911 Flick Becomes UNITED 93, Has New Full TRAILER

By Wind(up)bird March 24, 2006 5:56 AM

A few months ago it was titled Flight 93, then Lifetime or another soft-serve network like that aired a tele-movie with the same title.  Flight 93 is now United 93.  Directed by the capable (and lover of the handheld camera) Paul Greengrass (who recently agreed to shoot anoother Bourne flick) and starring a cast you've never seen before, dig the full trailer.

Watch the 1st FLIGHT 93  teaser with the old title, then watch the new, full UNITED 93 trailer.

Other New Trailers
- New ART SCHOOL CONFIDENTIAL Trailer Is Funny
- Watch the Scientology episode of SOUTH PARK online!
- Bootlegged X-MEN 3, SUPERMAN RETURNS promo reels online!!
- Watch the New Full X-MEN 3 Trailer!!
- Check the New MISSION IMPOSSIBLE 3 trailer
- Watch, ROCKY 6 has a teaser trailer

| comments: 6

Reader Discussions:

Post YOUR opinion too!

Could be Good   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 31, 2006 3:47 PM

Interesting... 9/11. I wuz there when the towers came down and i aint jokin. United 93 wuz an asterisk compared to the other planes, but still, this 1 might be the 1 movie that we need. (Axually i've already seen it on A&E). And actually, it iz good. Its sad too. :(. They hav good hijacker stuff in it. And it shows 1 passenger getting knifed. Awesome. Awesome. And boohoo babys that r mentioned in this.
Now about the trailer. The United 93 1 is definetly better than the Flight 93 1. Flight 93 trailer duznt really show much footage of the real movie, so why would any1 wanna see it? Its violent. Violence is my purpose in life. Without violence/gore, I would hav commited suicide befor typin this. United 93 trailer wuz 1663464645747756987542 times better than the Flight 93 1. If they had only shown the Flight 93 1, I wouldn't go see it on big screen. But still it iz a pretty good and violent movie. The terroists are awesome aktrs, and for those of you who didn't see the WTC axually go down, it has some recaps of that. So this is destined to become a classic 9/11 movie. No question about it.

RE: Could be Good   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2006 12:20 PM

Why is your responce called 'Could be Good' when you've already seen it and you claim that you thought it wuz good? Or do you just mean on the bigscreen? That would make sense.

Really big discussions   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 2, 2006 12:05 PM

Whats with all of these huge responces? I have seen some about 4 words long!

RE: Really big discussions   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 2, 2006 8:08 PM

Are you a fucking moron? People can write a response as long as they want.

RE: Really big discussions   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 14, 2006 8:10 AM

Yes, he is.

RE: Really big discussions   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 15, 2006 3:46 PM

Doesn't take a genius.