| NAVIGATION |  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote of the day:
"Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change." -- Peter Griffin (while riding a circus elephant) |
 |
|
 |
 Review: Opera 4.0 (beta)
By SKillBot on March 29, 2000 2:58 AM
(ZD) Opera, the coolest lightweight browser ever, has its new beta out. If you've never used it before, you should give it a try. They've added a simple email client (egads! the whole thing won't fit on a floppy any more), and support for 128 bit ssl. It also allows you to accept, block, or disable cookies for individual sites (like lynx has been doing for a long time now). The new version also has excellent HTML,XML,javascript, and css support. The only catch is its $35 price tag. You can read the review here.
|
Reader Discussions:
|
|
|
Posted by Acheron (denny@dtheatre.com) on March 29, 2000 8:35 AM
as good as it may be, why should I pay for a browser when there are so many out there, and pages are made for IE and Netscape/using their page builders?
|
|
|
Posted by sKillBot (travis@pulley.org) on March 29, 2000 6:03 PM
It has several features that neither netscape nor IE has. It's _really_ fast. It's extremely efficient, which makes it great for less powerful computers. It also lets you view pages at various zoom levels, which is way cool. I think it's more stable than the other two (definately moreso than netscape), but I haven't tried the latest version yet. Personally, I use all three browsers for testing, but IE mostly for general use, since I look at a lot of flash stuff.
|
|
|
Posted by sKillBot (travis@pulley.org) on March 29, 2000 6:05 PM
I have it on my laptop that has 8 megs of ram, and it's really not bad. I couldn't imagine using another browser on it.
|
|
RE: Review: Opera 4.0 (beta)
|
 reply
|
|
Posted by Demona (frogfarm@hempseed.com) on March 29, 2000 11:25 PM
NOOOOOOO! Oh well, Opera was fun while they remained true to
the vision but with the addition of an email client and the
consequent bloat to the point where it won't fit on a floppy
anymore, I must pin my hopes on Mozilla; when complete, we should
be able to compile custom versions of as pure and simple a
Gecko-based browser as we want. In the meantime I use Lynx for 99%
of my daily browsing, and if a website won't work with it I won't
shop there. Once I got SSL compiled in for secure transactions, I
haven't had too many problems :)
|
|
|
RE: RE: Review: Opera 4.0 (beta)
|
reply
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 30, 2000 7:56 AM
yeah, but Lynx sucks. The web is supposed to be a visual experience. All text sucks(though fast, it may be)
|
|
|
RE: RE: RE: Review: Opera 4.0 (beta)
|
reply
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2000 1:12 PM
Geeesh, I guess that X Server thing on Linux completely escaped you didnt it?
|
Discuss this story
|
|
|
 | Win a copy of Striptease!
|
|
![Digital Theatre [DTheatre.com]](images/logo.gif){kind=logo}
