|
Quote of the day:
"The liberator who destroys my property is fighting to save my spirit. The teacher who clears all possessions from my path will set me free." -- Tyler Durden (Fight Club) |
 |
|
 |
Reader Discussions:
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 19, 2005 6:46 PM
i don't like the costume. maybe they should put white lenses over the eyes sorta like spiderman or dardevil
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 20, 2005 3:03 AM
That one with the Scarecrow is obviously fan art.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 20, 2005 4:33 PM
anyone think catwoman is going to make an appreance
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 21, 2005 2:16 AM
How can she, since she didnt appear until Batman Returns.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 21, 2005 6:50 AM
What are you talking about? Batman Begins has absolutely nothing to do with any of the other films... and no, Catwoman is not going to be in this movie.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 22, 2005 5:09 PM
I like chicken
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 23, 2005 9:50 AM
it would be funny if the haile berry catwoman made an apreance
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 24, 2005 2:35 AM
Actually man Batman Begins is set before the other films. The ending will join on with the original Batman film. With the Joker.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 24, 2005 4:18 AM
The true question is, where can the films go after Batman Begins.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 24, 2005 2:11 PM
the pics are AWESOME, and hi-res! also, Mr. Bale is SO hot, IMHO my ideal male... I hear his wife travels with him on the sets, smart woman. also, I don't think this movie will suck. In fact, I expect it to be rather good. Mr. Bale is an excellent actor, as well as the rest of the cast... Gary Oldman, Ken Watanabe, even Rutger Hauer!!! haven't seen that guy in ages. I will be happy simply to see all these people in one movie, as well as to see a batman movie that isn't an insulting joke of the dark knight.
|
|
|
Posted by NAMELESS1 (No Email) on January 24, 2005 7:08 PM
if ur implying that they should make them look like the comic.... thats stupid because anything short of friggin flashlights over his eyes is gonna look cheesy. P.S. this is batman perhaps the most emotional of heroes, and the eyes are the windows to the soul therefore dont cover them.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 25, 2005 3:36 AM
I think your right, batman does have alot of emotion. But it wasnt shown in Batman 3 or 4
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 25, 2005 3:38 AM
Has anyone seen the new Bat car?
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 25, 2005 3:49 AM
Yes, there are pictures of it everywhere.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 25, 2005 6:37 AM
I saw a short video testing the car, its pretty fat. It was a bit dark though.
|
|
|
Posted by Jack (jack@dtheatre.com) on January 25, 2005 2:18 PM
The pictures of the batmobile can be found here and here. The Batmobile footage can also be found here
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 26, 2005 3:36 AM
The footage was good but the car sucked.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 26, 2005 3:36 AM
I like the new look of the Batmobile but I think they should have gone the whole nine yards and done the version from 'The Dark Knight Returns'
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 26, 2005 3:49 AM
Im not sure. Dont u think they should hav made it resemble the original Keaton car?
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 26, 2005 3:53 AM
Hav u got any links to pics or footage from the new Superman movie?
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 26, 2005 5:53 AM
this new series of films has absolutly no corolation to the other tim burton and shoe-maker movies. it is a complete re-boot. the joker is introduced at the end of this film for starters, but i believe batman stays on his tail through the second film, to finally be confronted with him in the third. the joker already exists here, where as i'm sure you all remember jack nicholsons character before he fell into the acid at axis chemical.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 26, 2005 5:54 AM
they don't exist yet.. keep your pants on.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 26, 2005 5:59 AM
when you think about it.. batman's emotion was'nt seen in any of the films, with a brief exception to the first. the closer we get to batman begins, the more excited i get to see a truer depiction of an awesome / menacing character. from batman returns, to that god-aweful batman & robin abortion, batman was depicted as a clown in a rubber suit. NOT NEARLY MENACING, OR for the laymans BADASS ENOUGH. BRING ON BATMAN BEGINS... .....PLEASE
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 27, 2005 12:57 AM
Who do u think wud win in a fight between SUPERMAN & BATMAN?
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 27, 2005 1:05 AM
Superman!
I think Keaton had a really dark side in the original, thats what the character needs.
Kilmer showed something, not sure what it was. Clooney just didnt have a clue.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 27, 2005 2:58 AM
Batman would win if he had time to prepare.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 27, 2005 3:28 AM
Prepare, how cud he?
He has no powers, he wud get smacked up.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 27, 2005 12:26 PM
i love them both.. batman because he's human, but he would get his ass kicked---B
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 27, 2005 12:29 PM
i agree, those actors are able to show a duel personality.. clooney, i could see as a bruce wayne type, but not as batman---B
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 27, 2005 5:08 PM
spiderman vs superman
who will win?
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 28, 2005 6:50 AM
All Batman needs is his Kyrpton power suit and he'd win easily.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 29, 2005 12:12 PM
batman may be more tactical, but the mere thought of the brute strength and powers superman posesses every day on earth makes him far more likley to beat batman.. if one was to try to imagine that a character like superman could exsist in real life. if we are refering to a COMIC BOOK, all bets are off..besides..krypton power suit would never exist, because superman has never allowed himself to be subject to any sort of test that would tell us exactly how strong, or what other weakness he may have. he's only told us that he is from krypton. the fact that kryptonite ever came up is damn near insulting. this is coming from a batman fan by the way---B
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 30, 2005 6:43 AM
Batman has some kind of power suit in The Dark Knight Returns doesn't he? Anyway, Superman was meant to have given Batman some Kryptonite once, he'd just use that on him.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 31, 2005 1:13 PM
well, i'm trying to keep this debate based in some kind of reality. like i said earlier..if were talking about comics, then all bets are off., but because this post regards the batman film adaption, i was talking about trying to keep things as realistic as possible. no one on the planet has any kind of technology that could rival the power of superman. remember, krypton was said to be millions of light years , and thousands of galaxys away. we dont have a clue about krypton, other than what superman would ever share with us... not even batman, or bruce wayne for that matter--- B
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 1, 2005 9:54 AM
The Dark Knight Returns, now THAT would make one Hell of a batman movie.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 1, 2005 10:12 AM
i would love to see frank miller get involved with a film adaption at anypoint along the way. he has always had a great feel for batman, and would really come across well on the big screen---B
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 2, 2005 2:25 AM
The truth is yes Superman would win. But the fact that Superman is so strong has nothing to do with it, he is very different from Batman. Batman always ends up killing the bad people. Whereas Superman just can't its not what he stands for. Because of that, Superman will always be around.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 2, 2005 4:00 AM
And Batman won't?
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 2, 2005 12:31 PM
do you even know what your saying? batman doesnt kill., his whole purpose is to preserve. he and superman are the same in that respect. batman vs. superman is as simple as how if superman were to fight any human, he would crush him in a sec.---B
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 3, 2005 1:56 AM
Yes I do mate. The fact is Superman cant kill, he wont. Batman can. Hes all about revenge, and no he wont be around forever he will get old and die.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 3, 2005 3:28 AM
I suppose the obvious answar would be that Superman would crush Batman in a second but Batman's meant to be pretty smart, I'm sure he'd come up with some way to beat Superman.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 3, 2005 7:20 AM
superman was born... he was sent to earth,by parents who knew earth was the closest to thier krypton atmosphere, he went to school, . he got older... moved to metropolis, and got a job at a newspaper...he aged just like all of us. how do you imagine, that he'll just stop getting older at a particular point in his life, to live forever??.?. i agree batman is about revenge..but that doesnt make him a killer. if you know hes about revenge, you should understand that its directed to preseve, and restore order to gotham city, while trying to ease the pain of his parents murder. his father was grandfather and father with wayne enteprises were responsible for building most of gotham. its gothams decrepid state that drives bruce away to where he eventually becomes batman.preservation my dear boy, and revenge on those who ruined it all.---B
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 3, 2005 7:28 AM
its more than just an obvious answer... supes is faster han a speeding bullet, stronger than a locomotive.. im sure you all know how that goes. batman is a guy who trained with ninjas for about 9 years, who is also, yes very smart, and tactical., yet even if hes got time to overload his utility belt, he is still a human being., try to imagine how boring superman would be, if all he did was go toe to toe with humans., and i dont mean lex luther either. but come to think of it, hes always come out on top with lex anyway.. so i guess thats enough said.---B
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2005 5:14 AM
Batman could use more than just gadgets from his utility belt.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2005 4:16 AM
Its Luthor.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2005 4:19 AM
After he has grown out of a boy and into a man. Hes aging process slows down. He wont get old like the people around him. Batman will, yes he does carry revenge but that wont be kept up once he dies.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2005 2:02 PM
slows down? where did you come up with that one..?---B
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2005 4:22 AM
I dunno. After development he wont get old like other people. The people on Krypton had much longer lives than people like us. Thats why Super wont get old.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2005 4:24 AM
Tell me. Whose ur favourite? Bat or Sup
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2005 6:46 AM
i think that may be the most rediculous thing ive heard in a while..batman is my favorite---B
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2005 1:24 AM
Then it doesnt matter how much I try to pursuade you my point. Batmans ur fav, and nothing will change that, rite?
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2005 1:26 AM
Then it doesnt matter how much I try to pursuade you my point. Batmans ur fav, and nothing will change that, rite?
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2005 7:30 AM
I'd definately change my point of view if it turned out Batman was gay or something. Not that I'm a homophobe, I'm not afraid of my house.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 13, 2005 12:31 PM
I'M BATMAN, AND I'M GAY FOR YOU BITCH!!!!
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 14, 2005 2:56 AM
If I'm a bitch that mean I'm a woman so if you're gay for me you must be a woman too. Okay, I'll be happy to have sex with you, just send me a photo so I can see whether you're a skank or not.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 27, 2005 11:53 AM
Bats taste Just like chicken....freak!
|
 Post YOUR opinion!
|
|
|
dtheatre.com
|
![Digital Theatre [DTheatre.com]](images/logo.gif){kind=logo}
Batmannews.de has posted one of two new production stills from the upcoming Batman Begins (see also most anticipated film of '05). The images sneak a few more peeks at the suit. Possible 1st look at Scarecrow added!
