Digital Theatre [DTheatre.com]
 SPONSOR
Search for  

NAVIGATION
HOME/NEWS
BUY DVD MOVIES
THE CHATBOARD
SUBMIT NEWS
HELP
COMPANY INFO
CONTACT US
LOGIN
Username:
Password:
Need an account?
Sign up Now!
Note: Logged in users do not have pop-ups and pop-unders.
More Options
User Utilities
Help

Quote of the day:

"Ah! the searing kiss of hot lead; how I missed you! I mean, I think I'm dying. " -- Apu Nahasapee-mapetilon
COOL LINKS
find books, dvds and movies:



Topic: News McG off SUPERMAN!!! Updated!
By Charley on July 11, 2004 10:13 PM

Director McG ("Charlie's Angels") is officially off of the new "Superman" movie, according to the Hollywood Reporter.  WB has listed McG as the director all along, but rumors have been far and wide regarding who would be directing the man of steel, particularly after an internet rumor linked Michael Bay to the project.  A spokesperson confirmed that McG is out, but who will replace him?

According to the trade, the WB spokesperson claimed that McG and the studio parted amicably.  The reason for the change is several disagreements between the studio and the director.  Shooting location and casting were chief among those.

As of this posting, no director has officially been chosen to replace McG, but it is being speculated that the previous rumor may have been a premature press release.  The IMDB "Superman" page seems to think so.  That does not prove it is true, considering that any registered user can affect that database, but it might be a preview of news to come.

UPDATE: A few web sites are reporting that WB has approached several people with the intention to talk directing.  Beside Michael Bay, the list is as follows:  Bryan Singer ("X-Men" series), Robert Rodriguez ("Desperado"), Jonathon Frakes ("Thunderbirds" [upcoming]), Rob Cohen ("XXX"), and David Goyer ("Batman Begins" writer).  Again, no one is set in stone, but it would be surprising to see Bay at the helm, considering his comments about "Superman" not being his type of project.  Goyer was hired to do rewrites on the script, but is apparently taken such a liking to the character that the studio is interested in his vision of the film as a whole.  Meetings have been set up with all of these potential directors, according to Superman-V.

A look at Filmforce reveals that Singer was offered the directing job sometime last week.  According to that article, Singer is still considering the offer.

More "Superman" news as it develpos.

[ comment on this story | comments (37) ]
Reader Discussions:
 McG   > reply 
Posted by Malqaeda (mkates@sierranevada.edu) on July 12, 2004 12:12 AM

It is a perfectly human and natural reaction to despise anyone named McG. The name sounds like a failed hamburger theme launched by McDonald's in an attempt to reach an urban demographic. McG directed Charlie's fucking angels. Thank god he won’t be disgracing the Superman saga. In fact, the only thing 'super' about McG is the size of the drink that comes along with him… “I’ll have a McG with cheese and a fo shizzle shake, yo.”

 Spider-Man 2   > reply 
Posted by TheFilmProphet (FilmProphet@hotmail.com) on July 12, 2004 4:59 AM

Who cares about Superman because Spider-Man 2 is the best film ever [Editor: URL deleted. Will this assmunch ever learn?]

 RE: Spider-Man 2   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 12, 2004 10:33 AM

I think this "FilmProphet" guy is involved in some sort of movie merchandise pyramid scheme.  Like an Avon for nerds.

 RE: Spider-Man 2   > reply 
Posted by TheFilmProphet (FilmProphet@hotmail.com) on July 12, 2004 2:09 PM

Oooops you figured me out dumbass as for this site it's always three steps behind with the news by the time time they get any news I would have already found out weeks ago.

 RE: Spider-Man 2   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 12, 2004 2:55 PM

Well, I would visit your site rather than this one if it wasn't for the fact that your site's filled with hardcore gay porn.

 RE: Spider-Man 2   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 12, 2004 3:36 PM

Then why are you here, trying to associate your seb site with this one?

 First of all....   > reply 
Posted by TheFilmProphet (FilmProphet@hotmail.com) on July 13, 2004 12:05 AM

First of all my site has no pop ups and especially nooo porn idiot and I'm here to support Spider-Man 2 thats all and you will immediately notice this if you ever did visit my site.

 RE: First of all....   > reply 
Posted by Malqaeda (mkates@sierranevada.edu) on July 13, 2004 12:23 AM

Spider Man 2 blows

 Whatever   > reply 
Posted by TheFilmProphet (FilmProphet@hotmail.com) on July 13, 2004 2:07 AM

If thats what you think you are entitled to your own oppinion but I will say this Ebert and Roper would not have given it two thumbs up for no reason.

 RE: Whatever   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 13, 2004 6:08 AM

Don't lie, your site's just full of gay men ramming each other.

 RE: Whatever   > reply 
Posted by TheFilmProphet (FilmProphet@hotmail.com) on July 13, 2004 10:48 AM

Listen whatever gay fetish you have is your problem and I swear my site will and never has had any of that gay porn you like ok.

 RE: Whatever   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 13, 2004 11:02 AM

Ebert?  Roper?  Now I know you're an idiot.  Those two corporate whores couldn't tell a midpoint plot point from a denouement.  Not that I don't like Spider-Man.  But to say "Would Ebert and Roper have given it two thumbs up..." is a freakishly inane argument.

 Spider-Man 2   > reply 
Posted by TheFilmProphet (FilmProphet@hotmail.com) on July 13, 2004 11:37 AM

It is obiously a very good movie otherwise it wouldn't have made $257 million dollars in only 12 days. Being the quickest film in history to reach $200 million in only 9 days.

 RE: Spider-Man 2   > reply 
Posted by TheFilmProphet (FilmProphet@hotmail.com) on July 13, 2004 11:38 AM

Excuse me I meant 8 days.

 RE: Spider-Man 2   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 13, 2004 2:49 PM

who gives a sh1t?

True fans rate the story they have been reading since knee high.

 Spider-Man 2   > reply 
Posted by TheFilmProphet (FilmProphet@hotmail.com) on July 13, 2004 3:02 PM

So far Spider-Man 2 has been the only comic based movie that has been the most faithful to the comics you jerk.

 RE: Whatever   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 14, 2004 6:58 AM

So your saying your site never has had any gay porn but it will? I knew it! You're an ass bandit!

 RE: Spider-Man 2   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 14, 2004 7:01 AM

Look, I love Spiderman 2 but the fact that lots of people have to to see it doesn't automatically make it a good movie.

 RE: Spider-Man 2   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 14, 2004 11:23 AM

the first one was WAY BETTER! there was an origin story. parker discovered his special powers in a fight at school. then the cage match. it was suspensful.

spidey 2 was good, but WAY TOO predictable. no surprises. it was just quite boring compared to the first one.

 RE: Spider-Man 2   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 14, 2004 3:16 PM

In your opinion.

 I disagree   > reply 
Posted by TheFilmProphet (FilmProphet@hotmail.com) on July 14, 2004 5:00 PM

I disagree it had to be predictable if it's based on the comic since everyone has already read the comics it would be pretty predictable.

 RE: I disagree   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 15, 2004 1:59 AM

Stop advertising gay Pornography on your webshite FilmProphet you arse intruding biatch!

 RE: Spider-Man 2   > reply 
Posted by Malqaeda (mkates@sierranevada.edu) on July 15, 2004 5:28 AM

opinions are like assholes; we all have one and they all stink

 RE: Spider-Man 2   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 15, 2004 6:44 AM

Mine smells like bakery fresh cinnemon rolls.

 Stop You Pervert!   > reply 
Posted by TheFilmProphet (FilmProphet@hotmail.com) on July 15, 2004 7:14 AM

For the last time talk about that gay porn that you like so much somewhere else you mentally disturbed pervert.

 RE: Stop You Pervert!   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 15, 2004 8:57 PM

As a mentally disturbed pervert, I am offended by your remarks. I in NO WAY wish to associate with these "pseudo-perverts" found on this site. Good Day, Sir!

 RE: McG   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 15, 2004 8:58 PM

McG couldn't direct his way out of a McG movie.

 RE: Stop You Pervert!   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 15, 2004 9:00 PM

P.S. I really enjoy the high quality of the gay porn on your website.

 Whatever   > reply 
Posted by TheFilmProphet (FilmProphet@hotmail.com) on July 16, 2004 12:16 AM

I'm going to stop now because I don't realy feel very comfortable arguing with a perverted gay person like you.

 RE: Whatever   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 16, 2004 1:16 AM

Don't worry! You'll get used to it.

 RE: Whatever   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 16, 2004 1:18 AM

P.S. I really enjoy the high quality of the gay porn on your website.

 RE: Whatever   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 16, 2004 8:15 AM

Don't you think that's a bit hipocritical? Not liking someone because they're gay and then having loads of gay porn on your site?

 RE: First of all....   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 16, 2004 9:13 AM

ok spiderman suck ass and if you think tobey mcguire can act i highly doubt you're worthy of the title filmprophet

 RE: Spider-Man 2   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 16, 2004 9:20 AM

BULLSH*T since when does spiderman have webs coming out of his hands? Since when does spiderman fall in love w/ mj before he finds and looses gwen stacy? jameson's son is supposed to come back w/ the symbiote on his ship that makes him sick. MJ never gets near marrying jameson's son. and finally tobey mcguire sucks ass

 RE: Spider-Man 2   > reply 
Posted by Malqaeda (mkates@sierranevada.edu) on July 16, 2004 7:54 PM

your opinion?

 BATMAN   > reply 
Posted by TheFilmProphet (FilmProphet@hotmail.com) on July 17, 2004 5:54 AM

[smilie]batman[/smilie]

 RE: BATMAN   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 18, 2004 9:13 AM

Right back at ya.


Post YOUR opinion!


Support dtheatre.com: Get cool merchandise!

Search dvds by keyword or cast:

Click here to buy movie posters!
Click here to buy movie posters!
Search For Posters!
Movie news related to: McG off SUPERMAN!!! Updated!

CURRENT HOT TOPICS

FANTASTIC FOUR Behind the Scenes! (26)

RAMBO IV: HOLY WAR?! (24)

EPISODE III Space Battle Photo!!! (17)

SEXY LADIES MOVIES

NATALIE PORTMAN CLOSER NUDE SCENE CAPTURES (14)

SIMPSON as DAISY DUKE! UPDATED! (4)

RECENT MOVIE NEWS

THE RING TWO Teaser Poster!!!

BATMAN BEGINS Full Trailer!!!

WAR OF THE WORLDS Trailer!

New STAR WARS Picture! (2)

New FANTASTIC FOUR Picture! (2)

International BATMAN BEGINS Poster!!! (2)

CHARLIE AND THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY Trailer!!! (10)

THE LIFE AQUATIC Featurette!!!

SENSELESS SURVEY
Who should play Ash in the "Evil Dead" Remake?
Bruce Campbell
Bea Arthur
Seann William Scott
Johnny Knoxville


[view results]

DONATE!
Support DT! Donate With PayPal:
LINK US!

dtheatre.com
dtheatre.com

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the poster. The rest © 2000 Digital Theatre, an Ai Graphics (AIGC) Production.