![Digital Theatre [DTheatre.com]](images/logo.png){kind=logo}
|
Starring on Dtheatre's Stage: Latest Movie News & Trailers, TV News and Productions,
Special Free Guides, Gadgets and Expert Reviews on Varity of Exciting Zones. We actually have a special expert responsible for every post series. Come back soon, you will always find new interesting things! |
By Jack September 12, 2001 12:20 PM
(EMPIRE) - A number of major studios have been forced to rethink their plans for impending releases after the horrific terrorist attacks in the US yesterday (12 September). Warner Bros' Schwarzenegger thriller Collateral Damage is currently in a state of limbo while execs decide what is to become of the picture, which begins with a terrorist explosion in a downtown skyscraper.
A similar hold has been put on Barry Sonnenfeld comedy Big Trouble. Starring Rene Russo and Tim Allen, the film was scheduled for a 21 September release in the US but, due to sensitive elements including a bomb on a plane, the film has been pushed back.
Sonnenfeld's latest project Men in Black 2, which was shooting in New York, has had production stopped, as has animated adventure Ice Age, which was also in production in the city. It is unclear when work will resume.
The teaser trailer for Spider-Man has also been removed from the film's official website as it features a helicopter sequence shot between the twin towers of the World Trade Centre. All of Hollywood's studios and talent agencies closed their doors yesterday after news of the unprecedented attacks, which has seen the loss of more than 10,000 lives.
Thanks to Variety.
| comments: 42
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack 
reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 12, 2001 1:13 PM
i think that holind off on some of the movies,(arnold's) is a good idea, with the state of the world, but I think what "we" need in the near future is something to get us beyond this, film is a great medium for that.
and for the first time in years I give my respect to Hollywood for showing good taste,
which incidentally, if it were to happen again, would be a sign of the apocolypse, and hell would freeze over.
RE: What will be done reply
Posted by 100% AMERICAN (hellskitchen_@hotmail.com) on September 12, 2001 1:20 PM
I just learned that 4 of my pals did not make it out of the towers. I wonder how long it will be until another master mind terrorist plan erupts here in NYC or elsewhere in the USA. Perhaps the Bush Admisistration will end all terrorists defesnse mechanisms ASAP, and put a stop to this. To do that is simple and ferocious. All terrorists are either hidden or funded by countries around the world. We must make it very clear that any country or organization with ties of any kind to a terrorist group, will be destroyed(murdered, killed, whatever you want to call it). We will give Afghanistan 12 hours to hand over Osama Bin Laden and 100 of his highest ranking men, or we will completley destroy Afghanistan. That's it. Simple. Effective. A lesson for any country that supports these groups.
If China, Russia, and the other powers to be are smart, they will back us, if not, I don't give a rats ass!
Those FUKERS are going down.
If you want to argue with me, fine. E-mail me.
There's a quote from "Animal House": "Don't get mad, get even". Well, EVEN ain't gonna do it.
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 12, 2001 1:46 PM
Got this one at work today. We should appreciate this one, from a Canadian newspaper. Worth sharing.
TRIBUTE TO THE UNITED STATES
America: The Good Neighbor.
Widespread but only partial news coverage was given recently to a remarkable editorial broadcast from Toronto by Gordon Sinclair, a Canadian television commentator. What follows is the full text of his trenchant remarks as printed in the Congressional Record:?
This Canadian thinks it is time to speak up for the Americans as the most generous and possibly the least appreciated people on all the earth. Germany, Japan and, to a lesser extent, Britain and Italy were lifted out of the debris of war by the Americans who poured in billions of dollars and forgave other billions in debts. None of these countries is
Today paying even the interest on its remaining debts to the United States. When France was in danger of collapsing in 1956, it was the Americans who propped it up, and their reward was to be insulted and swindled on the streets of Paris. I was there. I saw it. When earthquakes hit distant cities, it is the United States that hurries in to help. This spring, 59 American communities were flattened by tornadoes. Nobody helped. The Marshall Plan and the Truman Policy pumped billions of dollars into discouraged countries. Now newspapers in those countries are writing about the decadent, warmongering Americans. I?d like to see just one of those countries that is gloating over the erosion of the United States dollar build its own airplane. Does any other country in the world have a plane to equal the Boeing Jumbo Jet, the Lockheed Tri-Star, or the Douglas DC10? If so, why don?t they fly them? Why do all the International lines except Russia fly American Planes? Why does no other land on earth even consider putting a man or woman on the moon? You talk about Japanese technocracy, and you get radios. You talk about German technocracy, and you get automobiles. You talk about American technocracy, and you find men on the moon- not once, but several times-and safely home again. You talk about scandals, and the Americans put theirs right in the store window for everybody to look at. Even their draft-dodgers are not pursued and hounded. They are here on our streets, and most of them, unless they are breaking Canadian laws, are getting American dollars from ma and pa at home to spend here. When the railways of France, Germany and India were breaking down through age, it was the Americans who rebuilt them. When the Pennsylvania Railroad and the New York Central went broke, nobody loaned them an old caboose. Both are still broke. I can name you 5,000 times when the Americans raced to the help of other people in trouble. Can you name me even one time when someone else raced to the Americans in trouble? I don?t think there was outside help even during the San Francisco earthquake. Our neighbors have faced it alone, and I?m one Canadian who is damned tired of hearing them get kicked around. They will come out of this thing with their flag high. And when they do, they are entitled to thumb their nose at the lands that are gloating over their present troubles. I hope Canada is not one of those.? Stand proud, America!
RE: What will be done reply
Posted by FredHater (fred_hater@hotmail.com) on September 12, 2001 1:59 PM
Sorry to hear about your friends 100%.
I'm generally a pacifist (a liberal, dove) but this is one glaring case when the USA needs to get out the big stick.
There are some cowardly motherf*ckers out there that need killing and the country is going to band together and find those bastards one by one.
I am 100% (no pun) behind any means necessary to get these villains and bring them to justice, and justice in this situation is nothing less than death.
GOD BLESS AMERICA.
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by FredHater (fred_hater@hotmail.com) on September 12, 2001 2:02 PM
Nice, but it was written in 1973 by Gordon Sincalire, in response to the international criticism of the USA after we pulled out of Vietnam.
However, the words ring true today, how soon the world forgets that the glue that holds this world together is red, white and blue.
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by alator (boognish@whoever.com) on September 12, 2001 6:51 PM
It may be in best taste to take out certain scenes out of the movie that might upset the family and friends of the people hurt or killed in the horrible events that happened but They are just movies. Arnold's new movie would probably be a good thing to bring out to continue to make people aware that the threat is always there. There is no way to toally stop terrorist forever so why stop the movies from release? Since they have stopped the release of these movies are they also going to pull every movie that has ever had a building blow up or a tall building in it from the shelves? They are just movies. That's what we tell our kids all the time. If they are going to stop the movies which aren't about the actual event why don't they stop showing the footage on the news every 3 seconds?
RE: What will be done reply
Posted by BroosterB1 (No Email) on September 12, 2001 7:47 PM
Here in New Mexico far from the destruction we weep and mourn for our country. Over fifty years ago here in our desert we worked for three long years to perfect the weapon that would end the evil of the Third Reich. We used that weapon to end the tragedy of the Second World War. It is my belief that we use those same weapons to end the scourge of Terrorisim. When those who are responsible for these kind of act find that their safe havens are turned to glass and when those who harbor these animals find their cities are no more, these same may feel a little different about allowing terrorists to act from their countries. Whether we use our "special" weapons or our conventional weapons we must not let this action go without true and meaningful retaliation. These actions will not stand!!! May God Bless America!
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 12, 2001 10:26 PM
To the people of Canada.
Thank you for the kind words that you have posted here.
You just touched at least one American!
There is those of us American's that are proud that you are our friends and hopefully it stay's that way for ever!
I don't mind that our goverment helps other countries in time of need but you are right nobody helps us in our time of need.
I think it is time to help ourselves and after we finish straightening out our own problems here in America then help others.
RE: What will be done reply
Posted by 100% AMERICAN (hellskitchen_@hotmail.com) on September 13, 2001 5:31 AM
Well put, however if we are to scare anyone in the world from helping the terrorists, it must be on an all new level. Our bombardment of Japan will seem faint compared to the punishment we will deliver to those that must be made an example of. Without their defense, terrorists will be left in the open, and will be easily dealt with throughout the world, or we can do nothing more than a little missle attack, and terrorism will continue to strive. All we can do, is wait and see.
- With liberty and justice for all
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by AXEMAN (bigturnerfish@hotmail.com) on September 13, 2001 8:50 AM
"This will not stand, this aggression will not stand."
George Herbert Walker Bush & Jeffery "The Dude" Lebowski
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 13, 2001 10:12 AM
Good quote from a classic movie. Some humor is good right about now. Hey 100%, I too am sorry for your loss, and everyone else who died or lost a loved one thanks to these "folks". Your right man, we gotta make the world see, from Ireland to the Balkans, that it does not pay to be assocciated with Terrorists. I don't think its enough to obliterate Afghanistan, we should also destroy Iraq for good measure.
- Union Jackie
RE: What will be done reply
Posted by CorneliusD (No Email) on September 13, 2001 10:36 AM
I'm very sorry for your loss as well, 100%. My friends and family in NY offer their condolences. Keep the good memories of your friends as an eternal tribute.
RE: What will be done reply
Posted by allknowing (you'llneverfindme.com) on September 13, 2001 1:13 PM
I as well lost friends, and my cousin in that...
I can't even put it in words, I feel angry and helpless, I send my regrets to you 100%, lets just hope that don't have to find out if the rest of us are 100% american too.. I've had enough reality this week, good luck out there 100, hell's kitchen just got a little bit closer to everyone
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 13, 2001 2:42 PM
Should we also destroy ourselves in the United States and bomb our own country to oblivion? We have after all, harbored an evil individual such as Timothy McVeigh, but does that make the rest of us evil like him? I don't think so. Do 10 terrorists living in a country of millions of innocent people make the entire population a target of murder? I don't think so.
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 13, 2001 2:45 PM
By the way.. did anyone know that Osama Bin Laden was backed and trained by the CIA in the early days, and Saddam Hussein was put into power BY THE CIA ALSO!!! The US government is partially to blame for those events, so should we destroy our own country for it?
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 13, 2001 3:04 PM
No we should not. We should and will however destroy Afghanistan is a much worse manner than we destroyed Tim McVeigh, otherwise terrorism will continue to flourish.
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 13, 2001 3:06 PM
We killed McVeigh, if they do the same to bin Laden that would be great, but instead they are protecting him. Get a clue, traitor!
RE: What will be done reply
Posted by power-trip (powertripz@hotmail.com) on September 13, 2001 3:21 PM
My condolances to you allknowing, 100% and to all thoses that have suffered a personal loss in this tragedy.
A prayer to those of us who remain but feel the anguish.
A curse for those who orchestrated this monstrosity--your time left in this plane of existance is short, very short.
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 13, 2001 3:23 PM
You bigot. I'm just displaying a point of view. For one, its a calculated guess as whether he did it or not, but if he did, I have no problems about executing him. I just hope that they find the right targets. There are people in Afghanistan who are opposed to the dictatorship rule there, and I am sure that we as Americans will help them end that dictatorship. But let's not get this carried away and start killing everyone there. Then we'd be just like the terrorists. Remember that.
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 13, 2001 3:51 PM
Listen Moron, try reading some of these posts. The reason for destroying all of Afghanistan including the good and the evil is to show the world over what will happen to those who fund, protect, hide, or have any relationship to terrorists. If we do nothing more than kill a few assassins, then terrorism will only continue. The reason we and everyone else have been unable to kill them in the last 10 years is because we cannot get to them. Various countries protect them. Do you think these countries will continue to protect them when an example is made of Afghanistan, of course not, they don't want to be destroyed. Hence the end of terrorism, with no place to hide they will all be vanquished, and the entire planet that much closer to peace. Or we could do it your way: only punish those who commited the crime, in the mean time Afghanistan will continue to let these scum train in their back yard, and protect them from the hundreds of countries that want to get them for their murdering actions. Listen, sorry I called you a moron, obviously you don't understand whats going on. This is much bigger than just bin Laden, we already want him for the murder of our Marines in 93', which he admited to doing, but still the Taliban refuses to give him up, they are as bad as he is. It is a horrible thing to annhilate an entire country, but it must be done. It's for the good of the entire planet. If we do not do it, then you should expect this type of terrorism to occur at a much greater rate all over the world. It must be stopped now, this is the best and most effective way.
- Jimmy
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by Error11 (No Email) on September 13, 2001 8:14 PM
About the story: There is a scene in the upcoming Spiderman movie where the Green Goblin fires several blast at a New York Hotel and large parts of the buiding fall on people and police cars. The movie won't be out until summer, but it would be a shame if Hollywood were to be over sensitive and cut scenes like this from big motion pictures. Now, "timely release" is the operative phrase here.
In another light; building explosions and falling concrete in a movie has never appeared as devistating as the real thing, [unfortunatley we know that now]. So I suspect that the producers of Collateral Damage did not really put the film on hold in "good taste", I think the Hollywood bastards just want to rework the smoke cloud special effects of the opening sequence.
RE: What will be done reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 14, 2001 3:25 PM
Argue with you?? I think that it has to be the best thing I have heard anyone say since the attack!!
I am sorry about your friends
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by jackcool (silentnolonger) on September 14, 2001 6:55 PM
I have been reading this for awhile. To all our American friends, Our thoughts and prayers are with you. KEEP THE FAITH.
Subject: Miami Herald Article
Published Wednesday, September 12, 2001
We'll go forward from this moment
Article from Miami Herald by Leonard Pitts
It's my job to have something to say. They pay me to provide words that
help make sense of that which troubles the American soul. But in this moment
of airless shock when hot tears sting disbelieving eyes, the only thing I can
find to say, the only words that seem to fit, must be addressed to the
unknown author of this suffering.
You monster. You beast. You unspeakable bastard.
What lesson did you hope to teach us by your coward's attack on our World Trade Center, our Pentagon, us? What was it you hoped we would learn? Whatever it was, please know that you failed. Did you want us to respect your cause? You just damned your cause. Did you want to make us fear? You just steeled our resolve. Did you want to tear us apart? You just brought us together.
Let me tell you about my people. We are a vast and quarrelsome family, a family rent by racial, social, political and class division, but a family nonetheless. We're frivolous, yes, capable of expending tremendous emotional energy on pop
cultural minutiae -- a singer's revealing dress, a ball team's misfortune, a
cartoon mouse.
We're wealthy, too, spoiled by the ready availability of trinkets and material goods, and maybe because of that, we walk through life with a certain sense of blithe entitlement. We are fundamentally decent, though -- peace-loving and compassionate. We struggle to know the right thing and to do it. And we are, the overwhelming majority of us, people of faith, believers in a just and loving God. Some people -- you, perhaps -- think that any or all of this makes us weak. You're mistaken. We are not weak. Indeed, we are strong in ways that cannot be measured by arsenals.
Yes, we're in pain now. We are in mourning and we are in shock. We're still
grappling with the unreality of the awful thing you did, still working to make
ourselves understand that this isn't a special effect from some Hollywood
blockbuster, isn't the plot development from a Tom Clancy novel. Both in terms of the awful scope of their ambition and the probable final death toll, your attacks are likely to go down as the worst acts of terrorism in the history of the United States and, probably, the history of the world.
You've bloodied us as we have never been bloodied before. But there's a gulf
of difference between making us bloody and making us fall. This is the lesson Japan was taught to its bitter sorrow the last time anyone hit us this hard, the last time anyone brought us such abrupt and monumental pain. When roused, we are righteous in our outrage, terrible in our force.
When provoked by this level of barbarism, we will bear any suffering, pay
any cost, go to any length, in the pursuit of justice. I tell you this without
fear of contradiction. I know my people, as you, I think, do not. What I know reassures me.
It also causes me to tremble with dread of the future. In the days to come, there will be recrimination and accusation, fingers pointing to determine whose failure allowed this to happen and what can be done to prevent it from happening again. There will be heightened security, misguided talk of revoking basic freedoms. We'll go forward from this moment sobered, chastened, sad. But determined, too. Unimaginably determined.
You see, the steel in us is not always readily apparent. That aspect of our character is seldom understood by people who don't know us well. On this day, the family's bickering is put on hold. As Americans we will weep, as Americans we will mourn, and as Americans, we will rise in defense of all that we cherish.
So I ask again:
What was it you hoped to teach us? It occurs to me that maybe you just wanted us to know the depths of your hatred. If that's the case, consider the message received. And take this message in exchange: You don't know my people. You don't know what we're capable of. You don't know what you just started.
But you're about to learn.
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by wegotnukes (syd91098@home.com) on September 14, 2001 7:16 PM
As a member of the armed forces I will proudly defend this nation's freedom. I believe that you need to re-examine your convictions if you think it is fine to allow to Afghanistan to and other countries that harbor terrorists to get off free of charge. I am updated daily with information that I can not share with you so I know from where I speak. Bin Laden did not act without political support. I would gladly unleash our Tridents on them. -Oh say does that star spangled banner yet wave...
RE: What will be done reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 16, 2001 4:07 PM
Are you out of your mind? Using nuclear weapons? Do you have any sense of the geography of the world? Check a globe or map and look at Afghanistan's neighbors. Check out how many of them have nuclear warheads of their own. Do you realize the fall-out from the nuclear blasts would reach their neighbors, coincidentally countries that are supporting our future actions against terrorism. Do you realize that this sort of escalation would most certainly lead to an apocolyptic end of the world.
I'm all for a conventional weapon solution to this, but before we start WWIII, we need to get our facts straight and target the right people, so that we are not again perceived as terrorists ourselves.
RE: What will be done reply
Posted by Pauleywog (pauleywog@home.com) on September 17, 2001 8:07 AM
I think the U.S. needs to concentrate on exactly how they are going to deal with those responsible if and when we get ahold of them. Execution is too good for them. They are already willing to die for their cause so we need to keep them alive and just torture the HELL out of them for the rest of their natural lives. One method that comes to mind is to start by breaking all of their fingers, one by one. Break the first finger and just when they are about done reeling from the pain, crack another one.....and so on. When all of their bones are broken, I say we skin them alive and make some terrorist lamp shades and auction them off to raise money for the families directly affected by this tragedy. This may sound vicious and savage, but it might make future terrorists think twice before doing anything like this again ANYWHERE. Let's make an example out of these people!!!!!
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by Pauleywog (pauleywog@home.com) on September 17, 2001 8:14 AM
First of all, you're an idiot. Second, Timothy McVeigh was not a fugitive being harbored by our country. He was a criminal being prosecuted for a crime commited that affected our own people. I don't like violence either, but look at where being non-violent has gotten us so far. We need to start kicking some rear ends....AND HARD!!!!!
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by Pauleywog (pauleywog@home.com) on September 17, 2001 8:21 AM
Whether or not Osama Bin Laden is directly responsible is not in question. He is. He is responsible because of the example he is setting for his followers. I think we all need to stop being "politically correct" and start looking at these people for what they really are. MONSTERS.
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by Pauleywog (pauleywog@home.com) on September 17, 2001 8:27 AM
Wow!!!! Incredibly well said!!!!
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 17, 2001 10:12 AM
He's captured our feelings and our spirit. Very well said.
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by hannible (free stuff) on September 17, 2001 4:45 PM
I feel for americas loss but all this talk of war and destruction is not gonna solve any thing. killing 30 000 more peple is just not right how does that solve anything. all thats doing is makeing many more inasent peple upset just like the rest of america. it would be better if bush and the government /fbi got there thumb out ther ass and done some research to find out exactly who is responcible. and oh yea bush talks real hard now but were was he when the planes crashed ,ill tell u were hiding out like a chikensh*t in a bunker. Until bush gets hard evidence against bin laden it would be stupidety attacking afghanistan. cause all that means is more death on both america and afganistan or may be even other countries such as (iraq). thuss begining world war 3
and also it was iggnarent of america to think that it was invincible aginst any attacks. other places like the uk are always awere of the terrorist attacks so prehaps the government itself should realy take a slap in the face for such poor securety. so what im trying to say hear is that the answers of war and destruction is not the wright one but at the same time you cant just do nothing in short there are no wright answers.
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by Pauleywog (pauleywog@home.com) on September 17, 2001 9:02 PM
You are absolutely right Jimmy. I believe the majority of all Americans agree with you also. Killing is a horrible thing but living our whole lives in constant fear is far worse.
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 19, 2001 6:47 AM
hannible:
You are a moron. Any country protecting terrorists should be punished. By destroying Afghanistan we will teach a lesson to the hundreds of countries and states that harbour terrorists as well. Without they're protection we can destroy terrorism throughout the entire planet. Or we can do it your way, and let terrorism flourish. Use your head for a change. Drastic warfare requires drastic measures.
~TINY
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 19, 2001 12:55 PM
Sounds like a good idea to kill all those innocent people too. After all 1 innocent american is far more valuable than 1 million innocent afgans.
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by hannible (free stuff) on September 19, 2001 3:12 PM
Ok tinY TELL ME WHAT DO WE DO ABOUT THE IRA THEY ARE ALSO A TERRORIST ARGINISATION. DO WE KILL ALL THE IRISH OR PUT SANCTIONS ON IRELAND FOR HARBORING TERORISTS.
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 9, 2001 11:43 PM
You Americans are stupid. When are you going to realise that it was you who started this war not Bin Laden not the Taliban, YOU!! Im not American or Muslim, far from it. I just know that from the beginning the kind of bullsh*t your country's government has been doing to other countries. Of course you ignorant Yanks dont know (or dont care), the governemnt has been hand feeding you their supremacist and so called "justice talk" to you all your sheltered lives. How many non-Americans has your country killed throughout history? Do u know? Do u care? America only help countries when there is something in it for them. Otherwise they dont give a f*ck! This plan to wipe out terrorism for good is a crock of sh*t. bush couldnt care about the terrorsism anywhere else but in USA. When approached and asked if he was going to ward off terrorism in 3rd world countries such as India and other sub-continental nations he said NO! Why because, USA have no interest there and they are not a threat to USA. George W Bush and your country to outsiders seems like the Anti-christ. Im Christian and I dont believe that what USA is doing is right... I dont believe that what Bin laden did was right. But do you even know how many innocent people and children have been killed because of Americas attacks? I doubt it. Why? Well because as usual USA like to control evrything, not only what their country know but what the rest of the wolrd should know. Can anyone say "propaganda".!!? Its clear in what Bush said "If your not with us you are agaisnt us" Although he chooses his words a little better it doesnt fool us, the rest of the world. Why should we be against you if we dont want to fight a battle u got yourself into... It has no interest or benefit to us. We shouldnt have to make that choice and USA shouldnt threaten or intimidate the rest of the world that way. Who do you Americans think you are, Supreme race? f*cking Nazi's? please wake up and smell the Brazilian coffee... theres a whole world outside America.
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by 100% AMERICAN (hellskitchen_@hotmail.com) on September 19, 2001 4:38 PM
Unfortunately many innocents will be killed by us, as has been stated by various posters, in order to expose the terrorists of the world.
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by 100% AMERICAN (hellskitchen_@hotmail.com) on September 19, 2001 4:49 PM
What part of Tiny's post did you not understand. No one will help the IRA or any terrorist group anywhere in the world when they see how the absolute majority of super powers reacts to it. This will be an on going chain, world wide. Would you harbour an organization, if it meant the complete destruction of your home, as well as the horror of realizing that every item you require from outside sources has been shut down for you?
Some posters have deemed it feasible to the launch of WW3, of course when you look at the parties involved it really could not be thought of as a world war. The vast majority of the world despises terrorism and has already joined our side. No terrorist group will stand a chance once an example has been made.
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by hannible (free stuff) on September 20, 2001 11:42 AM
listen dick what ever way you try to spin it does not make it any more the right.
the way you are talking is like a dumb f*cking hilbilly .
kiling millions of affgans is not gonna sh*t any trrorists up . if any thing it will motivate them more ,because they have already succeded in what they were trying to do which was to get america to start a war.
what did you think they did somthing like this for fun. this whole attack was well thought up and obviously took years of planning. so if you wann talk and behave like a farm boy and start a war and kill milions of people to justify what hapend to america then you might aswell call your sell 100%dumass.
did you know half the people in afgan dont even have TVs and were unawere of what had been going on untill recently.
i dont know wht news network youve been wacthing but prehaps you should get all the facts befor running your mouth by saying stupid sh*t!
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by soulkitchen123 (sessa1969@yahoo.com) on September 23, 2001 4:56 PM
We need to stop fighting about this. They want us to be divided. I don't believe most of us want to kill millions of innocent Afghans just cause they have the misfortune to have been born there which is basically what it amounts to. We're just hurt and angry and sad. If we did that we'd be like them. And I know this country could never sink as low as those cowardly sh*ts. That doesn't mean we shouldn't make those responsible pay. They could die a 1000 painful deaths and burn in hell forever and it wouldn't be enough. But the people of Afghanistan are victims too. Don't forget that. And mass destruction of them would send a very different message. The leaders of that country don't care about its citizens anyway so it wouldn't matter. That is obvious from any news reports that come from there-only the Taliban has fresh water and other basic amenities. And by the way, Bush was not behaving cowardly on Tuesday. He wanted to go to New York but his advisors wouldn't allow it. Imagine if they had killed the leader of the free world. It couldn't be risked and we were clearly under attack. It is bin Laden who is an evil coward by hiding in these destitute countries and refusing to give himself up. If there is a hell, he will burn there forever with Hitler and McVeigh and everyone like them.
(I was not by the way a Bush supporter in the election and did not vote for him but all that is irrelevant right now. God bless our leaders and this country)
RE: Projects On Hold After Terrorist Attack reply
Posted by 100% AMERICAN (hellskitchen_@hotmail.com) on October 2, 2001 3:32 PM
Sh!t Head Hannibal:
If Terrorists have no money they cannot commit terror! God your stupid, and there's nothing wrong with being on a farm.
very sorry reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 3, 2002 7:49 PM
hi i'm very sorry to hear this. my geo teacher told us. :(
 CONAN THE BARBARIAN |
 CAPTAIN AMERICA |
 CRAZY, STUPID, LOVE |
 THE SMURF |
 COWBOYS AND ALIENS |
 BAD TEACHER |
 MR. POPPERS PENGUINS |
 GREEN LANTERN |
