Rumors that B-Lo Affleck is suddenly not interested in reprising his crap role in the crap sequel to the crap film DareDevil. ?Apparently he'll do it if Kevin "Talentless Fat Ass" Smith writes the script and/or "is involved," but isn't that psyched about the possibilities.
He mentioned to Sci-Fi Wire, "You'll know my career is really on the slide when I start resurrecting the franchise." ?What a boner.
Excellent news
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 10, 2003 5:20 AM
Daredevil was not a good adaptation of the classic comic book, and a big part of that equation starts with a horrible cast, and centers on Ben Affleck, who in a word: sucked.
I for one think James Spader should reprise the role of Murdock, as far as The man with no fear goes, he's in a costume so any agile athlete could take the role. Also it should be noted that the Kingpin is white, and that Bullseye is not a midget irishman.
RE: ewerrr
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 4, 2004 5:27 PM
Can't any of you respect each other's opinions? For god's sake so what if Daredevil sucked? So what if Spiderman kicked ass? And what does that person mean by stating it isn't the actor's fault? Of course it is! The actor is the entertainment, they're supposed to turn the crappiest script and make it the best you've seen! Maybe if the cast of Daredevil had talent it would be different, but to see real talent I advise you to watch Boondock Saints or The Piano or something
RE: daredevil cool
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 10, 2004 6:05 PM
I know i'm almost certainly not alone in this,but,i've been collecting DD for 10(+) years and yesi think Ben Affleck SUCKED!!The ONLY actor suitable to play an effective Matt Murdock is GUY PIERCE!!! Why hasn't he even been mentioned?Memento was great but his natural 'look' IS Matt Murdock.I say 'natural look' because of the unnecessary mistake that was a helmet for the green goblin in spiderman.C'mon,isn't Willem Dafoes' FACE enough?
RE: Good tip
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 11, 2004 1:13 PM
YOU ARE PRETTY NARROW MINDED, THINKING THE MOVIE WAS MADE FOR THE COMIC BOOK FANS.. I'LL LET YOU IN ON A LITTLE SECRET, THE MOVIES BASED ON COMIC BOOKS ARE MADE BECAUSE PEOPLE SHOW AN INTEREST IN THE OVERALL STORY PORTRAYED IN A COMIC BOOK NOT IN EVERY LITTLE DETAIL ABOUT IT. IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT DON'T GO WATCH MOVIES BASED ON COMIC BOOKS BECAUSE YOU ARE NEVER GOING TO GET ALL YOU EXPECT OUT OF THEM.
daredevil
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 14, 2004 9:44 AM
ok, ive read this entire argument and there are lots of valid points, but because u r all so fucking opinionated u wont take into consideratinon other opinions and argue against them, instead u just shunt them and push ur opinions forward. Agreeing with an earlier point i'd have to say that Daredevil is as good as true comic adaptations come (i know, ive been a fan for some time) and lots of the shots are recognisable from previous comics. However, hollywood films are made for money and so have to be adapted to suit everybody, not just Daredevil fans. This, in turn, usually brings in big names among hollywood to play lead parts, personally i think Ben Affleck is an accomplished actor but did a bad job in Daredevil, he seemed flat and false and was outshone by the rest of the cast (who all suited their roles, i feel) if kevin Smith were to participate in the next film it could bring more humour and nice touches but might deter slightly from the original themes of Daredevil. He is superb at comedy and Clerks, Mallrats, Chasing Amy and Dogma are all brilliant. Jay and Silent Bob stirke back was made entirely for profit purposes and i didn't enjoy it half as much as the others
person on the 16th
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 18, 2004 11:27 AM
this is exactly what i was talkin about, the person who posted on the 16th is a closed minded wanker, who probably does fuck his grandma, seeing as that is the only thing he can do inbetween staying at home and watching ben affleck whilst jacking off over him, u can't consider other peoples opinions or listen to their arguments, which dictates that u must b thick. if u had listened i thought i said ben affleck was good but was outshone by the rest of the cast, fucking dumbass
agreement
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 21, 2004 2:14 PM
yeah, i agree, he's a knob. but i can't help but feel this entire discussion forum has tragically declined into a mindless bitch-fest. does no one wanna discuss daredevil here? this is what its 4! its 4 general opinion and i have only seen a few cases where there has been a good argument out forward as to what people like and dislike in the movie daredevil
sry.
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 29, 2004 4:03 AM
Sorry about that, I don't know what came over me, what were we talking about again? Oh yea, DareDevil. I think Ben Affleck made a good DD, he had just the right amount of charisma and presence to pull it off unlike all those FUCKING GEEKS WHO DISSAGREE WITH ME WHO CAN GO FUCK THEIR MOTHERS AND UNCLES AND GOLDFISH ALL DAY LONG!! AAARRRRGGGGGHHHH!!!!!!
Sorry, sorry I lost my temper again... I'm calm now... FUCKING DICKS!!!!!! no... no honestly I'm fine, deep breath.
charisma??
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 29, 2004 6:19 AM
Charisma?? what charisma?? Ben Affleck was totally void of charisma in Daredevil, fair enough he had a good presence but the line which sticks in my head is "My God, you are so beautiful" the delivery was crap and to think Elektra would actually fall for that is crap, he isn't believable, he didn't have the charisma or the charm