First X-Men 2 Script Review

By Skullfire June 26, 2002 7:42 PM

From time to time, appears someone has the ultimate buzz on a movie. In this case, the X-Men sequel: do you believe his story?

Editor: The following story or article was submitted by one of our readers and may not necessarily reflect the Dtheatre.com crew's opinion. We hold no responsibility for inaccuracies or hoaxes.

Read More...

| comments: 20

Reader Discussions:

Post YOUR opinion too!

WOW!!!   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 27, 2002 10:37 AM

An actual contribution?!  

I'm glad to see my influence is taking hold of you.  Be proud, Skullflamer you did good for once.  

Go ahead and smack your a-ss and use the jelly for your vibrator.  You earned it.

RE: WOW!!!   reply

Posted by Skullfire (hulacete@ubbi.com) on June 27, 2002 2:32 PM

I did more contributions than you, whoever you are. Your influence showed me the stupid way, and I'm avoiding it, probably cause you fill all that road.
I'll do another contribution, which is forgive you for the next 2 billion jokes (that we've never heard before) about gays and foreigner spelling; if you don't have anything more to say than that, then you could change a little and give another use to your free time.

RE: WOW!!!   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 27, 2002 2:45 PM

no

RE: WOW is right.   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 27, 2002 3:10 PM

Besides skullflamer, two whole (yet entirely lame) articles doesn't really make you all that special.  Specially educated perhaps, but not particularly educated to say the least.

Who do you think you are?  Harper Lee?

Who the fuck is Harper Lee?   reply

Posted by Skullfire (hulacete@ubbi.com) on June 27, 2002 9:52 PM

I don't care about being special or say the least. And I don't remember any of your contributions, but probably were lame too. All articles here are, cause aren't ours: we just report news, nothing made by us. If you want literature, read a book.

RE: Who the fuck is Harper Lee?   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 28, 2002 3:28 PM

To Kill a Mockingbird, Skullflamer.  One of the finest pieces of American literature ever written.  

Y'know you shouldn't down books too much.  It very obvious from your lack of any coherent sentence structure that you could start learning some very valuable tips from them.  Start with, say, a first grade primer.  It'll be a little above you but, oh so worth the challenge.

Lord, how you suck at writing, skullflamer  Funny for once, but suck nonetheless.

RE: Who the fuck is Harper Lee?   reply

Posted by Skullfire (hulacete@ubbi.com) on June 28, 2002 6:28 PM

You're such an incredible jerk, who thinks yours is the only language. My spanish is excellent, probably better than your english. But no, you keep thinking that education is about your language. Well, my friend, you didn't show knowledge of spanish, like probably hadn't the author of that play; which, by the way, I do know, altough I never read it. I could suggest you some books in spanish, or you could go to a latin kindergarten.

RE: Who the fuck is Harper Lee?   reply

Posted by The Original Shemp (Daddy-O@shempsrule.com) on June 28, 2002 8:50 PM

Now this is way better than the usual stuff.

Nice work ladies!

What do you mean?   reply

Posted by Skullfire (hulacete@ubbi.com) on June 29, 2002 8:11 PM

Not with ladies, of course.

RE: What do you mean?   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 1, 2002 7:27 AM

I'm the incredible jerk!?  f*ck, you are one selfish and ignorant sonovbitch ain'tcha skullflamer.   I definately share the glory of incredible jerk on this lame-ass site.

Here's a clue for you:  WE don't need spanish on this site.  We usem ing-grish.  You usem ing-grish too.  Either that or stick to the goddamn subject, dummy!

Or not...

It is actually funnier watching you play sis-boom-ba ra-ra-ra with the spanglish.  

Be sure not to forget to thank me.  I've made you into what you've always wanted to be on this site: funny!

RE: What do you mean?   reply

Posted by Skullfire (hulacete@ubbi.com) on July 1, 2002 10:24 PM

WE? Again, you're alone here, cause you scare the rest. I would talk in spanish if I want; besides, I bet you talk spanglish too, just backwards.
Thanks for showing me the world has no hope with you on it.

RE: What do you mean?   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 2, 2002 9:43 AM

And in America we drive on the RIGHT side of the road and MAKE money in all of our endeavors.

Well, except for Enron, Worldcom and a host of other soon-to-be-known corporations.  f*cking golden parachuting CEO muthafukers.

"Thanks for showing me the world has no hope with you on it."  is an individual experinece you know only to well, skullflamer.

Please, don't hog all the credit.  I want to thank you too.

Hallelujah!   reply

Posted by Skullfire (hulacete@ubbi.com) on July 2, 2002 5:12 PM

FINALLY, YOU ADMIT IT: there's people in your country that doesn't make ALL the things TOO WELL. Ain't that something?
Every comment of yours are individual experiences too, dude. Altough you have multiple personalities, and none of them thinks with anything more than his 1024x768 pee-nis.

RE: Hallelujah!  PAY attention this is alot for U   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 3, 2002 9:57 AM

What's more important to recognize here skullflamer is that you admitted it as well.

At least Americans try. As poorly as our choices have been in the past at times, We are indeed proud to at least have the balls to backup our amazing cacks.

Seriously, could you objectively say the same about your countrymen, skullflamer.

RE: Hallelujah! ?PAY attention this is alot for U   reply

Posted by Skullfire (hulacete@ubbi.com) on July 3, 2002 6:19 PM

Like your people, sometimes we did, and sometimes we didn't.

RE: Hallelujah! ?PAY attention this is alot for U   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 5, 2002 9:35 AM

Yet so unlike my people as you so eloquently divide up the human race. If your definition for the word "sometimes" regarding your people is "hardly, if ever."  Then we might just agree on one thing so far.

X-Men 2   reply

Posted by NightHawk (nighthawk235@excite.com) on July 13, 2002 12:35 AM

X-Men I while visual good disappointed me.  First they made most of the characters at least 10 years younger than in comics.  They rewrote Rouges story and what happened to Jubilee?  Rouge ran in to Mystic before she became an x-men and she stole Ms. Marvels powers which is the reason she can fly.  It seems they are following the new X-Men tv cartoons instead of the original comics.  I hope they work some of this out before finalizing script.  Did they not encounter the Sentinels before they met Stryker, messing up the timelines for me.

Dare Devil   reply

Posted by NightHawk (nighthawk235@excite.com) on July 13, 2002 12:40 AM

Just saw the preview for Dare Devil, unfortunately it is so dark I can not see all that is happening.  I also did not like the his superhero suit, looks like a jacket with leather strips, like tennis shoes to close it.  It is so dark red that you have problems seeing it.  Be nice if spidey does a visit in sequel since they did meet when he defended Peter Parker.  What has always been interesting is that DD is one of the few blonde superheros (and I do mean blonde), wonder if they kept that in the movie

RE: Dare Devil   reply

Posted by Skullfire (hulacete@ubbi.com) on July 15, 2002 12:44 PM

They never follow the real story; not a single comic movie did it.
They need to adapt the characters to reality, like Spidey and X-Men, and so they will in DD, Hulk & X2 I suppose.

Sentinels are too expensive FX.

RE: X-Men 2   reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 9, 2003 11:56 AM

were are the xmen pictures