RE: the mask 2
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 27, 2004 5:38 PM
It's annoying, thats why.
This movie, looks to me, sucky. I hope it doesn't suck, but i'll see when i see it.
wierdos
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 17, 2004 5:48 PM
You guys are all wierd. You can't even spell right. You also use horrible language. I know you guys are just a couple of immature children or teenagers. Anyway....this movie doesn't look that good. I think that Jim Carrey should be in it. Also, how did the baby get those powers without even having the mask on? They just want to make money, but they will ruin the series.
LAME MOVIE
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 17, 2004 5:50 PM
Yeah, I think that the director is crazy thinking he can just go and make a sequel. get the original director, the original writers, and the original actors instead. Also, the baby looks so fake. You can tell he is computer animated.
son of the mask disaster
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 23, 2004 8:48 PM
the son of the mask is a very very poor movie made by an amateur director. have you seen the disgusting trailer? and other sites show that this gay guy lawrence guterman is putting babies in sexual situations. this guy needs a good kick in the face for this.
RE: The Mask 2
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 27, 2004 4:55 AM
"They just want to make money, but they will ruin the series."
Hey moron, without this movie there IS no 'series'. Don't get me wrong, I think it looks like shit but how can they be ruining a series that doesn't exist without this movie?