can not wait. Roald Dahl's Charlie and the Chocolate factory is awesome, The 70's Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory is awesome, and god is Johnny Depp awesome! When I heard he was doing this I cried a little. :)
I cannot wait. So excited!!!
Marilyn Manson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 24, 2004 5:33 PM
Johnny Depp actually almost turned the part over to The Anti-Christ Superstar, but Manson turned it down. Now that would have made the movie about 50x darker than Depp's version.
RE: So gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 25, 2004 6:15 AM
How dare you say that! Anyone who would say that just has no confindince in anyone elses ability to make something work.
RE: So gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 25, 2004 7:42 AM
In this film they're going to make it more obvious that the Oompa Lumpas are slaves from an African country.
Don't you understand? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 26, 2004 10:38 AM
This is not a true re-make of the Willy Wonka and the Chocolate factory movie, it is adapation of Charlie and the Chocolate factory-The original book. If anyone has read this book, they would notice that there is quite a difference in the Gene Wilder version compared to the book. This movie is rumored to be more like the book, thus it's title "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory".
I am very optimistic of it's turn out. The pics look great.
I happen to like the new oompa loompas! (Although he does look like something out of mork and mindy)
P.S. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 26, 2004 10:41 AM
That last comment was not made to anyone in particular, just the people that are trying to comapre the pics to the original movie.
RE: P.S. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 27, 2004 4:07 AM
WE FUCKING KNOW ALREADY!!!
Jesus! people have been saying the same thing for the last 100 posts!
NOT A remake reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 27, 2004 5:49 PM
I loved the old movie as much as the next person.. But this movie is meant to be a different adaptation of the book, not at ALL a remake of the movie... Compare Johnny to Gene all you want, but Tim Burton, along with his dream team of Johnny, Helena Bonham-Carter, and Danny Elfman, will create a new filmthat only a film maker and an actor with such talent and perspective can successfully pull off.
RE: .... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 27, 2004 5:54 PM
THANK you for pointing out the genius of such creative contributors to the film industry. I can't spell contributors correctly, but I can show my appreciation nonetheless.
For those of you true Johnny fans out there, he was nominated for the Golden Globe for his transvestite-director title role as Ed Wood, again with Tim. :)
Who the fuck is Willy Wonker? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 28, 2004 2:49 AM
I keep seeing that name. Who is that? And someone once floated a rumor that Marilyn Manson would play Willy Wonka. Can he even act? Is he an actor? Do people still like that tired, played-out piece of shit loser?
RE: Who the fuck is Willy Wonker? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 28, 2004 5:16 AM
In answer to your questions... no.
oompa loompa reply
Posted by pink_floyd_atreyu (fuckyoubitch@cunt.com) on November 28, 2004 2:43 PM
okay on the oompa loompas, they arent really dressed like that during the whole movie, they are only suited up such as in those suits during one scene because in the book "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory", it says "then the oompa loompas came in dressed in bright red space suits wearing helmets and goggles" but that was during when they meet mike teavee i think...
RE: depp is so fucking gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 28, 2004 3:27 PM
youre the gay one. johnny rox and just cos your so insecure with your sexual feelings doesn't mean that everyone is a homo. go suck cock, johnny Depp will rock this movie!!!! we luv u Johnny, devoted fans.
RE: we love johnny reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 28, 2004 3:31 PM
laura and rachel would like to say that Johnny rox in every movie, we love you as an actor and you are so hot!!!
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 28, 2004 4:56 PM
I believe that if people judge this movie based on the older movie, than they should sit down and read the book. The book was amazing and people should stop being lazy and stop judging this movie before they see it.
RE: Manson should have been Wonka!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 28, 2004 4:56 PM
At least if Manson were in it, we'd get to maybe see the lovely and talented Dita Von Tease. Yum.
When do we get the "James & the Giant Peach" redux reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 28, 2004 5:00 PM
I wish we could get a decent live action/cgi version of Dahl's other masterpiece. That horrible stop-motion version was so disappointing. (And mind you, I *loved* "Nightmare Before Christmas.")
RE: You stole these Pics from AICN!!!!!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 28, 2004 8:16 PM
Ain't It Cool News steals shit from everyone else. What's the damage? Besides, half of the shit they have, they make up. FUCK AICN.
Depp - not a genius reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 28, 2004 9:14 PM
i don't think johnny depp is a genius. he may be a good actor.. but genius? i mean, he doesn't write the scipts to the movies, he just reads them. And most people only really "loved" him after he was in Pirates of the Carribean. He wasn't huge and loved and talked about alot when he was in Edawrd Scissorhands and Once upon a time in Mexico. Im soryy if i offend you Depp "lovers", but he is not a genius.
P.S - I would like to see Burton do a twisted version of The Wizard Of Oz. that might be fun to see.
RE: Depp - not a genius reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 29, 2004 8:25 AM
I'd love to see Burton do a twisted version of Backdoor sluts 9.
RE: P.S. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 29, 2004 4:49 PM
WE FUCKING KNOW ALREADY!!!
Jesus! people have been saying the same thing for the last 100 posts!
-----------------------
Well sorry. Who the hell has time to read all these damn posts.
wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 29, 2004 10:41 PM
Should be interesting,hope he does better on this version then he did on "Planet of the Apes". That was a screw up!
RE: P.S. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 30, 2004 5:16 AM
You could have read any one of the last 100 posts to work it out.
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 30, 2004 9:22 AM
are you kiddin me you killed it...willy wonka was a classic to remember but now your ruining it...maybe if you kept the same characters an the same look for them like the green hair for the ooppa loompas an the orange skin then this would be a+ but this sucks....
Anyone want fries with that? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 30, 2004 10:31 AM
Super size?
Original Oompa Loompas reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 30, 2004 11:53 PM
To those arguing about the Oompa Loompas,
If y'all care to see...
How Roald Dahl *originally* depicted the Oompa Loompas in the first editions of the book is discussed here (along with the controversy that caused the publishers to ask Dahl for revisions to the Oompa Loompas a decade after the book was first published).
veddy interesting...
http://www.roalddahlfans.com/books/charoompa.php
I'm eagerly awaiting this adaptation with Depp and am open to enjoying all versions for their individual merits.
RE: Charlie and The Chocolate Factory reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 1, 2004 7:38 AM
you don't look like willy wonka
Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 2, 2004 10:06 AM
I HAVE TO BE THE BIGGEST FAN, of not only Tim Burton's Films, & Johnny Depp, But Ronald Dahl's book Willy Wonk and the Chocolate factory is one the most amazing kids books to ever be released! I bet my money on it that this movie is going to be a MASTERPIECE
RE: Book vs Movie reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 3, 2004 3:33 PM
I would just like to point something out to all of you fuckers, Roald Dahl wrote the first movie, it was his vision on film. H ewnated it to be different from the book so don't go saying that they tore the book apart in the original because tearing it apart would be some dbag going and doing whatever they felt to the novel, the fact that Dahl did it makes it ok because it's his own literature. Second of all this isn't a remake of the original, it's a new telling of the book, totally different concept all together, kind of like how Planet of the Apes was not a remake but a "reimagining" yes I know it sucked but whatever. Let Tim make the movie and if it's a failure whatever. All I know is I'll be at the midnight show if there is one. Now you can all go to hell
faithfull adaptation reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 3, 2004 7:15 PM
To end all these arguments about oompa loompas and how the characters dont match up to the book, this movie will be a more faithful adaptation of the book than the original! The guy that wrote the screenplay, John Augest, has never seen the orgiginal movie and only based it on the book. This movie has been promised to be a darker adaptaion, like the book. Next time you go on a wild rant, why dont you know what you talking about
faithfull adaptaion also reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 3, 2004 7:17 PM
and just so you know Rohl Dahl despised the orginal movie.
RE: You can't fix perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 3, 2004 11:49 PM
There was an earlier comment made that everyone needs to look at. If not, then I'll repeat it for ya. The first Chocolate Factory movie wasn't soley based off of Dahl's book. Burton is changing that and is going to be more loyal to the book. If you loved the original, then read the book and go see this one because with Tim Burton directing it and Johnny Depp in it, it's sure to hit big!
RE: Oompa loompa? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 4, 2004 11:52 AM
WTF you idiot. It's two w's together which stands for "Willy Wonka", douche.
Depp is a god reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 4, 2004 12:04 PM
Look, let me calmly explain this to you people who seem to be color blind. Johnny isn't pale in the movie. It only looks that way because of the color of the awesomely made costume he's wearing. Take an art class or something cunts and learn about your fuckin' colors! :)
RE: Depp is a god reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 4, 2004 2:22 PM
Willy Wonka isn't exactly a guy who'd get much sun is he?
RE: Book vs Movie reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 4, 2004 9:00 PM
ok child... you are not the fucking biggest fan. sorry... ive beaten you out...
get over it and move on :)
Exciting! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 5, 2004 10:55 AM
Johnny Depp is an excellent actor, Tim Burton is an excellent director and Roal Dahl was an excellent writer. That's why I'm looking forward to this film. Gene Wilder's Wonka was impressive, but I never got the darker feel in that film that I get when reading the book. That is why this film is perfect for Burton. I'm not sure if it's been said already, but the picture of the Oompah Loompah appears to be the guy who plays Mr Soggybottom in Burton's Big Fish.
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 5, 2004 1:06 PM
If you've read the book you'd know that the Umpa Loopma's weren't orange and green. There were tiny goldenish (tan?) people. And there were women and children too.
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 6, 2004 4:22 AM
Who cares? The whole orange face and green hair thing is iconic, everyone loves it.
depp as wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 6, 2004 8:45 AM
my original choice for willy wonka was marilyn manson. but that was cause i was hoping for a darker version of the story like the book. not the wilder version
RE: So gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 6, 2004 9:40 AM
ARE YOU KIDDING?? .. HE LOOKS SUPER DUPER YUMMY! .. ARE YOU A LITTLE JEALOUS??
RE: depp is so fucking gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 6, 2004 10:15 AM
If Depp is so much worse than Manson then why are they inseperable. If you call Depp gay then Manson must be his lover. As for the movie Tim Burton does not do "remakes" he only makes masterpeices and the team of Depp and Burtin should produce a truly magnificent movie.
RE: Manson should have been Wonka!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 6, 2004 3:09 PM
FUCK YEA MANSON HSOULD HAVE BEEN WILLY WONKA..IT WUD BE THE GRATEST MOVIE THEN.
HED DEFFINITLY PLAY BEST AS WILLY WONKA...I SAW MANSON 2 WEEKS AGO AT STARLAND BALLROOM NJ..HES FUCKING ASWOME MAN
RE: Manson should have been Wonka!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 6, 2004 3:39 PM
manson is thr greatest fucking person ever.he wud fucking make this movie into the fuckign
(sic)est shit ever!!!i saw him like 3 times starland and ozzfest!!!
RE: depp is so fucking gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 7, 2004 5:31 AM
"Tim Burton does not do "remakes" he only makes masterpeices"
What about Planet of the Apes? If I recall that was a remake and was hardly a masterpiece. Also, Manson is no actor, get over it.
Hmmmm... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 7, 2004 6:50 AM
I like both Johnny Depp, and Tim Burton. First off, Johnny Depp has more experience than Manson. Remember Edward Scissorhands? That was a great movie and wasn't it by Tim Burton.
If they want to do a Manson version, that'd be cool too. It would be like a freaky horror film. I'd love it if they did both, frankly. I'm a Johnny Depp, Tim Burton, Roald Dahl, and Marilyn Manson fan and proud of it.
RE: Hmmmm... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 7, 2004 6:51 AM
Yes, I think it was by Tim Burton..
You can't fix perfection etc reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 7, 2004 7:30 AM
IT IS A REMAKE. No one is trying to 'fix' anything. As already said a completely different approach has been taken with this- get real, its Tim Burton and the awesome Johhny Depp! Whoever Nov13 at 6.09 said Johnny Depp is 'pure genius', he so is.
Whoever is having doubts about Tim Burton and Johnny Depp in 'Charlie and the Chocolate Factory' (July 15th US, July 29th UK 2005) should seroiusly go rent some Tim Burton and Johhny Depp collaborations-'Edward Scissorhands', 'Sleepy Hollow'. Johnny Depp rocks in 'Pirates Of The Caribbean: The Curse Of The Black Pearl'. If you haven't seen it why not! I have every faith in this remake, i am so excited about it.
Get real reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 7, 2004 7:35 AM
JOHNNY DEPP IS IN CHARACTER. He doesn't look kike a poof or whatever, whoever said that.
Thats what actors/actresses do, they get made over as a character so that they can play the role and it adds more to the role.
Would you have preferred Captain Jack Sparrow without the pirate costume/makeup. Or maybe Edward Scissorhands without the Scissorhands.
Think!
RE: Hmmmm... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 7, 2004 7:35 AM
Tim Burton also did The Nightmare Before Christmas which is like the best movie in that catergory
I've never seen Big Fish though, is it good?
Johnny Depp's Character reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 7, 2004 7:38 AM
I'm positve that Johnny Depp can pull off a Willy Wonka. Those candies in the cane look so cool, you know what they remind me of? Nerds!!!
Yummy...
RE: You cant beat Perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 7, 2004 10:55 PM
its not about beating perfection its about paying tribute.
RE: Johnny Depp's Character reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 8, 2004 8:14 AM
"I'm positve that Johnny Depp can pull off a Willy Wonka."
Thankyou, you gave me a good laugh.
RE: You can't fix perfection etc reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 8, 2004 1:42 PM
Actually it's not a freaking remake. It's staying TRUE to the ORIGINAL BOOK, not movie!!! Get ir right people...
RE: faithfull adaptation reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 8, 2004 4:17 PM
Roald Dahl wrote the screenplay
You guys are dumb. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 8, 2004 5:05 PM
If you're dissappointed about how they look, you really must remember that THIS IS NOT A REMAKE. Yeah so no need to compare movies because they WILL NOT be the same.
oompa loompa reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 8, 2004 8:43 PM
ugh are those guys in red oomps loompas? if they r that sux. whats willy wonka with out little orange dudes?!?!
RE: oompa loompa reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 9, 2004 3:47 AM
Yea, why's the oompa loompa a fucking packie?
RE: oompa loompa reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 9, 2004 6:17 AM
I think that comment just sums up the general stupidity that some of you folk seam to be holding on to.
Having just read the entire conversation, I think it's fair to say;
Stop taking this whole thing quite so seriously.
Those of you who want to see the film, you'll see it and I hope you enjoy it, those devotees of the first film, don't see it and reminisce over the first film.
The original was a fantastic book, the film of this book was (as a piece of filmography) very good, Burton's new film, will (I hope) be equally as good, but I will not be comparing the two. There is no point. At all. Like many of you have said. The "original" film was quite far away from the book, but I think you'll agree that it was still a good film. Those of you who are so (strangely) aggravated by the thought of the remake...why such hostility? Do you feel the same about the Lord of the rings/ shall you feel the same about the up-and-coming "Phantom of the opera" This film (Phantom) is said to be a "re-make" of the musical and not the book, as such, are we to protest?
NO! - We?ll embrace what we're being offered.
Do we not?
- As far as im aware, none of you, or myself, are Johnny Depp, Burton, or indeed in quite the same business as them, so how can we give them such agro? They are both very good in their chosen fields,
as was Dahl,
and wilder.
Lets remain broad-minded guys?
It?s a big world.
Thanks for listening.
RE: depp is so fucking gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 9, 2004 2:10 PM
Must be a jealous man with a teeny-peeny who wrote this....
RE: depp is so fucking gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 10, 2004 4:40 AM
Yea, because Johnny Depp has a massive trouser snake.
I love Johnny Depp!!!!!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 10, 2004 9:36 AM
this willy wonka movie will be better than the that came out in 1971,
no offense to the oringinal willy wonka(gene wilder) but johnny depp will make a way better willy wonka than him.
plus i'm so excited that johnny is doing 2 more movies with tim because burton is my most favorite director of all time.
what is it about tim's films that make him my favorite director......oh wait he used johnny depp in some of his movies DUH........go johnny we love you!!!!
RE: depp is so fucking gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 10, 2004 2:07 PM
In all of our dreams he does, eh dude?
just watch the movie. in july. sheez. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 10, 2004 3:04 PM
The screenwriter for this film read the book and wrote the play NEVER HAVING SEEN THE 1971 VERSION (though, he must have lived in a closet somewhere all these years... you can't escape that movie...). Therefore, it is not intended to be a remake of the 1971 film, but a film interpretation of Roald Dahl's original text. So, get over your clouded preconceptions and just watch the movie when it comes out and enjoy... bah...
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 10, 2004 3:15 PM
i no that umpalumpas a poser
Family Guy reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 10, 2004 8:51 PM
Yeah, I saw that family guy thing!
RE: Family Guy reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 11, 2004 7:35 AM
I just saw the trailer and it looks just like 'The Cat in the Hat' movie.
RE: NOT A remake reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 11, 2004 8:32 AM
Hahahahahahahha.. ahhh man, this thread is fuckin hilarious.
All of it.
RE: NOT A remake reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 11, 2004 3:56 PM
well i dont no about tim burton i dont like his style of directing heaps but if its halph as good as edward scissor hands its good it looks awsome though i dont get hu was singing the wsong in the trailor and does n e one no if its gonna be the musical
RE: NOT A remake reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 12, 2004 3:43 AM
Aaaaarghhh!!! I can't get that fucking song out of my head! I'm going to slash my wrists!!
Johnny Depp?????? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 12, 2004 5:47 AM
I'd just like to point out the fact that Johnny Depp is after totally ruining Willy Wonka!!!!! Willy Wonka has a PURPLE jacket, if im not mistaken i do believe Johnny Depp's is BROWN! if you havent noticed the colour makes a slight difference?!?!?!?! As much as i like J depp, he doesnt look like the part but i say he'll act the part to his best, which will be quite cool! Cant wait to actually see it!! DEAD KENNEDYS rock!!!!!!!!!!!!1
RE: Both sides of Depp. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 12, 2004 5:55 AM
nope hense lesser known??? duh?
RE: depp is so fucking gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 12, 2004 5:58 AM
fuckin gay?? yourt a fuckin dope to think so!!! eeeeeeejit.
RE: You cant beat Perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 12, 2004 7:22 PM
Its not perfection until it is done by Burton!
RE: You cant beat Perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 13, 2004 6:04 AM
The trailer looks like this film is aimed at retarded five year olds.
Read this reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 13, 2004 7:29 AM
those of you who think Gene Wilder played the best Willy Wonka, you're right and wrong. Gene Wilder fit the perfect role for a happy willy wonka, but if you ask me or anyone we all know Johnny Depp would fit the role for a wired quirky willy wonka. the 1971 version was an altered version of the book, Burton is doing the Book version it's not that hard to understand. so if you're arguing about whos better as wonka just read this and look at "who'd be better for each of the 2 roles", Gene for a happy wonka, Johnny for a Quirky wonka. Gene wilder was yesterday sadley enough but c'mon Johnny Depp is today, be happy it wasn't anyone like Orlando Bloom or Decaprio playing wonka. Johnny Depp has played more roles than almost anyone is hollywood, from a Notorious Cowboy Criminal to an Astronaut to an unstable pirate. Face it Johnny Depp is todays Willy Wonka and they coulnd't have chosen anyone better to play Wonka.
different takes reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 13, 2004 10:08 AM
I don't think it's a matter of trying to out-do or re-do the first one -- i think it's a matter of, here is someone else's version of it, their take on the story. it doesn't mean it's better or worse than the first one, just means it's Tim Burton's outlook on it, so respect him for his viewpoint -- i'm sure it's not about trying to be a *better one* than Gene Wilder's. Obviously it's a classic, and no one can out-do a classic.
also-- WHERE IS NOAH TAYLOR'S CHARACTER? and if Christopher Lee is playing Wonka's father, how can you knock this version already when we have such quality actors like Lee?
RE: different takes reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 14, 2004 5:43 AM
Gene Wilder's version of Willie Wonka wasn't happy, it was really bizarre and twisted. Also, in the trailer Wonka says he hates chewing gum the most. Why does he make it then?
RE: Tim Burton's Willy Wonka: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 14, 2004 8:48 AM
r u a freaking moron. I luv johnny depp and tim burton, but he just ruined this movie. i mean "chewing gum i think is grose.Chewing gum i hate the most" thats not bad willy wonka would say that. but he is suposed to have a PURPLE suit not MAROON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 14, 2004 12:10 PM
yeah an Umpa loompa dummy
RE: depp is so fucking gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 14, 2004 12:16 PM
depp helped make the name of burton by playing edward scissor hands. Geeze your a moron. Why use manson. The dumbass already sold out to eminem.
Know before you go. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 14, 2004 12:22 PM
technically the orginal edition had the oompa loompas come from a small part of africa. But do to racism and slavery a 2nd edition was released with oompa loompa's as hiipy like folk.
4 words "Planet of the Apes" reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 14, 2004 11:43 PM
How many more classics must he fuck up.
RE: 4 words reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 15, 2004 4:00 AM
Everyone deserves a second chance. Except you moron.
Original screenplay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 15, 2004 11:49 AM
For those who commented that Dahl wrote the original screenplay, so what was on screen was the film he wanted to make...
The studio was very unhappy with the Dahl screenplay, so David Selzer was brought in to compltely rewrite it (he introduced the whole Slugworth plotline) and Newley and Bricusse were commisioned to write brand new songs to turn it into a musical (which wasn't the original intention).
Dahl was furious with this treatment, and as a result pulled the rights to the "Glass Elevator" sequel.
What is up there is, in my opinion, absolutely fantastic (and one of my favourite films) - but it certainly isn't what Roald Dahl wanted the film to be.
WHO DOES HE LOOK LIKE? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 15, 2004 8:46 PM
I just saw the trailer and his big teeth and mannerisms, especially on the bubble-gum line, he looks SOO much like someone but I can't place who!!! Maybe the chick who was in Amelie.
RE: You cant beat Perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 15, 2004 10:58 PM
that's why they're not FIXING anything; they're taking a different approach. the cinematography, the characterization, the costuming, the visuals in general, the story line, and the inclusion of details are very different. it will be another look at the novel, not an improved take on the movie.
RE: You cant beat Perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 16, 2004 3:40 AM
Looks like that Grinch movie to me.
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 16, 2004 3:47 AM
The dudes that work the TV room in the original movie were oompa's too.
RE: You cant beat Perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 16, 2004 12:25 PM
You think Dahl didn't realise that it sounded like wank? He did it on purpose
read reply
Posted by jazzGirl (jazzyaltogirls@yahoo.com) on December 16, 2004 3:11 PM
seriously now, why are people picking favorites here? both movies have the same plot line, but some things have changed, thats all. i personally love gene wilder and the 1971 version, and im totally excited about the new one, because Johnny Depp+Tim Burton= great movie. Johnny will be different at Willy than Gene was, but it will still be good. Everyone should give it a chance whether you enjoy johnny depp or not.
RE: .... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 16, 2004 6:05 PM
I agree with you. Noone is trying to "fix perfection". That's why this is called a remake and not a revision. This is just another version. If you liked the 1st time, but you don't go see this one how do you call yourself a fan? You can't completely be a fan without being open to other versions. Maybe this one will be a little bit closer to the book. I think noone can replace Gene Wilder,but that doesn't mean I don't think that Johnny Depp could be just as good.
my wit the oompa loompa reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 16, 2004 6:59 PM
hello everybody how long is your dick because ill like to suck it its me the boy that is soooooooo horney for mr wonka i got some good new i learned that the oopa loompas love i mean love getting it up the ass because were at my house wit mr wonka and charlie and charlies grampa he real ruff we had so much fun but fucking each other and sucking each others dick oooooo man im sooo horney im rubbing my nipples and my dick at this moment oooooooooooo yes my little hand yes ooo that feels good were my poster of mr wonka wit the holes for me dick il brb............ok im putting my dick in the hole nowoooooooooooooooo see ya later im to busy having fun
RE: my wit the oompa loompa reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 16, 2004 7:06 PM
how small are there dicks u wanna suck mine
RE: my wit the oompa loompa reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 17, 2004 7:07 AM
The role of Wonka needs someone the kids can look up to, a role model they can trust and have faith in. Depp fits the bill, he is an excellent choice. I have not only seen the original film, but have read both the book and it's sequel, Charlie & the Great Glass Elevator, which I am sad was never made into a movie. All that matters now is that the magical Mr Wonka is back to delight a new generation!
i love the cock reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 17, 2004 1:38 PM
willy wonka is the best dick sucker i have to get another apointment the oompa loompa like to sing songs about dicks
RE: Read this reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 17, 2004 1:40 PM
u wanna suck my cock plez
i don't suppose reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 17, 2004 8:10 PM
that anyone has noticed the eerie similarity between depp's willie wonka and michael jackson? think about it. it's brilliantly subversive.
I hit the wrong button reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 17, 2004 9:45 PM
Yes Danny Elfman is doing score...Did you watch the trailer? Can't you tell his music anywhere? I just wanted to say that yes Depp does look a little bit like Manson, but did anybody else get that Clockwork Orange feel from him as well? Watching the trailor I felt like Burton took the one really creepy scene from the first movie and made the whole thing like that. Well we will all know what its like in June when its out.
RE: I hit the wrong button reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 18, 2004 4:24 AM
Me love you long time Mr. Wonka.
The characters reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 18, 2004 12:34 PM
The characters have great costumes for this movie, and Johnny Depp looks very funny(The right kind of person). I can't wait to see the Oompah Loompah's.
RE: Depp - not a genius reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 18, 2004 8:12 PM
"i mean, he doesn't write the scipts [sic] to the movies, he just reads them."
Really, if you believe it to be so simple to act well then you must live in a fantasy world.
You should really try directing actors for film at least once... you'll quickly see that it takes a very special talent for a performer to act well, and yes--I would say it takes a level of genius to not only act well but also consistently create new believable characters.
Johnny Depp's range of ability is mind-blowing from a professional point of view. Stop and think about the variety of characters he's portrayed, each one defined by personality traits he's given them, that he's cultivated based on the script. The script is lifeless without the 'genius' of a talented actor.
RE: Book vs Movie reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 19, 2004 1:47 AM
Actually, R.D. wrote the first draft of the script to the "original". Once it was complete and turned over to the movie studio, they changed it. He never intended for this movie to be a musical, that was added to peak interest from kids. He was incredibly unsatisfied with the original. When the studio decided to make the "remake", the R.D. estate basically said, only if Tim directs it. I have no idea if this will be more or less like the first one, but what does it matter? I will go see it because I love Tim.
RE: Tim Burton's Willy Wonka: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 19, 2004 8:55 AM
Thank you! I've been checking out various chat boards and what not.. and all I've seen is bad comments about it. When I first saw the trailer to this, I almost freaked out. Tim Burton is my favorite director in the world.. he just has the stuff to pull ANYTHING off. And with Depp as Wonka, he can definately pull this off. I can't wait til July.
RE: Tim Burton's Willy Wonka: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 19, 2004 10:21 AM
So you didn't like the trailer? I don't know about anyone else but when I was a kid I hated musicals, I always thought the songs got in the way of the story.
fucking no reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 19, 2004 11:20 PM
tim burton is the best. Four words "The Nightmare Before Christmas". the best movie ever. therfore, it will be one of the great movies that will come out int the greatest year of movies, 2005
RE: fucking no reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 20, 2004 6:30 AM
Four words: Planet of the Apes.
Willy Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 20, 2004 6:58 AM
I like the older version with gene wilder... or how his name is. But I think that with Johhny Depp the movie can be awsome.. just like the older one... but I do hope that the oompa loompa's are pretty much the same
how gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 20, 2004 2:35 PM
it looks like someone who is staring in a first grade play
RE: how gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 20, 2004 2:37 PM
i can see why you said that
zoes hot reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 20, 2004 2:39 PM
she is so fine
RE: zoes hot reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 20, 2004 2:41 PM
my friend Loral thinks she is too. He wants to ask her out.
RE: Tim Burton's Willy Wonka: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 21, 2004 11:39 AM
it is not a musical you nit wit!
RE: You can't fix perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 21, 2004 7:53 PM
you guys are missing the point. they are trying to re create it not follow it exaclt word for word. so go screw yourselves, this movie is gunna be awesome
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 22, 2004 12:10 PM
Oompa Loompas didn't have green hair and orange skin in the book
Purpose reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 22, 2004 8:09 PM
When the writer of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory saw the first version of the movie he was greatly dispointed because it was way darker than his book was. So what I would be expecting is a fun, light hearted movie...not dark like the first one.
RE: depp is so fucking gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 25, 2004 12:37 AM
I'm a Marilyn Manson fan, but I don't think he would've done justice. I believe Johnny Depp will do great, he's a wonderful actor. Think about what you all are saying, you haven't even seen the movie. How can you judge it so early now? And his clothing seems more elegant. But if you think about it, he has money, people with money dress that way. I'm trying to put it in simple terms so ignorant people that only know how you curse can understand what I'm saying, I know you close-minded jerks won't because you're mind frame is set on one thing, but I had to add my two cents.
RE: depp is so fucking gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 25, 2004 8:59 AM
Damn right and manson would have made a better wonka, and depp will ruin the name of burton and willy wonka. I dont even want to eat the candy anymore, because of Johnny Homo.
That just cracked me up. Calling Depp a pouf and saying Manson (the one guy who actually DOES take it up the arse) should have played Wonka.
WHAT! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 25, 2004 8:33 PM
This movie looks so gay and you know what....Johnney Depp is going to suck in this role because it is Gene Wilders role and no one else's. can we think back to some of Burton's remakes and see how they sucked balls? So will this. I've got news for you. Johnney Depp always gets credit from catty girls who just think he is hot. I thought Kate Winslet was brilliant in Finding Neverland but nobody gave her any credit. Ya'll are jaded
Questions reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 26, 2004 8:55 AM
I heard this is base on the first movie plus the books. Is this a musical. And i say this movie will be pg or pg-13.
RE: You can't fix perfection etc reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 27, 2004 2:08 AM
let's get some things straight, obviously (what, are you blind??) this film wont be an exact adaption of the book as there is only one parent for each child... sound familiar???
Also, Gene Wilder as Willy Wonka was perfect. just the right amount of joy, evil, quirkiness and hatrid for awful children!! One question, where do people get this strange notion that Roald Dahl's book is soooo much 'darker' than the film, I personnaly think it's the other way around... Wonka's jacket was plum, which is closer to moron than purple, so let's leave that alone. I am sure that the main reason Roald didn't like the original film very much was MAINLY due to all the political crap he had to go through with the studio. For what it's worth I love Dahl, Burton, Depp, Manson, Wilder, Elfman, Bea Arthur and my mummy
RE: You can't fix perfection etc reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 27, 2004 4:52 AM
I think Will Smith should have played Wonka, plus it would make more sense cos his skin's the colour of chocolate.
RE: You cant beat Perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 29, 2004 12:17 AM
the old movie was someones in-terp-er-ta-shion of the book...sorry about the spelling...
radar at surge123456789@yahoo.com
RE: You cant beat Perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 29, 2004 12:18 AM
the old movie was someones in-terp-er-ta-shion of the book...sorry about the spelling...
radar at surge123456789@yahoo.com
RE: You cant beat Perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 29, 2004 4:59 AM
And this new one isn't going to be?
The new Willie Wonka Movie reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 29, 2004 12:56 PM
People should keep an open mind even though Gene Wilder is the greatest.Heck I at first was hoping they would offer Marilyn Manson the part since he does know how to act sinister part very well of Mr.Womka.But that is just my opion coming from someone who has an open mind.
Opions very and so do closed minded people reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 29, 2004 1:41 PM
Gene Wilder is and will always be the greatest original Willie Wonka.Just like Marilyn Manson will always be trully Brian Hugh Warner a true blue Wonkwer such as myself and as Johnny Depp and lots of other people who have actually been around when those 2 books and the oringinal movie first came out.Its not about sex/drugs or really even gothic music it is about the little people like you and me having a shot like these well known famous people have had and still do at finding our selves and making our dreams come true no matter how low the chances are.Its also about family .Come on people how can you forget.I did not .You should not either.Tim Burton and all these other actors deserve a chance just like Charlie deserved the golden ticket.This is how dreams are made so please if you want to crush chilhood dreams that goodhearted people like us have do it where we cannot read it and hear about it.Thank you for your time hopefully you people will change your opion about this movie.From>StarMoon214
RE: Opions very and so do closed minded people reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 30, 2004 3:33 AM
dooodes, yous gots ta like open your minds to the possibilites man. Willy Wonka is like so out there and all I'm getting is a load of negative vibes here man.
katie reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 30, 2004 10:38 AM
i'm psyched about this movie. i bet its good. johnny depp's awesome. who didn't like pirates of the carribean?
RE: katie reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 31, 2004 4:52 AM
Just because he was in a good film doesn't mean every film he's ever going to be in will be good too. What kind of logic is that?
RE: johnny depp reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 31, 2004 4:06 PM
poop
MUCH LOVE!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 31, 2004 10:27 PM
YES! first comment of the year. I'm soooo excited for this film. I LOOOOVE Johnny Depp and i absoultly love tim burton. they both are my favories so it looks promising. Let me know if i can find out more about it! July 15 seems soooo far away but i'm gunna haft start a countdown! YAY
RE: MUCH LOVE!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 1, 2005 3:41 AM
Sorry to break this to you but your message was posted December 31st 2004 at 10:27.
RE: MUCH LOVE!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 1, 2005 8:17 PM
It's different when you live in new york you smartass
ALL reply
Posted by vbdramaqueen18 (rightsidehitter18@yahoo.com) on January 1, 2005 10:10 PM
I liked the first move, but I enjoyed the novel better.. I think if they make this one more like the novel it will be better. From the looks of it, it is going to be alot more like the novel i mean of course there are similarities but this one first off is called Charlie and the Chocolate Factory so my guess is they are gearing it more twards the book.
RE: MUCH LOVE!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 2, 2005 3:45 AM
Look at the date at the top of your post. I was the first to post in 2005. I win! I rule all! No soup for you!
REal Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 3, 2005 2:40 AM
I think they are trying to make Depp look like the cartoon guy from the real WONKA chocolate ads...he does look like him.
RE: REal Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 3, 2005 6:52 AM
I think that you're trying to make yourself look like a retard and you're doing a good job.
RE: charlie? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 3, 2005 3:46 PM
Xcuse me,but Freddie Highmore(Peter from Finding Neverland) was nominated for BEST YOUNG ACTOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
RE: Johnny Depp?????? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 3, 2005 4:09 PM
For the costome half of it, i think u should blame the costume designer for those colours.......
RE: You cant beat Perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 3, 2005 4:12 PM
5 yearolds? then y r we having this conversation? unless u r a 5yearold.
RE: different takes reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 3, 2005 4:16 PM
Chewing gum? its called charlie & the CHOCOLATE FACTORY. not charlie & the gumfactory.
RE: my wit the oompa loompa reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 3, 2005 4:22 PM
is this the prostitute convention? U HAVE PROOBLEMS!!!!!!!!!!!
RE: different takes reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 3, 2005 4:28 PM
CHOCOLATE FACTORY
RE: my wit the oompa loompa reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 3, 2005 4:39 PM
A tale of delight, and delectable fright, in a world made of sweets, and tasteariffic treats, mind your tongue and your teeth, or you'll end up beneath this factory of choc-o-late and horror. A ticket you have found, now i must take you 'round, 'til i rid myself of gnats, you infuriating brats, so put the gumdrops down, or in syrup you shall drown, and my secret to the world shall so remain.
RE: my wit the oompa loompa reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 4, 2005 3:53 AM
word.
Bahh reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 4, 2005 9:44 AM
You all are so narrow minded. Tim Burton is an amazing director and very creative I must say...I cant wait for this to come out.
And maybe you all should wait for it too...instead of posting all the rude comments. You`ll never know untill you actually see it...
RE: READ THE BOOK reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 4, 2005 1:21 PM
I so agree. The original movie, no matter how good it was, didnt stick with the story as well. The new one is supposed to be more correct. Ronald Dahl didnt even really like the original movie version that much. And they changed the oompa loompas to be politically correct.
i adore johnny depp--but whats up with the teeth?? reply
Posted by Lp-DEPP fanatic (schere00lp@hotmail.com) on January 4, 2005 2:00 PM
the trailer is really trippy...so of course im gonna go see the movie...i cant wait!..
anyway...wtf with the teeth?????? oh well... he knows hes hot, thats why he doesnt care..haha
Does anybody know of a band called"la ley"..i think they are from chile?? or something..im mex-ame..so i sort of know.. well the lead singer used to wear the kind of wierd glasses johhny is wearing.. they look identical..exept for the teeth..there i go again..haha... but no ones better than johnny at looking wierd-hot and awesome at the same time.....
is the guy in the red clothes an oompa loompa?? yuk... wheres the green hair?? and the orange face??
Disturbing reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 4, 2005 7:32 PM
This movie looks kind of disturbing, to be honest. Now, I heard they weren't trying to remake the old movie, but trying to make a brand new, original one. And, I do agree that Johnny Depp looks like a woman.
d reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 4, 2005 7:50 PM
d
RE: Relax reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 4, 2005 7:52 PM
I think we need to remember that the most important thing about a movie is if it is enjoyable. I think this movie looks like a lot of fun. Dont worry about comparing it to the original. If you dont think you would enjoy watching it, then dont. But personally, I have never had Tim Burton let me down. I even enjoyed Frankenweenie :)
RE: Relax reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 5, 2005 2:54 AM
This movie will suck almost as bad as Edward Scissorhands and Batman Returns.
RE: Is it Manson!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 6, 2005 12:56 AM
WILL U JUST SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT THAT RETARD MANSION??? THE BEAUTIFLY TALENTED AND AMAZING JOHNNY DEPP IS PLAYING HIM SO JUST FUCKEN DEAL WITH IT!!!!!
RE: Depp - not a genius reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 6, 2005 1:01 AM
WILL U SHUT UP???WOT WOULD U NO ABOUT BEING A GENIOUS ???? JOHNNY DEPP IS AN AMZING ACTOR BCOZ HE BRINGS SO MUCH MORE TO THE CHARACTERS AND HE HAS NEVER LET ME DOWN IN ANY OF HIS MOVIES AND I'M SURE THAT THE REST OF HIS "LOVERS" FEEL EXACTLY THE SAME!!!!!
IF U HAVE NOTHING GOOD TO WRITE THEN DON'T WRITE NOTHING AT ALL!!!!!
RE: Relax reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 6, 2005 1:08 AM
IF U THINK THAT EDWAED SCISSORHANDS IS NOT AMAZING THEN I SUGGEST U GET SUM HELP!!!!!!!
U STUPID LOSER!!!!!!
ALL OF U OUT THERE WHO R NOT LOOKING FORWARD TO THIS MOVIE...MAY I MAKE IT CLEAR ENOUGH:::
DON'T FUCKEN SEE IT!!!!
RE: Relax reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 6, 2005 2:49 AM
Fuck off you stupid ten year old.
RE: Relax reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 6, 2005 9:24 AM
*Fucken*= redneck for "fucking"
Morbid Burton. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 6, 2005 9:28 AM
I really hope to god that this movie will be an acid trip realized, and scare the shit out of anyone that sees it. I hope that Burton, and Depp suffice, and keep it dark and distrubing.
The movie's done... so why is everyone freaking out about Depp being Wonka? If you cant appreciate the art, then don't go see it. I cant believe people have so much time to agrue this. Forums should be positive, and at least slightly intelligent. Perhaps with all the weather going on in the northeast all the kiddies have time to rank and rave and mis-spell their curse words.
Kudos to the guy that pointed out "fucken" is a redneck word.. hahaha
RE: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 6, 2005 9:46 AM
I loved the old ommpa lummpa, their green hair was awsome, the new one with thier glasses on look scary and the limericks they song were funny the only down side to them was that the limericks would get inside your head for two days.
RE: charlie? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 6, 2005 10:03 AM
I would like two know who is playing charlie too he is the main character and johny deep is getting all the attention
RE: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 6, 2005 2:53 PM
I want to see the movie i just hope it isnt like the grinch and the cat in the hat movies cuz they sucked and they were really different from the book
RE: Relax reply
Posted by Lp-DEPP fanatic (schere00lp@hotmail.com) on January 6, 2005 3:00 PM
ha...
RE: Relax reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 6, 2005 10:48 PM
let's all just remember that since johnny came out of the closet in 03, its important for him to choose more masculine roles. and as far as tim burton, that suit that was filed against him in that child molestation case angered many people, so he needed to prove his fidelity by doing this film.
RE: Relax reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 6, 2005 10:54 PM
do u have anything betta to do then make fun of a movie u havent even seen yet???
get a life!
RE: some of you are so damn stupid reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 6, 2005 10:56 PM
"C) CATCF was originally a book therefore, a ?remake? - not an original script."
How can you remake a book? Especially into a movie? It's just a different adaptation of the book. Not a remake of the 1971 film. I mean, there are at least a dozen Romeo and Juliette (sp?) movies out there. Are they all remakes of the first one?
Anyway. That's all I have to say. Except for Johnny Depp is not a fag. And I'm not refering to the poster who I quoted.
RE: faithfull adaptation reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 6, 2005 11:01 PM
"Roald Dahl wrote the screenplay"
Roald Dahl did not write the screenplay for the '71 film. Check the imdb records. David Seltzer wrote the screenplay.
RE: faithfull adaptation reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 7, 2005 3:56 AM
Wait a minute... Johnny Depp is GAY!?
RE: faithfull adaptation reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 8, 2005 10:15 AM
yep, he sure is. check out johnnydeppthroat.com for some pictures of him and burton getting it on.
RE: depp is so fucking gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 8, 2005 2:05 PM
Of course Manson would have been better. But at least Depp tried to base it a bit on Manson himself. Which is awesome.
RE: Marilyn Manson vs. Depp? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 8, 2005 2:07 PM
Actually...Depp himself said that he would like for Manson to play the part...although that sint happening. Manson has played in other movies though. Depp also based part of Willy character on Manson which is cool cause Manson based some stuff on Willy Wonka. It was one of him favorite movies.
Circle of Life reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 8, 2005 4:50 PM
Don't you guys know that things go in cycle? For some reason, in the past 2 decades, society seems to need to redo things. Whether it is A Brady Movie, Batman, Psycho, Starksy and Hutch or Willy Wonka.
I am not against the idea of movies being updated to fit the times but some movies should not be touched. What's next? Gone With The Wind starring Brad Pitt and Pamela Anderson?
RE: Circle of Life reply
Posted by sandsallyLP (No Email) on January 8, 2005 6:03 PM
dont be so ridiculous comparing brad pitt and pamela anderson to any movie johnny depp is in...
RE: P.S. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 9, 2005 10:17 AM
your a fucking bitch
RE: P.S. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 9, 2005 4:45 PM
Better be careful. If your mommy sees you talking like that she will take away your computer.
BTW, weren't you over at JohnnyDepp.com saying "I love you Johnny. I think you're HOT."?
RE: P.S. reply
Posted by sandsallyLP (No Email) on January 10, 2005 11:57 AM
ha ha...
RE: johnny depp reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 11, 2005 12:47 PM
i love johnny depp and hes without a doubt the sexiest man alive, but edward scizzorhands looks ten levels better than willy wonka. Face is too white, hair is too straight, and no facial hair at all (if i was kissing him, id want him without the stache, but for this film, he needs facial hair.
RE: johnny depp reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 11, 2005 12:50 PM
is that even really johnny depp? he doesnt look right. I think they should of got an "unknown" to play the part, rather than depp. BUT, depp is very versatile
Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 11, 2005 1:53 PM
I think instead of Johnny Deep they should have hired The darkest of them all, as Wonka, Robert Englund!!!
RE: pfff reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 12, 2005 1:05 PM
dude, you say that like sucking penises and vaginas is a bad thing
RE: ... reply
Posted by zany zebra (yeoooo@hotmail.com) on January 13, 2005 1:07 PM
um didnt u call depp gay in 1 of ur other post?? cus ur contradicting urself there if u have a brain and know what that means MAKE UP UR MIND MAN also hes a brillant actor so stuff u
the NEW wonka reply
Posted by loony (rocksteadyy@hotmail.com) on January 13, 2005 7:20 PM
ok.. before say anything 'bout this movie let's not forget that Tim Burton's movies are always the greatests... yeah yeah, Gene Wilder IS Willy Wonka... but let's give a chance to Depp, shaw we ?
Nevermind Depp... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 14, 2005 11:04 AM
yeah yeah...Johnny Depp..blah blah blah..let's consider other things about this film. CHRISTOPHER LEE as Wonka Sr.!!! ( Dracula to you elder readers,Saruman to you younger Lord O' The Rings peeps.)What the??
Of course Burton's wifey has to be in it as Charlie's mom. Danny Elfman returns for Burton with more music.
That guy in red (seen way up ^ up there.)IS an Oompa Loompa...and yes,from the T.V. room...remember,they run all of Wonka's stuff.
But as dark as the film may get,it will never be done EXACT to Roald Dahl's works. For one the Oompa Loompas were pygmies.(Anyone who has read the original books with the original drawings can tell you this.)
All that aside...the "classic version" will always be such. But I am willing to try out the new one,just to see a non-musical version.
RE: Nevermind Depp... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 15, 2005 3:46 AM
I'm a personal friend of Johnny Depp and he wants me to let you all know that he hopes you stupid Goth wannabee's get raped by your dads.
RE: Nevermind Depp... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 15, 2005 8:36 AM
I thought Chris Lee is playing Grandpa Joe not Wonkas dad.
I think Tim Burton's movies are too dark and freaky. Edward Scissorhands, Nightmare Before Christmas...too wierd. But I like Depp and this movie is supposed to be closer to the book than Wonka. So I will give it a look.
jonny DEPP OR Marilyn Manson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 15, 2005 6:38 PM
im glad the choose depp, manson is just to scary and sinister
HilaryDuffLover reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 16, 2005 9:49 AM
Willy looks like a ceareal killer
HilaryDuffLover reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 16, 2005 9:58 AM
Who's playing Mike T.V.
RE: HilaryDuffLover reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 16, 2005 4:14 PM
That kid from Malcom in the middle is.
Un-F'ing-believable reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 16, 2005 4:38 PM
I can't believe I read the whole thing. Not the book but this lame thread. Geez I wasted more time on this than learning about the nature of Black Holes on the Physics Forum.
I'm gonna have to set my alarm clock 20 minutes earlier tomorrow so I can get the time I WASTED back..right after I block this URL in my firewall so I don't accidently come here again,,,
RE: Un-F'ing-believable reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 17, 2005 3:22 AM
Ya'll come back now ya here?
Poor Poor Johnny reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 17, 2005 6:50 PM
poor johnny has to look like a fag playing willy wonka. that's super sad that they have to hide his hottness. i luv him to death and all, but i'm scared to watch this movie!!
RE: Poor Poor Johnny reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 18, 2005 5:01 AM
I heard there was a scene where he rapes all the children.
hotty!!!!!!!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 18, 2005 6:17 AM
nice job!!!!!!!J.C.D
RE: HilaryDuffLover reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 18, 2005 12:27 PM
I think you mean "serial" killer -- unless you're a five-year old who is just learning the complicated dynamics of the alphabet and of spelling, you must be the biggest moron who somehow managed to work a computer keyboard. My advice, shut up or go back to elementary school.
Why can't we wait and see reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 18, 2005 3:05 PM
Everyone is commenting and saying "such and such would have been better" how do we now that they are going to be bad until we have seen them do the part. Johnny Depp may look stupid but he may be amazing in this role. So can you wait till the movie comes out then decide what you think.
Wait and see reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 18, 2005 9:21 PM
Why doesnt everyone wait and see when the movie comes out instead of judging it now?
RE: Too pale, Too straight reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 19, 2005 12:49 PM
Too pale?? Too straight?? You expected a California tan and a modern doo from some guy who has supposedly been cooped up inside that factory for over 15 years?? The costume/make-up crew did a magnificent job turning Johnny into to psychitso weirdo Wonka was supposed to be!!
RE: Too pale, Too straight reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 20, 2005 4:14 AM
Sum1 sed b4 how it wud b gud if will smith waz playn wily wonka. dats jus stoopid, how can u hav a nigga play wonka?
RE: Too pale, Too straight reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 20, 2005 5:37 AM
A lot of Burton's movies are eye candy and have a wierd look to them. If you think I am on crack go look at Batman, Scissorhands or Nightmare Before Christmas. Why should this movie be any different?
I think JD has come a long way since his 21 Jump Street days. I am curious to see how he will pull this off.
HIIIGH reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 20, 2005 9:34 PM
i hope this movie is awsome to see stoned!!! I am looking foward to watching this movie really HIIIGH, i just hope it dosent BLOW if ya know what i mean!!
RE: HIIIGH reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 20, 2005 9:36 PM
Totally dude!!!!
RE: HIIIGH reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 21, 2005 7:13 AM
I bet you're some 12 year old who's never so much as had a drag on a reefer.
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 21, 2005 3:10 PM
OMG!!!!! if ur making a movie from the chocolate factory there gotta be proper oompa loompas!!! whoever put that fake pic is a fricken gay ass retard adlfjlasdkjfl! put the real oompa loompas on. not sum fat guy in a red suit.
YAY! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 21, 2005 3:14 PM
i loved the 1st movie! i hope da 2nd one just as good! i came online searching ESP cuz i didn't understand sumthing sum1 said and this web popped up and im like omg yay! i was soo excited wen i heard a new one was coming out! GO WILLIE WONKA AND OOMPA LOOMPAS!
RE: YAY! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 22, 2005 3:18 AM
Let's start a petition! Real Oompa Lumpas and no packies!
RE: You can't fix perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 23, 2005 2:49 PM
Don't hate...
YERP reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 23, 2005 10:02 PM
It should be rated R and it should be like a horror movie like they get traped in side and willy wonka is a mad man
RE: YERP reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 26, 2005 4:25 AM
Yea, and while they're trying to make it as shit as humanly possible they should also get Paul Anderson to direct.
test reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 26, 2005 1:22 PM
test
I am looking forward reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 26, 2005 1:24 PM
I was very afraid to see how the movie would be but after watching the trailor I am looking forward to it!! I think it will be well worth the time to watch and become a classic of it's own.
RE: some of you are so damn stupid reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 27, 2005 7:01 PM
Dude, are you sane? The one that Dahl would have wanted? That's funny, I wonder why he didn't get 'the one he wanted' when he co-wrote the original screenplay and was actually on the set during the filming?
You probably liked the screen version on the Flintstones too, you goober.
RE: Original screenplay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 27, 2005 7:19 PM
Dude, where did you get that line of shit from? Depp's personal hershey highway? If Dahl so utterly hated the originial--which he co-wrote--why the fuck would he hang out on the set during the filming? Just to get more pissed off? That is a bullshit thread that several dorks have brought up.
Depp is a goober.
Manson would have blown him out of the water.
Dead Kennedys rule. Wish they had done the soundtrack.
True to the book? Wonka's dad--WTF?
RE: Original screenplay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 1, 2005 10:15 AM
And the Oompa Lumpa's are fucking sand niggas!
About Dahl... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 1, 2005 12:52 PM
Just so you know, Dahl wasn't happy with the original version, and that's why they never made a movie version of "the Great Glass Elevator" since they never got the right to it. Now, stop judging this movie, which you have never seen, and make yourself useful, by leaving.
some people reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 1, 2005 7:51 PM
my god people! you are going to have to open your minds before you watch this movie!!! This isn't "willie wonka and the chocolate factory" (the 70's movie people like to watch on acid) this is "Charlie and the Chocolate factory" (a 2005 movie people will like to watch on acid)! 2 different movies, most likely pretty different stories, it would be stupid to go in expecting Gene Wilder to prance around for an hour and a half (isn't he dead?). Just chill out, take a couple hits and just watch the damn movie!
RE: some of you are so damn stupid reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 3, 2005 10:55 PM
Thank you for being smart about this. For one thing you are right because this is closer to the book. Also if anyone int his discussion is a true Tim Burton fan they would remember that he does NOT make remakes. If you remember Planet of the Apes 2001, he said it was his teak on that story rather than a remake of the original movies.
RE: some of you are so damn stupid reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2005 6:02 AM
And look how that turned out.
Oh My God reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2005 2:24 AM
I've never read such a ridiculous series of comments in my life. I don't know who you people are, but I suggest that the majority of you get a dictionary, you know, one of those big books filled with words? Spelling and grammer are obviously lost arts these days.
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2005 3:34 AM
when is the film coming otu coz im rearing to go and see the so called umpalumpas they don't even lokk like them
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 5, 2005 9:25 AM
I'm really looking forward to this movie.
I'm also looking forward to the inevitable porn knock-off.
Possible title "Free Wonka's Willie".
RE: You cant beat Perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2005 9:35 AM
I agree, but now will see another version of perfection. The first was for kids, this one is for the adults and the author.
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2005 9:48 AM
OMG i sm sooo mad!!!well i am happy they r making the new one but they r sayin its going to be more dark if ya know what i mean and if they r gonna do it that way they should have used MARLIN MANSON insted of johny depp i mean marlin manson should have got the part!!!he would have done it better than johny depp and since they r using depp they shouldnt have made him look like a retard with the huge teeth!!!
this is bullshit!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 6, 2005 10:55 PM
i am a willy wonka fanatic, but this movie doesn't even look like it is worth seeing. they said that it was going to be the same everything from the original movie, but it is not appearing to be that way. i refuse to see this. if they were going to make a sequel to it they should have done that in the 70s not in 2005. they could have used the same people for christ sake!!! p.s. the characters look like shit
RE: Yay, Depp! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2005 5:32 PM
yay i want to see this movie even if it is for lil kids but look who stars in it :) (sigh)
RE: oompa loompa reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2005 5:36 PM
yeah i'll misss those lil orange faced freaks :( poor oompa loompas and didn't that girl that chews gum all the time have brown long hair and wasn't she fat? ah who cares it has johnny d in it
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2005 4:05 PM
WHY???
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2005 8:05 AM
Manson may be a good singer (depending on your tastes in music) but he's certainly no actor, what makes you all think he should have gotten the role?
RE: So gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2005 7:40 AM
Leave Johnny Depp alone. He is a good actor.
OH MY GOSH reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 14, 2005 10:22 PM
I AM SO ANGRY RIGHT NOW. I CANNOT BELIEVE THEY ACTUALLY CAME OUT WITH A "NEW" WILLY WONKA AND THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY. I WILL PERSONALLY KILL JOHNNY DEPP IF HE FUCKS THIS UP!!!
RE:Willy Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 15, 2005 11:22 AM
That would be sooooo flucking cool if they remade WW&TCF; w/Marlin Manson!!!
He Is Soooooo SEXXYYY!!!!!!! I love MM.
RE:Willy Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 15, 2005 11:27 AM
That would be sooooo flucking cool if they remade WW&TCF; w/Marlin Manson!!!
He Is Soooooo SEXXYYY!!!!!!! I love MM.
RE: RE:Willy Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2005 4:37 AM
He would probably eat you if you ever met him.
MOVIE SETS TONE, NOT BOOK reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2005 1:31 PM
The book is the book is the book! Gene Wilder is the real Willy Wonka people know of the 70's and up till now. Even if the book was the best book in the world, it all comes down to the movie. This is where stars are born and history and careers are made. NOT THE BOOK. Look at Harry Potter. The writer is great, but what does she look like? Can you say HOLLYWOOD? Give the new movie a chance, but don't deminish the 1st movie because it strayed from the book. It is all about the movie and the reason is more people will see a movie than read a book. That is the fact! Without seeing the 2005 movie is unfair to pass judgement. When is the last time you sat down with a bucket of popcorn and read a book? Wilder was and is FANTASTIC! Give Depp a chance to give us a chuckle just for chuckle sake and end it there.
RE: RE:Willy Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 17, 2005 10:52 AM
Yeah, sure thing. And he also throws puppies in the crowds.
Uhm. NOT.
Fucking hell, what is it with the fucking stereotypes?! He had the guts to be himself and not the easily digested bullshit we see on TV daily.
Wish we got some honesty like this from fucking lawyers. The world would be so much fucking better.
RE: this is bullshit!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 17, 2005 5:50 PM
actually, the 70's version was sanctioned by roald dahl. he hated that version. it had a plethora of references to drugs and barely followed the story at all. there were no golden geese in the book! willy wonka did not spout lines from shakespeare and other assorted poems/pieces of literature. the oompa loompas were short black aborigines in the original story, but changed to short non-descript aborigines several years later when racism became a major social faux pas. the overall tone of the story was much, much funnier. if you don't believe me, actually read the book.
RE: this is bullshit!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 17, 2005 5:52 PM
the overall tone of the story is much funnier. i have no qualms in saying that tim burton's style will do justice to the project, so long as he stays true to the book, as has been constantly stated time and again.
RE: this is bullshit!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 18, 2005 12:21 PM
ur talkin a load of bull ur all gay
RE: this is bullshit!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 20, 2005 3:40 PM
actually, the 70's version was sanctioned by roald dahl. he hated that version. it had a plethora of references to drugs and barely followed the story at all. there were no golden geese in the book! willy wonka did not spout lines from shakespeare and other assorted poems/pieces of literature. the oompa loompas were short black aborigines in the original story, but changed to short non-descript aborigines several years later when racism became a major social faux pas. the overall tone of the story was much, much funnier. if you don't believe me, actually read the book.
Blah blah blah same thing again and again, I got two words for you SHUT THE FUCK UP.
I love him reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 20, 2005 11:18 PM
I do love him, and I do think thats he's hott!
RE: Tim Burton's Willy Wonka: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 20, 2005 11:24 PM
I totally agree, burton could not have cast a better actor for the part of willy wonka. Depp is so great.
OMG...OMG... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 20, 2005 11:31 PM
OMG I AM SOOOOO PUMPED! I CAN'T WAIT I LOVE JOHNNY DEPP SOOOOOOOOOO MUCH HE IS SOOOOOOO HOT. HE IS A TOTAL SEX GOD, AND I CAN'T WAIT FOR HIS LATEST MASTERPIECE TO ARRIVE IN THEARTERS! AHHHHHH!
. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 21, 2005 5:14 PM
your gay
. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 21, 2005 5:19 PM
i read the book its good i saw the movie its good i saw the trailer and it sucked my fucking nut sack
this movie will suck cock reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 21, 2005 5:26 PM
the first movie kicked ass, everyone is going to see the johnny depp version, it will suck dick then they will pretend they like it, then a month later everyone will forget about it, and then "oceans 13" will come out fuck remakes and fuck sequels to remakes, and fuck books books are for girls, and annoying ass high school kids.
RE: this movie will suck cock reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 22, 2005 6:49 AM
Ride on Brudda! All we needs is wrasslin on tha teevee.
Random Pic reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 25, 2005 1:01 AM
I sure hope that random guy isn't supposed be Mike Teavee heh :P
I mean it is a tad odd the rest of the kids are shown here, he isn't but some random guy is
RE: this is bullshit!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 25, 2005 1:03 AM
That's four words
RE: . reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 26, 2005 8:01 PM
??? v_v
Nowww..hang on.... reply
Posted by LetMeSeeNow (Balderdash@aol.com) on February 28, 2005 3:21 PM
Now I seriously doubt that Johnny Depp ruin Willy Wonka. I must especially point out that I believe Johnny's coat is a shade of RED, not brown...and even though I'm not of the contention that EVERY older movie needs to be 'refreshed', I do think this will be a very intriguing version. No, he doesn't look the part so much as Gene Wilder; but that's quite alright. I do agree with you that Johnny will act the part to the best of his abilities. We shall all see when it comes out!
RE: Both sides of Depp. reply
Posted by LetMeSeeNow (Balderdash@aol.com) on February 28, 2005 3:31 PM
I love the Gene Wilder version...I will probably very much like and accept the Johnny Depp version. What people MUST keep in mind is that this film is simply THAT...a film. Johnny Depp will do his best; he usually always does. My hat remains tipped to Gene Wilder with respect; but Johnny is the only actor TODAY who could recapture this character. I simply couldn't see anyone else taking this role now.
RE: Is it Manson!! reply
Posted by LetMeSeeNow (Balderdash@aol.com) on February 28, 2005 3:35 PM
People...Johnny Depp is married, with a family. Can we please move off the 'fag' wagon please? The man has classic features. He is wearing what he was instructed to wear by Tim Burton and those who designed the costumes for the film. Nothing more.
RE: Book vs Movie reply
Posted by LetMeSeeNow (Balderdash@aol.com) on February 28, 2005 3:36 PM
Your blood pressure must be absolutely off the charts....and all because of a movie!
RE: WHO DOES HE LOOK LIKE? reply
Posted by LetMeSeeNow (Balderdash@aol.com) on February 28, 2005 3:38 PM
Its so odd...I think he looks like....Johnny Depp???? Oh no, that couldn't possibly be it.
yay! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 2, 2005 11:23 AM
i absolutley love johnny depp, tim burton and the film this film is going to be so wickedly cooooool cause depp's exactly based his techniques on marilyn manson (lil fact i know) so its going to be fucked up!!! eek! i cant wait!
RE: jonny DEPP OR Marilyn Manson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 4, 2005 1:36 PM
manson is scary/sinister..manson is a fucking pussy..but glad they stuck to the book...its fucking harcore, industrial man..tim burton is wiser.depp is the only one that could play the role..PLUR
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 5, 2005 3:40 AM
try getting out more or even better..get your head out of the book and at least get as far as the telly to watch the fil. Umpa lumpas have green hair, strange wide kneee trousers and a heigh deficiency
RE: READ THE BOOK reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 6, 2005 10:24 AM
shut up u bitch
RE: Come on reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 8, 2005 1:07 AM
Actually manson didnt get the role because he didnt have the time to make the film.
Johnny Depp reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 9, 2005 6:33 AM
He has now lost his hotnes
RE: Manson should have been Wonka!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 9, 2005 6:36 AM
i agree
RE: READ THE BOOK reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 9, 2005 6:52 AM
YOU ARE A MEAN PERSON
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 9, 2005 6:39 PM
This is shit why mess with a classic!!!!
RE: You can't fix perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 10, 2005 1:07 AM
'Not going to see this film, just going to get the original and best out, and watch it over and over.
There can be no other.'
you can't really say that the older one is the best if u don't even give the new one a chance to compare them
RE: Tim Burton's Willy Wonka: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 10, 2005 3:19 PM
Why the hell are the kids so young?
RE: So gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 10, 2005 4:04 PM
I agree totaly !!!1
RE: So gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 10, 2005 4:07 PM
what do you mean?????
from Sapphire
RE: So gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 10, 2005 4:09 PM
well my opinion is that
Willy Wonka just looks
stupid
from Saphire and write
something else besides
he looks gay.
RE: So gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 10, 2005 4:11 PM
yo, what are you
talking about dude?
I think he looks plain
stupid.
From, Sapphire
RE: So gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 10, 2005 4:18 PM
how can I be jealos?
I am a girl.
are you a boy or a girl?
RE: So gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 10, 2005 4:21 PM
no and are you a boy
or a girl
RE: johnny depp reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 12, 2005 12:51 PM
well maybe depp looks like that because that's how the director pictured it. tim burton is known for putting weird and crazy spins on things along with depp. there's a lot more people involved in the costuming and such besides the character. i think it will be a great version because tim burton and johhny depp would never try to make it exactly like the original.
What are you all complaining about? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 12, 2005 1:39 PM
Personally I cannot wait to see the movie and I am seeing the first showing, besides that: What are you all complaining about? Its a movie. It is not necessarily going to follow either the movie or the book, what movie can completely do that. I am going to look at it apart from them. It is a movie and should be viewed as any new movie should be. Whatever your reason for watching it judge it apart from the original and the book. One no directer can put everything from a book into a movie and they must make it original in some way (look at Harry Potter for instance). And second the first movie can never be recreated, but there can be a NEW movie on this book. I do not see why you all are fussing about it. I think it will be spectacular because of the director and the cast. Take it as IT is not as YOU think it should be, isn't that what most do to a NEW movie that they know nothing about?
(I know this doesn't help my point but Manson? I cannot imagine him being in a movie that loads of children are going to see... That may be why Johny Depp is the main guy, because if Manson acted some might not have seen it as well as Johny is a well known and especially good actor right now, many want to see his movies so that makes the rating and the numbers/money go up)
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 18, 2005 8:29 AM
umpa lumpas rock!!!!!!
DAH reply
Posted by DeppChick339 (Tigergrrrrl2000@yahoo.com) on March 19, 2005 8:52 AM
to let you know this version of the movie isnt saposted to be the cady coded version it will be a lot more like the book and if you have read the book you know it was kinda weird and creepy so i think it will be a lot better
humph reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 20, 2005 9:06 AM
THAT AINT PHILIP THINGY!!! i no dat boi...
RE: So gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 22, 2005 8:59 AM
thats an unapropreat comment.its homophobic,and rood..i think this movie is going to be kick ass! kuz depps a hottie!
RE: So gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 22, 2005 8:59 AM
thats an unapropreat comment.its homophobic,and rood..i think this movie is going to be kick ass! kuz depps a hottie!
RE: You can't fix perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 27, 2005 1:08 PM
I absolutely agree. I gor the original movie in 1986 when I was four and my Mum thought I'd hate it. How wrong she was! I virtually know every line, and I just know with absloute convition that I will hate the Depp version. Even from the trailer I can see that all the witty and yet dark responses Willy Wonka has are missing from the new one. The original was so wonderously crafted with Wonka's strange yet intriguing verse, often lines from famous origin,e.g. Shakespeare, that a 'dumbed down, Depp version will be tragic.
johnny depp reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 28, 2005 5:45 AM
ok people...johnny depp is mine so back off, and he did not get botox for the movie sorry but he didnt, and by the way its called makeup!
RE: So gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 30, 2005 1:30 PM
Oviously you are subnormal.I suspect you have the intelligence of a shoe........ Either that or on some sort of medication, why don't you OVERDOSE scumbag !!!!!!!!!
RE: You can't fix perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2005 11:04 AM
i think that the first movie was great, but we wont know which one is better untill the new one acctually comes out. gene wilder was a great willy wonka, but i really like johnny depp. he can do good at almost any part. i think either this movie is gonna be really good or really bad, but we dont know yet. In my opinion, johnny depp will be awesome. this new movie will probobly be great unless they screw up the oompa loompas.
RE: You can't fix perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2005 11:16 AM
just to clarify, tim burton is making his movie based on the book. it will NOT be a remake of the movie. So you people who loved the movie can watch willy wonka, and the book lovers can watch the REAL charlie and the chocolate factory. GO DEPP!
Depp Rules reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2005 11:23 AM
Depp can play any part in the world and he is the best actor in the world and he is a total and complete hottie. he'll do great!
RE: Depp Rules reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2005 8:39 PM
all u depp haters can go to hell johnny is an awsome actor a really hot guy and a perfect person
he is NOT gay he did NOT have botox and he is NOT ugly!!!
jonnydepp reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 3, 2005 7:24 PM
johnny depp is the best part for any movie! he is so cute!
Willie Wonka and the Chocolate Factory reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 9, 2005 7:09 PM
wow. just, wow. its official. Depp is making a fool of himself.wow. He looked sort of like Michael Jackson in the trailer.wow
RE: jonnydepp reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 9, 2005 7:11 PM
NO HES NOT!!
....... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 11, 2005 6:59 AM
the funny part in the old one is when violet blows up like a blueberry and they dont show what happens next, that the weird part
RE: depp is so fucking gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 17, 2005 2:53 PM
Who cares if Johnny Depp is gay? He is a great entertainer and that's all that matters to movie goers.
RE: oompa loompa reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 17, 2005 3:04 PM
I was a huge fan of the original book. I probably read it five times when I was a kid. I loved the illustrations.
I didn't like the movie as much for two reasons.
First, I didn't like the way the design of the Oompa Loompas. They were weird looking and ugly, although I understand why they could be like they were in the book. I am glad Burton has gone back to the drawing board when it comes to the Oompa Loompas.
The other thing I didn't like in the movie was the incident where Charlie disobeyed Wonka by drinking soda pop. My recollection was that Charlie was never naughty in the book.
I hope Burton stays closer to the book and isn't afraid to let Charlie be a goody-goody. In my mind, Charlie was a hero for goody-goodies and there is no shame in that.
THE TRAILER reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 23, 2005 6:32 PM
THE TRAILER ROCKS!!!!!!
RE: So not gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 26, 2005 8:18 AM
u r evil!!!!!!!!!!
willy wonka is beautiful!! u r nothing compared to him!!! he is sweet as a candy bar and u r as sour as a cabbage. u just wait when we get married i will tell him about u and he will come and kick ur stupid ass all around outside our factory so all ur friends can c and everyone will c u 4 the evil guy u r!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
shemp is right reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 26, 2005 8:21 AM
you r SO right! gene wilder will always be the only decent wonka! He played that role so perfectly that all others pale in comparison!
RE: charlie? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 10, 2005 3:37 PM
>>That sounds like an unhealthy relationship if you ask me
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 12, 2005 3:26 AM
I know it is so not like a reg. umpa lumpa!
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 12, 2005 3:34 AM
I know it is so not like a reg. umpa lumpa!
He looks like a tec. man!
RE: You cant beat Perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 12, 2005 3:38 AM
Yes you can. at least Jonny Depth can and i would like to see you try. you are so childish
the red guy!!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 12, 2005 6:24 AM
The red guy!!!
isn't an oompa loopa but a guy from the TV room as in the old movie where they did the choc transfer thing.
RE: Yay, Depp! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 26, 2005 3:13 PM
The original movie SUCKED!!! The story was to happy-endingish... LAME.. the kid who played Charlie couldn't act!! Gene Wilder made the movie the classic it is... Tim Burton is a genius!! He made the new one better and Depp is perfect for it!!!!!
Jordan fry "aka" mike teavee is gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 26, 2005 6:42 PM
Jordan fry is so gay he looks and acts and sounds gay and wuts up wit his head it looks like a potatoe !
Depp is art. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 27, 2005 6:25 PM
Depp has covered such a broad range over his career. He is a fantastic choice for the part. It takes true-blue commitment to something to get the kind results Mr. Depp achieves. He transforms completely into his character without the arrogance of acting with a trademark that so many other actors feel compelled to incorporate into all their movies, i.e. an accent, phrase, look, etc. When Johnny takes on a role, any previous role he has played is nowhere to be seen. And that's very refreshing to me. He makes the effort to challenge himself. I have complete respect for Mr. Depp and am personally looking forward to the transformation of what was my latest experience, from "Captain Jack Sparrow" to this wonderful role. (I'm counting the days until Pirates of the Caribbean 2 and 3 as well.) I can't think of anyone better for the part. Johnny, you're a true actor and you bring fantastic talent to the screen. Thank you for your efforts.
Neeta
Honestly reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 28, 2005 8:58 AM
You all act as if it's the end of the world....if you don't want to watch the movie fine...but don't put others down just because they want to watch it. It's just a matter of opinion! Honestly some of the comments I've read on this post are insane.....it's just a movie, so let's not loose our heads! I liked the book,the '71 version and this one was terrific as well. But like I said, it's an opinion, so just get over it please.
Johnny Wonka Rocks! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 28, 2005 10:07 AM
I really enjoyed the new Willy Wonka! I think there was DEFINITELY no other fit more for this role than Johnny Depp.
Johnny is THE most talented actor out there TODAY! He takes his roles and mixes other peoples characteristics into one character and makes that person his to where NO ONE could mock his personality. He is his own person I greatly admire that!
Tim Burton *did* give justice to this movie because he is a stinkin' GENIUS! He really brought this book to life!
I have seen this movie 3 times and cannot wait til it comes out on DVD! I could never watch the old Willy Wonka again!
RE: yay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 30, 2005 1:37 AM
i agree but i prefered the old willie wonka the new 1s a bit dull
RE: yay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 30, 2005 1:37 AM
i agree but i prefered the old willie wonka the new 1s a bit dull
RE: depp is so fucking gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 30, 2005 4:20 PM
Depp is HOT!!
RE: yay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 30, 2005 4:24 PM
Dude its WILLY not WILLIE!
RE: depp is so fucking gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 30, 2005 9:05 PM
JONNY DEPP IS NOT GAY HE'S COOL
JONNY DEPP IS COOL reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 30, 2005 9:25 PM
Jonny Depp is the best actor and cool and one of my favorite movie in the entire world is "CHARLIE AND THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY". jonny depp is my favorite actor and wanna know how much times i saw "CHARLIE AND THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY" counting today? 50times i saw"CHARLIE AND THE CHOCLATE FACTORY". and im about to see it again tomorrow cause it's my one in all time best movie"CHARLIE AND THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY" and i have pictures wallpapers on my computer on my desktop and a slideshow pictures of "Jonny Depp as Willy Wonka in CHARLIE AND THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY". So Jony Depp is the best actor and he's really cool. JONNY DEPPP U ROCK MAN, U HEARD ME U ROCK MAN.I like the those chains u wore and the words when u said "UH UR REALLY FUNNY OR REALLY WEIRD". that was funny so funny and other music in the movie was funny.
RE: Tim Burton's Willy Wonka: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 31, 2005 7:32 AM
i think that jonny depp was the best and funniest charector in the movie sooooo tim burtin thanks for making jonny dep willy wonka it was my favorite movie in the universe
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 31, 2005 7:38 AM
well i think jonny depp was the best charector ever but wen voilet blew up it was really grooose but jonny depp was really funny wen the kids got in truble and wen he ran into the elevator that was the best and i would give it 4 thumbs way way way way WAY UP IF I HAD 4 THUMBS SOOO I AM USING MY TOSE TO SOO TIM BURTEN U PICKED THE RIGHT WILLY WONKA
Depp is not gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 1, 2005 10:49 AM
YOU ARE JUST JEALOUS! He makes the best Wonka in the world! And he makes any character the best! The man just has talent and is handsome! So just SHUT THE FUCK UP LOSERS!
WOW! WHAT A MOVIE!!!!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 2, 2005 6:04 AM
I think this movie is AMAZING and Johnny Depp plays the character so well!
(i still love the original too!)
x x x
Depp= Wonka? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 2, 2005 9:01 AM
I saw the movie- I admit I was blown away. but burton made depp a little too creepy to be a good Willy Wonka. even though this is so much better than the original, Gene Wilder will always be Willy Wonka
RE: Depp= Wonka? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 2, 2005 10:44 AM
Why you can't get off old things? Nostalgia or what? If a new thing is better, why not accept it? I think the new movie is much better and Depp makes the perfect Willy Wonka! :)
WOOO BEST MOVIE EVER reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 2, 2005 10:23 PM
omgshh i think this is the BEST MOVIE IN THE WHOLE WORLD!!! JOHNNY DEPP DID A FANTASTIC JOB!! HE IS SUCH A TALENTED ACTORY! DEPP IS A WAY BETTER WONKA THEN GENE WILDER! WOW I LOVE THIS MOVIE!! IT SO FUNNY!
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 4, 2005 5:34 AM
i love the new movie.
RE: You cant beat Perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 4, 2005 7:37 AM
THAT IS THE TRUTH!!!!
RE: Manson should have been Wonka!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 4, 2005 9:40 AM
Yea it would of been cool to see Marilyn Manson as Willy but it wouldn't be as entertaining as Johnny Depp was. I seen the movie N I loved it! :P
RE: we love johnny reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 4, 2005 10:05 AM
Fuk yea I agree :)
RE: So gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 4, 2005 3:04 PM
You're GAY!
RE: depp is so fucking gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 4, 2005 3:14 PM
If you think that Depp is so gay, then why would you even go see the movie? I loved Johnny Depp in this movie. I thnk he did a great job with the role of Willy Wonka. He and Tim Burton are great together.
RE: we love johnny reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 4, 2005 3:24 PM
I have to aggree
hot!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 4, 2005 10:21 PM
willy wonka is soooo freeking HOTT!! in ther!!! :):):):):)
WW RAPED CHILDREN?! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 6, 2005 10:15 AM
I got the impression this was a children book/movie, so, can you please explain this?!
JOhnny was the Best !!!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 6, 2005 6:22 PM
For those who are not liking the movie
Movie was the Best! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 6, 2005 6:24 PM
For those who loved the movie i agree totaly but for those who say stuff not to nice Thats your choice not mine
RE: hot!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 6, 2005 6:26 PM
I Agree Those Eyes were Cool i could not belive How great the did that movie
Willy Wonka ROCKS!!!!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 9, 2005 5:05 AM
I love Willy Wonka! He is my favourite character! In fact he is the only deacent character in charlie and the chocolate factory! All the rest are boo boos! Charlie's ok. It's just that everyone else had a dig at poor Willy. And I'd like to shove T.N.T up their asses for dissin my darling Willy Wonka!
RE: Willy Wonka ROCKS!!!!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 9, 2005 5:11 AM
Yeah! like that utter Jerk Mike Teevee! I hope his eyes pop out, watchin TV!!!
WILLY WONKA IS SEXEY reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 10, 2005 10:16 AM
YOIU ARE THE SEXIEST MAN ON EARTH JHONNY AND I LIKE YOU BETTER DRESSED AS WILLY WONKA BEACOSE YOU ARE SO ROCKING.
RE: You can't fix perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 10, 2005 2:37 PM
AMEN!!! Johnny Depp was Once Upon a Time in Mexico. The movie was just ok..but with him it was GREAT!! I love him in everything including Willie Wonka. This was much better than original. And the boat ride in 1st one....who was smoking pot when they made that?
johnny depp a wanker reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 14, 2005 1:46 AM
Its the shittest movie downfall in johnnys career original rocked here we go pirates of the carribean 2 dissapointemt to the max willy wanker if they wanted a "evil" willy wonker they should of had Marilyn Manson because johnny looked white pale go back to edward sciscor hand you goon
johnny is good reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 16, 2005 12:08 PM
I think johnny depp is the best acteur ever he makes the movies so funny
I loved pirates of the carribean but this i founded even better he was much funnier in this movie
and I hope is movies become better and better.
xxx-bowauf-xxx
jorda fry reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 18, 2005 5:55 PM
is a little fag
jordin fry reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 19, 2005 4:56 PM
he cannot act worth of shit
Alright, I've had it reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 21, 2005 7:26 AM
I must say I am shocked and disappointed yet again by moviegoers of the world. You, the public, never cease to amaze me in your narrowmindedness and eagerness to shit on anything that's different from what you expect. Will people never stop complaining about the Oompa Loompas not being the moderately annoying orange butterballs of the 70's?
This movie is not a remake of the Gene Wilder classic (and classic it is)!!! It is NOT a sequel! This is Tim Burton's vision of a classic piece of literature. I find the man's style to be fascinating and very artful. He's true to the book, he even used the original Oompa Loompa songs from the novel. It's not BASED on the book, it's the movie version OF the book! The Gene Wilder version, while a very good movie, was nowhere near as true to the book as this one. And while Roald Dahl may have been on the scene, that doesn't mean that Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory is the DEFINITIVE version of Dahl's whimsical novel. But, I will say, NEITHER is Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (The movie). Different director's have different visions, but Tim Burton's work is much much MUCH truer to the book.
Next, I would love to see people stop picking at Johnny Depp's look in this movie. I thought it was perfect. Willy Wonka is an eccentric candymaking genius, so the funny haircut and the wierd clothes are to be expected. And the pale skin? The man had not been outside in several years, OF COURSE he's going to be pale. He doesn't look like Michael Jackson, and Marilyn Manson would NOT have been a better pick.
I deeply respect Mr. Depp for his amazing ability to completely disappear into his character when he does a movie. The man is one of the great actors of our time, and I wish the general populus was intelligent enough to be able to see talent. I'm not saying that Depp is the ONLY great actor, but he is definitely very talented. You don't have to like him, but he at least deserves to be recognized for his talent.
Now, I would personally be a very happy individual if the idiots of the world would realize that just because a movie isn't what they saw as a child, it's wrong. It's the attitude like that that got Pudding banned in Protestant England way back when. That attitude that causes people to become recluses and hermits and hate the world for not meeting their expectations. The people who refuse to be open to different versions of things will have an increasingly difficult time being happy. To really get the most out of life, it's important to be open and enjoy things for what they really are.
This is a beautifully done movie and a work of art. I for one will never forget it. I just wish I could do a simple web search without seeing people who have nothing better to do than to complain about things being different.
RE: johnny depp a wanker reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 23, 2005 1:50 AM
you narrow minded little dweeb! y cant ppl leave him alone. he is a great actor and they werent trying to make him bloody evil. if u watch and concentrate you can see that he acts the way he does because of his troubled youth you plonker. and for all those ppl still complaining about the ump lumpas, i suggest u just read the damn book!
RE: Alright, I've had it reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 23, 2005 2:04 AM
i agree. i love both tim burton and johnny depp. i loved the first one but this one was fantastic and i dont even compare them because there is no point as they are completely different. if they were made by the same person i could see why ppl wud compare them. people need to realise that just because there is a new version out, that it doesn't change anything about the original we all know and love.
RE: Jordan fry reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 23, 2005 9:44 AM
his head may look like a potatoe but he was great in the movie
RE: jorda fry reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 23, 2005 9:48 AM
but not in real life sooo right back at you .ooooooo
some small questions reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 24, 2005 12:11 AM
all those ppl who are still just complaining about the movie 1) why did you go and see it? 2)why bother comeing on this thing about the film if u dont like it? and 3)why are you so up your own ass that you can't except that other people have different ways of putting accross things. back when the first one was made, they did not have the technology to do what they have now and they couldn't make the umpa lumpas what it says in the book as there was issues about racism (hence the orange). im only 15 so i wasnt around wen it was made but i loved it all the same and now the original is my 2 year old sisters fave film but wen the new one comes out on dvd here in england i will show her and hopefully she will like them both the same. why cant u just accept that some people have different opinions about things and that tim burton, johnny and co could not have pleased everyone as that would have been impossible. as you can tell, i love both films as they both show great artistic ideas and should be appreciated
jordan fry reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 26, 2005 2:09 PM
jordan is a fag
jordan fry reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 27, 2005 5:25 PM
is a fag that fucks men
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 1, 2005 9:19 AM
i think johnny as willy is totally fit
RE: Tim Burton's Willy Wonka: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 1, 2005 10:55 AM
yup it sure is
RE: Tim Burton's Willy Wonka: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 4, 2005 8:51 AM
I totaly agree. I've seen the movie three times and it was quite good.
RE: Tim Burton's Willy Wonka: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 5, 2005 10:42 AM
it sucked
Charlie and the choc... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 9, 2005 11:57 PM
Ok....I loved the movie and i hearted willy wonka more....I do not think it would have been the same if there if johnny depp was not cast as ww....not because he is "Like totally hot and awesome" but because he just had the weird factor growing and was very mysterious i guess....It was pretty good....
RE: Manson should have been Wonka!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 15, 2005 5:00 PM
Why didn't Marilyn Manson get the part? Meh its not far Manson could have done his own make up and done a way scarier job than Johnny depp. Childsplay!
RE: some of you are so damn stupid reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 15, 2005 5:08 PM
Please take that damn stick out of your arse. who cares who is the bigger fan as long as people enjoy the movie, however your toxic attitude has all but extinguished my feelings for this movie. everything you are saying and doing isnt the attitude of the fan you claim to be, you should be trying to get people to understand your point of view not criticise.
Wonka wars reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 15, 2005 5:26 PM
y is evrey 1 sooooo upset ppl plz jst think. and i am a j. depp fan and i dont appreciate what has been said by "depps personal friend" as rape is a serious offence THAT MAKES THE MOST HEANOUS THING THAT HAS BEEN PUT ON THIS PARTICULAR MESSAGE BOARD.My step sister was raped and i was date raped i do not appreciate your hurtful comments> i am gothic and i do not wish J.Depp any harm in fact i admire cant we jst stop the bullshit.
RE: Willie Wonka and the Chocolate Factory reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 15, 2005 5:33 PM
FUCK YOU ASSHOLE I HOPE YOU GO AND DIE IN THE STREET.AND FURTHER MORE STOP EATING OUT OF MY GARBAGE CAN DIDNT YOUR MOTHER TEACH YOU ANY MANNERS IN BETWEEN BRINGER U UP AND HOOKING (that means prostituting cocksucker)YOUR JUST JEALOUS THAT YOUR NOT A FAMOUS FILM STAR ( feeling a little upset that your audition wasnt taken aye. POOR BABY! "i hope you get cancer i wont to watch you rot."
RE: So gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 15, 2005 5:37 PM
iSNT SAPPHIRE A STRIPPERS NAME? AH WELL WHATEVER SPINS YOUR WHEELS
HELLO THERE CHILD reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 15, 2005 5:45 PM
pLZ SPIN MY WHEELS AROUND AROUND HEH HEH
RE: You can't fix perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 18, 2005 8:59 AM
What the fucking hell hell you mean 'there can be no other'? The 1971 version utterly sucked, no offence to Gene Wilder. You dont even know what the new ones like and its like, the best film of the year. Besides, you cant fent the old one out because everyone hated it so much every copies been burned. So sucks to you.
RE: So gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 22, 2005 11:34 AM
toatally gay im who would drss kike that
RE: to Mr.Depp from Jackson.M reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 28, 2005 4:59 PM
He is really cut !!! Drakan XOXO ?mail lunard_romulus@yahoo.ca
Johnny Deep is Hawwt! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 29, 2005 9:10 PM
Omg! I've seen this movie and I totaly lovvve it ^^
Im wondering were the hell is the pic of Charlie and though?! huh huh?
I have no F****** Subject! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 3, 2005 10:28 AM
I LOVE THE OLD MOVIE AND THE NEW ONE, THE NEW ONE IS FUNNIER AND CLOSER TO THE BOOK, AND DEPP IS COOL IN IT ^_^. lol
RE: HilaryDuffLover reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 4, 2005 1:14 PM
iyy8y908y09uioyo9y8 7666666jh jhv h5j
Darn Retards reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 11, 2005 7:46 AM
Usually the people that hate the movie are the ones that don't get the dark humor in the script. So all you haters, some how grow a sense of humor. No one likes critics that don't understand the film
RE: Tim Burton's Willy Wonka: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 14, 2005 8:34 AM
hi i love your film i is so funny
RE: So gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 18, 2005 3:50 PM
4 reall
2 separate movies. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 27, 2005 4:44 PM
look. The reason Willy wonka and the CHocolate Factory was called Willy Wonka and the chocolate factory was because it was a musical adaptation of Raold Dahl's book. The Reason CHARLIE AND THE CHOCLATE FACTORY bears the same name as the book is because it is a DIRECT adaptation of the book. It is not a remake. It is not to be looked at as the same movie as Willy Wonka and the cf. they are 2 completely separate films. One is influenced by the book, the other is based on the book. Those of you who are comparing and contrasting the two are wasting your time. Both are great, classic movies and both deserve respect.
RE: stupid flippers!!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 31, 2005 1:19 PM
i dont no y u people just wont get it together!!! sum1 in here is so mean. depp is a great person and you would not be happy if YOU were willy wonka in this movie now would you? huh,huh,huh??? now i might sound so totally gay and brainy but you stupid flippers better get the flip together you dumbnuts sincerly: napolean dynamite
RE: oh my gosh. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 31, 2005 1:35 PM
oh my gosh you dumb flippers. yes. i am the same person you just read on the paragragh before mines. anywayz, why cant you people just see depp on the flip side.*you guys are retarded, mean flippers.* one day depp is going to read this page and write back to all you people that you are flippin stupid. and he is sitting right next to me!!! dont believe me? hi this is jonny depp, and you people are flipping retards. retards. yeah double retards. you are gay. faggot faggot faggggooooot faggot faggot faggot faggot faggot faggot oooh yeah you know that you are feeling really crucnchy. go eat some peanutbutter!!!
RE: HI EVIL PEOPLE WHO DONT LIKE JONNY DEPP reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 31, 2005 1:40 PM
chicken
RE: You can't fix perfection reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 2, 2005 9:53 AM
You might not be able to fix perfection but you can get a whole lot closer to the book's storyline. The new movie isn't better it's just different
RE: Willie Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 10, 2005 5:50 AM
u r gay a smeel lik poo!!!!!!!!!!1
you are the gay one. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 10, 2005 11:09 AM
willy wanker? how lame.
you lame tools. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 11, 2005 3:38 AM
god, johnny depp is the bomb! HAHA the new movies cracked me up HEAPS everytime i try to watch the first one I fall ASLEEP yes thats right ASLEEP!
so go to hell if you think its gay.
sexy! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 11, 2005 3:39 AM
Willy Wonka is sexy
*perves*
haha reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 11, 2005 3:40 AM
DAMN RIGHT ! woot woot
tee hee hee reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 11, 2005 3:43 AM
aw why arent I as sexy as Willy Wonka ??
Wierd reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 11, 2005 12:43 PM
I thought the movie was a little wierd, but it was so funny at the same time.My favorite part was when they showed violet's mom!lol, it was way funnier than the first movie!
Tell me your favorite part at shelbyandquinn@cts.com
Ewwwwwwww! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 11, 2005 12:47 PM
I don't think Depp is cute at all!I think he is a good and funny actor, but I would never think as him like that!DISTGUSTING!
RE: sexy! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 11, 2005 3:44 PM
yes he is
:) reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 14, 2005 4:22 AM
I loved both films. I too read the book first when I was about 6, and was glad to see the second film adhered more closely to it. I loved Gene Wilder as Willy Wonka, but think Depp brings his own interpretation into the character and makes it much deeper. The first movie freaked me more than this one did, probably cause I was a kid when I saw it. I loved the chocolate room in the newer version. For some reason the oompah loompahs bothered me in the newer film....they look like plastic beings!! Wonderful film. I'd watch it again.
He was wasnt he! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 15, 2005 6:22 PM
I had these really strange dreams!!!! Ill tell you them!!!! okay I was at the factory sitting in the room at a long table. Johnny Depp at the end of the table. I was sitting at the side of him. four seats down on the other side was Willy Wonka! the rest of the seats were filled with the family of Charlie Bucket. We were all leaning forward and wathcing Johnny Depp (let me make this straight it was Johnny himself eating not Willy wonka) eat like a baby! Everyone started to laugh! I woke up, then I fell asleep again! this time i was trapped by glass under the ocean! a fisher man came to save me. he told me where the factory was. I ran all the way back. When I got back I met up with Willy and he hugged me!!! HEEHEE!!!! *smiles hug self* then i seen some kids playing with a big yellow ball in a circle. A dog came over and licked the back of my neck (and I could actually feel it) then I woke up.
He was soooooooo cute!!!!!!! In the movie and my dream *sigh*
mm reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 29, 2005 11:26 AM
It is travestit!
Calm down, for christ's sake! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 7, 2005 2:32 PM
Please people stop trying to kill each other! Yes, Gene Wilder's version was good but Tim Burton's is good also. I would also like to point out its not a remake but just another point of view on the book. For you people who want Manson to play the role, sorry it's too late, it's been given to Johnny Depp so quit whining like a five year old! And also to people who say Johnny Depp's gay, please get a life and a dictionary. And please don't use that lame comeback " I have a life", i mean get a proper life instead of this pathetic excistence you inhabit. Johnny Depp is a talented actor, very handsome and all round nice guy. Ok i have now finished my rant.
RE: who thats freaky reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 15, 2005 5:16 PM
willy wonka looks like my 3rd grade teacher
and she was a girl
omg thats freaky reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 15, 2005 5:29 PM
willy wonka looks like my third grade teacher who is a gir
RE: You stole these Pics from AICN!!!!!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2006 2:43 PM
fuck you
biatch
RE: So gay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2006 3:14 PM
you suck Willy wonka rox!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
RE: yay reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 22, 2006 5:28 PM
I saw the movie and I think it's amazingly funny!!!! You'll love it. Johnny Depp( Willy Wonka) isn't the cutest actor, but he sure is a funny one! My fourth grade teacher just loves Johnny Depp and she hasn't even seen the new movie!!!! She'll love it don't you think?
The Name Willy Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 9, 2006 10:15 PM
Roald Dahl told me that the name is based on a game, rather like frisbee, that he played as a child.
It was known as "Skilly Wonka", tho he had no idea why.
He said the name sounded a bit silly and he liked it, so he changed it to Willy Wonka so that he could use it in his book.
No important meanings to it, he liked the sound of it, and had good memories of the game he played as a child.
I've been living with the Charlie and the Chocolate Factory story for most of my life.
My REAL NAME is Charlie Wonka.
Yes, really.
I was a teenager when the book came out so I have first claim to the name(s).
You fools who giggle because the name reminds you of 'wanker' really ought to try to graduate from your 8th grade mentality.
Mr. Dahl created a number of great characters, and some wonderful stories for us all.
I agree with you reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 24, 2006 4:45 PM
I agree with you he is gay!
RE: I agree with you reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 27, 2006 10:39 PM
He's not gay! why write that??? ohh well from my point of view: Johnny Depp as Willy Wonka is Really Great...!!! Marilyn Manson is not cute like him! well I think this movie is really beautiful, it's like a child dreams'... it's a fantasy movie, for children and all the people... Manson couldn't b there!!! the movie is great with Depp, a lot of people like him as Wonka, and it's true, he is really cute, handsome and sexy, not only like Willy Wonka; Jack Sparrow is sexy too! oh yes! He's a really really really great actor... Simply Wonderful!
RE: we love johnny reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 3, 2007 8:39 PM
you got that right he is hot and I love him just as much as u
RE: Tim Burton's Willy Wonka: reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 10, 2007 1:40 PM
tim burton in my eyes is the best director ever.
I think he should re-make Alice in Wonderland.
It would be the best ever!!!!!!
RE: jordan fry reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 7, 2007 5:05 PM
WOULD YOU LEAVE JORDAN FRY ALONE!!!!!!!! YOU KNOW YOU JUST LEAVE HIM ALONE RIGHT NOW!!!! AND SHUT YOUR LITTLE YAPS. HE'S MY BOYFRIEND RIGHT NOW!!! SO SHUSH UP
RE: Who the fuck is Willy Wonker? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 14, 2007 2:00 PM
your mum
... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 14, 2008 8:59 AM
who the hell writes this shit?
johnny depp = fag
anyone else who likes him = fag
RE: You stole these Pics from AICN!!!!!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 14, 2008 9:06 AM
amen
RE: Charlie and The Chocolate Factory reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 8, 2008 7:18 AM
where's charlie
RE: the new movie reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 15, 2009 11:14 AM
Have you read the book? The book wasn't dark at all.
 CONAN THE BARBARIAN |
 CAPTAIN AMERICA |
 CRAZY, STUPID, LOVE |
 THE SMURF |
 COWBOYS AND ALIENS |
 BAD TEACHER |
 MR. POPPERS PENGUINS |
 GREEN LANTERN |
