Digital Theatre [DTheatre.com]
 SPONSOR
Search for  

NAVIGATION
HOME
CHAT
SUBMIT NEWS
RESOURCES
HELP
COMPANY
GALLERY
STOCK PHOTOS
TIPS ARCHIVE
AWARDS/REVIEWS
CONTACT



Quote of the day:

"Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change." -- Peter Griffin (while riding a circus elephant)

NETWORK
find books, dvds and movies:
  aigc.net
  dark horizons
  wonko.com
  IMDB
  badass mofo




Topic: Film David Fincher on Mission: Impossible 3?
By Jack on April 17, 2002 11:06 AM

(Guardian) - Fresh from his success with The Panic Room, David Fincher looks set to direct the third Mission: Impossible outing later this year, with Tom Cruise again in the leading role.

Cruise is believed to have instrumental in securing Fincher for the job, having been impressed by the director's technical prowess and distinctive visual panache. The Paramount production is tentatively slated as the studio's big release in the summer of 2004.

Details of the script remain under wraps. But speaking in London during promotional work for The Panic Room, Fincher described the central concept as "a really cool idea, really violent." Fincher, of course, is no stranger to screen violence, having already put audiences through the mill with his anguished serial-killer thriller Seven and the bare-knuckle assaults of 1999's Fight Club.

What's more surprising is why Fincher would sign on to direct a sequel to a major studio franchise after suffering such a painful time on his first movie, Alien 3. Having seen his original vision compromised, he later swore never to direct another sequel for a major studio. Now he seems more philosophical. "You can never make exactly the movie you want to make," he admits. "But if [Paramount] let us do even half of what we want, it should make for a pretty interesting film."

[ comment on this story | comments (14) ]
Reader Discussions:
 !   > reply 
Posted by Submissive-Girl (S&M;@eureka.com) on April 17, 2002 11:18 AM

Those are sexy movies, I hope it's more like the first than the second. Number 1 was a great movie!

20
 RE: !   > reply 
Posted by Daredevil (DD@marvelcomics.com) on April 17, 2002 1:02 PM

I concur

40
 RE: !   > reply 
Posted by Skullfire (skullfire@clarinmail.com) on April 17, 2002 2:09 PM

The question should be: Mission Impossible 3?

60
 RE: !   > reply 
Posted by power-trip (powertripz@hotmail.com) on April 17, 2002 11:59 PM

More like: "Which Cruise hairstyle showcased in MI3 is next?"

80
 Cruise sux   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 18, 2002 2:09 AM

Cruise is a fag.  He needs to stop making movies because he acts like the same putz in all his movies, no talent, just over act and get paid.

100
 RE: Cruise sux   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 18, 2002 4:04 AM

M:I-3 will be the third movie in the series.

120
 RE: Cruise sux   > reply 
Posted by Skullfire (skullfire@clarinmail.com) on April 18, 2002 7:29 PM

Oh... That explains the past two movies and the three in the title...

120
 RE: Cruise sux   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 19, 2002 3:14 AM

If they made another one after M:I-3 then it might be called M:I-4.

120
 RE: Cruise sux   > reply 
Posted by Skullfire (skullfire@clarinmail.com) on April 19, 2002 6:26 PM

Damn!

120
 RE: Cruise sux   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 22, 2002 2:40 AM

I also think that the reason with it's called Mission: Impossible is beacuse in the original TV series their mission always seemed impossible. Then when the made the second movie they decided to shorten it to M:I-2. I not stating the blatently obvious am I?

120
 RE: Cruise sux   > reply 
Posted by Skullfire (skullfire@clarinmail.com) on April 22, 2002 12:24 PM

I.L.(ick for)M.(oney).

120
 Wrong comment up!   > reply 
Posted by Skullfire (skullfire@clarinmail.com) on April 22, 2002 12:30 PM

Sorry for that. What I wanna say is that the only resemblance with series is Lalo Schifrin's music. I'll dye Cruise's hair to white for the next one.

120
 RE: Wrong comment up!   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 23, 2002 4:24 AM

It's a movie about spies and stuff.

120
 RE: Wrong comment up!   > reply 
Posted by Skullfire (skullfire@clarinmail.com) on April 23, 2002 9:50 AM

And not the best in his genre.

 
Discuss this story


LOGIN
Username: Password:
Need an account?
Sign up Now!
Note: Logged in users do not have pop-ups and pop-unders.
More Options
User Utilities
Help
WIN STUFF!
DEMI'S BACK!!!Win a copy of Striptease!
RECENT HEADLINES

Upcoming Loch Ness Documentary by Werner Herzog

Weekend Top Ten Box Office Films

New Indiana Jones Movie in Two Years

More comic adaptations: The Punisher

Interview: The Angels Talk!

RIAA Plans To Sue Individual Downloaders

South Park Team to Create Puppet Movie

Weekend Top Ten Box Office Films

SENSELESS SURVEY
How bad will Tomb Raider II be?
It Will Rule
Meh/Could Be Worse
I Pray For Death
Almost-Tolerable


[view results]

LINK US!

dtheatre.com
dtheatre.com

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the poster. The rest © 2000 Digital Theatre, an Ai Graphics (AIGC) Production.