![Digital Theatre [DTheatre.com]](images/logo.png){kind=logo}
|
Starring on Dtheatre's Stage: Latest Movie News & Trailers, TV News and Productions,
Special Free Guides, Gadgets and Expert Reviews on Varity of Exciting Zones. We actually have a special expert responsible for every post series. Come back soon, you will always find new interesting things! |
By Azad September 5, 2001 4:31 PM
The Dark Horizons Web site reported a rumor that writer John Milius is clashing with directors Andy and Larry Wachowski over the script of a proposed third Conan the Barbarian movie. Citing an anonymous source, the site reported that the Wachowskis have requested changes to Milius' script for King Conan: Crown of Iron, but that Milius is balking.
The directors reportedly want the script toned down. Milius has declined, and the project is reportedly at a stalemate.
The following is a quoted observation from the anonymous source:
"I have some major news regarding Conan 3. There is a new battle brewing with "King Conan: Crown of Iron" but ironically, it doesn't involve Conan. It is a battle over creative differences. The Wachowskis are making gentle demands towards writer/director John Milius to change his Conan 3 script in a direction he would like to avoid, and the situation has become a 'stand-still.'
We have been waiting a long time for John Milius to pen a sequel to "Conan the Barbarian." Now almost twenty years later, everyone believes that the script Milius has presented is exceptional. BUT.. on the heels of a new draft, the Wachowski Brothers have expressed the need for changes - a request to "water down" the tone of the script.
Personally I find this a worry. Milius knew what he was doing when he fought Dino De Laurentiis to maintain his original barbarian vision... I believe we owe it to him now to help keep his latest vision intact. The alternative may be another "Conan the Destroyer."
| comments: 89
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? 
reply
Posted by 100% AMERICAN (hellskitchen_@hotmail.com) on September 5, 2001 5:18 PM
Anything will be better than the first two, which sucked in a very serious way. 1 & 2 concentrated on image, and completly forgot what Conan is all about. He's such a simple character, it really should'nt be that tough to get it right. I would be interested in hearing who is being casted.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by alator (boognish@whoever.com) on September 5, 2001 5:49 PM
Conan The barbarian is without a doubt in my movie collection, sadly the Destroyer is so bad it will never be viewed by me again. I have been waiting years for a new one to come out. Let's hope the original script is kept. Toning down of movie is only an attempt to get a pg 13 rating so the movie can make more money.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 5, 2001 7:29 PM
only arnold can be conan in the first place.why would you have to tone-down a story about a barbarion.please make the picture with arnold before he's to old. j.c.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 5, 2001 11:36 PM
Looks like we've got another deluded movie-goer who thinks only one person can play a role. The part of Conan could be played by a wooden spoon and be more believable. Any lunk could play the part. If Arnold does it, it will be a comedy. His career is over.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 6, 2001 12:57 AM
Bah. Both Conan movies were not true to the spirit or script of the short stories and books. Conan is not a complex character, but he is far more than the wooden spoon that you seem to want, and Arnold played.
Personally, I wouldn't mind seeing someone else try to capture the spirit of Conan.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 6, 2001 5:33 AM
Look who is talking about a lame mind?
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 6, 2001 6:38 AM
Conan = Arnold. Period.
The persona, good or bad, well acted or not, is ingrained in the popular culture and any other actor would doom the film right out of the can. This isn't a 007 flic where the suit and gadgets make the role (along with a english accent) Arnold's presence in both films made the Conan character come alive not the writing.
CAPPY!
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 6, 2001 8:48 AM
Personally, I think there are at least a hundred actors in hollywood that could play a convincing Conan.
Probably, two hundred if you look outside of Hollywood. Let somebody else have a go at the role. I liked End of Days, didn't see the 6th day,but Arnold is pretty old now. He's had heart surgery for god's sake! Can he even do his own stunts? If not who can be a convincing stunt double for Arnold. And to throw fuel of this fire,I think Stallone would have been a better choice for the role originally anyway.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 6, 2001 11:14 AM
you all amuse me.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 6, 2001 1:21 PM
Not only do you amuse me, but you all also have had my Mom on many different occasions. I guess in a way, your all my father. Thanks.
- Random Shemp
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by damick (rwdamick@home.com) on September 6, 2001 1:27 PM
"simple", if taken from a perspective that you are just viewing entertainment. One must read the Conan Chronicles and realize that this is/was a day & age when man(woman) had to be skilled in the art of "killing" just to remain alive & free. Just one man's opinion............rw
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by damick (rwdamick@home.com) on September 6, 2001 1:34 PM
Stallone!!!!!!!!!!! My God man you have been relieved of your ability to think!!!!! This month's playmate is bigger than that whimp. Get a grip....rw
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by CorneliusD (No Email) on September 7, 2001 6:07 AM
Agreed...just remember six words: Stop or my Mom Will Shoot
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 7, 2001 6:39 AM
Go smoke some more weed buddy...
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 7, 2001 8:10 AM
"Yo, Crom laughs at your Four Winds."
I don't think so.
Maybe if somebody knocked The Rock over the head with a brick he might play Conan as well as Stallone would have.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 7, 2001 9:21 AM
How about Vin Diesel? Or better how about Mark Walhberg?
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by Loath (loath@dtheatre.com) on September 7, 2001 12:44 PM
Woody Allen, Jennifer Lopez, etc. There are many similar choices for Conan.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A Specific Shemp (spam@someone.else) on September 8, 2001 10:23 AM
Too late, he's already too old for the role.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 8, 2001 2:18 PM
Stallone as Conan. Uh-huh. "Yo! Red Sonja!" He'd do real well, all 5 feet 4 inches of him. Ridiculous. What's wrong with you??
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 8, 2001 2:20 PM
And Mark Wahlberg??? Maybe he could have a special power where he sends Good Vibrations through his sword. He's not anywhere near masculine enough to play Conan, especially with that girly-voice of his.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 8, 2001 9:34 PM
I agree,Arnold or nothing,what`s Conan w/out Arnie?It would be like Terminator 3 w/Stalone or something.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 8, 2001 9:36 PM
B/S!!
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 8, 2001 9:38 PM
I agree,Sly as Conan?Smoke some more crack!
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by The Original Shemp (Daddy-O@shempsrule.com) on September 8, 2001 10:07 PM
How is it you're "Specific" now?
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 9, 2001 3:53 PM
Edward Norton should be conan. I would like to see that guy as a pissed off barbarian. Have you seen american history x? Yeah, that would be cool
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 9, 2001 3:56 PM
How bout a black conan like samuel l jackson?lol
RE: What the hell? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 10, 2001 5:52 AM
This sites either a joke or your all 15.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by FredHater (fred_hater@hotmail.com) on September 10, 2001 7:59 AM
I've got a barbarian king for you losers, the governer of Minnesota Jesse "the mutha-f*ckin Body" Ventura!
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by 100% AMERICAN (hellskitchen_@hotmail.com) on September 10, 2001 1:14 PM
yeah, like I said.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by 100% AMERICAN (hellskitchen_@hotmail.com) on September 10, 2001 1:35 PM
That dork was the "cook" in the S.E.A.L.S., thats like being the woman of the crew, and didn't he wear a boa when he was a wrestler. I wouldn't label Ventura a "Barbarian" Fred Hater, I'd label him a "politician". He was however pretty fricking cool in "Predator".
"Conan" is a simple movie to get right. He's a massive guy, very strong, agile, homorable, a great fighter, and thief, who is after loot and woman. Conan is a killer as most are in the Hyborian age. Thats about it. If they concentrate on a good story (there are hundreds in print), build a good cast (stage actors), and stay away from the commercial BS, then it should be pretty easy to make a good picture. If Stallone were chosen as Conan, the rest of the cast would have to be midgets. I think if Arnold can no longer pull off the physique, then perhaps Vin Diesel could do it, or maybe Kevin Sorbo, of course he'd have to juice in a huge way. Red Sonja, if she were in the movie would be a real pleasure to cast. There's not much prettier in the world than a vuluptous fire pie.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by FredHater (fred_hater@hotmail.com) on September 10, 2001 2:26 PM
I think a big budget xxx rated conan would be the end all movie of the genre.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by 100% AMERICAN (hellskitchen_@hotmail.com) on September 10, 2001 2:53 PM
Thats a good ideal, it would truly fit the story.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 10, 2001 3:28 PM
Dood, go outside for a while.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by FredHater (fred_hater@hotmail.com) on September 11, 2001 6:49 AM
Hell yes it would.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 12, 2001 12:07 AM
do you know a good movie//i think not..you probaly got off too boogie nights
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 13, 2001 6:22 AM
i think either sean connery ( if that's how you spell it), or HHH with a good accent would do pretty good. you are asking why sean connery, well if you think about it, everyone gets old at some point or another. and well HHH would look like a barbarian somewhat with a sword shield and a helmet, and I think they should test his acting abilities, since he can act like a jackass really well
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by Teri (terirees@mac.com) on September 14, 2001 9:12 PM
Interesting that you find Arnold wooden and untrue to the spirit of Conan. I have been a devotee of the Conan saga for over 3 decades now, and clearly remember the elation we all felt with the way that Arnold nailed Conan's barbarian spirit and honorable character. Granted, he may not have been the most emotive actor of his day, but can you seriously believe that a man from a kill or be killed upbringing would be slap-happy in alternation with deeply philosophical. He fights, he wenches, he is sincerely devoted to his friends and his pursuit of personal justice, and he defends those who cannot defend themselves. That is the essence of Conan, brother, and I found the original film vastly satisfying. I won't even discuss the second film, for it was and remains a raging disappointment due to it's incredibly campy special effects and cartoonish portrayal of its characters. As to Arnold in the role of the aging and burdened king, read your chronicles again. He did age into his crown--he is at the right age and in the proper physical condition to believeably portray the part. I only hope that Milius can push his version through successfully, for I have no doubt that any lesser version will send us screaming out the door in frustration.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 17, 2001 3:04 PM
You obviously don't understand the premise of suspended reality while watching movie adaptations. It's really sad that you couldn't see a difference between 1 and 2, i agree with you that 2 was not a very good sequal but 1 captured a barbarian time that has not been matched in cinema. So I am not sure where you start your lines and where you would draw them.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 21, 2001 8:23 AM
Actually, I think that the Rock should be the
new Barbarian. He's got
the mean looks required.
And the body build to go
with it. And he's at the peak of popularity.
What do you guys think?
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 21, 2001 8:29 AM
The Rock would be great.
He would'nt have to do a
lot of script acting. He
already has it down pat.
His mentality is already
there. Think about it.
RE: What the hell? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 21, 2001 8:33 AM
It's amazing that you are reading this. Do you
have someone in mind for
the part? Or are you thinking that you are best suited for this?
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 2, 2001 10:45 AM
First of all forget about the Wachowskis Bros.
Who cares about there creative differences with
John Milius. I just want the Conan film too be out
I've been waiting for this 3rd sequel forever.
So stop argueing and do it. I'm basically on the side of John Milius, he is with all respects brilliant.
Your the writer/director, you captured the essence in the first movie and it was great, now continue your talents for the 3rd movie, and don't let those Wachowskis Bros stand in your way.
P.S. dont forget Arnold
cause he made it all happen. he is the missing link to this upcoming movie
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 4, 2001 4:30 AM
conan is and has allways has been an uunbending foeto town down wwho he is wwhould certenly result in a washed down vertion of his carictoras was the destror version. DEGSr.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 4, 2001 4:40 AM
to artr. J milius, IfSus Barb.ssticks to the Conaan ccaarictor represented in the books wev,e read all these years than stick to your gun,s or we will have a washed down version as the detroer was ooor as the resently released D&D movie . DEGSr
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 4, 2001 4:59 AM
how is it that Arnold Schwarzenegger whould be to old for this part if in the org. R Howard twelve #12 depics Conan as being in his sixties when he leaves the throne to set out on this adventure DEGSr.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 4, 2001 5:43 AM
Teri you have one of the most logical comment,s of the bunch . After all there only one,s personal comment,s .What need is there in immature ridaacule there ssimply comments DEGSr.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 4, 2001 5:55 AM
Teri you have one of the most logical comment,s of the bunch . After all there only one,s personal comment,s .What need is there in immature ridaacule there ssimply comments DEGSr.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 6, 2001 7:32 PM
Know oh prince that one of those barbarian brother guys would make a damn fine Conan.Or Kevin Sorbo maybe.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 6, 2001 7:37 PM
Why don't you take Robert E. howards example and blow out your brains.Dickhead.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 6, 2001 7:43 PM
Dude Stallone is a midget.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 6, 2001 7:53 PM
they need to use a bit more of the supernatural aspects of the original Conan stories in my opinion.Like the ancientcthonic monsters evocitave of Lovecraft,who was a correspondant of howard's.This aspect of horror made the stories readable and is badly lacking in the conan movies.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 16, 2001 10:48 AM
I'm sorry but the First Conan movie ROCKED! It was the best barbarian epic ever, and who gives a F@ck if it captured the books, it was better. Arnold was perfect for the role, and anyone else just wouldn't cut it. Also if they water this movie down like they seem to be doing with everything else it's gonna suck.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 16, 2001 10:52 AM
Amen my man, couldn't have said it better myself. I've watched the original so many times the tape snapped. I refuse to watch the second, it's almost as bas as the second highlander movie. For this movie to work it needs arnold to play the older king, and it needs an R rating. Pg 13 and I won't even bother to see it.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 17, 2001 4:54 AM
Yah right! Arnold could kick Ventura's ass.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 17, 2001 4:59 AM
Vin Deisel,Mark Wahlberg? What the hell are you trying to do with the character of Conan? Make him a panzie?
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 17, 2001 5:00 AM
Vin Deisel,Mark Wahlberg? What the hell are you trying to do with the character of Conan? Make him a panzie?
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 17, 2001 5:05 AM
You've got one thing right, the second Conan outing,Conan the Destroyer did suck, but you've got one thing seriously wrong, the first one ROCKED!
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 17, 2001 5:13 AM
I agree, Arnold was born for the role of the savage barbarian, but Milius should kick the Matrix bros. asses. His script shouldn't be questioned because is the fitting directer, and what's this crap about tunning down the rating to PG? if you want a real Conan movie you've got to make it a X, or at least an R.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 17, 2001 5:18 AM
You've got that right, bro, Arnold is the fitting Conan. All you losers who think the Rock should be the savage barbarian, go see Glitter.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 17, 2001 5:22 AM
All you losers listen,Arnold is Conan the Barbarian, period.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 18, 2001 3:33 AM
There can be only one! Arnold is Conan! Just like the legend Conan, when it came down to survival of the fittest no man could ever conquer Arnold!!!
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 19, 2001 1:10 AM
You are defintely right, I have nothing to add to your comment!
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 1, 2001 4:49 AM
listen all of you. conan the barbarian was a work of genius. true inspiration. conan 2 was the prelude to xena. nonsensical crap.i hope they can make another in the vein of the first. perhaps with more of a wider scope the clash of kingdoms, empires and super tribes.and race generic like the first. well thats my say. long live conan!
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 1, 2001 4:57 AM
no arnie is the one and only conan. i suppose having one of the guys from friends in a loincloth would turn you on but that aint conan. that would be a sick f*cking joke. personally i cant stand morons like you who have destroyed a good thing again and again in hollywood.go wait for the friends 20th anniversary episode and leave cinematic art to the true fans
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 5, 2001 3:08 PM
I have been waiting for the promised story of the king. But I only want it from Milus. "Conan The Barbarian" is proof that he knows what he is doing. "The Matrix" is proof that those brothers don't. I think Milus will prevail.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 23, 2001 7:16 PM
just get the movie on the way before Arnold is on social security
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 26, 2001 10:58 AM
Aaawful idea!! Kevin Sorbo sucks. He is a younger version of David Hasselhoff. "Yeah, look at me. I'm on TV. Chicks dig that." Whatever!! Sorbo needs to take some acting lessons. I give Sorbo 2 years until he is a pop star in Germany doing duets with Hasselhoff.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by Link of 805 (Link@camarilloboyz.com) on January 2, 2002 2:59 AM
In the new script conan is supposed to be alot older, so arnold still fits it. And not having arnold as conan? NO ONE CAN SAY "Crom?" LIKE HIM.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 2, 2002 7:31 PM
There is only one person who can pull off a convincing Conan and that is Arnold. Now one else could and no one else better try or else there's gonna be a lot of fans who are not gonna go see this move - me for one.
As for you all bagging Stallone, i think he's a cool actor. Of course I would never want to see him playing Conan though. Could you imagine Arnie playing Rocky? Of course not.
Stallone = Rocky
Schwarzenegger = Conan
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 16, 2002 8:49 PM
in this i can only say"Conan is the only role Arny did not f--- up"
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 16, 2002 8:55 PM
King Conan the First was in his late 60s when last seen. Arney is but 55. thats about right.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 16, 2002 8:59 PM
like who? and do not say that twit from that tv f---up
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 16, 2002 9:11 PM
To Terri YES! And with blade in hand we will let the dogs who f--- with our sagas fear our wrath. R.T.V.P.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 16, 2002 9:12 PM
To Terri YES! And with blade in hand we will let the dogs who f--- with our sagas fear our wrath. R.T.V.P.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 8, 2002 4:51 PM
Yes, you bloody bastards! Have some respect for Stallone! He's of average height and has a great physique (see Rambo and you'll know what I mean).
Jennifer Garner (Alias) as Red Sonja would be great. She's so sexy everyone would want to bang her up and down.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 24, 2002 5:02 PM
It better be f**king Arnold as King Conan. You must be one of those fools wanting the Rock to land the role and stick that wooden spoon sideways up your candyass. If Arnold isn't in it who cares....
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 24, 2002 5:08 PM
Crom, Way to go Teri, that's hitting the nail on the head. Conversation over.......
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 13, 2002 12:06 AM
Amen Brother...
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 13, 2002 12:12 AM
Arnold is Conan, isn't that right Arnold?? It is and always will be...
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 13, 2002 12:18 AM
without arnold there is no conan...
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 14, 2002 1:03 AM
When arnold was doing the movie collateral damage his been working out to rebuil his body back in to its conan physique so when he DID his next movie TERMINATOR 3 he would be back in to have his TERMINATOR body, he has to look the way he did in the first moveie his been working on his body for the past year and now his bodys back he use to BE 210 pounds,
AND NOW HIS 240 pounds OF PURE MUCSLE for the movie TERMINATOR 3. HAVE YOU EVER SEEN HIS LATEST PICTURES HE IS HUGH AND NOW HIS DONE FILMING THE MOVIE AND HIS NEXT MOVE MAY JUST BE KING CONAN CROWN OF IRON IF HE DID THIS MOVIE HE WOULD HAVE THE SAME PHYSIQUE AS HE DID IN THE FIRST CONAN.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 29, 2002 1:33 PM
i'm sorry pal. but youre
a little off about this.
conan 1 was a classic. the fights, the revenge,
the sex,. it all makes up one image which arnold captured perfectly. but youre right about conan 2. it wasnt very good. but it was still worth watching,when you compare it to these other swordfighting movies. anyway, conan 1 is the best damn barbarian sword fighting movie ever made. and i hope when they make part 3, it captures all the emotion, intensity and magic that makes it the bad ass classic that it truly is. hell yah.
-michael- fort worth tx
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 29, 2002 1:38 PM
wrong bitch. if arnold isnt in part 3, then it will probably suck worse than part 2.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 29, 2002 1:39 PM
wrong bitch. if arnold isnt in part 3, then it will probably suck worse than part 2.
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 31, 2002 12:23 PM
true, the movies were not as true to the original vision of R.E. Howard but that had nothin to do with Arnie!
The Problem was the script. Though good, it has some big errors.
And Conan is not that shallow of a character! I see a lot more predictible characters every day! Van Deisel Anyone!
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 31, 2002 12:26 PM
amen brother,
Pretty boy f*cken panzies. that's what kids want nowadays!
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 31, 2002 12:41 PM
I think your getting a little excited fella. At the time of the conan movies arnie was the strongest dude in the world! It's extremely unlikely that he would ever attain such a level of fitness again! He is fit and big though and that is all that matters. Conan the king is an older man. He's also a less active man the the young verile mercenary/thief of the earlier versions.
The thiong that pisses me off is I have been waiting 20 yrs for the ellusions of Conan the king at the end of conan I & II to come true and damn it I aint waitin any F@cken longer!!!!!
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 21, 2003 9:23 AM
Jason Priestly would do it if they asked him im sure...?
RE: Conan 3: Suspended Barbarian? reply
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 11, 2003 5:32 AM
Chuck Norris as well !!!
 CONAN THE BARBARIAN |
 CAPTAIN AMERICA |
 CRAZY, STUPID, LOVE |
 THE SMURF |
 COWBOYS AND ALIENS |
 BAD TEACHER |
 MR. POPPERS PENGUINS |
 GREEN LANTERN |
