RE: g-g-g-gollum
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 7, 2003 6:27 PM
I must disagree, It is true that his charater developement is fenominal, but his actions and movements are corky, and irritating, I find it insulting to the true nature of Gollum as depicted in the books.
Return of the King
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 15, 2003 10:35 PM
Does anyone yet know how Jackson intends to end "Return"?? I've heard there will NO Hobbiton scenes, only an ending either on Mount Doom or with the Eagles rescues?? Has anyone heard otherwise?? And, No, I don't think Mr. Peter is about to tell us just yet....
RE: gollum & aragorn
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 17, 2003 12:00 PM
Unfortunately JRR Tolkien wrote the book and he had Boromir killed off, Peter Jackson could hardly change the whole premis of the trilogy now could he, and oh, learn to spell.
RE: Return of the King
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 20, 2003 9:18 PM
Ok, i very much agree with you, this move will be the ultimate movie of all time, except maybe Fast and The Furious 2, hahaha YEAH RIGHT!, LOTR will own all, and i think every character deserves an oscar, oh yeah i just finished the 3rd book... i almost cried!! Its sooo good, and yes Frodo's poor finger, leaves him to finish the journey alone.
RE: Return of the King
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 25, 2003 4:17 AM
I really think all of you people need to switch off your Pc's and go outside, your obviously all lacking in any kind of social adequacy and need to attempt to ready the situation, and before any of you smart arses amke the point, I stumbled across this site and just had to leave you a note because I was amazed at how sad you all are, and yes I have read the books, and I have seen the first two films, but quite honestly, as good as they are, and they are very good, you all need to calm down and get a life.
RE: Return of the King
reply
Posted by cicio (mm@interlink.com.ar) on February 27, 2003 8:46 PM
oh you are so above us right?
shut up
i hope they show hobitton on return of the king, especially the uprising of the shire an the killing of saruman and wormtongue or lenua de serpiente as we know him here
RE: Return of the King
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 1, 2003 11:12 AM
I heard this same statement back when TTT came out. I hope that it is just a vicous rumor! There is no way they could leave out "The Scouring of the Shire" and then Frodo going to the Grey Havens! Mr. Jackson if your out there PLEASE don't leave these scenes out!!!!!!!!!
RE: Return of the King
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 1, 2003 11:22 AM
If you are so bored that you stumbled across this sight while surfing then maybe you are the one who needs to turn off your pc and find a new hobby. The people in this discussion enjoy Tolkien's/Jackson's work and have fun commenting on it. You sound very lonely to be putting other people's hobbies down! Have a nice day! Legolas Rules!
RE: Return of the King
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 2, 2003 6:05 AM
hmmmmm, well.
All i can say is for a bunch of lotr nerds who proclaim to have read Tolkien's finest literature, almost none of you can either spell or correct your own grammar.
Aside from that i think the movies are a great interpretation of the books, and alot of people keep forgetting how hard it actually is to translate a book into film. (xmen does not do the comic of the same title any justice at all) So of course there will be alot of critism from outraged fans or whatever, but everyone has to realise it is probably near impossible to recreate such a masterpice as LOTR to its full glory.
And on that note all i can say is buy the toys now. They will be worth more than starwars figures one day so long as u dont open them from the package, as tempting as it is to play with Arwen.:)
Oh and p.s.........................get outside you nerds.
RE: Return of the King
reply
Posted by ANDY GOLLUM SERKIS (GOLLUM ROCKS.COM) on March 2, 2003 7:46 AM
true, it must be very difficult to make such a trilogy,and i for one loved both movies so far,and i can hardly wait for the final movie, but to call us nerds is just childish,and by the way...i noticed that you've got plenty to say,so why don't you go outside,if what we say upsets you,or the way we spell, then don't read it.
RE: Return of the King
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 2, 2003 7:27 PM
Ok well i think u people r taking this whole thing of goin outside a little too seriously. After all if we all went outside there wouldnt be an internet. And its not like i give a sh*t about the spelling, im just hanging sh*t on you guys caus im bored. Anyway, arent we straying a bit from the topic at hand? what was the topic again????
deagol and smeagol
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 3, 2003 3:32 AM
i think its sad how fomer hobbit smeagol killed his cousin deagol and took the ring so he became corrupted. I n the two towers you can see that smeagol did not want to betray the hobbits,especially frodo.In the book when he lead them to cirith ungol to shelob he looked at them sleeping and if sam and frodo could of seen him they would of seen a weary hobbit who has been taken away from friends and family way after his time and for a minute repented, then sam woke up and called him a sneak then his evil side overcame him again
RE: deagol and smeagol
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 3, 2003 3:43 AM
gollum might be a good character but he betrays them to the orcs in moria not pippin
in the book he also tells the orcs they are in lothlorien but lucky enough the fellowship slept in the treetops with the elves and betrays frodo and sam to shelob
RE: gollum & aragorn
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 3, 2003 3:15 PM
You are so wrong. How could you say that Aragorn sux. The story would be nothin without him. Boramier was cool and everything but with out him dying there wouldnt of been really that much drama. So in saying that Aragorn sux, that meens you suck. You ignorant fool.
RE: Aragorn&Anduril
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 4, 2003 2:13 AM
who is the person that said aragorn has not got anduril he or she is wrong in the fellowship of the ring when frodo ran away from boromir aragorn caught up with frodo and said where is the ring
and frodo said stay away and aragorn told frodo he would go with frodo until the end and frodo said i know and aragorn looked at frodo sword and it was shining blue which means that orcs are close aragorn told frodo to run and he held up his sword(anduril) to meet the host of orcs and fought most of them and when he is on top of that building he cries anduril and jumps from the top to collide with the orcs preventing most of them finding frodo and you can clearly hear him saying anduril so the person who said its a shame that aragorn has not got anduril or the sword that was broken reforged you are wrong!!!!
RE: Return of the King
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 5, 2003 12:27 PM
ur right there isnt going to be a burning of the shire.peter says that on the directors comentary in the extended virson dvd. since its suppose to be a story baced on the ring it will most likely end on mount. doom.But you never no! it actually might end with the eagles rescue. we'll just have to wait and see
RE: Aragorn&Anduril
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 5, 2003 12:51 PM
u couldnt be more rong!aragorn has the same sword throughout the movie.it may @ some point in time look like Narcil(not correct spelling but the correct name)but it is not.u never saw him with the sword of the kings.when u see the fellowship going across caradhras,and boromir picks up the ring when it fall of frodo,after, u see aragorns hand leave the sword,it isnt narcil.
stop trying to make ppl think you no the movie and actually watch it and find out for yourself! he doesnt get the sword
RE: Return of the King
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 6, 2003 12:15 AM
As to my original comments (RE: Return of the King), so it's to be an ending of either Mt. Doom and the eagles or the parting to the Grey Havens , is it? Still don't want to believe that Mr. Jackson will leave out the reclaiming of the Shire just to keep the film length down. Please, Mr. Jackson, if you ever even here a wisp of this, please, please include, in some form, "The Scouring Of The Shire"..And don't tell me he doesn't have the time, 9 months, on any time table should be more then enought time to do it right.
RE: Aragorn&Anduril
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 6, 2003 6:55 PM
god damn i thought i was a lord of the rings nerd but all you fags have proved me wrong
Im not saying i dont like the lord of the rings, i like all of the books, but when you know all these facts its just kinda lame...
RE: Aragorn&Anduril
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 11, 2003 3:54 AM
who in the f*ck are u calling a fag man just cause I read the book and watch the film and know a couple of facts
you are calling me a fag? first of all i think anyone here who just watched the film and thinks he knows sh*t they are fags and those people who don`t
know the difference between narsil and the sword remade(anduril)
are fags
and those people who thinks aragorn is carrying a different sword through fotr and the two towers are f*cking fags and those little **** who think
they are sick by saying
they will burn people`s houses down BULLsh*t fag
and those who cannot even spell and know they cannot contribute sh*t to this conversation are fags and last of all those fags who cannot even spell come back when you learn how to write ****!
damn I just came here to have a conversation about lord of the rings and some little dicks are tripping just because they don`t know sh*t!!!!!!
aragorn does have the sword anduril haters!
RE: Aragorn&Anduril
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 11, 2003 4:11 AM
what is the point in talking about lord of the rings if you hardly know anything about it??
and what on earth do you mean aragorn does not have anduril he does
I admit in fotr when aragorn is leading the hobbits from bree to rivendell he does have a different sword when he fights the nazgul(ringwraith)above weathertop(amon sul)he does have a different sword but up til the end of two towers he fights with anduril
RE: Aragorn&Anduril
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 11, 2003 4:24 AM
how come in the book elrond says that only the heir of isildur can wield the sword that was broken and in the two towers when gandalf,legolas,gimli and aragorn comes to edoras and hama tells them to leave the weapons he(hama)takes legolas bow and knives and gimli`s axe and he also takes aragorn sword if that was really the sword that was broken remade wouldn`t aragorn be hesitant to give it to him or wouldn`t that guy died? i think aragorn receives the sword in the extended version of the two towers when arwen after the battle of helm`s deep she gives aragorn the sword that was broken she rides with gandalf and the 2000 banished rohirrim that is what i think
a mistake
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 13, 2003 9:57 AM
in the two towers,in the great hall in edoras,just after legolas aragorn and gimli beat up the ppl who attacked them u see a behind shot and one of the ppl on the floor in twiddling his hair.lol it was so funny to see.keep ur eye on it the next time u see the movie
RE: Return of the King
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 14, 2003 9:01 PM
You are the one who is a nerd. You keep on telling us to go outside and do something. Well, why don't you take your own advice and go outside yourself? We all like to talk about LOTR and obviously you do too otherwise you wouldn't keep on coming back to this site and telling us not to write to each other and telling us to go outside and trying to correct our spelling. Who cares if we spell something wrong, as long as we can read and understand what we wrote and other people can read it and understand it then who really cares?
RE: Return of the King
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 18, 2003 5:02 PM
I came across a site that said the Scouring of the shire probably will be left out, Saruman and wormtongue are killed at the beginning of the ROTK, and it apparently ends at the Grey Havens! He may also include some of the Aragorn and Arwen tale from the Appendices at the end of the Movie. Their deaths. Sad. I always cry at that bit. Apparently it's gonna be a bit of a tear jerker!
RE: Aragorn&Anduril
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 18, 2003 5:09 PM
Aragorns sword is called ELINDIL!!!!!!!!!
Okay, now i can't bear to stay online any more because my brain can't handle the stupidity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
RE: Aragorn&Anduril
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 18, 2003 5:12 PM
I agree, he doesn't have the sword at all in the first movie, if he did they would have made a bigger deal out of it!!! Apparently he gets it in the third movie. In ROTK it shows the sword being reforged and Arwen brings it to him at Edoras...I think. thats the rumor anyway!
RE: What about the items that Galadriel gives to Frodo
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 18, 2003 5:18 PM
My favorite part in the two towers is when Sam says, "Let's see what we have to eat, Oh, look, Lembas bread, and look! more Lembas bread"
Lord Of The Rings
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2003 2:17 PM
ok, I think u all have different opinions on LOTR, i read the books and have seen fotr and ttt, and cant wait till return of the king. I think some of u dont realise THE STORY WAS WRITTEN AGES AGO U CANNOT CHANGE IT!!!!! IT IS TOLKIENS MASTER PIECE AND HOW CAN U SAY ARAGORN SUX??? HE MAKES UP AT LEAST HALF OF THE STORY!!!!
RE: k changing subject
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 30, 2003 9:08 PM
u are truly a dumb f*ck if u believe that site is serious. go to the site and read it again, its a protest and a parody to the low lifes who protest the two towers title claiming it was offensive to the victims of 9-11. it is done quite cleverly and very funny if u got the joke
RE: What about the items that Galadriel gives to Frodo
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 30, 2003 9:37 PM
merry and pippen get daggars, sam gets a rope legolus gets a new bow, gimli asks for a gets some hair from her head and they all get cloaks and elf bread
RE: What about the items that Galadriel gives to Frodo
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 30, 2003 9:42 PM
oh and aragorn gets a knife. i think its the same one he stabs the uruk-hai with and he licks the blood then he throws it at aragorn and he bats away with his sword(elindil or whatever its called)
RE: Lord Of The Rings
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 30, 2003 10:04 PM
well a least in most cases there were some things he changed that didnt need be. Faramir was turned inside out. merry and pippin are too buffoonish and totally missed the point at the council of elrond. the discusion should have surounded around the idea that no one wanted anything to do with bearing the evil.
RE: Lord Of The Rings
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 31, 2003 2:28 AM
i think it made the film more interesting that faramir could be seduced by the ring it made people watch the film without getting bored, in the book faramir helps them and is much wiser. In the book i think his character is great
RE: tom bombadil
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 31, 2003 1:08 PM
Yeah, and why did Jackson leave out all the poems ? Because they ARE BORING - just like Bombadil. Let's face it, the world Tolkien created is awesome, but there are some things that do not get Frodo ( and the reader or the viewer) any further. Imagine watching somebody reciting a two-page poem - the sheer thought of it makes me sleepy...
characters
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 31, 2003 1:29 PM
I agree that Jackson did alter the story a lot, but directors do need to personalise their films and add their own touches. The thing that pisses me off is that when people say a certain character sucks e.g. someone above said aragorn sucks, when every character helps 2 create the story
RE: Aragorn&Anduril
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2003 8:14 PM
aragorn gets anduril at the end of rotk, he certainly doesnt get it a rivendale, for christ sake it not even been reforged yet. They show it still in pieces!
RE: Aragorn&Anduril
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 3, 2003 11:35 PM
You sick f*ck , if you saw the special extended DvD edition you would know that he gets Narsil (or Anduril witch means Flame of the west) From elrond @ Rivendel, You can see at caradras and at all other fighting scenes that it IS the new sword.
RE: Aragorn&Anduril
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 4, 2003 12:31 PM
Listen up fools... in the books elendil's sword (narsil) is broken by sauron. it's reforged (into anduril) by the elves at rivendell during the fellowship and given to aragorn. I'm almost certain its given to him in the film but who cares ! And all these cacksuckers who are trippin over fans talkin about this in the first place - why the f*ck are you here if you think everyone else are freaks! the only freaks are those who get their kicks out of giving greif over internet message boards. educate yourselves before you start sh*t you cant back up! I'm a big fan of the books and the films... lets just leave it at that.
RE: characters
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 6, 2003 4:46 PM
I think my baby, frodo/elijah wood is the best!!!i luuuuv him.
i wanna have his little hobbit babies.lol
btw, can anyone plz visit my site?its not done yet,but o well..
its http://www.freewebs.com/elfprincess
tom bombadil
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 7, 2003 4:13 AM
tom bombadil is a maia spirit that dwelt in the forest even thogh tolkien does not say this in the book they called him fatherless and in the council of elrond the elves galdor and glorfindel both say why don`t we give the ring to tom bombadil(maia spirit) but gandalf says the ring has no power over him but he is a very unsafe keeper and in an encyclopedia it says that tolkien says that gandalf,saruman,sauron and tom bombadil are maia spirits gandalf,saruman and tom bombadil come from the undying lands and are maia spirits
RE: gollum & aragorn
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 17, 2003 11:06 AM
i totally agree. Aragorn was totally the best of them all. i mean like i liked Boromir and all but i mean like there has to be at least 1 person who dies from the fellowship. i LOVE Aragorn and am totally gonna cry when he dies in the return of the King
RE: Return of the King
reply
Posted by IRISH HIGHLANDER (jamison_moore@hotmail.com) on April 22, 2003 5:31 PM
I'd guess to agree with this guy,we all need to relax.Even though it's one of the greatest stories told,(I read the trilogy back in the late seventies and watched the cartoon movies.)It's nothing to fanatically go crazy over by cussing each other outand correcting spelling.This isn't English 101 is it?
RE: Return of the King
reply
Posted by Grapesoul (No Email) on April 23, 2003 9:32 AM
I truly believe that
the works of the late
(J.R.R Tolkien) are
far more represented;
not in the fantasies
which many have enjoyed
for decades,but the man
the scholar far exceeds
the attempts of Steve
Jackson,whom has tried
his best too interpret
through film-a masters
work-using the finest
talents to complete the
best ever movie trilogy
of this kind..I repeat:
"this kind"
You just cannot measure
Mr.Tolkien by four books
and emphatic fans.
RE: k changing subject
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 24, 2003 6:32 PM
whoa scary I just saw that controversy online, I'd be happy to write and complain, that book was written over 5o years ago, are those ppl mad>??
news!!
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 5, 2003 7:13 PM
This just in:
I watched a Peter Jackson interview tonight, and he said that the Return of the King will be 4 hours, and that there will be scenes that depict the Scouring of the Shire. He also said that there will be reference to Tom Bombadil, which should be very interesting.
RE: gollum & aragorn
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 14, 2003 9:04 AM
He doesn't die, the movie is called return of the KING, Aragorn being the king! Read the books!
RE: where are the mighty captains....
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 14, 2003 2:36 PM
Peter Jackson was too busy showing scenes of Aragorn and Arwen. While this is an important point to the story, it took away alot of time from other aspects of the story that were actually in the story!!! It really is too bad that he had to sell out in order to make the movie sellable.
RE: news!!
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 14, 2003 3:10 PM
I HOPE YOUR RIGHT ABOUT ALL THAT,I DON'TKNOW WHERE YOU GET ALL THS RANDOM INFO ABOUT WHATS GOING TO BE IN THE MOVIE.ANYWAY I TRY NOT TO BELIEVE EVEYTHING I HEAR ABOUT IT BECAUSE I WOULD HATE TOBE DISSAPOINTED ABOUT SOMETHING LEFT OUT THAT I HEARD WOULD BE IN,BESIDES WHAT PETER JACKSON LEAVES OUT OF THE BOOK.
RE: i luv lotr
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 29, 2003 4:40 AM
HArry potter sux, the movie is sooo fake but look at LOTR, they made whole cities, and LOTR should;ve won the oscar and every other award, wat do those judges know
RE: Aragorn&Anduril
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 30, 2003 12:01 AM
no,no; aragorn never has andruil in the movie. i have seen all the special features on the weapons and fight scenes from both the extended and the original dvds and they say on there that he doesn't have andruil. watch the movie again. you'll see that the sword is green handled. and so what? no one seems to remember that aragorn is supposed to have the shards of narsil all through the whole movie. they're not supposed to be at rivendell. but so what? the movie still ROCKS!
RE: Aragorn&Anduril
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 30, 2003 12:06 AM
hey, the sword that aragorn has with the green handle is not andruil. it's just his ranger sword. andruil is the same as narsil. and narsil is in rivendell (in the movie at least). the two swords are one in the same, it just has two different names.
RE: Lord Of The Rings
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 30, 2003 12:16 AM
i loved faramir's character in the book. i was totally bummed how they screwed him over in the movie. he's supposed to be all noble and able to resist the ring, and instead he falls for it as soon as he sees it.
Middle Earth
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 30, 2003 1:38 PM
This is the most amazing site I've been on yet. Not only is this a swamp of big mouths spouting off who have obviously NEVER opened any of Tolkein's books (or a dictionary), it's also an outright circus of insult. I must say, it's been worth a few chuckles. I'll offer this to anyone...if you like the movie because you want to see Gollum's wee-wee, or because Legolas is hot, then don't bother wit h the books. You won't get them. Geez.
If, however, you were one of those who actually recognized a thread of a story, then take the time to read the books (more than once) and get the facts of the story, as it was written...from the source. Then, if you want to get REAL adventurous, try reading some of the works of J.R.R. Tolkien as they relate to Middle Earth published after his death. Honestly, I don't know what's funnier, the incredibly wretched spelling (the web lingo NOT included) or the ridiculously poorly informed "experts" calling each other nerds. What a hoot!
RE: where are the mighty captains....
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 30, 2003 6:35 PM
I understand that you would feel this way since Arwen wasn't in TTT novel at all... but there were very few scenes of them, PJ really just reminded us of it in this film and I thought he did so tactfully by not spending too much time on it. Also, remember... this is over $300,000,000 of the studios money they are working with and even PJ cannot have his way all the time despite the success of Fellowship. The relationship does play a part in Return of the King, but I have every confidence that PJ will hit all of the necessary nails on their heads... he's done it thus far.
RE: lotr
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 30, 2003 6:42 PM
This I absolutely have to agree on. Hollywood is filled with a bunch of useless dildos!! Ian McKellan should have won the oscar for Fellowship. Most people can't even act w/o makeup on and he drove his part with heartwrenching emotion from under a pound and a half of latex prosthetics!! Brilliant performance!! Also, the fact that Andy Serkis didn't win for Gollum is obscene!! Gollum was better acted tehn most human characters are. What an advance in technology and performance. I honestly don't know what these Hollywood jerk-offs are thinking!! Return of the King should win something in the acting department although Hollywood somehow feels that horror and fantasy films shouldn't win awards... two words for you upper class douchebags,
Hannibal f*cking Lecter!!
RE: Return of the Kinf
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 31, 2003 2:29 PM
The artist Alan Lee has produced desifns for the Grey Havens, the elven harbour from whjch all the Elves and rinf bearers leave Middle Earth. The world is left for mortal men to rule as they see fit.
RE: Listen and Learn
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 2, 2003 2:40 AM
Im only 13 but i have read the Lord of the Rings quite a few times, and i think (just going on the stupid conversations yous guys have had) that even i probably have a better grasp on the story than you do! Come on guys instead of having an arguement and messing up this site discuss decent things and for gods sake re read the book!!!!
RE: lotr
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 4, 2003 7:51 PM
yes orlando bloom was definitely the sexiest and he deserved an award but not cause he looks good. He was GREAT as legolas! seriously he really captured everything about the elves. But Serkis was great as Gollum,too, and he should have been recognized for his hard work. Actually, in my opinion, the entire cast should get awards. Well, almost all.
RE: Return of the King
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 5, 2003 6:07 PM
I can't remember the website, but they don't show the scourging of the shire in ROTK. Just do a google search and type in "two towers". It's one of the first websites you'll see.
RE: where are the mighty captains....
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 7, 2003 3:36 PM
hEY i AM tOLKIEN FAN MYSELF AND I'VE READ THE TLOR SEVERAL TIMES, I KNOW A LOT ABOUT TOLKIEN'S, CELTIC AND ANGLO-SAXON MYTHOLOGY, BUT I ALSO KNOW A LOT ABOUT FILM AND NO MATER HOW GOOD A BOOK IS, A FILM DOES NOT WORK THE SAME WAY, THEREFORE THE FILMS OF TLOR ARE THE BEST. BOOKS DOES NOT EQUAL MOVIES.
RE: lotr
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 7, 2003 3:42 PM
DUDES, YOU GOT IT ALL WRONG YOU CAN'T GIVE TLOR AN OSCAR BECAUSE IT'S NOT FINISHED YET, IT'S NOT FAIR IF PJ GETS THREE OSCAR FOR BEST MOVIE IF IT'S THE SAME MOVIE. SO DON'T WORRY, THE OSCARS WILL BE HELD AND NOT BY YOU... SO GET A f*ckING LIFE AND STOP THINKING ABOUT SOMEONE ELSES LIFE!!!!!!!!
RE: g-g-g-gollum
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 7, 2003 3:47 PM
OOOOOOOOOH THE BOOKS, DID SOMEONE RE-WROTE THE f*ckING BOOK FOR YOU, IS YOUR LIFE AT THE EDGE OF CHAOS BECAUSE PJ DID NOT SEE THINGS THE SAME WAY YOU DID? WELCOME TO THE REAL WORLD WHERE FILMS ARE NOT THE SAME AS BOOKS. THAT'S RIGHT, I'S SORRY YOU WEREN'T INFORMED OF THIS BEFORE... BUT THEY AREN'T... a--hole
RE: Return of the King
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 12, 2003 7:56 PM
LOL LOL LOL ... u r sooo rite ... he probably is about 3000 yrs old... people have to get a life... THINK u people...u will not marry them and if u see them u mite as well say " Hello! I have your pictures all over my note book! You are so kool!" Their reply, "Wow thats great, wuld u like me to sign that?" Aragorn, Arwin, Legolas...everyone... the characters that they played and their parts, lines and their acting did not just happen... they were helped by so many people to help them get their part rite.
RE: Listen and Learn
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 13, 2003 1:54 AM
I heard that its going to be a mini series going straight to tv, although my source has been known to lie a bit, well alot, but he has let a nugget of truth slip occassionally. I mean he thinks adamantium is real and he claims to have a sword made from it. And for the record gollum kicks aaassss!!!
elendil or erendil?
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 13, 2003 7:58 AM
I live in belgium and i've seen that you were discussing about what aragorn sez, is it elendil or erendil? Well i can tell you it's elendil because i live in belgium and all the movies have subtitles here and the subtitles say ELENDIL!! So believe it or not he really sez elendil!!
RE: Return of the King
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 13, 2003 8:31 PM
What in the F*ck are you talking `bout Pippin is the best he is SO HOTT!!!!!! He don't get none of the F*cking credit it all goes to Mr. Cheeke Bones as he says and I LOVE PIPPIN!!!!!! He is mine no matter what anyone says you sons of a biscut eaters so go eat a lambas you elf f*cking worshippers why don't you just F*ck the damn elf!!!! PIPPIN IS MINE AND NONE OF YOU DAMN B**CHES BETTER DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT!!! Legolas is hott though but give Pippin credit though p-p-p-p-please do that for me. It is all I ask for. Give the poor lil Hobbits credit they are so misunderstood.
RE: elendil or erendil?
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 13, 2003 8:57 PM
Hey ho to the Pub I go to heal my heart and drown my woe rain may fall and wind may blow but their still be many miles to go sweet is the sound of the pouring rain and stream that falls hill to plain better than rain or a ripplin brook IS A MUG OF BEER INSIDE THIS TOOK!!!!! I LUV PIPPIN
RE: extended or not?
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 16, 2003 3:18 PM
i would DEFINITELY recommend the extended dvd, especially the scene where merry pippin and frodo sing their drinking song, and definitely the actor commentary, elijah sean dom and billy are SOOO FUNNY!!
RE: where are the mighty captains....
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 21, 2003 7:39 PM
I'm a LOTR fan myself, but I say books are always better then movies, no matter what. But you have a good point, movies and books do not work the same way.
RE: lotr
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 21, 2003 8:26 PM
Dude, put yourslef in their shoes! They worked hard day and night, and all you had to do was sit down in a comfortable chair with some popcorn and soda at your side, and keep your eyes open. Then to top it off you critisize the actors, who deserve an oscar. You weren't the one who had to wake up at 4 or 5 in the moring to get make up on, memorize line etc., plus, you weren't the one who had to do all the art work computer deisgning and all that. They are the ones who put the whole thing together, and it took lots of hard work and effert, and THEIR time!. Also, LOTR and TT ARE different movie. They ALL deserve an oscar. You don't!
RE: g-g-g-gollum
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 21, 2003 8:36 PM
How can you marry some one who is animated? Weirdo. And if Gollum had taken the ring, he himself would have become like an other Saruman, or worse. And Sauron is the one who made the ring, so Gollum would be under his power.
*
RE: Return of the King
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 21, 2003 8:59 PM
How can we give any credit to Pip, when you are calling us such foul words. No one will listen to you if you call us names. They will write back calling you names. And I don't misunderstand hobbits.
*
RE: If you could do
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 22, 2003 9:43 AM
Well first I would passionately kiss her, then work my way down their and give her the best time of her life. She is so hot just want to do her all night and day long. :)
RE: If you could do
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 22, 2003 6:35 PM
I would be Faramir. He is brave and honorable, and trys to make is father proud, though his father is practically a nut-head and thinks he can tell the future. Faramir also is sweet and gentle and humble, and he is witty and wise.
*
RE: If you could do
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 22, 2003 6:45 PM
If I could be any character in LOTR, I would be Faramir. I would be Faramir because he is brave and honorable, and trys to make is father proud, though his father is practically a nut-head and thinks he can tell the future. Faramir also is sweet and gentle and humble, and he is witty and wise.
*
RE: know what ya mean
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 24, 2003 1:03 AM
i agree there was like some many! but tolkins book had time for more events, and they oviously wanted to make it juicey, but i agree i love marry and pip!
RE: best stoy ever told
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 24, 2003 1:12 AM
i sooooo agree lotr is the best story that will ever be told for all time. the actors, well they make it pricesless! livz heepz kool but i'm not so shure about naked!
RE: realy! someone like me!
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 24, 2003 1:18 AM
oh my god i love the lotr sooooooooooooooooo much and did all i can to know all i could about it (i was abit late you see) i only started to become absesed in 1999! but it was quite amazing i only took 7 months to lern tolkiens elvish! oio and if anyone needs help with elvish email me at....
lione_evenstar_elf@
hotmail.com l8a... lione
RE: gollum & aragorn
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 26, 2003 4:28 PM
if youve actually read the books, he does NOT die, you arrogant bitch!!
RE: where are the mighty captains....
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 29, 2003 2:13 PM
dont be stupid, aragorn and arwen are both brilliant characters in the story and their relationship throughout the trillogy has made the films more accessable to people who would not just want to see fighting and war all the time.
RE: If you could do
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 2, 2003 4:17 PM
ok, you f*cking people are the biggest f*cking losers on the internet. talking about doing the characters of lotr!!! seriously get a damn life. and to see what little knowledge you have of the stories and you're so happy to post up your ignorance. get a life, better yet, quit jerking off for an hour of your life and read the books, maybe you'll learn some respect after reading a great literary work.
RE: extended or not?
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 2, 2003 4:23 PM
ok, you f*cking people are the biggest f*cking losers on the internet. talking about doing the characters of lotr!!! seriously get a damn life. and to see what little knowledge you have of the stories and you're so happy to post up your ignorance. get a life, better yet, quit jerking off for an hour of your life and read the books, maybe you'll learn some respect after reading a great literary work.
RE: elendil or erendil?
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 7, 2003 5:57 PM
its elendil dumbass use subtitles darrr you guys need to read the f*cken book get the extended DVD of the fellowship and know that in rivendell aragorn gets the sword in the book. in the movie he gets it in the third installment. people from Europe are gay. they say words like idear instead of idea.plus at the end of the fellowship Boromirs hand keeps disappearing on his death scene first its on aragorns left shoulder but then when the camera shows aragorns face it disappears. i can't believe they didn't notice that
RE: Return of the King
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 15, 2003 2:04 PM
I utterly agree with you .I was simply lookimg for the release date of the film and came across this collection of social retards.I have never encountered such unbridled ignorance coupled with a quite staggering degree of illiteracy.Tolkien would turn in his grave if he knew such half-wits thought his work "cool".
RE: where are the mighty captains....
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 29, 2003 2:07 PM
If your such a fan of Lord of the Rings how come you don't get the acronyms right? It's lotr, not tlor or whatever you said.
RE: you're right
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 2, 2003 3:31 PM
Jesus, how friendly everbody is... I think Tolkien also thought much of how important frendships are, and how people should be a bit more kind, when he wrote the amazing book.
Anyway, the book and the movies rules. Yes they are a bit different, but movies and books are different, which somebody has understood.
I don't mind more about Aragorn and arwen, maybe that just me, but Peter has to think of people who haven't read the book... Though, I didn't like Faramir too much in the movie...
By the way, I've heard that Aragorn get the sword from Arwen (in the movie, of course), but I'm not sure...
All of the characters and actors are great, but no one belongs to any of you (for those who say -I love him, he's mine!-
Personly, I love Aragorn, and he belongs to arwen and Tolkien.
Love the whole felloship(all nine), the book couldn't be the same without any of them.
Sorry about my spelling, for those who cares... Call me a freak, nerd, don't f**king care :) And I DO got a life, which I'm sure we all actually have.
~Marie~
RE: g-g-g-gollum
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 9, 2003 1:18 AM
when gollum tries to steal the ring from frodo, he bites off frodo's finger, and he's so happy, he dances himself clear off the edge of the cliff and into the "fires of mount doom!"
RE: gollum & aragorn
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 9, 2003 1:28 AM
could you possibly bring yourself above their level and not write like that. its very irritating and just shows that you are no better than them. ignore them, if they don't like the way you spell, then oh well. get over it. and don't be stupid like that.
RE: Return of the King
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 9, 2003 1:31 AM
pippin has some attractive attributes about him, but i have to agree with the others and say that legolas is the sexiest man(elf) alive, and i'm working on the f*cking him part.
RE: If you could do
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 11, 2003 11:16 AM
Not in the movie. There, Faramir's character is far from Tolkien's Faramir - unfortunately he shows some of Boromir's character traits, as well. He too has a somewhat hard time resisting the spell of the ring. What was the point of taking Frodo and Sam as'hostages' ? And by the way: Boromir rules, I want him back, please Mr. Tolkien...
RE: Return of the King
reply
Posted by Ethereal125 (Ethereal125@aol.com) on August 21, 2003 9:22 AM
Hang on - the scouring of the shire was shown in Galadriels mirror in the first movie, wasn't it? So they must have made SOMETHING about it, even if it is very little.
RE: gollum & aragorn
reply
Posted by Ethereal125 (Ethereal125@aol.com) on August 21, 2003 9:40 AM
Come on guys, you got to stop dissing one character over another. They're all neccessary to the story. Without Aragorn the Hobbits wouldn't have reached Rivendell. Without Boromir, Merry and Pippen would be dead. Without Legolas, the Fell Beast would have killed a bunch of people. Without Sam Frodo would have trouble with the mountains (the rope). You see my point? I'm not trying to make anyone angry here, just trying to make a point.
RE: where are the mighty captains....
reply
Posted by Princess Legolas (PrincessLegolas@aol.com) on September 14, 2003 6:58 PM
Ok. You are so wrong about Peter Jackson putting stuff in TTT movie about Aragorn and Arwen that "wasn't in the story" If you were to read Appendix A in the back of the ROTK book you will find the part titled "Here Follows A Part Of The Tale Of Aragorn and Arwen." That part tells the intire love story between them from the time they meet to the time they die. And Peter Jackson went through that part, which shows clearly that he paid more attention to the TRUE STORY then you did, and he put the parts from the romanic love story into the movie where they belonged! So next time you may want to get more of you facts strait before you advertise your ignorance in Tolkien.
RE: lotr
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 10, 2003 3:58 PM
i second that it is not only the dbate that is the strength of the character but the inner struggle reflecting the frailties that is inherent even in all human beings, such as hope, despair, joy, sin and redemption smeagol was truly a human character that speaking on my behalf really drew me in, in a way that i actually empathized with the character
RE: so great
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 12, 2003 4:32 PM
I dont think anyone is confused about what's written in the book. The debate is about what's in the movie. Someone mentioned that Aragorn dies in ROTK. And someone else is questioning the validity of that statement. Yes, in the book, Aragorn lives through the entire story and, in fact, according to the appendix lives for a substantial number of years after that. But why did someone mention that he dies in the final movie?
BULLSHIT
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 19, 2003 7:47 AM
I havn't completely finished the LOTR: ReTurn of the King yet but i heard that Legolas, frodo, and most of the main characters die in the book.... but i saw the movie and that didn't happen...im sorry but...im going to be really F-ing pissed if this is true. It ruins the integrity of Tolkeins work. How do you go and change the ending of one of the top selling books to ever live. That is writing your own death sentance in my opinion...f-that...the film was incredible but if that wasn't the true ending...then i quit
RE: where are the mighty captains....
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 26, 2003 9:16 PM
No, you f*ck#ng calm down. every time i gets it they takes it away. it was'nts their fault though, they was oonly trying to helps uss. f*ck you too you little F@gg0t!
RE: where are the mighty captains....
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 5, 2004 9:23 PM
What are you TALKING about? True, Arwen was not in the books NEARLY as much as in the movies; but nonetheless, she was very much present in the books.
RE: where are the mighty captains....
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 16, 2004 11:44 PM
do really want to take it there? i can get just as vicious as you, so why don't you quit while you're ahead. i don't want to tell you to shut the fuck up again. got it?
sad sad people you are
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 16, 2004 8:45 PM
i read what all you people and i have to say.. *tisk tisk tisk* how sad. you people spend way too much time arguing. u sound like a whole bunch of drunk guys that are swearing at eachother just cuz of a movie. get a life!!! Ya the movie ROCKS like no other but its no reason to scream at eachother!!! u people are really sick who are talking about having sex with the charectors and lesbians and talking on about gollums weenie. SICK you are!! you have taken the most amazing movie and talked trash about it. your all gonna turn out like those dead orcs in the battle fealds! mwahahaa
Re:sad sad sad you people are
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 16, 2004 8:54 PM
i agree!!! SHUT UP YOU SICK PEOPLE!!! this movie has nothing to do about that crap u people are pulling. its about purehearted people that are risking their lives to fight for all that they hold dearest in their hearts and suffering and dying because they know that life wouldnt be anything without watching the white flower petals fall from the sky or hearing a little girl laugh or waking up in the morning with a heart full of hope. they are dying with honor and all you people can talk about is how u want to have sex with legolas just because he has a pretty face???? you have no more heart than a nazgul.
RE: If you could do
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 8, 2004 10:07 PM
you are f*cking sick you moron,idiot,duface,head