
|
Quote of the day:
"Ah! the searing kiss of hot lead; how I missed you! I mean, I think I'm dying.
" -- Apu Nahasapee-mapetilon |
 |
|
 |
Review: The Punisher: It was Punishment alright...
By Aaron on April 16, 2004 5:16 PM
It would be too easy for me to spout off how much I hated The Punisher and everyone involved in this steaming pile. To be fair, Rebecca Romijn-Stamos (soon to be Rebecca Romijn-Lucchesi, oh yea), is quite good. Granted her role is rather simple and one-dimensional (course, anyone who sees this craptasical film will totally get the irony of that statement). Still, the character of Joan is well performed and you genuinely feel sorry for her lot in life. With the exception of the utterly wasted Roy Schieder, all the other performances have been phoned in. Hell, Kevin Nash showed better acting skills in the squared circle. See, I’m doing what I promised I wouldn’t do. Well, let me get the review out of the way so I can get to the point.
Poorly made 80s action movie. Flat characters. Bad acting. Terrible one-liners. The Punisher in Miami. I found myself looking for Crocket and Tubbs to save the day. Alas, nary a Salmon colored blazer to be seen. If you must see this film at least go to a matinee of it, your self respect will thank you later.
Now then, the REAL point of this article: The Punisher painfully shows what happens when you stray too far from the source material.
Their first mistake was showing Frank Castle (aka, The Punisher) as a stable human being. Part of the core of Frank’s character is that he is heavily damaged and scared from the horrors he was forced to experience in the jungles of Vietnam. Frank Castle returns to America and does his best to have a normal life. He marries a woman that helps him rejoin society. He has a child that allows him to see the beauty that still exists in the world. Although his scars are still visible, his wife and child give him a true shot at love and peace. His family soothes the bestial rage that simmers inside him. Then the horrendous moment comes. More then just his family is gunned down on that fateful day in the park. Frank Castle’s humanity dies with them. Frank dies that day. There is only his anger, his rage, and his hate. Only The Punisher remains. By ignoring these simple, but needed character points the film fails before it even has a chance.
Granted, this film is modern and so Vietnam would have to be altered. That would be fine, there have been plenty of bloody moments in history since the 1970s to give Frank his hell. Better yet, place the film in the late 70s early 80s, nothing wrong with some period flicks now and then. Making Frank Castle a simple FBI agent wanting to get out removes some of his core pain. He is not a burned out law enforcement officer. He is an emotionally scarred man who is shattered by the violence brought upon his life. The greatest mistake the film makes however is making the audience feel sorry and pity towards Frank Castle and the people he is dealing punishment to. The best Punisher tales are when the reader is simply an observer of the violence in the Punisher’s world. The Punisher comic allows each one of us to explore that terrible and frightening emotion that can surface from time to time. Through the Punisher we can feel and experience the raw power and visceral pleasure in exacting vengeance. The Punisher film never once gives us that feeling. Even worse, The Punisher makes us feel sorry for the villain. Indeed, we feel MORE sorry for Travolta’s character. Never once did I care when Frank Castle’s family died or the pain he suffered after. I did, however, feel sorrow and pity for Travolta’s family. In a Punisher story this is completely and wholly unacceptable. There is nothing wrong with the sympathetic villain; except in a Punisher story. The Punisher deals out the most violent and merciless form of revenge and the audience must NEVER, not ONCE feel any sympathy for the people he is killing. You must fully agree, support, and possible even enjoy the violence he is dealing. This simply never happens in the film.
I could have forgiven the poor acting. I could have forgiven the cheesy lines. I could even forgive the loose editing. But making me feel pity towards the man who KILLED Frank Castle’s family? NEVER!
THAT deserves the real Punishment.
|
Reader Discussions:
|
|
|
Posted by Aaron (hoser_prime@yahoo.com) on April 16, 2004 11:05 AM
Or... Have I just jumped on the "screw The Punisher" bandwagon!? Bring it folks!
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 17, 2004 5:48 PM
Well, I've only seen the trailer so I can't really comment on the film as a whole... but what the hell, it stinks like a Thai ladyboys G-string.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 18, 2004 12:21 PM
now, generally, when it comes to comic adaptaions to film, i am quite leanient. i let things such as a web cartridgless spider man slip, or a rogue and icemen rendes vous. but these films captured the point of the comic, and as i am a big marvel fan, thats all i ask the films 2 do. but, i have 2 agree, the punisher is shocking. its bad. not even funny bad, just bad. save ur money, wait 4 spidey 2 2 web his way on dvd
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 18, 2004 8:39 PM
or see spidey at da big screen.
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 19, 2004 6:30 AM
Yea, I mean that's where it's meant to be seen.
|
|
It took place in Tampa
|
reply
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 19, 2004 7:30 AM
Not hard to understand since they kept saying and showing "Tampa"...
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 19, 2004 8:38 AM
Very true. X-Men and Spiderman strayed a bit from the comic. But, as you said, they maintained the heart and soul of the characters. Punisher did not. Now, I've been told that the tone of the film follows the "new" Punisher style in "Welcome Back Frank". (They should have left him undead, anyone remember those GREAT stories in the early Marvel Knights days)? Anyway, I took a long look at the Ellis Punisher and the film differs from his style as well. Oh well, it got schoolined at the Box Office anyway. Anyone think this will have an adverse effect on the comic movie genre?
|
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 25, 2004 4:14 AM
Sounds like the original punisher movie was better...
|
|
Oh Frank....nooo!!!!
|
reply
|
|
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 27, 2004 1:12 AM
Oh Frank...no...Frank...why.
Guess it's back to those paper pages of Frank cutting someone's wrist and then throwing the guy off a helicopter.
|
|
The Punisher: 1 out of 10
|
reply
|
|
Posted by Amayos (marc@amayos.com) on September 20, 2004 4:41 PM
Why is it that a former reader of these comics finds himself having to remind Marvel what their very own character is all about? This is truly a sign of the times. Must the notion of mindless money-making in films infect every one of my childhood idols in the modern day as they are resurrected shamelessly? Between Daredevil, AVP, and now this . . . it's almost starting to feel personal.
DEAR MARVEL: I will now explain your own creation to you. In a nutshell: To say Frank Castle's world is dark is an understatement. An emotional wreck from his time served in the military, Frank resurfaces in life through experiencing his family and the humanity it brings back to him in doing so. He is allowed to say goodbye to the darkness and learn to love his wife and his children—something any scarred veteran can give an understanding nod to. One terrible day while in a PARK (not a beach in Miami) his family stumbles upon and bears witness too a criminal execution—one they are not allowed to tell of later. His entire family is slaughtered before his eyes, and he is left for dead as well. When Frank Castle emerges from his haze of madness and grief, his only desire is to bring about vengeance upon the ones who did this. Thus, the Punisher is born.
Frank Castle's new life becomes deeply entrenched in the seedy underworld of organized crime. His realm is one of dark streets, criminal underworlds, shady places, and the horrific violence and the dark emotional landscapes we bear witness too as we follow him in his pursuit to being justice to all beings who prey upon the helpless and innocent.
Frank is a shell of what he once was. He is haunted by his past as he goes, and encounters many interesting characters along the way.
But this movie tells nothing of this. The lighting has a bright commercial quality to it, the acting luke-warm, the soundtrack laughable, and the plot so mutated and watered down that I don't even recognize this as the Punisher at all. Not matter how bloody and violent it gets, it still feels somehow like we’re watching a Disney film.
Where is Microchip, btw?
I really could go on and on, but I prefer not to. You no doubt get the point.
AND NOW . . .
Word to those who are making their college careers a study of filmmaking: Watch this film in order to understand how to avoid common clichés that will sink any movie. Note the strangely ghey and upbeat soundtrack contrasting against the violence and overall theme, the lack of an actual script of any originality, the garish studio lighting that strips the film of all mood, the terrible dialogue, the terrible directing in general, and how many times Tom Jane takes off his shirt.
IN CLOSING: There is nothing about this film that is savory. The only reason this film was made was to sucker Gen Xers like myself to pay to see it. Fortunately, I waited until this came out on DVD; apparently I'm catching on to this disturbing trend in moviemaking and knew it would suck.
Try again in another ten years, Marvel.
|
Post YOUR opinion!
|
|
 |
dtheatre.com
|