RE: RE:
reply
Posted by sKillBot (travis@pulley.org) on March 29, 2000 6:03 PM
It has several features that neither netscape nor IE has. It's _really_ fast. It's extremely efficient, which makes it great for less powerful computers. It also lets you view pages at various zoom levels, which is way cool. I think it's more stable than the other two (definately moreso than netscape), but I haven't tried the latest version yet. Personally, I use all three browsers for testing, but IE mostly for general use, since I look at a lot of flash stuff.
RE: Review: Opera 4.0 (beta)
reply
Posted by Demona (frogfarm@hempseed.com) on March 29, 2000 11:25 PM
NOOOOOOO! Oh well, Opera was fun while they remained true to
the vision but with the addition of an email client and the
consequent bloat to the point where it won't fit on a floppy
anymore, I must pin my hopes on Mozilla; when complete, we should
be able to compile custom versions of as pure and simple a
Gecko-based browser as we want. In the meantime I use Lynx for 99%
of my daily browsing, and if a website won't work with it I won't
shop there. Once I got SSL compiled in for secure transactions, I
haven't had too many problems :)
RE: RE: Review: Opera 4.0 (beta)
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 30, 2000 7:56 AM
yeah, but Lynx sucks. The web is supposed to be a visual experience. All text sucks(though fast, it may be)