RE: Edward Furlong Not in Terminator 3
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 18, 2001 3:09 PM
whether we like the actors or not...i believe that all sequels should continue with the original cast...
"hannibal" was terrible, the batman movies went consitantly downhill, and everyone knows that connery was the best "bond"...
RE: Edward Furlong Not in Terminator 3
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 19, 2001 4:54 AM
Furlong is a poof anyway... I thought he was a terrible John Connor. Glad hes not returning, Arnie is enough bad acting for the whole movie anyway.
RE: Edward Furlong Not in Terminator 3
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 19, 2001 11:27 AM
I hope Arnie doesn't hav to beat up a female cyborg...That would be horrible. But kicking Vin Diesels ass would be pretty cool!! And as for Ed Furlong...Come on don't ya remember his horrible voice in T2....like that should have removed him from the very beggining!!!
RE: Edward Furlong Not in Terminator 3
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 20, 2001 12:30 PM
Can Arnie still do muscle shots?
I heard his phsique now resembles Philip Seymour Hoffmans. They should replace Arnold with someone with equal acting ability like say: Will Smith, Keanu Reeves, or Terry Bradshaw.
RED
RE: Edward Furlong Not in Terminator 3
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 27, 2001 3:16 PM
Ahnold is beautiful to look at, I can look at him for hours on end, and just pretend I'm ffeling his hard body, and kissing his pumped muscles. He is the King.
Skullfire
RE: Edward Furlong Not in Terminator 3
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 29, 2001 9:23 PM
Whoever is imitating Skullfire is a pussy and needs to get an identity of his own and express his homosexual tendencies via self acceptance and realisation that being a skullfire wannabe will never replace the dark, molestations that have occured in their poor, pathetic life. Be a man shemp, or a woman or whatever it is you are and stop banging on Skullfire because you are jealous and need a hug.
Web Traitor Control (WTC) ;)
RE: Edward Furlong Not in Terminator 3
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 1, 2002 4:19 AM
Shut up!
Although Arnold Swarzenegger spurts off the same lame acting and cheesy catch phrases he is still irreplaceable as the terminator and no one could set alight the movie screen the way he does. Arnold is the truest.
RE: Edward Furlong Not in Terminator 3
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 1, 2002 4:22 AM
I personally think it was Edward Furlong's time to ditch his old childish image of terminator 2 and come into his own on the screen as John conner, and I think now he has the acting ability to pull off a great John Conner and possibly the best role of his career, behind maybe American History X.
EDWARD FURLONG NOT IN TERMINATOR 3
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2002 8:51 AM
THIS SUCKS!! ITS BEEN SUCH A LONG TIME SINCE I HAVE SEEN HIM IN A REALLY GREAT MOVIE AND I WAS HOPING WITH T3 THAT THIS WOULD BRING HIM BACK!! EVERYBODY MAKES MISTAKES GEEZE. ROBERT DOWNEY JR WENT TO JAIL HOW MANY TIMES AND GOT TO BE ON A WHOLE BUNCH OF DIFFERENT TV SHOWS AND MOVIES WHATS UP WITH THAT PEOPLE!!!
RE: Edward Furlong Not in Terminator 3
reply
Posted by Adamski (no email) on February 12, 2002 8:18 AM
About the Star Wars 7 - 10 comment... They dont need to fade away the wrinkles... Mark Hamill looked fairly old towards the end of RoTJ, and 7 - 10 are supposed to be after 4 - 6 anyway... Hence the order of the numbers... Wrinkles are good for the later films... Shows that they are continuing the timeline...
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
reply
Posted by FilmFanatic (No Email) on April 1, 2002 5:36 AM
I am a big fan of the Terminator movies and I cannot believe that Eddie Furlong has been dropped I was really looking forward to seeing him reprise his role as Jon Connor-this totally sucks and i'm seriously considering not ever watching terminator 3 coz without the original cast or changing the characters, it will just not be the same. Like someone else said on the board everyone makes mistakes, this is just so unfair! So does anyone know who will be playing Jon Connor? Coz I think they will have a hard job finding someone else! Thats all I have to say!
RE: Edward Furlong Not in Terminator 3
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 4, 2002 6:47 AM
OH SHUT UP, YOU A FAT ASS YURSELF. THE WHOLE CAST WAS FANTASTIC. IF YOU WANT MY OPINION, T2 AND T1 ARE IN MY TOP 10 LIST OF FAVE MOVIE. SO STUFF YOU.
RE: Edward Furlong Not in Terminator 3
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 8, 2002 3:12 PM
You guys have no clue on what your talking about...Edward Furlong is one of the sexiest and best actors...So, you all should shut your faggotty ass mouths about him your starting to piss me off, hes obviously better then all of you look where he is and where you are. And as for his voice he was a little kid in T2 ok, im sure you sounded just as bad when you were his age then. So enough with the Furlong bashing and get the f*cking picture HES GREAT, I love him!
RE: Eddy not in Terminator III
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 5, 2002 1:46 PM
I THINK SO TOO, GOSH! JUST PUT HIM BACK IN, HE CAN ACT!
RE: Edward Furlong Not in Terminator 3
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 9, 2002 7:48 PM
why did you say he wasn't in 'Terminator 2'
He was in that, and I saw it. Don't you mean that you feel sorry for him not being in 'Terminator ''3''?
RE: Edward Furlong Not in Terminator 3
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 9, 2002 7:51 PM
No, I think you mean ''T2''
T3 isn't even out yet and I don't even know if it's being made, even as I type, so to speak.
RE: Edward Furlong Not in Terminator 3
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 9, 2002 8:06 PM
Here, here, you got my vote, actually make that 50, no...
I think I'll top that and make it 100 votes instaed. Eddy Furlong is a very good looking, very hansome, very intelligent, not to mention very sexy actor and I love him in his films!
If there's anyone out there doing a spot of queer bashing, well I think it's dreadful and shouldn't be alllowed.
Gays can actually be quite nice once you get to know them, and it's not as if they've turned into aliens or anything. Not that I'm one myself cause I'm not, but I personally just have allot of respect for them that's all.
RE: Eddy not in Terminator III
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 9, 2002 8:15 PM
erm, actually I think that should be ''T2'' Judgement Day'' and not ''T3'' Judgement'' Day as you stated.
Sorry to be judgemental, I get like that sometimes although it's not out of spite or anything. I just wanted to make sure that people knew what they were saying that's all. Once again, sorry for that okay?
Edward furlong should be cleaning bathrooms
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 26, 2002 4:52 PM
HAHA. Wow. Seems like the whole population of San Francisco is on this board. OK, fudgepackers, listen up. Yes, Edward Furlong is the worst actor in history. He sucked in T2 and he will continue to suck in his future endeavors. There's no doubt about. We're talking about a guy who was chosen off the streets with no acting ability whatsoever. Cameron chose him for the role because he looked like a nipple feeding mama's boy that could cry alot. Any movies that Furlong has been involved in since then are good for only one thing. For all of you repressed homosexual pedophiles to jack off to with the volume turned down.
RE: Edward Furlong Not in Terminator 3
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 6, 2003 6:02 PM
it sucks hard that hes not in it.. my guess is that this movie will suck goat balls, i mean look at the facts: a porn star as the "TX" some looser as john connor, and linda hamilton isnt even in it, i HATE when the sequels suck, T1 and T2 rocked the boat, but T3 is just a bad excuse for making money, i bet its gonna be a really cool movie, but it shouldnt be named T3 im a terminator fan and i will start a jihad if this one does not live up to my expectations
RE: Edward furlong should be cleaning bathrooms
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 26, 2003 5:03 PM
i think that you're having some confusing feelings toward people of the same sex. it's okay to be a homosexual, maybe you should just accept it and move on.
RE: Edward furlong should be cleaning bathrooms
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 28, 2003 4:54 PM
Hmm. So you're basically saying it's ok for people to be homosexual pedophiles? haha. Get a grip, moron. "Confused" is anyone that thinks Furlong can act worth a damn.
RE: Edward Furlong Not in Terminator 3
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 24, 2003 7:31 PM
I think Edward should be in terminator 3 because he is a great actor he started the movie.Not because he has drug charges it doesn't mean he ca not be on it.Edward is a great actor please let him be on the movie.
Terminator III might going to suck.
reply
Posted by Arnold strong (No Email) on April 18, 2003 4:20 AM
With gay actors like Nick Stahl, a dum hollywood bitch who'd better spend her pityfull time cleaning her kitchen and an overload of homosexual digital crap which isn't in service of the movie. However, Arnold acts again, which compensates the previously mentioned negative points.
Above is inferred from seeing the new T3 trailer. Although I haven't seen the movie yet, I fear the worst. Terminator I & II are farout the greatest movies ever (together with Star Wars IV/V and VI) so it will be HARD to outstrip these. At all events not with horrible housewives and gay actors... but we'll see..
RE: Edward furlong should be cleaning bathrooms
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 30, 2003 4:13 PM
Actually, I really enjoyed Edward Furlong's role in T2. I wish he was recast. I think it would have been interesting if Linda Hamilton were reprising her role, but I really wish Edward were back.
RE: Edward Furlong Not in Terminator 3
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 31, 2003 7:37 PM
Furlong just did a movie where he makes out with some dude ("artsy" my ass...he's a fag), he probably wouldn't do something like a Terminator movie again.
RE: Edward rulez
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 2, 2003 2:47 AM
I saw T3 last night and Ed Furlong is definitely beyond this piece of garbage. I consider Nick Stahl a good actor, but he was not right for this part. This movie essentially consists of the following: over-extended CGI action sequences intertwined with Arnold quotes repeated from the first two installments (with the exception of the ingenious "talk to the hand.") In addition, this movie has an ending that would make the most adament Terminator fan consider demanding his money back.
Edward is not in T3
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 2, 2003 12:06 PM
I think it is a chame that Edward is not in T3!!!I think Nick Stahl can not reach up 2 Edward ( he will always be the real John Connor)!!!!!I think i will not even go and see such a sh*t of a movie without real stars!!!!!!!Keep on going EDWARD!!!!!
RE: Edward Furlong Not in Terminator 3
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 6, 2003 5:01 PM
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 6, 2003 6:02 PM
it sucks hard that hes not in it.. my guess is that this movie will suck goat balls, i mean look at the facts: a porn star as the "TX" some looser as john connor, and linda hamilton isnt even in it, i HATE when the sequels suck, T1 and T2 rocked the boat, but T3 is just a bad excuse for making money, i bet its gonna be a really cool movie, but it shouldnt be named T3 im a terminator fan and i will start a jihad if this one does not live up to my expectations
I think what this guy says sums it up...ill like any Terminator but i think they kinda f*cked it up...
RE: One more thing
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 8, 2003 10:31 PM
Well, the fact that Edward Furlong did not return in T3 has been KILLING me. He was fantastic, compelling, and original in T2 and his acting was phenomenal. Nick Stahl ruins T3 in my opinion with his boringness and inferior acting. Overall, T3 was such a dissapointment. It lacks the amazing cinematography of T1 and T2 (because Cameron left?) and even the action is not as compelling as the masterful T2. It is so ridiculous how this movie pales in comparison to its predecessor from 1991...it is 2003 for christ's sake. Kristanna Loken is the only saving grace...she is so hot and does a good job. Claire Danes and Nick Stahl just cannot match the emotion and chemistry between Eddie and Linda. T3 was fun to watch but it pissed me off. And give me a fu@#ing break...droppin Eddie because of a DUI?! Its not like TERMINATOR movies promote healthy and good values, not to mention Hollywood in general. Eddie was deserving of the role and would have been flawless. BAH!
RE: Sorry, Eddie - but Nick was awesome
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 9, 2003 10:07 AM
Edward Furlong is a million times HOTTER than Nick!!!! Edward Furlong is the BEST, Nick is noteven close to Edward Fulong!!!!! Cause Edward is sseexxiieerr!!!!
RE: One more thing
reply
Posted by zephyrgirl (No Email) on July 10, 2003 5:48 AM
I was merely asking the question and you're complaining about T3? I actually liked the movie, even if they had to put in different actors and I don't care about that. I think the overall plot is decent and yes, I prefer T1/T2 over T3, but I still enjoyed the movie.
I think Nick and Claire did pretty good as well. They're great actors. Like I say, you're entitled to your opinon about the movies. ;)
Ed's gone? Who gives a rat's ass?
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 12, 2003 7:32 AM
I bet li'l Eddie's kicking himself silly now that T3 has been produced and released (a thoroughly entertaining flick I might add). He might have put himself right back in the middle of the lime light with a movie on the scale of T3, instead of those backwater, over-rated movies everyone keeps talking about. It would seem that he did not think it worth his while, however, believing that having fun out on the town soaking up the nightlife to be more rewarding.
I have little pity for the guy. Anyone that was literally handed the amount of success that he was at such a young age and then to flush it all so completely down the toilet obviously was not deserving of it in the first place. He?s clearly taken life for granted, considering the high-strung, party nut that he is (he once submitted himself to rehab for a month and then promptly went straight back to the mess that he came from).
Personally, I didn't even know that he was cast in anything other that T2 until recently. I consider an actor to be a good one partly by his (or her) staying power, and certainly not by his good looks (as seems to be the case with so many of you here). If an actor is not widely publicized, it must be for a reason. Right? What director/producer would want a half-baked, prim-Dona actor with good looks as his only asset? Maybe the pr0n industry?
Anyhow, I guess Ed can take consolation from his legions of ass gremlins that we see here clinging to his bollocks. He has their support at the very least. Nice work guys? Really.
RE: Ed's gone? Who gives a rat's ass?
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 14, 2003 9:52 PM
Oh my God...How ignorant and retarded are you? Edward Furlong was KICKED OFF because of drug abuse and DUI (oh, like Terminator and Hollywood withold godly values). He didn't WANT to not be in T3, you idiot. Do your research. You are ridiculous...you should consider an actor "good" by his GOOD ACTING, not by his "staying power". RECOGNIZE EDWARD'S GREATNESS.
RE: Ed's gone? Who gives a rat's ass?
reply
Posted by zephyrgirl (No Email) on July 15, 2003 10:20 AM
Call me the names all you want.
You're being an ignorant and retarded yourself because you're the one who's whining.
I was being nice and you're being naughty. My final saying, Nick kicks ass in T3 period. You f*cking idiot.
RE: Ed's gone? Who gives a rat's ass?
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 19, 2003 9:44 PM
I feel sorry for Edward, I saw Terminator 3 and I enjoyed it but I would of loved to have seen Edward in it as well. His a great actor he deserved to be in it.
RE: Ed's gone? Who gives a rat's ass?
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 26, 2003 6:10 PM
Edward Furlong can't act worth sh*t either way. He was chosen for T2 simply for the fact that he was (still is, and will always be) a pathetic, no-talent, nancy boy. Who cares about the DUI and drugs??
"actor "good" by his GOOD ACTING, not by his "staying power"."
Exactly, and little Eddie is FAR from being even a BAD actor. So don't embarrass yourself anymore by contradicting yourself. haha.
"RECOGNIZE EDWARD'S GREATNESS."
Hey, you wanna take your finger out of ol' Eddie's belt loop there and trade yourself off for a half a cigarette or something? How utterly pathetic. You must be one of those gay pedophiles I was talking about earlier. Go buy a dildo for yourself, for god's sake.
Anyway, let me reiterate. EDWARD FURLONG SUCKS AND HE CAN'T ACT FOR sh*t. The role of John Connor is supposed to be that of a great leader with military prowess and cunning. John Connor is supposed to be a toughguy and not a tearfaucet, weakling, mama's boy like Furlong. The only way Furlong would be perfect for the role is if it required no lines (or the worst acting imagineable), alot of crying, alot of whining, alot of screaming and limp-wristed action, and a tutu. Oh, and Furlong's the only one that wouldn't need the tutu. As he get's the point of it across without having to wear one. Hell, it's impossible to make him look like any more of a sissy than he already is anyway.
So get your heads out of furlongs cackhole, you bunch of pansies! Hahaha.
this is why edward aint in T:3
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 5, 2003 1:32 PM
The T:3 director has said that Edward ain in this movie because he has a health problem. He was going to be in it till that happened! I don't know what his health problem was but if u ppl wanna kno then go find out on google
RE: this is why edward aint in T:3
reply
Posted by Pseudonymn (getreal@dotcom.com) on August 8, 2003 7:36 AM
It should be obvious to anyone who looks at the putz. He's one of the most burnt out looking actors that I know of. Forget his "charming" looks that all you slack-jawed faggots out there idolize in him. Those have been utterlay wasted by his constant substance abuse. Seriously, the dude looks like he spends all of his days in a massive bong. And he's gone through rehabilitation (unsuccessfuly) at least once.
So there you have it. Ed FourBong can't act, has drug related problems and has no good looks to sell to the masses any longer. That is why he is not starring in either Terminator movies. Bottom line.
RE: Ed's gone? Who gives a rat's ass?
reply
Posted by Pseudonymn (getreal@dotcom.com) on August 8, 2003 7:47 AM
You obviously didn't read my post properly. If you had, you would have noticed that I made mention of Eddie's drug/drinking habits in abundance in my last post. Obviously that was the reason that he was kicked off the set. Even if Hollywood in general doesn't promote the best morals, that may not be said of all directors / producers. What's more, big Arny, being the huge health advocate that he is, probably would not want his image tarnished from working so closely with such and obvious addict. Not to mention he his political plans. If I were in Arny's position, I certainly wouldn't want to hang around such riffraff (I'd be watching my backside like a hawk 24/7 at that.... never know what that little ass goblin might try and pull... literally). As for doing my research? Well, as a matter of fact, I did do my homework before I posted. I'd post the links to just a few of the articles that I've read, but this damn forum has character limitations that won't allow me to post the full URL. Whether you believe me or not is completely irrelevant to me. At least I take the time to properly read people's posts.
RE: this is why edward aint in T:3
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 16, 2003 6:13 PM
I've only seen edward in two movies. And from what I've heard he obviously has some kind of health problem (unfortunately). But I think he's a pretty good actor, especially in T2. It would have been great to see him in T3.
RE: Edward Furlong Not in Terminator 3
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 29, 2003 2:05 PM
Edward Furlong is soo hot! Hes a good actor and he should have played John Connor. If he was in that movie, i would have seen it. its soo stupid without him!
T2 vs T3
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 3, 2003 11:27 AM
i love T1, T2, and T3. they are different but in my opinion terminator is the only continuing movie that satisfied my expectings. i'm so sory that edward wasn't jon connor in t3, because i know he'd be perfect. anyway, a read lots of reasons in the newspapers, that i dont want to believe. edward is like made for john connor. but, however, nick wasn't so bad, except his BLUE eyes (edward's are brown), and brown hair (edward's is quite darker). but...that's it! edward, we missed you in T3, a lot!!!
by jel
RE: this is why edward aint in T:3
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 29, 2004 6:17 AM
Many people seem blind to the truth. Obviously 'health problems' means drugs! All child actors end up either commiting suicide, turning gay, or on drugs. I won't say Furlong's a terrible actor, but he doesn't get my vote. IMO, there is no denying that he is hot(or was, apparently he's gone downhill recently) and maybe he's a nice guy (again, I have my doubts) but why does this make people think he's a good actor? He was well chosen for T2 because he must have a diploma in crying, screaming and whinging, and he was pleasant to watch on screen (i'm no pedo) but I've seen better acting. Hell, I couldn't do better, but as an actor, he should. Open your eyes. I look forward to being completely insulted from all sides.
RE: Edward Furlong Not in Terminator 3
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 14, 2004 12:36 AM
Ur a fucking horny shit! Dat is soo gross ur talking about kissing a 70 yr old guys muscles, i mean seriously get over yourself his fucking ugly anyway