Digital Theatre [DTheatre.com]
 SPONSOR
Search for  

NAVIGATION
HOME/NEWS
BUY DVD MOVIES
THE CHATBOARD
SUBMIT NEWS
HELP
COMPANY INFO
CONTACT US
LOGIN
Username:
Password:
Need an account?
Sign up Now!
Note: Logged in users do not have pop-ups and pop-unders.
More Options
User Utilities
Help

Quote of the day:

"The secret of being tiresome is to tell everything." -- Voltaire
COOL LINKS
find books, dvds and movies:



Subject: what a terrible remake.
From: (No Email available)
Date: 2004-06-25 13:56:44


i saw this movie about a week ago in theatres, not knowing anything about the movie, but expecting some sort of sci-fi thriller.  what i got instead was a ridiculous, incomprehensible story that while fairly well-acted, was just badly written.  yes, i admit i did laugh at some of the jokes - this movie did have its funny moments.  but i walked out of the theatre asking myself "what the hell did i just watch???"  i couldnt figure it out.  was it supposed to be a spoof?  was it made simply to confuse the audience?  i was so curious that i decided to rent the old stepford wives, and to my surprise, it was an entirely different movie!  the main characters had the same names, and the grocery store scene with all of the wives greeting eachother with mechanical "hello's" was present, but otherwise the movie held a completely different tone.  seeing both, i have come to this conclusion.  the 1975 version of the stepford wives was a chilling, 1984-esque story about the supression of female rights.  very enjoyable although at times melodramatic.  the 2004 version, however, is just ludicrous.  why did they do it?  what was the point?  i could not picture anybody watching the old movie and thinking "wow! this would make a GREAT comedy!"  it just does not make sense.  i find the remake pointless, and have been looking everywhere for a review to see what others think.  i entirely agree with this review, and think it is entirely necessary to contrast the two movies.  i cant imagine what fans of the first thought of this new piece of shit.  it is a shame too, because the acting was superb.  it just...was not a cohesive movie.


Add Your Discussion Comments:

Important Reminders:

    Please try to keep posts on topic.

    Try to reply to other people's discussions instead of starting new threads.

    Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.

    Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.

You are currently Not Logged in.
Click here to login or sign up

Subject:

Comment:

(Check your URLs! Don't forget the "http://"!)



Allowed HTML: <A href etc..></A> <B></B> <I></I> <U></U> <EM> </Em> <P></P> <TT></TT> <STRONG> </STRONG>
Links: Links are done with the standard HTML tag <a href="http://yourname.com/~you/">Link Text </a>.

Problems regarding accounts or comment posting
should be sent here.


CURRENT HOT TOPICS

WAR OF THE WORLDS Teaser Poster! (7)

Connery: "INDY 4 STILL A POSSIBILITY"! (5)

Steve Martin in THE PINK PANTHER Trailer! (5)

MOVIE LADIES

NATALIE PORTMAN CLOSER NUDE SCENE CAPTURES (31)

SIMPSON as DAISY DUKE! UPDATED! (14)

RECENT MOVIE NEWS

Ever Seen the STAR WARS Christmas Special? (2)

U.S. Drug Companies Scared of MICHAEL MOORE?!

FOCKERS Win Christmas Weekend

SIN CITY Trailer and Pictures! UPDATED!!

Steve Martin in THE PINK PANTHER Trailer! (5)

David Goyer Takes On THE FLASH! UPDATED!

New ELEKTRA Trailer Online!

WAR OF THE WORLDS Teaser Poster! (7)

SENSELESS SURVEY
Who should play Ash in the "Evil Dead" Remake?
Bruce Campbell
Bea Arthur
Seann William Scott
Johnny Knoxville


[view results]

DONATE!
Support DT! Donate With PayPal:
LINK US!

dtheatre.com
dtheatre.com

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the poster. The rest © 2000 Digital Theatre, an Ai Graphics (AIGC) Production.