![Digital Theatre [DTheatre.com]](images/logo.png){kind=logo}
|
Starring on Dtheatre's Stage: Latest Movie News & Trailers, TV News and Productions,
Special Free Guides, Gadgets and Expert Reviews on Varity of Exciting Zones. We actually have a special expert responsible for every post series. Come back soon, you will always find new interesting things! |
By Wind(up)bird November 8, 2004 5:55 AM
An nice, trippy, colorful, teaser poster has sprung up online over at Darkhorizons.com and will no doubt be springing up in every multiplex theatre for the holiday season. ?Check it out. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory opens next summer.
Check out the New WILLY WONKA Trailer!!!
Check some NEW Charlie and the Chocolate Factory Photos
Read Dark Horizons Exclusive Post...
| comments: 136
CATCF 
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 8, 2004 7:16 AM
Wasn't the original movie called Willie Wonka and the chocolate factory? Also, Depp looks like Marilyn Manson in that poster.
RE: CATCF reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 8, 2004 7:28 AM
Actually you are correct. But the book was called Charlie &, The Chocolate Factory,.. so maybe they're sticking closer to the book, and/or gearing up for the book's sequel, Charlie and the Glass Elevator.
ooooooooohhhhhh reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 8, 2004 8:45 AM
i have the last of the everlasting GOBSTOPPERS!!!!!!!! and yes this is a satanic movie! AWESOME i hope they make it evil. After all Willy was a child killer, its so obvious lol well should be interesting, and btw i am glad this thread didnt turn into the political nonsense that the Star Wars III turned into. ok take care have fun and pray ;D
blahblah reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 8, 2004 11:19 AM
why did they make, deep look so gothic in the movie.I mean come on Willy Wonka doent look that evil.
RE: blahblah reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 8, 2004 1:46 PM
Read the book(s)- the first movie made was wonderful, I loved it for it's own value- but in terms of the book it really was not relevant at all. The novels are actually incredibly dark- it seems that this new film will be more closely following Dahl's original intentions from the book.
RE: ooooooooohhhhhh reply
Posted by Jack (jack@dtheatre.com) on November 8, 2004 5:56 PM
The Star Wars thread died. It's getting about 80 vistors per minute and our shitty code is choking on the 500 some queries that are preformed on the database per vistor.
charlie and the chocolate factory reply
Posted by nate76 (No Email) on November 8, 2004 8:41 PM
fantastic. another burton classic will soon hit the screens. johnny depp you rock. mabe this movie will bring back the child in all of us that we once lost.
RE: blahblah reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 9, 2004 4:34 AM
You've got it the wrong way round, there was nothing dark at all about Dahl's original story and part of the reason he was unpleased with how the film turned out was because they'd made it too dark (Like with the whole psychedelic boat tunnel and Wonka's creepy chanting etc...)
RE: CATCF reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 9, 2004 4:58 AM
They actually asked Manson first but he refused.
RE: blahblah reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 9, 2004 5:00 AM
Yeah, except that Wonka trusted humanity as far as he could throw it, and that he wanted only a child cause he distrusted adults, and a child could easily be molded into the person he wanted that child to be. Nothing wrong with that of course.
RE: blahblah reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 10, 2004 7:27 AM
All that was more blatant in the film though.
RE: blahblah reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 10, 2004 11:21 AM
i guess your right
Wanka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 10, 2004 1:28 PM
I can't wait to see it how it is supposed to be. Dahl's writings are very dark .....
Give Credit In Your Reports!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 10, 2004 7:37 PM
You didnt get this poster Dark Horizons Did!
RE: Give Credit In Your Reports!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 11, 2004 7:02 AM
Noone claimed this was an 'exclusive'
Exclusive: The "Charlie" Poster reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 11, 2004 8:44 AM
http://www.darkhorizons.com/news04/041108h.php
"I'm proud to debut in an exclusive to Dark Horizons"
And you stole the AICN Wonka Pics without giving them any credit.
You Shouldnt host there files reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 11, 2004 8:54 AM
You Shouldnt host there files
RE: Exclusive: The reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 12, 2004 8:47 AM
Let me rephrase. Noone at Dtheatre claimed it was an exclusive.
RE: Exclusive: The reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 12, 2004 10:04 AM
But Dark Horizons did.
When someone is exclusive to another site you dont take there images on post it on another.
Thats stealling the image and taking traffic away from the site that deserves it.
Instead you write a paragraph on it and give a link to the article at dark horizons that has the image.
RE: Exclusive: The reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 13, 2004 3:18 AM
Look at the top of the page, see how it says the images are from Dark Horizons? What's the problem?
Your taking away Dark Horizons.... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 13, 2004 10:14 PM
Traffic by storing the image on dtheatre's servers and not DH's.
Most people wont follow the link because the image is right there infront of them.
RE: Your taking away Dark Horizons.... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 14, 2004 7:07 AM
The internet is supposed to be all about the flow of information quicker and easier.
Smeels Like Children reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 15, 2004 11:44 AM
ok i heard so many rumors about this movie its not even funny i just want to kno one think is marilyn manson going to be in this movie or no .Just curious
willy wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 15, 2004 5:55 PM
You're a bunch of loons...the point is that the movie is being made and here is some information. Move the heck on or get a hobby. It will be a great movie with Johnny Depp, no doubt. The first one made a huge impression on many of us. End of story. Geez. Why be so pissy???
RE: willy wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 16, 2004 6:25 AM
Who the fuck is being pissy!!!???
Ridiculous reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 16, 2004 11:41 AM
Who cares about who is hosting the frickin' files or carrying what links, etc. Are you the internet police or something ? Nah, probably just some I.T. geek who gets off on pointing out ridiculous nonsense that no one with a real life cares about.
RE: Smeels Like Children reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 16, 2004 1:11 PM
i just wnated to freaking know who's acting in this fucking movie gesus deep sucks get over hahahaha ok i admite hes ok but wouldnt you want to see freaking marilyn manson beging willy wonka i mean he made an album that looks like the movie thing i just want to know
Charlie Vs Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 16, 2004 4:54 PM
the Gene Wilder Version was not liked by Roald Dahl partuularly as it took away from the darkness of his book to a certain extent. the original apparently supposed to called Charlie and the chocolate factory but due to the release/production of Willy Wonka sweets at the time they decided to rename it and have a tie in. Dont forget people that this is not the first Roald Dahl story to have the Burton magic touch - he also did James and the Giant Peach....
RE: CATCF reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 16, 2004 8:49 PM
The Movie was "Willie Wonka and the Chocolate Factory"
but the book was "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory"
Also instead of Marilyn Manson I think he looks like Malcom MacDowell in "A Clockwork Orange"
RE: Wanka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 16, 2004 9:04 PM
dahl's writings are not dark! They simply put down adults in every possible way, goodness read a bit!
RE: "Wanka" ha ha that's funny. reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 17, 2004 4:56 AM
Yea, where's everyone got this idea that the book was some kind of 'gothic thriller' from?
everything reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 18, 2004 2:12 AM
i am really exited with this new movie. But i would love to see manson in this. Can some please tell me if he is going to star in it or not!?
RE: Charlie Vs Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 18, 2004 12:09 PM
Correction: Burton did not "do" "James and the Giant Peach." He was a producer of the film, with Denise Di Novi, but Henry Selick (who also co-produced) directed that film. It's not a Tim Burton film.
RE: CATCF reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 19, 2004 4:50 AM
Marilyn Manson can't act, why does everyone think he should be in the film? Why not just cast The Rock while your at it?
Manson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 19, 2004 1:11 PM
Marilyn Manson is not in this movie. That was simply a rumor... from pre production. He was being considered for Wonka, which is obviously Johnny Depp (hooray). I'm glad they are going for the darker, orginal concept that Dahl had in his book (and yes they were much darker). If Depp doesnt make this very different from Wilder's performance, there is no way this film is going to succeed.
RE: Manson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 20, 2004 9:23 AM
I think you all must have read a different version of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory because there was nothing 'dark' or 'gothic' about it at all.
RE: Manson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 24, 2004 3:31 AM
Let me ask you something... Did you ever do English Lit?
Yes, it is dark. If I could be assed I'd go looking for quotes... :)
But yes, Dahl = Darker-than-you-think, you just have to read into it.
RE: Manson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 24, 2004 11:31 AM
A bit off-the-wall to be sure but not dark.
Burton + Dahl reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 25, 2004 11:59 AM
No one but Tim Burton could perfect perfection on a Dahl classic such as Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. This movie is gonna be a feather in Burton's cap and no mistake!
RE: Burton Dahl reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 26, 2004 6:55 AM
Cor blimey, apples an pears an no mistake Mary Poppins!
RE: Smeels Like Children reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 27, 2004 6:59 PM
IN RESPONSE TO: i just wnated to freaking know who's acting in this fucking movie gesus deep sucks get over hahahaha ok i admite hes ok but wouldnt you want to see freaking marilyn manson beging willy wonka i mean he made an album that looks like the movie thing i just want to know
------------------------
Okay.. why didnt anyone say anything about this idiot before... He spelt Smells Smeels... And Jesus with a G for Christ's Sake... I think stupidity at this level should be inadvertantly smited from the face of the Earth.
RE: Smeels Like Children reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 27, 2004 7:00 PM
your a fucking moron i mean how old are u and how stupid would one have to be to listen to the opinion of someone who spelled jesus wrong? and as far as marilyn manson, have u seen him do a lot of movies? i dont think so he leaves it to the pros. Johnny Depp is the best thing that happened to this movie especially since the original was a fucking musical!
RE: CATCF reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 27, 2004 7:08 PM
that is soo fucking true at least johnny depp can act and isnt it enough hes friends with that freak marilyn manson? to make this short and sweet johnny depp good actor marilyn manson freaky but good musician
RE: CATCF reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 28, 2004 5:36 AM
I think he might have been trying to spell 'genius'
RE: blahblah reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 28, 2004 11:53 AM
he looks 'gothic' because it's Tim Burton that is re-making the movie. Have you ever seen a Tim Burton movie? ('beetle juice', 'edward sissorhands.', 'the nightmare before christmas', ect;) He's dark. That's his premise for his movies.
Have you READ 'Willa Wonka and the Chocolate factory'? How do you know it's not a dark movie?
In response to:Smeeels like children (or whatever) reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 28, 2004 12:27 PM
IN RESPONSE TO: i just wnated to freaking know who's acting in this fucking movie gesus deep sucks get over hahahaha ok i admite hes ok but wouldnt you want to see freaking marilyn manson beging willy wonka i mean he made an album that looks like the movie thing i just want to know
--------------------------
First of all, learn how to spell. Your grammar and illiteracy disgust me and it makes you look like an idiot.
Johnny Depp is a very well respected actor. He's been in countless movies, and he's done a great job in all of them, what are you talking about? And Marilyn Manson as an actor? HAH! You slay me, seriously. I don't know what Tim Burton was thinking even ASKING him. Johnny Depp will do an excellent job. In fact, about two years ago, before i even KNEW we was going to play Willa Wonka, i was thinking 'who would be be a great part for the movie if they were to remake it?', and Johnny Depp was the only person who came to mind. You're opinions, although poorly written, are welcome. But not when you're acting like a complete ignoramus.
RE: blahblah reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 29, 2004 8:27 AM
The book's called CHARLIE and the chocolate factory and yes I have read it.
RE: blahblah reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 29, 2004 8:29 AM
I think that when most people heard that Burton was doing this film everyone pretty much guessed that Depp would be playing Wonka.
RE: CATCF reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 4, 2004 1:12 PM
actually, rohl dahl was so angry about how the 'mutilated' his book(how far off the first movie was from the book) that he wouldnt let anyone do the second book.
RE: CATCF reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 4, 2004 2:25 PM
I hope he's burning in Hell right now.
RE: In response to:Smeeels like children (or whatever) reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 6, 2004 5:25 PM
finally someone who knows how to put this idiot in his place, i would like to thank you personally for your very well thought out and intellegent remarks, Johnny Depp is a very well respected actor, the movie is going to be better than the first with Tim Burtons ingenius visions and Johnny Depps phenomenal acting, honestly Marilyn Manson as an actor oh my fucking goodness! Depp is clearly the right and best choice for this movie so anyone else want to challenge this feel free, but make it good otherwise if you are just going to be an idiot and make terrible remarks about Johnny Depp without thinking it through then FUCK OFF! always,-Roxxxy_888
RE: In response to:Smeeels like children (or whatever) reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 7, 2004 5:35 AM
u r such a fukin freek! Manson wud b soooo gud in dis movie an da ooopa lumpas dont hav orange face an green hair so dere r not stayin true 2 da story!
RE: In response to:Smeeels like children (or whatever) reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 7, 2004 7:44 AM
As in other forums, IN the BOOK the oompa lumpas didn't have orange faces... Maybe some of these people should read it sometime, It's by Roald Dahl in the Children's section and is called CHARLIE AND THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY
RE: In response to:Smeeels like children (or whatever) reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 8, 2004 8:21 AM
i don wan 2 red no fukin kids book u retard, bring bak da propa umpa lumpa i say!!
RE: Smeels Like Children reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 10, 2004 8:11 AM
marilyn manson what the fcuk u on!! this is a film for little kids its comedy not a horror, marilyn will scare the fcuk out of children, now get a life!!
RE: blahblah reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 10, 2004 8:33 AM
Its not gothic its mysterious like the facktoory and the oompa loompas...its ok though the whole movie was made to promote Quaker Oakmeals new candy bar, but ohh how that was a miserable failure. Its cool too the movies is all based on drugs the producers were all LSD dropping hippies
RE: blahblah reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 10, 2004 3:02 PM
This film looks great and the book is quite dark at times. I hate the orginal as i am a big fan of the book. Sorry to offend anyone who likes it know. Anyway i cant wait to see this.
i want th@ poster!!!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 10, 2004 4:53 PM
where can you actually BUY the poster?
RE: blahblah reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 10, 2004 6:12 PM
The book wasn't dark exactly it was fatalistic. The author believed that adults were destroying civilization and were raising kids who would be just as bad as them.
As for someone else to be Wonka I had been hoping for Christopher Walken to be Wonka originally. I thought his talents as a triple threat actor would have been excelent he's a bit older than Wilder when he did the role but it keeps with "I want to retire" mentality.
Plus Walken can go from harmless and psychotic in about .65 seconds.
RE: blahblah reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 12, 2004 6:38 PM
I never though of Walken, what a great idea. He would make a great Wonka (although my love for Depp can never be surpassed by any actor), I'm very much looking forward to this film and I loved reading all the comments!
RE: blahblah reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 12, 2004 7:19 PM
"They" did not make the movie either "evil" or "dark". Let me put this in a nice way, it is a Tim Burton film(music by Danny Elfman!),and all of the movies he directs are rather "odd" by most people's opinions. AKA Nightmare Before Christmas, Big Fish, Edward Scissorhands,etc...see how all of his films are considered "weird" by some? That's just his influence on the films.
RE: CATCF reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 12, 2004 7:20 PM
SERIOUSLY??MM could have been WW??That would have been soooooo cool..and hott..
RE: CATCF reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 13, 2004 5:04 PM
That's funny you should mention he looks like Marilyn Manson.. he was an option to play Willie Wonka. And seriously, by making that comment, you complimented Marilyn Manson. Seriously. I absolutely ADORE how Johnny looks there. Not usually. Like Willie. Perfect.
RE: CATCF reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 14, 2004 5:46 AM
Not too quick on the uptake are you?
RE: Smeels Like Children reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 15, 2004 10:15 AM
oh really you are critisizing for mispelling "spells", your dumbass spelled "being", "beggins", STUPIDITY. Oh yes, you said it!!!!!!!
RE: Smeels Like Children reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 16, 2004 3:42 AM
Don't burst a blood vessel.
RE: blahblah reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 17, 2004 12:45 AM
LoL yeah, when i first heard about the movie being remade i thought christopher walken would've been perfect! it's ok though, i love depp and know the movie will be so awesome.
RE: blahblah reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 18, 2004 4:26 AM
This movie will either be the greatest thing ever or ot will suck huge monkey balls in Hell.
RE: blahblah reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 19, 2004 10:23 AM
...with Michael Jackson.
RE: CATCF reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 21, 2004 9:03 AM
yeah, the Original movie was called Willie Wonka and the Chocolate Factory But this isn't the original its a sequel and theres no better way to have a sequelthen to have it made after the book...Charlie and The Chocolate Factory. Which was released as a more childish book but it was most defintely interesting. If the movie came out with a such name like "The Return of Chocolate Factory" then people might get confused especiallly if it had nothing to do with the ending of the Original movie or the Book. And just because Johnny Depp looks a little portrayed as Marilyn Manson that does not mean he is. There are rumors going around saying that Manson was asked to play in the movie but he turned them down also stated in a recent interview with him. This movie will be more than a big hit at the box offices, but who knows if it'll turn out to be a bummed out movie leaving you lost and confused as heck??
Thanks-RAchel N. Stone
What a bunch of Gits reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 23, 2004 10:17 AM
All of you that fail to read the prior comments, and repeat endlessly the same things over and over. I feel (IMHO) that Tim Burton & Johnny Depp have been an outstanding combination in every endeavor they've collaborated on. But they are also great when working with others (Pirates...Depp and Nightmare...Burton). Now as for Marilynn Manson (spelling??) as an actor...I know of only one other film he has even been connected with at this point other then as a musician and that would have been "JawBreaker" with his then girlfriend Rose McGowan.. and the minimal role he played he did well and was not overly dark and scary, but quite professional. So lay off the bashing of an artist you don't understand and except the fact that he MIGHT have made a descent Willy for the movie but chose not to do it...Maybe he didn't feel like getting type-cast as a dark actor so that in the future...he might have a future.
Thanx for your time,
Shemp the most underated Stooge
RE: What a bunch of Gits reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 27, 2004 4:58 AM
He was also in Bowling for Columbine.
RE: Smeels Like Children reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 28, 2004 3:59 PM
i STRONGLY disagree with your thesus which states that marilyn manson should be willy wonka. Isnt this movie supposed to be aimed more at children than adults? I dont think marilyn manson would make a little child laugh. The movie would get horrible reviews if manson were wonka.
RE: Smeels Like Children reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 29, 2004 5:02 AM
Yea, who said that Manson is exactly like Wonka in the book? Willy Wonka is nothing like him.
manson as wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 1, 2005 7:54 PM
the relationship between Marilyn Manson and C and the CC:
Manson ASKED to play Willy Wonka. The producers' response: "that would be insane."
I read it in a crappy mainstream fluff rag (Time or Newsweek or something) months ago.
Just so y'all know...
RE: manson as wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 2, 2005 3:49 AM
Know what?
RE: manson as wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 3, 2005 7:42 PM
just my two cents:
i believe the movie (and more importantly, the book)is aimed at society as a whole. it presents to children a world where everything they want is handed to them as long as they're not evil brats, and adults respect them. to adults it's a huge reality check that we're raising our children wrong and destroying the world that they'll have to deal with eventually. MM would have very well portrayed the darker side of WW, and i believe that he would have been entertaining as well. have you ever seen the guy in an interview? he's brilliant. however, he might have freaked out the youngins, so johnny depp would be the better choice. as for CW, he seems too extreme. he's either harmless or creepy. there's no undertones, no hints. the reason JD resembles MM in the film is because he looks creepy, and manson looks creepy. however, he's wearing a shirt, he has shorter hair, and he's not wearing false eyelashes.
RE: manson as wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 4, 2005 3:54 AM
It's all about following your dreams and believing in yourself.
willy wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 4, 2005 12:37 PM
Okay, Marilyn Mansen is not brilliant. He thrives on shock value to get attention. He thinks, "let's see how freakin' weird and different I can be so people will talk about me and how scary I am." Then, he gets on an interview and speaks normally so that not-so-intelligent people out there will say, oh wow, isn't he just brilliant! He's just expressing his "art"! He's a genius! Give me a big freakin break. I think he dropped out of high school-- could be wrong on that, but I thought I heard that. Anyway, now that I'm done with my rant, I would like to say that I am very much looking forward to this movie and I can't wait to see if Johnny Depp can pull this off. Gene Wilder was amazing, and will be very hard to top. Are they going to have the four bed-ridden grandparents in this one?
RE: willy wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 4, 2005 2:41 PM
MM thinks differently, that doesn't make him stupid, and he wants his voice heard (just like you, dumbass!) and not many people would listen to his ideas if he wasn't the way he is. he's brilliant even if you don't recognize it cuz your mind's too clouded with your own ideas to listen to someone else's.
RE: Smeels Like Children reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 4, 2005 4:42 PM
you can't spell
RE: Smeels Like Children reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 5, 2005 2:58 AM
Marilyn Mansen is the Devil! His evil songs are what cause all those children to commit highschool shootings! How dare you suggest that he should star in a childrens movie!? I will pray for your soul, you need Jesus.
RE: willy wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 5, 2005 6:25 AM
okay, that doesn't even make any sense. Are you saying I shouldn't have my own opinion?He's a marketing scam, and you're a sucker for buying into it. And you didn't have one thing to say about WW. You suck.
RE: blahblah reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 5, 2005 7:32 PM
ok depp does look a little gothic but in my eyes he is still dead sexy! DEPP I LOVE YOU!
RE: (k)Johnny Depp(k) reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 5, 2005 7:36 PM
i Totally agree Depp is like seriously the sexy thing on this earth, he may be 41 but omg hes stunning!
RE: (k)Johnny Depp(k) reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 6, 2005 2:51 AM
You need Jesus!
M. Mason/Depp friends? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 8, 2005 12:15 PM
Are they really friends or is that a rumor? Also, is MM really an antichrist. if so, how do you know and why did he choose to be that way?
RE: M. Mason/Depp friends? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 8, 2005 12:32 PM
Here some things I do know, there is a God and there is Satin. The Devil can be take any form he wishes and speak with as much elegance and intellect as anyone. In Johnny's case, he has had a difficult childhood which has left an impression on him spirtitually. Although he now understands the joys of life through his (wife) and children, the illusions of the dark sides of life are still familiar to him. I can only hope that he has the strength to stay "closer to the light" as he was quoted as saying in an article.
Posts reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 8, 2005 10:57 PM
I just stumbled in here when i searched "charlie and the chocolate factory" looking for some info on the new movie. I think that the language that you guys are using in this forum is completely ridiculas. I'm sure in the upcoming months as the premier of the movie gets closer, there will be many young children who accidently end up in this forum as i did. As a bunch of adults, you should be ashamed of yourselves. And before you go putting me down as some older adult, i just wanted to let you know that i am 21. Thanks!
RE: Posts reply
Posted by sandsallyLP (No Email) on January 9, 2005 3:07 PM
im 19...and i dont think any 10 year old is gonna be looking up info on the movie anyway...they probably juat wanna see it.....
RE: Posts reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 11, 2005 11:44 AM
yeah, i definitely agree with you there. also, i love how everyone acts like mason is the spawn of satan. he is actually quite intelligent, and while i don't think he would be able to fit the part for wonka in this movie, i most definitely don't think he deserves to be put down.
RE: Posts reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 11, 2005 11:47 AM
and by agree i meant i agree with the fact that no children are going to read this. even if they do, do you actually think that if they are surfing the web and can find this site that this is the first time they have ever viewed foul language? nope.
RE: Posts reply
Posted by sandsallyLP (No Email) on January 13, 2005 10:43 AM
exactly...
MM as WW reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 14, 2005 10:52 AM
As to if Manson was asked to play Wanka, I find conflicting stories spread across the web. However, the rumour isn't that off kilter, take a look at Manson's first albumn and its follow up. His logo is very Wanka, he is even quoted as saying he wanted to come off as a more evil wanka. So the Manson kids ran with it. This either sparked a rumour, or led the production crew to actually consider it. Could he have pulled it off? We'll never know. We can't discredit his acting ability, in fact we have nothing but evidence for it, he is more entertainer than musician, and is quite good at what he does, love him or hate him. As for Depp, brilliant casting. I think there are very very few actors I would even consider a proper fill in for Wonka, shy of genetically creating Wanka in a lab. Dahls books were not "dark" persay, but in contrast to Wilder's performance, quite a bit darker. Burton is just the man to bring a bit of oddity to a story that cries out for something beyond the norm. Wonka always seemed more spooky than zaney to me anyway... my 2 cents
RE: MM as WW reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 15, 2005 3:49 AM
"Here some things I do know, there is a God and there is Satin."
Ha ha, what a moron.
hmmm reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 30, 2005 8:10 AM
actually, he kinda looks like michael jackson
RE: hmmm reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 1, 2005 10:17 AM
I hope Michael Jackson's found guilty on all charges and ends up in prison for the rest of his child molesting life.
Johnny Depp reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 3, 2005 4:46 AM
Is Johnny Depp playing Charlie all grown up at the chocolate factory, and how could this book be a dark one. answer me.
charlie reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 3, 2005 4:48 AM
yo fuck this movie smoke weed everyday or else your fucking gay you know what i say go eat some hay, and smoke weed by the bay, what do you say. you ALL PUSSYS PEACE
RE: charlie reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 4, 2005 6:07 AM
Yo yo yo
dose rhymes is TIGHT!
But yo beta listen up to dis lyrical fight!
Yo talk about fags an bein' gay
Sounds ta me like yo green wit envaaay
Dude dat ain't cool, beta stay in school
beta learn some shit so yo be no fool!
Gots ta get a job, gots ta bring in da dow,
Den yo be livin' it up in yo crib wit yo hoe;
Word up.
RE: In response to:Smeeels like children (or whatever) reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2005 11:37 PM
Manson is a great at what he does, and that's singing. Although he's a very intelligent man, and he seems like he's very nice, I don't think his acting ability is anywhere near what Johnny Depp could do. Stop being a frigging idiot and just shut up already.
RE: charlie reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2005 6:47 AM
shut the hell up
RE: charlie reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 12, 2005 8:07 AM
For the love of God why won't these voices in my head stop!?
Goodness Ya'll reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 18, 2005 7:12 AM
He dosen't look evil, he looks like a figure in a teaser poster. For Pete's eternal sake.
RE: Goodness Ya'll reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 20, 2005 3:50 PM
My uncle used to dress up kinda like that when he used to do magic tricks for me. He'd come into my room at night and I would have to rub his magic wand to make the fairy juice come out. I couldn't tell my parents though or the magic would go away.
RE: Goodness Ya'll reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 23, 2005 11:50 AM
oh gosh...hehehe
RE: Goodness Ya'll reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 23, 2005 11:50 AM
oh gosh...hehehe
RE: Goodness Ya'll reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 23, 2005 5:14 PM
Suck it out of a hose huh?
RE: In response to:Smeeels like children (or whatever) reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 7, 2005 11:34 AM
If you think MM is great at singing, well, to each his own, but what in the sam hell leads you to believe the man is intelligent? He doesn't do anything but "sing" and dress like a drag queen. What are you basing his intelligence on? You, or I, for that matter, don't really know the guy at all 'cause his image is all marketing, so I wouldn't confuse your liking of his music with having any kind of a brain.
RE: CATCF reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 9, 2005 7:54 PM
They are sticking closer to the book. The guy that wrote this particular screenplay had never seen the original movie version...he has only ever read the book. Hurrah!
RE: blahblah reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 13, 2005 11:52 AM
ohh another stereotyper...i should find you and kick you, first off...gothic,'Of or relating to the Middle Ages; medieval. ' its not a genere, whoever started that up was a moron and you are supporting it! also, why not READ THE BOOK!? it describes him looking as so, and in the first film, same outfit, different pants and hair, but exactly the same so....shut it...moron...
RE: Posts reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 15, 2005 5:15 PM
"yeah, i definitely agree with you there. also, i love how everyone acts like mason is the spawn of satan. he is actually quite intelligent, and while i don't think he would be able to fit the part for wonka in this movie, i most definitely don't think he deserves to be put down."
Exactly...people have no right whatsoever to put someone down when they don't even know them.
And yes, to everyone else, I also agree that Johnny Depp is fits the role better.
RE: Posts reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 20, 2005 10:21 AM
fuck you faggots
RE: blahblah reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 20, 2005 8:23 PM
acually i was watching E!news and they said his outfit is suppose to look different and darker
RE: In response to:Smeeels like children (or whatever) reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 20, 2005 8:27 PM
your opinion MM is a good singer because he sucks and he grosses me out and i think he is satan!
RE: blahblah LOOOOOOKK!!!!!!!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 20, 2005 8:42 PM
HEY! I KNOW FOR A FACT THAT WHEN I WAS WATCHING 100 SCARIEST MOVIE MOMENTS OF ALL TIME, ON BRAVO, CHARLIE AND THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY WAS #74 SO STOP SAYIN THAT IT IS NOT SUPPOSE TO BE DARK! AND ACTUALLY I WATCHED THE MOVIE ABOUT A WEEK AGO AND THE DVD SAID IT WS CHARLIE AND THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY NOT WILLY WONKA SO STOP SAYIN THAT ITS NOT!
RE: blahblah LOOOOOOKK!!!!!!!! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 23, 2005 12:44 PM
WHO FREAKIN CARES??? For heavens sake, quit arguing over whether or not it will be dark!! Wait for the damn movie to come out, and then you all can debate it 'til the sun comes up. Until then, PLEASE get on a different topic about this movie!!
Cause this whole ongoing argument is getting real old.
RE: CATCF reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 7, 2005 10:25 AM
depp looks like marilyn manson all the time
RE: Manson reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 11, 2005 6:41 PM
UM OKK JUST TO LET U KNO THE ORIGINAL MOVIE WAS MENT FOR ADULTS HOWEVER KIDS LOVED AND YES IT IS DARK MORON JUST hAVE U SEEN THE FUCKING MOVIE ? ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY GO THREW THE TUNNEL ON THE CHOCOLATE RIVER , I MEAN YOU JUST HAVE TO LISTEN TO THE SONG!
RE: In response to:Smeeels like children (or whatever) reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 29, 2005 7:12 PM
Ha that is funny! "he seems very nice" That guy is a satanic FREAK! if he was in the movie i wouldnt go see it.
Horror Story reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 26, 2005 8:45 PM
Wasn't the first book meant to be a horror story and was even banned from the US?
gabii reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 1, 2005 3:16 PM
POOOO o deep eh a coisa maais linda e perfeita do mundooo !!
squriel labor reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 26, 2005 2:02 PM
i read that for the movie they got real squriels and had them born in captivity and made them do work and crack nuts i mean isnt that really evil they dont care a thing about the enviorment i mean they dont hav any feelings for squirrels hav thet ever heard of special effects!!!(also i hate johhny depp)!!! never buy anything that has 2 do with willy wonka!!!
Re: everyone above (well, almost) reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 27, 2005 8:23 AM
hahaha....i take it everyones watched the film now?? just wanted to say after readin all this and watching the film, the original film WAS called willy wonka and the chocolate factory..i know this because i do media studies and had to reseacrh this film to write a review and compare it to the original. Secondly, its not sposed to be a dark film. So shut up. Dahls widow recently said in an interview that Dahl hated the original willy wonka for the fact that he portrayed willy wonka as a psycho basically and was too scary/dark which is why Depp was perfect for the role as he portrays willy wonka as a more quirky, friendly person. Maybe you should all do your research before arguing about something you know nothing of. Also the comment before me, they didnt breed those squirrels especially for the film, they were already tame squirrels and it only took like three months or something to train them.
Willy Wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 31, 2005 2:33 AM
Nope. he looks like Michael Jackson. And yes, Burton did "do" james and the giant peach.
about it reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 3, 2005 1:14 PM
this movie was alsome i loved it
RE: CATCF reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 6, 2005 12:27 AM
oh shut up wat do u no
RE: blahblah reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 20, 2005 2:25 PM
HE IS CUTE
MSN reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 20, 2005 2:28 PM
I DONT HAVE MSN CAN I TALK TO YOU
The Movie Person reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 25, 2005 5:57 PM
One of the reviews says that they hate Johnny Depp. Well, I hate you! You are evil!!! Besides, it was a good chance for squirrels to be in a movie! You shouldn't judge things so quickly!
bitchfit0718 reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 13, 2005 2:11 PM
DAMN DUDE CHILL OUT! CAN'T PEOPLE WISH FOR A CREEPY FILM-?
RE: Smeels Like Children reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 30, 2005 2:56 PM
well im a high schooler and i listen to marilyn mansen and i havent shot anyone dumbass
RE: willy wonka reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 29, 2006 12:06 PM
it's the greatest thing i have ever seen
i like this image so much
look at him isn't he awesom
johny is perfect
he did willy wonka unusual
GREAT JOB JOHNY
RE: Violetta reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 29, 2006 12:09 PM
I love Johny
He is hot in all the images
RE: Violetta reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 29, 2006 12:10 PM
Marilyn Manson is grose
How can you even compare with such a good man as johny depp
Willy Wonka is great
RE: Violetta reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 5, 2006 3:14 AM
Marilyn Manson rocks.
So Shut Up.
And its 'Gross'.
Fool.
 CONAN THE BARBARIAN |
 CAPTAIN AMERICA |
 CRAZY, STUPID, LOVE |
 THE SMURF |
 COWBOYS AND ALIENS |
 BAD TEACHER |
 MR. POPPERS PENGUINS |
 GREEN LANTERN |
