WALLACE AND GROMIT MOVIE Trailer Online!

By Wind(up)bird March 1, 2005 6:40 AM

Screenrant.com has posted a WMV versions of the new teaser for the first Wallace and Gromit feature film set to open next fall. ?The film's subtitle, Curse of the Were-Rabbit.

Click, and scroll down.

See It at Screenrant...

| comments: 99

Reader Discussions:

Post YOUR opinion too!

shit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 1, 2005 5:44 PM

they should quit arleady, they had a few good movies, but now it is getting old

RE: shit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 2, 2005 5:24 AM

They had a few shory films that were 10-15 minutes long but this is the first feature length movie. I'd much rather we get more innovative and orginal animations like this than more brain-numbing, pop-culture referencing crap like Sharktale and Shrek 2.

RE: shit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 2, 2005 5:27 PM

fuck you, shrek was much better than this pile of shit

RE: shit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 3, 2005 8:55 AM

Shrek was a pretty good movie but Shrek 2 was just one long pointless exercise in reeling off as many references to other films that you can. Just because they do something from LOTR or Spider-man doesn't automatically mean it's funny. And don't even get me started on SharkTale with it's endless fish puns- "Oh look, it's Gup instead of Gap how clever!" Give me a fucking break.

RE: shit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 3, 2005 8:15 PM

(.)(.)
/  \
(!)
/  \
/   \

RE: shit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 3, 2005 8:15 PM

what the fuck is that shit

RE: shit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 4, 2005 6:44 AM

The guy tried to make it look like a naked woman and failed miserably.

RE: shit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 4, 2005 10:10 AM

fuck u cock eatin shit likin fucker all them flms were good now shut the fuck up

shitheads   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 4, 2005 8:49 PM

eat it biotch. stop swearing so much you uneducated assholes...

RE: shitheads   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 5, 2005 7:16 AM

fuck you

RE: shitheads   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 5, 2005 9:16 AM

i like shrek 2 an sharktale cos they woz funy! i like it when the fish talk and say stuff like you da fish coz dats cool!

RE: shitheads   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 6, 2005 11:46 AM

oh yeh i forgott that you had a major movie contract to make a motion picture oh yes you dont so you have 20 years of filming maing  and being world known and thne start saying that other peoples movies are shit so just shut up!

RE: shitheads   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 6, 2005 1:58 PM

you shut the fuck up you gay bastard

Wallace and Gromit The Movie   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 6, 2005 3:07 PM

Wow. It's great to see how well education the general population is.

I for one am excited about the Wallace and Gromit movie. I've enjoyed their shorts and Chicken Run (lest we forget they did that one too).

Shrek2 and Sharktale had their redeeming moments, but otherwise they were both rather bland with little character development and a predictable plot. I can't wait to see what Wallace and Gromit can do.

Wow...   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 6, 2005 5:02 PM

This website has managed to unload a bus full of kindergarten children onto its message boards.

Now I'll bet they'll bicker over the spelling of the phrase "cocksucker."

BTW: Looking forward to the Wallace and Gromit movie.

Best news this year aside from Ralph Bakshi announcing that he's making a new movie.

RE: Wow...   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 6, 2005 5:44 PM

Where, oh where is the babysitter?!?! ;)

at the rist of sounding as uneducated as others who have posted...who's Ralph Bakshi?

RE: Wow...   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 7, 2005 5:10 AM

Whoever the guy was who said that no one can criticise a movie if they are not themselves a successful filmmaker- what the fuck were you smoking?

funny   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 7, 2005 5:53 AM

me n my friend thought it was funny.

RE: funny   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 7, 2005 1:55 PM

What? Wallace and Gromit or Shrek 2?

RE: funny   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 7, 2005 4:04 PM

bite me bitch

RE: funny   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 7, 2005 4:32 PM

YOU'RE ALL A BUNCH OF TOSSERS.....ISN'T IT PAST YOUR BEDTIME?

RE: funny   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 7, 2005 7:12 PM

aww, little baby is cranky.  time your bottle

RE: funny   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 8, 2005 6:49 AM

Shrek 2 and SharkTale were the biggest pile of shit stained crapfests that I've seen for years.

RE: funny   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 8, 2005 1:47 PM

Will you explain why? It's one thing to say something was horrible, it's quite another to back up your statement.

I enjoyed Shrek2 on a purly "Turn off your brain and be entertained" sense. Sharktale, on the otherhand, was redundant and predictable. The entire "I love you son" "I love you dad" was a bit strained for my tastes.


there. See how easy that was? now, why do YOU think Shrek2 and Sharktale were horribe?

Ralph Bakshi   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 8, 2005 5:07 PM

Who's Ralph Bakshi? Point your browser to http://www.ralphbakshi.com/ and check it out yourself.

RE: Ralph Bakshi   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 8, 2005 5:14 PM

fuck you

RE: Ralph Bakshi   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 9, 2005 7:05 AM

I enjoyed Shrek 1 because the central premise was alot of fun- namely, 'what if all the fairytale characters lived in the same world but acted like real people?' Out of that concept they created a very fun and worthwhile movie. The reason why I thought Shrek 2 was a pile of crap was because its central concept was 'Medievil Flintstones.' The characters are now living in a world which is basically modern day LA but with a medievil twist. You know, where the Flintstones would have a prehistoric Las Vegas and make it Rock Vegas, Shrek 2 has a Barney's of New York store called "Barney's of Old York." That kind of thing, over and over. Plus it just had waaaaay too many pop-culture references, In the first Shrek, there were references aplenty, but usually with an added punch that didn't depend on wink-wink, nudge-nudge. For instance: In the amusement park, where Donkey activates the machine that launches into a frenzied musical number performed by wooden dools. It was obviously a riff on Disney's "It's a Small World" ride, but the song was manic enough and witty enough that it could have stood alone as a gag without that knowledge. In Shrek 2 we just get stuff like a ring falling onto Fionas' finger in the same way as LOTR or a reharsh of the upsidedown kiss from spider-man, there's no humour in them, they just serve as opportunites for morons to nudge the person next to them and say "Hey! I know what that's from!"

RE: Ralph Bakshi   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 9, 2005 3:43 PM

fuck you too

RE: Ralph Bakshi   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 9, 2005 5:34 PM

Excellent analysis. Well explained analysis. I totally agree with you.

Now, on to the topic this discussion board is SUPPOSED to be on: Wallace and Gromit.

I think the two creators are very clever in the way they represent Wallace and Gromit. Particularly the manner in which Gromit seems to accept Wallace's idiosyncracies, and yet just barely tolerates him as would a babysitter.

Chicken Run is a particular favorite of mine. Though the arguement can be made that the movie is just "The Great Escape" with chickens.

RE: Ralph Bakshi   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 9, 2005 5:36 PM

wow, i came here to see the trailer and found something much more interesting...way to go morons

RE: Wallace and Gromit The Movie   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 10, 2005 1:19 AM

I really got a kick out of Wallace and Gromit, and have since bought the vhs and dvd for myself to share with others, who may I add have also developed an appreciation for at least the stories if nothing else. The art of claymation just fascinates me, as I remember in my boring 6th grade math class, using up my new school tablets to animate stick figures, then sharing them with other guys who did the same (not exactly mickey mouse, but fun to be creative anyway) I for one am looking forward to the new movie and will no doubt be taking my three boys to the movies when in theaters. (too bad they dont have cheese & crackers) Popcorn has taken second place for my boys, when watching movies, they have to have their cheese & crackers now. As for the other 2 movies, we saw both of them and although they both had their own redeeming entertainment values, I couldn't help but feeling a bit caught up in the enertainment whirlwind to catch my buck. I'm sure the creators of Wallace & Gromit are going to rake in some fine jingle, but (at 41)there's also that kid inside me that is able to appreciate the fine artwork going into this form of entertainment.I'm sold!

RE: Wallace and Gromit The Movie   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 10, 2005 5:40 PM

fuck you gay ass faggot

RE: Wallace and Gromit The Movie   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 11, 2005 6:11 AM

Anyone who criticises Wallace and Gromit has either never seen it or has issues with homosexuality... namely they are one.

RE: Wallace and Gromit The Movie   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 11, 2005 11:03 PM

I'm gay for you :)

RE: Wallace and Gromit The Movie   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 13, 2005 4:44 AM

So now we have the sexy time?

RE: shitheads   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 18, 2005 4:03 AM

your the main cant!

RE: Wallace and Gromit The Movie   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 18, 2005 4:04 AM

you sad mufa fukers saying all that shit on a shitty wallace and gromit websites u shud all go out and calm down abd buy urself a gimp suite. u latex fukers

RE: Wallace and Gromit The Movie   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 18, 2005 6:06 AM

Gimp suit? Latex? I think you're on the wrong website. Go somewhere else if you're into that kind of thing.

Wallace and Gromit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 19, 2005 2:17 AM

I would just like to inform all you assholes out there that diss Wallace and Gromit, that the films are marketed at the children not you d***heads!

So would you kindly stop chatting, and dissing the film in your swear words.

RE: Wallace and Gromit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 19, 2005 2:19 AM

here here, I agree, well said anon.

RE: Wallace and Gromit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 19, 2005 2:21 AM

Finally someone who understands.....

Wallace and Gromit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 19, 2005 4:47 AM

All you dumb fucking Americans,come here to England and suck my cock you strange wankstain of a  nation!!!

Wallace and Gromit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 19, 2005 4:54 AM

Why are Americans so fucking stupid?

RE: Wallace and Gromit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 19, 2005 7:08 AM

Wallace and Gromit is aimed at the same target audience as pixar films and movies like Shrek. It's not just for little kids.

RE: shit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2005 11:28 AM

He FUCK U MAN! THEY RULE!

?   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2005 11:29 AM

WOt u on about about?

RE: erm   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2005 11:31 AM

dont worry but hey im from ENGLAND WOOOOOOO I RULE !    U FUCK FACES!

RE: erm   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 30, 2005 4:00 AM

4-0 to the En-ger-land!

wallace and gromit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 2, 2005 2:04 AM

On viewing the trailer I can only assume they have had the van converted as the handbrake should be on the right hand side of the driver not the middle and is not of the button variety

RE: erm   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 3, 2005 12:44 PM

I'll remember that England hates American's next time your door is being knocked on by angry Germans....Or is your memory as bad as your grammar?

RE: Wallace and Gromit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 3, 2005 12:50 PM

A great deal of Shrek had inuendos that only adults would understand and, in my opinion, children shouldn't know.
For Example: Farquhat (sp?) laying in bed watching the image of Fiona again and again.

Wallace and Gromit, while aimed at the same audience, has more innocence and, in my opinion, purity that makes it great for children.

I may be an adult, but I'm looking forward to seeing the movie this Autumn.

Wallace & Gromit review   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 3, 2005 2:39 PM

My one and only comment: That's a lot of hostility for a Wallace and Gromit movie review!

RE: Wallace & Gromit review   reply

Posted by stumpy (No Email) on April 5, 2005 7:22 AM

you guys are all a bunch of fucked up individuals !

hahaha you loosers   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 5, 2005 11:44 AM

stop arguing over the internet for the love of god!

This film looks good and shrek 2 was good but why are we talking about it here!

arguing on the internet is like running in the special olympics, even if you wil your still retarded, remember that!

ok im going and im never probably coming back onto this site unless i need another film trailer so will still never go to this page so if you try to call me names or argue you will be seriously redundant!

this film is gunna rock!

RE: hahaha you loosers   reply

Posted by stumpy (No Email) on April 5, 2005 2:34 PM

i totally agree with you. wallace & gromit are cool & will rock. its about time we showed the y(w)ank`s a thing or 2 about animation. y(w)anks`s dont know there arseholes from their elbows. ive a few questions..
1, what does the "DT"  in DTtheatre mean..? is it DeepThroat. :-D

2, is the pope really dead or another american cover up.

3, Ive just acquired a bullet proof golf buggy. how much you reckon i`l get on E-bay?

4, michael Jackson.. innocent, or a child molesting plastic freak.... i think`s so.

5, sandwiches for lunch tomorrow, cheese & pickle or jam & ham.. !

6, 1969, did man really land on the moon ?!!

RE: hahaha you loosers   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 6, 2005 5:08 AM

1. It's Tenacious D backwards, this site is run by Jack Black.

2. The Pope never dies, he just regenerates like doctor Who.

3. I'll give you $1 for it.

4. Michael Jackson is just a simple man who is truely touched by children.

5. Why not all four?

6. No, it's alla cover up. They really landed on the sun.

P.S: Shrek 2's humour wasn't adult in any way, just a load of fart gags aimed at 12-15 year olds.

RE: hahaha you loosers   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 6, 2005 3:05 PM

first off, these Yanks you complain about saved your sorry ars in two world wars...a few American Greats spring to mind: Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Walt Disney, FDR...

2. The Pope is Italian...blame the MOb.

3. good luck selling your crap on Ebay.

4. Only in America can a poor black boy grow up to be a rich white woman. (he's guilty as sin, though).

5. How about spotted dick for dessert...only the British would eat that crap.

6. Oh goody! a conspiracy buff who's head is so far up his ars he can see out his belly-button.

RE: hahaha you loosers   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 7, 2005 10:00 AM

Once again we see how Americans have no sense of irony. If you didn't get so much of your knowledge of history from Hollywood movies you'd probably know that America didn't win WWII single-handedly.

Winning the Wars   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 7, 2005 10:24 AM

Did I say Americans did it alone? If that's the impression you got then that is unfortunate.

In WWI the Americans served mainly a superfluous role, appearing only in the last two years of the war to turn the balance toward the Triple Entente. Admittedly, the Europeans did most of the work.

In WWII, however, Americans were in the thick of things almost from the beginning with troops, and definitely from the beginning with money (lend/lease, war loans). From here we get into speculation history, and that is a dangerous subject?the ?what if? kind of thing.

While the American?s didn?t do it alone, the British certainly didn?t either?and the French wouldn?t have even thought of trying to fight on their own.

RE: hahaha you loosers   reply

Posted by stumpy (No Email) on April 7, 2005 11:20 AM

1. I,m sorry, the only way that you can have the words "bill Gates" & "great" in the same sentence is if you include the words "is the worlds" then after "great" putting "est  dumb fuck whos doesnt deserve all that money.." Why doesnt he spend all his money developing a operating system that actually works properly without fucking up all the time. Dick !!
2. ok the Mob can take the blame. I wonder where is tardis is now.
3. the crap wasn?t mine. It?s the pope`s pope-mobile. Batman has one so why cant the pope.
4. I thought wacko jacko was male. If that?s what you think a woman looks like then your even more fucked up that I presumed..
5. spotted dick. No thanks. Try some haggis. That`l get some pubes out your balls ( oh i`m sorry you don?t have any )
6. why would I want to see out of my belly button.?  I think you have a thing for the male arse. Are you a tail gunner/ joby jabber /fudge packer / chocolate donut pocker / arse bandit*.. I think so..   *delete where applicable

we know the british / French didn?t do it alone u dumb fuck

RE: hahaha you loosers   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 9, 2005 10:10 AM

"In WWII, however, Americans were in the thick of things almost from the beginning"

Yea, if three years into the war is the begining. I don't want to get into a big argument but it just pisses me off when I see all these Hollywood movies depicting America as winning the war all by themselves and subsequently you get loads of Americans who actually go along with it. When it comes down to it WWII hinged on alot of things. If America hadn't have joined then the Nazis would have won but then again, if Britain had fallen to the Nazis like the rest of Europe then the Nazis would have occupied that whole region. Where would America have been able to launch any attacks from? It would have only been a matter of time before Germany would have been invading the USA from the east with Japan attacking from the west. If the Russians hadn't have defended Stalingrad then they wouldn't have been able to put pressure on Nazis either. There's a reason why it was called a WORLD war and it just comes across as a bit arrogant when Americans go on about "How we saved your asses!" all the time.

Sadly....   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 11, 2005 2:07 PM

This site is designed to discuss Wallace and Gromit, not Amero-centrism and European complexes.

It is a shame to see entire generations of Americans believing that 'they' won wars themselves due to Hollywood dramatizing historical events.
No country won a World War on their own...

The American's could not have won the Revolutionary War without the help of the French, and Europe could not have kept the Nazis at bay without the aid of the Americans. Before you go off on me, I did not say the Americans saved anyone from being run over.

History has a nasty habit of being written by the victor, regardless of whom that may be, and thus skewed toward one view or another. Much of History, at least in the States, is taught as "The West and the Rest." Which, again, is very unfortunate.

RE: Sadly....   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 12, 2005 9:16 AM

...The West being America.

RE: Sadly....   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 13, 2005 1:46 PM

America, and Europe, to a large extent. Though admittedly, the bulk of the information is colored with American preconceptions.

RE: Sadly....   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 14, 2005 7:57 AM

Whoever the limey was who said that if Britain had been taken over by the Nazis then we would have lost the war, your talking out of your ass. There's no way germany would have been able 2 attack us, we were just way 2 strong. all it would have ment is we'd have had 2 defeat the nazis all by ourselfs which is what we pretty much did anyway when u think about it.

RE: Sadly....   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 16, 2005 3:12 AM

Well what an interesting chat you guys are having!!

1) America only joined after pearl harbour.
2)used the war to lend money to european countries with stupidly high interest rates which most countries are still paying back.
3) Americans only do things that benefit them!!!!!

i fucking despise you bastardised crapface of a cock sucking sheep shagging ass licking of a nation!!!!!!!

George bush can come here all the way to England and lick my hairy asse and munch on my faeces!!! the cunt...

RE: Sadly....   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 16, 2005 8:46 AM

Your just jealous cos our countrys the greatest nation on earth and we have freedom.

International Relations   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 20, 2005 11:10 AM

International relationships are fueled by economics. Wars are based on economics.

I'm not excusing the behavior, just explaining it. Want examples?
Sure:
 Vietnam: U.S/French relations - French insisted on U.S. help in Indochina in exchange for a nonaggression treaty that included trade with Germany in post-war Europe (that the U.S. wanted France to sign).

WWII: Hitler wanted more land for the Lebensraum of Germany...for some reason the rest of Europe didn't like that idea (its called sarcasm...don't jump on me).

French Revolution: its called bread, people. The French people were hungry, and tired of incompetent leadership.

American Revolution: It wasn't "no taxation without representation" that's a convenient tagline. In reality the Colonists wanted to be able to tax their own people and create their own national income.


The idea of Lend/Lease in World War II was an excellent idea. Granted the interest was a bit high, but I can't help but wonder if anyone out there remembers the Marshall Plan?
In an attempt to forestall another Great Depression-like dive in the global economy the U.S. loaned enough money to Europe (including Germany) to help rebuild the continent. This had its own ramifications, however, in that Russia felt left out and isolated which in turn led to the Cold War...which was again based on economis (who can outspend whom).

'President' Bush...what can I say? Accidents happen. Don't base your opinion of all Americans on the Politicans of my country. 'Politician' is a dirty word afterall.

RE: International Relations   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 21, 2005 5:50 AM

Jeez, someguy was simply comparing American animations to British ones...

RE: International Relations   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 22, 2005 4:39 PM

What has this got to do with te new Wallace & Gromit movie?

I can't wait to see the movie later this year but to all those that don't like the look of it why can't you put forward proper reasons for not wanting to see it instead of just saying stuff like "it's s**t"?

Also before anyone goes off calling me gay or whatever I'm bisexual and proud and would take the comment as a compliment.

RE: International Relations   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 23, 2005 7:57 AM

But if someone calls you gay then they're saying that you don't like women which you do if you really are bisexual.

RE: Wallace and Gromit The Movie   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 25, 2005 1:49 AM

u latex fukcers we r back agen. how old are r u u sad gay? posting your little comments on a shitty website, u say u dont like these films but u talk about themall day u fuckin peice of turd, buy a gimp suit u dick ul feel alot better believe me, dont get too tight around the mouth tho.. u cock eater.. xxxx

RE: Wallace and Gromit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 25, 2005 1:51 AM

and as 4 u u little prick! here here! here fuckin here! wat did u say u prick! i shud bang u out, no if, buts asking, telling or questions, just straight out! ur the biggest latex mufa fuker! u posh silver spooned dickwad.xx fight me

RE: Wallace and Gromit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 25, 2005 4:55 AM

No, that's alright. I give up.

RE: Wallace and Gromit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 25, 2005 6:12 AM

GIVE UP! give fuckin uP! u shud b ashamed of yourself u latex gay, ur a fuckin lil prick who shud get basnged out one day soon, watch ur back u gay one punch and its all done, wham bam, all done one simple punch and ur out, good night sweetheart get it? any time and place fight me! right now right here i dont care hit me i love it ahh ur a penis i wanna munch u, ur a faggot and ur a dick wad who doesnt ddesrve not to have his face done over, priccckk!! gimp suited twat

RE: Wallace and Gromit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 25, 2005 6:14 AM

onli jokin, love u love gudstuffxx

RE: Wallace and Gromit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 25, 2005 12:48 PM

wow i came onto this site to find a trailer and instead i get to read about sum little dipshits who dont even know how to use a fuckin keyboard. I dunno how old some of u ppl r but im sure its too young to know how to use ur cock properly. Back on topic wallace and gromit looks to be really gud, i especially enjoyed chicken run with the great escape knock offs

RE: Wallace and Gromit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 26, 2005 4:17 AM

dipshit hey, fight me muthfucker, one on one, no rules, just a full on fight to the death u latex fuck. i mite not know how to use a keyboard but i know how to bang u the fuck out u little fuckin prick. i'm thinkin u and me wearing gimp suites this saturday in a cage fight and i'll go ken shamrock on your ass.

RE: Wallace and Gromit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 26, 2005 7:33 AM

How can we fight you if we can't even understand a fucking word you say?

RE: Wallace and Gromit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 27, 2005 2:10 AM

understand this latex fuck, you and me one on one, winners takes the other mans gimp suit and the zip around the mouth! if you dont understand that then you can understand my foot in your latex ass. everyone knows ur a lil prick and that u love cock up ur ass, why do u wear a pink gimp suit? everyone elses loves red or black, pink u prick! u poof!

RE: Wallace and Gromit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 27, 2005 10:00 AM

The gimp's sleeping...

RE: Wallace and Gromit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 28, 2005 7:06 AM

Well then I guess you'll gonna have to go wake him up now won't you.

RE: Sadly....   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 30, 2005 4:08 AM

I'm not even going to pretend I know anything about America, economics or wars in any great detail.

I'd just like to know out of all the nations why does it only appear to be America appearing in the news for killing troops on their side by mistake?

RE: Sadly....   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 2, 2005 4:27 PM

"Friendly Fire" happens to everyone, it's the American's whose news people are allowed to be in the middle of the action with a huge "Shoot here" signal on a shoulder (that would be the camera).
I completely, whole-heartedly disagree with allowing untrained personel in a combat zone. Like Star Tours in disneyland says "What are you doing here? this is a combat zone, it's restricted!" (dumbest line in the entire place).

Do some research for "Friendly Fire" and tack on a country to the end of it. You're bound to find something other than Americans killing themselves and allies.

In point of fact:
http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=325732003Scotsman

There's more though, with the bulk of it about American "coy-boy" nature.

RE: Sadly....   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 3, 2005 9:37 AM

But you just don't hear about American troops being killed by Friendly fire from British or Austrailian or Italian troops do you?

RE: Sadly....   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 9, 2005 5:36 PM

What is the American "coy-boy" nature?  

As an American, I'm curious.

RE: Sadly....   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 9, 2005 9:32 PM

"Cow-Boy" is in quotation marks to indicate it is a blanket statement.
In general (blanket statement, there are always exceptions) Americans tend to be viewed as "Trigger-Happy NRA-Loving gun-toting lunatics" who'd rather shoot first and ask questions later. At least that's what the world seems to view Americans as.

Though I do think the American police force is more effective than the British: "Stop! Or I'll say 'Stop' Again!!"

RE: Sadly....   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 10, 2005 2:32 AM

we are on a wallace and gromit website not a politics, if u sad fuks wana change the subject then i'm gona start talkin about gimp suites. anyone got a gimp suit in extra small, really tight round the mouth? i need one for my summer ball next week.

RE: Sadly....   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 10, 2005 2:49 AM

u little shit, gimp suites? whats wrong with u u little freak, i'll give u fuckin tight around the mouth. its sick fucks like u that should be tied up and severly beaten. obviously i'm gona send u my gimp suit in extra small, tight around the mouth.

Wallace and Gromit; back to basics?   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 13, 2005 7:11 AM

I didn't bother reading all the crap other people have posted on this forum (c'mon if you want to bitch whine at each other, arrange a time and place away from us) so i'm sorry if someone has already said this; is this going to be a proper "W&G" film, or is it going the way of "Chicken Run"? I say this because there's a massive difference between the two.

Wallace and Gromit was made in the UK for british tv. Let's face it, original W&G wasn't expected to even reach America, in fact the first stuff was only going to be shown here (uk) on tv every Christmas. Everything about W&G feels british from the crackers & cheese jokes to the look of the sets and Wallace in general. It's clear to see why Americans don't like it as much; it'd be like making U571 historically accurate by using british sailors instead of american ones, or leonardo di caprio being english in Titanic; they'd hate it because it wasn't about them. Sometimes a great film is ruined by casting the wrong person to get more sales.

And here's my point; Chicken Run was different because they threw Mel Gibson in there as an american rooster to appeal to the American market. When i was watching "Chicken Run" i was wondering why Nick Park wrote in the token American guy on a farm full of english chickens? While we're at it, why didn't he throw in a hispanic chicken, an asian chicken and a russian chicken, stereotype them as much as possible and make more jokes about their nationalities? If you're still not convinced, take a look at Fowler the old RAF chicken, and tell me the Americans don't just love that heavily-stereotyped, elderly-english-gentlemen character? I'm 21 and i've never heard anyone talk like that.

W&G was true to its english humour (which let's be honest is very different from the American's) and didn't feel the need to boost their sales and the cost of its excellent humour. If Nick Park tries to appeal to crowds out of the Uk, he'll end up making a film completely different from "A Close Shave", "The Wrong Trousers" and "A Grand Day Out". Stick with model railways, porridge cannons, cheese & crackers and cardigan-wearing sheep jokes, those are the gags that made Wallace and Gromit great.

RE: Wallace and Gromit; back to basics?   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 13, 2005 8:34 AM

Yea, I don't want Wallace and Gromit to turn into some crappy pop-culture referencing shit with 'star name' voice actors like Shark-Tale or Shrek 2.

we`d still kick their ass   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 15, 2005 7:19 AM

its true..
btw, whats happened to this. no more comments coming on this anymore?

RE: we`d still kick their ass   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 22, 2005 11:17 PM

Some of what was posted before has been deleted...don't know why....


who's ass are you referring to?

RE: we`d still kick their ass   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 7, 2005 7:29 AM

hey shut your hole you candy ass cock bite munching paedo..  Bring out the Gimp.. he`s a twitcher !!

hi   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 12, 2005 3:34 AM

hi dis is da bomb

RE: shit   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 29, 2005 5:42 PM

Firs class entertainment and action from the dynamic duo..Wallace and Grommit...when is the second and third movies coming out?

hey numbnuts   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 30, 2005 2:52 AM

is there an echo in here or does some pant stain of an excuse of life not know how to leave a comment without copying it 3 times.
u dickwad !!
he twitches !

:)   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 4, 2005 6:38 AM

hey hey, were back the gimp suite wearing, latex, tight around the mouth (sorry exrta tight around the mouth) motherfuckers. we've been away for a while but ihavent forgetton how fuckin gay u lot are, wallace and gromit sucks cock, like all ur mums, ur all a bunch of ponsey faggot gays who need to get a life, i cud bang each and every one of u out in one punch easily, if i cud bothered but ur all such fukin latex losers i cant be bothered, i cant belive how gay u lot are, u make me sick. ur the biggest loada no time dustbin emptying losers iv ever had the displeasure of talkin to, u fukin bunch of women fucks u all stink like a hippos shit. and ur mum looks like a dead rat on toast, and she eats it the fat bitch xx

to :)   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 18, 2005 5:24 AM

hey less of the extra tight around the mouth bullshit. you are a sad pathetic excuse of human existence. if you were on fire i wouldnt even pull out my donger to piss on you you fuckin retard. go back to your little hole in the ground & let your brother shag you up your botty cause that`s what you like. your momma`s so freakin ugly she wouldnt even get a second glance from a rhino.
go on beat it you little crettin brown nosed numbnuts asshole..