![Digital Theatre [DTheatre.com]](images/logo.png){kind=logo}
|
Starring on Dtheatre's Stage: Latest Movie News & Trailers, TV News and Productions,
Special Free Guides, Gadgets and Expert Reviews on Varity of Exciting Zones. We actually have a special expert responsible for every post series. Come back soon, you will always find new interesting things! |
By Charley July 11, 2004 10:13 PM
Director McG ("Charlie's Angels") is officially off of the new "Superman" movie, according to the Hollywood Reporter. ?WB has listed McG as the director all along, but rumors have been far and wide regarding who would be directing the man of steel, particularly after an internet rumor linked Michael Bay to the project. ?A spokesperson confirmed that McG is out, but who will replace him?
According to the trade, the WB spokesperson claimed that McG and the studio parted amicably. ?The reason for the change is several disagreements between the studio and the director. ?Shooting location and casting were chief among those.
As of this posting, no director has officially been chosen to replace McG, but it is being speculated that the previous rumor may have been a premature press release. ?The IMDB "Superman" page seems to think so. ?That does not prove it is true, considering that any registered user can affect that database, but it might be a preview of news to come.
UPDATE: A few web sites are reporting that WB has approached several people with the intention to talk directing. ?Beside Michael Bay, the list is as follows: ?Bryan Singer ("X-Men" series), Robert Rodriguez ("Desperado"), Jonathon Frakes ("Thunderbirds" [upcoming]), Rob Cohen ("XXX"), and David Goyer ("Batman Begins" writer). ?Again, no one is set in stone, but it would be surprising to see Bay at the helm, considering his comments about "Superman" not being his type of project. ?Goyer was hired to do rewrites on the script, but is apparently taken such a liking to the character that the studio is interested in his vision of the film as a whole. ?Meetings have been set up with all of these potential directors, according to Superman-V.
A look at Filmforce reveals that Singer was offered the directing job sometime last week. ?According to that article, Singer is still considering the offer.
More "Superman" news as it develpos.
| comments: 37
McG 
reply
Posted by Malqaeda (mkates@sierranevada.edu) on July 12, 2004 12:12 AM
It is a perfectly human and natural reaction to despise anyone named McG. The name sounds like a failed hamburger theme launched by McDonald's in an attempt to reach an urban demographic. McG directed Charlie's fucking angels. Thank god he won?t be disgracing the Superman saga. In fact, the only thing 'super' about McG is the size of the drink that comes along with him? ?I?ll have a McG with cheese and a fo shizzle shake, yo.?
Spider-Man 2 reply
Posted by TheFilmProphet (FilmProphet@hotmail.com) on July 12, 2004 4:59 AM
Who cares about Superman because Spider-Man 2 is the best film ever [Editor: URL deleted. Will this assmunch ever learn?]
RE: Spider-Man 2 reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 12, 2004 10:33 AM
I think this "FilmProphet" guy is involved in some sort of movie merchandise pyramid scheme. Like an Avon for nerds.
RE: Spider-Man 2 reply
Posted by TheFilmProphet (FilmProphet@hotmail.com) on July 12, 2004 2:09 PM
Oooops you figured me out dumbass as for this site it's always three steps behind with the news by the time time they get any news I would have already found out weeks ago.
RE: Spider-Man 2 reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 12, 2004 2:55 PM
Well, I would visit your site rather than this one if it wasn't for the fact that your site's filled with hardcore gay porn.
RE: Spider-Man 2 reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 12, 2004 3:36 PM
Then why are you here, trying to associate your seb site with this one?
First of all.... reply
Posted by TheFilmProphet (FilmProphet@hotmail.com) on July 13, 2004 12:05 AM
First of all my site has no pop ups and especially nooo porn idiot and I'm here to support Spider-Man 2 thats all and you will immediately notice this if you ever did visit my site.
RE: First of all.... reply
Posted by Malqaeda (mkates@sierranevada.edu) on July 13, 2004 12:23 AM
Spider Man 2 blows
Whatever reply
Posted by TheFilmProphet (FilmProphet@hotmail.com) on July 13, 2004 2:07 AM
If thats what you think you are entitled to your own oppinion but I will say this Ebert and Roper would not have given it two thumbs up for no reason.
RE: Whatever reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 13, 2004 6:08 AM
Don't lie, your site's just full of gay men ramming each other.
RE: Whatever reply
Posted by TheFilmProphet (FilmProphet@hotmail.com) on July 13, 2004 10:48 AM
Listen whatever gay fetish you have is your problem and I swear my site will and never has had any of that gay porn you like ok.
RE: Whatever reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 13, 2004 11:02 AM
Ebert? Roper? Now I know you're an idiot. Those two corporate whores couldn't tell a midpoint plot point from a denouement. Not that I don't like Spider-Man. But to say "Would Ebert and Roper have given it two thumbs up..." is a freakishly inane argument.
Spider-Man 2 reply
Posted by TheFilmProphet (FilmProphet@hotmail.com) on July 13, 2004 11:37 AM
It is obiously a very good movie otherwise it wouldn't have made $257 million dollars in only 12 days. Being the quickest film in history to reach $200 million in only 9 days.
RE: Spider-Man 2 reply
Posted by TheFilmProphet (FilmProphet@hotmail.com) on July 13, 2004 11:38 AM
Excuse me I meant 8 days.
RE: Spider-Man 2 reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 13, 2004 2:49 PM
who gives a sh1t?
True fans rate the story they have been reading since knee high.
Spider-Man 2 reply
Posted by TheFilmProphet (FilmProphet@hotmail.com) on July 13, 2004 3:02 PM
So far Spider-Man 2 has been the only comic based movie that has been the most faithful to the comics you jerk.
RE: Whatever reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 14, 2004 6:58 AM
So your saying your site never has had any gay porn but it will? I knew it! You're an ass bandit!
RE: Spider-Man 2 reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 14, 2004 7:01 AM
Look, I love Spiderman 2 but the fact that lots of people have to to see it doesn't automatically make it a good movie.
RE: Spider-Man 2 reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 14, 2004 11:23 AM
the first one was WAY BETTER! there was an origin story. parker discovered his special powers in a fight at school. then the cage match. it was suspensful.
spidey 2 was good, but WAY TOO predictable. no surprises. it was just quite boring compared to the first one.
RE: Spider-Man 2 reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 14, 2004 3:16 PM
In your opinion.
I disagree reply
Posted by TheFilmProphet (FilmProphet@hotmail.com) on July 14, 2004 5:00 PM
I disagree it had to be predictable if it's based on the comic since everyone has already read the comics it would be pretty predictable.
RE: I disagree reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 15, 2004 1:59 AM
Stop advertising gay Pornography on your webshite FilmProphet you arse intruding biatch!
RE: Spider-Man 2 reply
Posted by Malqaeda (mkates@sierranevada.edu) on July 15, 2004 5:28 AM
opinions are like assholes; we all have one and they all stink
RE: Spider-Man 2 reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 15, 2004 6:44 AM
Mine smells like bakery fresh cinnemon rolls.
Stop You Pervert! reply
Posted by TheFilmProphet (FilmProphet@hotmail.com) on July 15, 2004 7:14 AM
For the last time talk about that gay porn that you like so much somewhere else you mentally disturbed pervert.
RE: Stop You Pervert! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 15, 2004 8:57 PM
As a mentally disturbed pervert, I am offended by your remarks. I in NO WAY wish to associate with these "pseudo-perverts" found on this site. Good Day, Sir!
RE: McG reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 15, 2004 8:58 PM
McG couldn't direct his way out of a McG movie.
RE: Stop You Pervert! reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 15, 2004 9:00 PM
P.S. I really enjoy the high quality of the gay porn on your website.
Whatever reply
Posted by TheFilmProphet (FilmProphet@hotmail.com) on July 16, 2004 12:16 AM
I'm going to stop now because I don't realy feel very comfortable arguing with a perverted gay person like you.
RE: Whatever reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 16, 2004 1:16 AM
Don't worry! You'll get used to it.
RE: Whatever reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 16, 2004 1:18 AM
P.S. I really enjoy the high quality of the gay porn on your website.
RE: Whatever reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 16, 2004 8:15 AM
Don't you think that's a bit hipocritical? Not liking someone because they're gay and then having loads of gay porn on your site?
RE: First of all.... reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 16, 2004 9:13 AM
ok spiderman suck ass and if you think tobey mcguire can act i highly doubt you're worthy of the title filmprophet
RE: Spider-Man 2 reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 16, 2004 9:20 AM
BULLSH*T since when does spiderman have webs coming out of his hands? Since when does spiderman fall in love w/ mj before he finds and looses gwen stacy? jameson's son is supposed to come back w/ the symbiote on his ship that makes him sick. MJ never gets near marrying jameson's son. and finally tobey mcguire sucks ass
RE: Spider-Man 2 reply
Posted by Malqaeda (mkates@sierranevada.edu) on July 16, 2004 7:54 PM
your opinion?
BATMAN reply
Posted by TheFilmProphet (FilmProphet@hotmail.com) on July 17, 2004 5:54 AM
[smilie]batman[/smilie]
RE: BATMAN reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 18, 2004 9:13 AM
Right back at ya.
 CONAN THE BARBARIAN |
 CAPTAIN AMERICA |
 CRAZY, STUPID, LOVE |
 THE SMURF |
 COWBOYS AND ALIENS |
 BAD TEACHER |
 MR. POPPERS PENGUINS |
 GREEN LANTERN |
