• New Movie News
  • Satellite TV Software!
  • Movie DB
  • New Movie Trailers
  • Fix Xbox 360
  • New Movie ARC
  • Gaming Zone ARC
  • People Records Zone ARC
  • Experts Zone ARC
Digital Theatre [DTheatre.com]

Starring on Dtheatre's Stage: Latest Movie News & Trailers, TV News and Productions, Special Free Guides, Gadgets and Expert Reviews on Varity of Exciting Zones.
Ads? Contact Us

We actually have a special expert responsible for every post series. Come back soon, you will always find new interesting things!



Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together

Topic: News By Jack July 19, 2001 12:11 PM

Bookmark and Share    Bookmark and Share   Print Story

(EMPIRE) It?s the moment martial arts fans have been waiting for since Hong Kong?s two biggest action stars first kicked spectacular arse on the big screen. Martial arts masters Jackie Chan and Jet Li will be thrown together for the first time in an upcoming film set to start filming in fall 2002, according to Variety.

The two brightest stars in Hong Kong cinema have wowed audiences worldwide since their transition to mainstream Hollywood pictures. While Chan has flexed his comedic skills as well as his phenomenal fighting prowess in films like Shanghai Noon and Rush Hour, Li has taken the more serious route, stoically laying low all who oppose him in Romeo Must Die and Kiss of The Dragon. The likes of Steven Seagal and Jean-Claude Van Damme may cut it on the bottom shelf of Blockbuster but when it comes to explosive action fight scenes, Chan and Li are the undisputed big screen kings.

The duo will star together and co-produce the, as yet untitled, project being written by Kiss of The Dragon and Fifth Element co-writer Robert Mark Kamen. No details are available on the nature of the project but you can rest assured that fur and all manner of household items will most certainly fly when these two meet on screen.

Tweet This Now! Bookmark and Share Bookmark and Share
| comments: 346

Reader Discussions:

Post YOUR opinion too!



RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by 100% AMERICAN (hellskitchen_@hotmail.com) on July 19, 2001 12:32 PM

This is exactly what Jet "Boring Mofo" Li needs. Chan can teach Jet how to make a picture that won't put an entire theatre to sleep. Hopefully Jet will also take some acting classes and learn how to act.He is taking a step in the right direction, perhaps in a few years he will make movies that are good, unlike boring flix like: Romeo Must Die, Black Mask, "KOD", and "Lethal Weapon 4". Best of luck to you Li, I really do mean that too.

RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by Loath (loath@dtheatre.com) on July 19, 2001 12:45 PM

Ironically enough, Jet Li movies make lots of money because people don't find him boring. I have yet to be in a theater showing a Jet Li movie where a single person has slept. I guess each person has their own taste and sleeping ability...

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by allknowing (you'llneverfindme.com) on July 19, 2001 2:00 PM

wow....
only thing I'm wondering
is who's the bad guy...
or are they both good guys..
'cause ya' know that Jet can beat Jackie even on a bad day

RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 19, 2001 2:04 PM

What are you talking about Jet Li was funny in KoD. I'm not sure he meant it to be funny but it was. The entire theater was laughing. Almost every time a person was killed people laughed.

RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 19, 2001 2:31 PM

I could not agree with you more, Martial Arts movies are not what they used to be. If Bruce were still around, think of how many great martial arts movies there would be

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by Lemos (mys-tickleman@excite.com) on July 19, 2001 2:59 PM

If you have ever watched the once apon a time in china series or maybe even any other H.K. movie starring Jet Li, you would know that trying to put him in american movies hasn't worked quite as well. Also most Jackie Chan movies from Hong Kong are longer with the story intact unlike the ones we see released here. For me I think it will be a welcome event and I can even mention a great bad guy or 2, Maybe Yuen Wah, from such movies as Supercop & Iceman cometh (with Yuen Biao). How about Sammo Hung that would be cool. But what will probably happen is they will getsome typical American actor to be the bad guy and it will be another formula film, like the ones Jet has been in so far from America. It should be interesting none the less.

RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by I.B. (notachance@home.com) on July 19, 2001 5:03 PM

I think the whole Marshal Arts thing died with Bruce Lee And the seventies, and I want it back about as much as people want Disco and the Pet Rock to make a comeback.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by Jack (jack@dtheatre.com) on July 19, 2001 5:44 PM

That's because you watched it was some sadistic bastards!

RE: RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 19, 2001 10:25 PM

loser


RE: RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 20, 2001 2:32 AM

Sure, that's why Rush Hour; Kiss of the Dragon; Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon; Romeo Must Die; Rumble in the Bronx; etc.; etc. have done so poorly.  That's why Jet Li's career was launched in America by his character in Lethal Weapon 4.

Yeah, right.  By the way, it's "martial," not "marshal."

RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 20, 2001 5:58 AM

The reason we laughed was because we knew the movie wasn't real. We knew people were not actually getting hurt. The deaths in the movie were ironic and humorous so we laughed and enjoyed the movie. That doesn't make the whole theater sadistic. Did you even see the movie? If you did you should have at least chuckled at least once.

RE: RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 20, 2001 7:13 AM

Crouching tiger Hidden Dragon Sucked and plus Chinese and Japanese don't know how to kiss in movie except Jet Li

RE: RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by allknowing (you'llneverfindme.com) on July 20, 2001 7:17 AM

what ?
oookaaay...
these random shemps need to stop huffing gas

i loved it too   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 20, 2001 10:46 AM

i had a pet rock....

RE: RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by Loath (loath@dtheatre.com) on July 20, 2001 11:41 AM

I saw it with him and I can tell you for a fact that he did. I'm not sure if it was for the deaths or because the guy in the back screamed "ALRIGHT!" whenever someone died...

RE: i loved it too   > reply

Posted by Loath (loath@dtheatre.com) on July 20, 2001 11:43 AM

Mine died...

RE: RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by ActorWannaBe01 (ActorWannaBe01@hotmail.com) on July 20, 2001 12:18 PM

Okay, Do Not "Mock" a Brilliant Foreign Film! Or their race! At least they know what there doing! Crouching tiger Hidden Dragon is a great traditional Martial Arts Foreign Film! You sound like a raciest "pig" ( I wish I could say more!) Now back to the main subject, a movie with both Li and Chan sounds like a great idea.

RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 20, 2001 1:10 PM

Not even on Jackie's worst day could Jet Li beat him. Both men are extrodinary Martial Artists but I put my money on Mr Chan he has been around a little longer that Mr Li and has a few more tricks up his sleeve. But then again what does it matter. Just because one person can beat up another person does that mean that he is better than the other. No. SO who Cares Buddy!!!!!! ("I still got my money on Jackie...LOL")

RE: RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by Loath (loath@dtheatre.com) on July 20, 2001 1:14 PM

I have to agree with allknowing. Jet Li seems to be in the air a lot while fighting and Jackie seems to take a lot of blows. Anyway, they're both actors and not really killing people so it's just a silly discussion anyway. :)

RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by johnny5237 (johnny5237) on July 20, 2001 2:01 PM

My first reaction is when and where, also that they both are my number 1 Actors. It isn't that I like one actor more than the other, because I respect both and that both have worked hard to get where they are today.
How ever, Jet LI give's more action than I have seen compared to let say "Bruce Lee".

RE: RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by johnny5237 (johnny5237) on July 20, 2001 2:09 PM

Your Coment is What I was looking for, I have all of Jet Li, Moves and he is the best actor
as far as I have seen in
Karate, I have all of Bruce Lee and I wold go as far as to state Jet Li is good at, Script?

RE: RE: i loved it too   > reply

Posted by johnny5237 (johnny5237) on July 20, 2001 2:14 PM

Yours? was never there!

RE: RE: RE: i loved it too   > reply

Posted by I.B. (notachance@home.com) on July 20, 2001 3:10 PM

Okay, maybe the pet rock was alright. Excuse the mistake in the spelling of "martial" but I didn't realize we had an editor out there. And maybe the MARTIAL arts films are doing well in the box office but they haven't had much competition if you ask me. and on a personal not I found Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon to be a sad attempt to Americanize the Japanise MARTIAL arts film style, despite the grosses.

RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 20, 2001 8:51 PM

I am a fan of both and have a big collection of movies from the two.For one Jet Li's movies are far from boring u jack a... His movies like Kiss of Dragon felt more realistic and the action was far more mature than Jackies.U sound like u more of a Jackie fan and can't blame u cause he funy but Li's moves seem better by a long shot.  I wish them the best of luck on their movie and hope ur dumbe a.. gets more Jet Li movies like Fist of Legend which I think is one of his best movies.See ya u dumb a...


RE: Jet Bites   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 21, 2001 2:10 PM

Jet Li sucks and he is boring.

RE: Jet likes small boys   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 21, 2001 2:11 PM

Jet Li is a pedophile, and he is buddies with Michael Jackson!

RE:Jet Li eats human feces   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 21, 2001 2:16 PM

Jet Li could not be more boring if he tried. I looked around the theatre during KOD and the whole place was sound asleep. I must admit though, I did laugh a lot at Jet Li cause he's so small he looks like a seven year old kid. There's a rumor going around saying he's dating Michael Jackson, or was it Patrick Ewing.

RE: RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Togethe   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 21, 2001 2:17 PM

Bruce Lee could whip Jet Li's midget ass in about 1 second, of course Jet Li could blow Bruce while standing up.

Jet digs children!   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 21, 2001 2:20 PM

Who saw "Once Upon A Time In China", man did that movie fuking Suck!

  Jet should stop molesting little kids and learn how to act.

 LEARN HOW TO ACT JET!!!!!!

RE: RE: RE: Jet Li kes it from Behind   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 21, 2001 2:27 PM

Mel Gibson kicked his ass!

ENOUGH SAID, send this 3 foot bit*h back to the sandbox so he and Michael Jackson can play togeather.

 Hair cut wise Jet Li is the Bill Gates of bad martial arts movies

Jet Li's favorite meal is Shrimp!

Jet is addicted to sniffing socks

Jet Li plays with himself all the time!

I know all this cause I'm his Agent!

Jet, get off my toes, you sick bastard!!

RE: RE: Jet Bites   > reply

Posted by I.B. (notachance@home.com) on July 21, 2001 6:47 PM

I couldn't have said it better myself!

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by butchh1956 (butchh1956@hotmail.com) on July 22, 2001 7:09 AM

I can't wait for the movie to come out I like both Jet Li and Jackie Chan with one doing serious movies and one doing comedy this should make for an interesting combination but I think it will work out great besides with the 2 best martial artist out there doing a film together it can only be a good movie

RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 22, 2001 7:55 AM

what a bunch of kids i see here. you don't even KNOW what you are watching as far as Jackie Chan and Jet Li go, or for that matter, Bruce Lee.
Jackie learned "martial arts" from the chinese theater. there they beat the crap out of you until you get it right and then beat you harder for not doing it right the first time.
Jet Li on the other hand is a Wu Shu master from age 7 or so. has a wife and a kid.
i am surprised that they are even talking together let alone making amovie together. Jet Li made a movie in china (i can't remember the name) that made fun of Jackie Chan's alcoholism. there is a real role model for you. like Bruce Lee (and i know i will take crap for this). Bruce, from what i've read, died of an OD. when he came to Hollywood he got sucked into that scene.
When i first saw Jackie it was in his first American movie, The Big Brawl. now, less then twenty years later, he looks like he aged 50 years. Jet Li will be around a long time, so, learn your lesson from it: if you don't like his prvious movies, don't waste your money, or my place in the theater. i'll be there for every oneof his movies.

RE: RE: RE: i loved it too   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 22, 2001 1:17 PM

Actually "Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon" Showed us the Chinese martial arts not the Japanese style, excuse me as in the original comment the Japanise.

RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 22, 2001 8:32 PM

if you dont like jet your still sucken on your moms tit chans movies suck like you  romeo was a good ass film you ever been in the bay area thats how it is family against family besides you probably never done any kind of athletic thing in your life

RE: Athletic Endeavors   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 23, 2001 5:17 AM

I had your mom last night and again this morning, she's so ugly and fat that I would consider that to be very athletic. By the way she says you were a mistake. Sorry dude.

RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by 100% AMERICAN (hellskitchen_@hotmail.com) on July 23, 2001 10:12 AM

You mean the 2 best martial arts actors.

RE: RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 23, 2001 12:21 PM

There is a difference between an Actor and an "Actor/Martial-Artist. 1.) In Reality, if a fight broke out on the street, and both an Actor and a Actor/Martial Artist was in the middle of it. The Actor would hide behind the Actor/Martial Artist, who would be defending himself and protecting the "Actor". Then again, if I where the Actor/Martial Artist, I would "throw back" the Actor into the fight.

RE: RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by 100% AMERICAN (hellskitchen_@hotmail.com) on July 23, 2001 1:47 PM

what?

RE: RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by MR.PPV (MR.PPV@hotmail.com) on July 23, 2001 3:31 PM

Now, to set the record straight.  Jackie was in the Peking Opera, but WU Shu training is included in all the acrobatics training they recieve.  Watch "Farewell my Concubine," if your infantile intellects can handle it.  Yes Jet Li is also a Wu Shu student as well.  Now on to Bruce.     HE DID NOT OD! It was an allergic reaction to a Chinese herbal medicine he was taking to curb intense abdominal pains he was having.  I am a student of both Pak Mei Gung Fu and Jeet Kune Do (Bruce's martial art) and I'm sick of moronic comments by those who will never have the drive or discipline to get off the couch and try the art itself.  Keep your mouths shut until you, yourself can even attempt what amazing feats these men have accomplished.  Although film martial arts are considdered "slap and tickle" by the masters!

RE: RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by Loath (loath@dtheatre.com) on July 23, 2001 4:06 PM

Wow, you sure have seen a lot of movies.

RE: RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by wing (arandom@shemp.com) on July 23, 2001 4:15 PM

Who doesn't?    I watch Jackie Chan movies with my sons and they love his movies.  As they get older I'm sure they will check out the harder edged films, including Jet and any others that may come along.  This new movie definitely can't hurt Jet Li's career.  By the way, would like to check out some of Bruce Lee's movies, what are some of the better ones?

RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by shaunsteel (shaunsteel@excite.com) on July 23, 2001 6:35 PM

try to watch the movie china. it is in your local video store. after viewing it e-mail me back and tell me if you still think jet li is boring. he is the lead role of wong fei hung.

RE: RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by shaunsteel (shaunsteel@excite.com) on July 23, 2001 6:45 PM

i am a hung gar gung fu student and have been for some time. yes jet is wu shu and jackie is more of a combination. unfortunately those of you who think bruce lee was some great fighter have your facts distorted. bruce lee has a foundation of kung fu. he created jeet kune do only a few years before he passed away. no one can claim to be a great fighter coming from jeet kune do unless they have a base form of kung fu. bruce lee knew there were many men that could take him and there were many times that fights did not take place when he was challenged because he knew if he lost it would be the end of his movie career.the movie once upon a time in china is about my martial art, hung gar, hence the lead characters name wong fei hung. he created it. for more info on this art check out donald hamby on quandoman.com

RE: Shaun   > reply

Posted by 100% AMERICAN (hellskitchen_@hotmail.com) on July 24, 2001 5:17 AM

thats a good post brother, I'll check it out.

RE: This SHEMP is a liar   > reply

Posted by 100% AMERICAN (hellskitchen_@hotmail.com) on July 24, 2001 5:22 AM

No true student of Jeet Kune Do or any type of Kung Fu would state something in such an immature manner. Unless of course you started a month ago and have no discipline whatsoever.

RE: RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by allknowing (you'llneverfindme.com) on July 24, 2001 6:05 AM

glad to see that there is always an endless supply of erogant pricks to preach to themselves,
listen here chief..
just because you think your an informed, diciplined, and educated individual only means that you are confusing narcissistic rage with a feeling of superiority..
its hard to see the forest from the trees..
get a grip maybe you'll have friends someday..
maybe


RE: Once upon a time in China   > reply

Posted by 100% AMERICAN (hellskitchen_@hotmail.com) on July 24, 2001 12:46 PM

Oh..I thought the movie you recomended was called"China", I've seen "once Upon A Time In China" and was very disapointed with it. I take Krav Maga which is a fighting system consisting of various effective "Martial" Military Arts. My istructor said the movie would blow me away, and rivaled that of the great Bruce Lee movies. In my opinion he was off his block. Besides painfully low budget, poor acting, boring action scenes, and disapointing climax. I love good action movies, wheather its DeNiro in "Ronin", Clint in "Good, Bad, & Ugly", Arnold in "Predator", or Lee in "Chinese Connection". I hope that Jet Li does in the future make great action flix, but from what I've seen so far (about 6 movies), they are just way too slow and boring. Regardless of an actors actual fighting skills, they don't mean much in the movies if there is not a great choregrapher on the set, an interesting plot, decent soundtrack, good supporting actors, and a great climax. Jet may be the future of the Martial Arts Flicks, but he still has a way to go.

RE: RE: Once upon a time in China   > reply

Posted by shaunsteel (shaunsteel@excite.com) on July 24, 2001 9:37 PM

you have to understand what it is that you are looking at when you see a movie like once upon a time in china. you are looking not for the giant jumps or super high beautiful kicks, you are looking for the raw power, the energy created by a block or a tiger claw. for example, would you rather be the person able to kick high and pretty, or the person that inflicts pain when he blocks the kick. you also have to understand the story. wong fei hung was a real person, a chinese hero. the two sequels to once upon a time in china are not exactly accurate, but the first is fairly. if you are a true martial artist next time you watch a martial arts movie try seeing power and skill, not how action packed it is.

RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by I.B. (notachance@home.com) on July 24, 2001 9:48 PM

Okay, I am a student of I Don't Care. Get a life (or maybe a Job) people, These are just movies and actors FOR OUR ENTERTAINMENT not to base a lifestyle out of. What would your girlfriends say? (well what would they say if you had any?)

RE: RE: RE: Once upon a time in China   > reply

Posted by 100% AMERICAN (hellskitchen_@hotmail.com) on July 25, 2001 9:45 AM

Thats what documentries are for. There are some fantastic ones, that have covered the very topic of which we speak. Since no story, plot, or structure is required, they can focus on showing what the Arts are really about. Realistic fighting movies are boring, because realistic fighting is close quatered, and boring. Ever watched the UFC's, they're kind of fun, but don't expect anything more than grappling, or throat shots cause that's what it comes down to. I hear what your saying, but do not agree with it. If Bruce Lee had made a realistic martial arts movie, there would have been no Nunchucks, no high balanced kicks, or flying back strikes, and since realistic fights don't go longer than a few seconds, the movie would be pretty short. A GREAT movie requires all the hoopla.

RE: RE: RE: Once upon a time in China   > reply

Posted by shaunsteel (shaunsteel@excite.com) on July 25, 2001 7:37 PM

aaahhhhh, i was hoping someone would respond in the way you did so i could further explain myself. if you have seen once upon a time in china then you would understand that kung fu movies for the most part are real fighting. minus of course all the flying around. the trick is to have two accomplished fighters battling it out. for every move there is a counter! say if i were an excellent fighter in kung fu and you were as well, we could fight for ever. as long as you had a counter for every move i had and i for every move you had. that is what kung fu is about, defend and counter. these movies are more realistic than you think. and like i said before, if you are a true martial artist you will not be bored with no high kicks, etc. because you can see each move and know what the artist is trying to do. a simple backfist or leg sweep can seem interesting as long as it is executed perfectly.

RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 28, 2001 1:23 PM

I don't find that Jet Li is that bad of an actor.  Sure some of his movies ahd their down points but his acting and martial arts flicks are some of the best, compared to some other martial arts moviesout there.

RE: RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by grayghost (sillyslop534@hotmail.com) on July 28, 2001 1:42 PM

I don't know where you got your info. but Bruce Lee, from what I have found out, did not die from an OD but while fighting a rival of his.  I woulden't put any money on it but this is from a source that I would die for.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 31, 2001 1:33 PM

Almost everybody here is TOTALLY missing the point of this discussion. The topic isn't how sh*tty anyone is, it's how great it is that two of today's best martial arts/action actors are going to be in the same movie!...by the way notice the word A-C-T-O-R!!!..."oh well mel gibson kicked li's butt"...sorry man, but you're a tool. But not to drop myself to your level and be a hypocrit, the fact that these two are going to be in a movie together will only bring out the best that both have to offer. Now if only John Woo would direct it...hmmm.

RE: RE: Once upon a time in China   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 2, 2001 7:09 AM

Did you watch the dubbed version of Once Upon a Time in China?  There is a difference between the english dubbed version and the original chinese.  The movie actually makes sense in Chinese.  In the English dubbed version whole scenes are gone.  The movie is much better in Chinese.  Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon was better when viewed in Chinese.  The english dubbed versions are bad.  Once Upon A Time In China I-IV are classics now.  They receive much more respect than Jackie's movies.  Fist of Legends is another great movie.  If you haven't seen these in their original state, then of course you didn't like it.  The movie has been cut up and hardly makes sense.  

:O)

Hypersphere

RE: RE: RE: Once upon a time in China   > reply

Posted by shaunsteel (shaunsteel@excite.com) on August 2, 2001 11:46 AM

there is no once upon a time in china IV. but 1 thru 3 is good. part three just came out on video and DVD last month.

RE: RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by shaunsteel (shaunsteel@excite.com) on August 2, 2001 11:49 AM

bruce lee never died from an od. i don't know who is spreading these horrible rumors. he basically had a stroke. he was given some medication for severe headaches that he used to have all the time and got a blood clot in his brain. that's how bruce lee died. i'm sure there are many people that would have loved to be the one to kill bruce lee. god knows there are accomplished fighters that could.

RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 2, 2001 12:34 PM

Any man with a brain knows not watch a martial arts movie for the acting.  Jet Li's movies are watched for the action alone.  Dare you to say what you did to Mr. Li's face.

RE: RE: RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 2, 2001 12:39 PM

Hey Moron, The Great Bruce Lee and Jet Li are from China.  That means they studied Kung-Fu not Karate which is a Japanese Martial Art.



RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 4, 2001 7:22 PM

I've studied martial arts for about 4.5 years now (Tae Kwon Do, Hap Ki Do, and Judo) And I've studied movies for about 40 years.  To be honest, I have never understood the appeal of Hong Kong martial arts flicks.  


I like the Jackie Chan movies because NOBODY dies (well, not too many), he is funny and incredibly athletic.  His movies are live action cartoons.  But even HIS films made for Chinese audiences leave me cold (except for Double Dragon).  To be honest though, he is nearing the end of his career as a martial arts movie star, though not as regular movie star.



I saw Kiss of the Dragon and a couple of Jet Li's other older films I can't remember the names. Kiss of the Dragon was much better.



I think both have benefitted from the better production values and more rigid adherence to plot found in the western cinema.



RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 4, 2001 7:23 PM

I've studied martial arts for about 4.5 years now (Tae Kwon Do, Hap Ki Do, and Judo) And I've studied movies for about 40 years.  To be honest, I have never understood the appeal of Hong Kong martial arts flicks.  


I like the Jackie Chan movies because NOBODY dies (well, not too many), he is funny and incredibly athletic.  His movies are live action cartoons.  But even HIS films made for Chinese audiences leave me cold (except for Double Dragon).  To be honest though, he is nearing the end of his career as a martial arts movie star, though not as regular movie star.



I saw Kiss of the Dragon and a couple of Jet Li's other older films I can't remember the names. Kiss of the Dragon was much better.



I think both have benefitted from the better production values and more rigid adherence to plot found in the western cinema.



RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 5, 2001 7:53 AM

I'm fluent in Chinese & English and have been watching many movies from both actors since I was a child.  I'm also a kung fu student (Bak Sil Lum, Choy Lay Fut, Praying Mantis).  Both actors are great; that's why they're famous.  

Jet Li was from China, where he went through super vigorous Wushu training in a national sports academy in Beijing as a kid and won the National Championship in the late seventies.  All wushu training is vigorous (that's what "kung fu" means), but what Li went through was just ridiculous, thanks to the Chinese government.  Jackie trained in a martial arts school with a respected master in Hong Kong also since he was very young and worked around the movie set to earn money.  

It's clear they have different backgrounds.  They also have different styles.  Jackie likes the playful aspect of his films; he wants people to be relaxed and laughing while watching his films.  Jet, as a serious Wushu competitor, started out his film career making realistic style kung fu movies and that kind of set him up for what he starred in afterwards.

So, my point is, to say which one is better is totally up to the individual.  Some people like action movies, others like "chick flicks," and there's nothing wrong with that.  Within the action genre, some like serious action, others like comedy or what not; it depends on the audience's background, too.  I personally know some Chinese history and was able to find Jet's Once Upon a Time in China series interesting, even though they were only partially historically accurate.  That's why we have so much variety in our films... appreciate it.  You don't want to see Jet Li do what Jackie does in his films and vice versa 'cause then it'll be really hard for them to co-exist in the film industry as actors.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 5, 2001 10:25 PM

I think that a movie with jet li and jackie chan would be great, but.....I have one question: if this movie was to be a good guy-bad guy movie then who would be who. would jet li be bad or jackie???

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 6, 2001 8:14 PM

I've never seen Jackie as a bad guy... he's too funny.  Jet looks to be easier to portray as a bad guy.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 27, 2001 12:28 AM

Exactly thats what ive been talking about. jet li sucks he cant fight and he's really ugly.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 27, 2001 12:28 AM

Exactly thats what ive been talking about. jet li sucks he cant fight and he's really ugly.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 27, 2001 12:37 AM

Yes i saw it hes still boring and Jackie did the role of wong twice and his version was a funny and enjoyable experience unlike the stiff acting string usin pimple faced jet li

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 27, 2001 12:47 AM


What action? Jet li is nothing but a puppet on strings. Hes controlled by the directors in every way. Jackie is Almost 50 and he is still light years ahead of every one in speed and actions and movie genius especially the no talented broken english jet li. Everyone who saw rush hour 2 know jackie can do things jet can only dream of like do a chinese get-up over a foot stool flip over chairs but most impressivley slide through Cashier slots. And he does this while Jet is flying through the air or jumping 100 feet in the air. I also know there are going to be a bunch of homo's who are going to post crap about jackie so im asking all the Jackie fans to back me up cause i know jet sucks, and im doing this from a martial artists view. I train under royce gracie(3 time ufc champ) in jiu-jitsu and Bruce lees #1 Student Dan Inosanto in Jeet kune do and they both said Jackie was better and his chinese boxing was superior to jets wushu so in closing jet li is a sorry puppet and Jackie will be the king forever.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 27, 2001 12:58 AM

You wanna know why they laughed. There is a difference between Jackie and Jet. Jackie's english makes us laugh because at times Jackie messes up and says some really funny stuff and the people laugh with him. But with Jet people laugh at him. Because at alot of times especially in live interviews he cant explain himself and he goes of the subject. Hes also slow sice he couldnt learn mandarin fast enough and hard working chow yun fat learned enouh for crouhing tiger in 2 weeks so he got the part, poor jet.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 27, 2001 12:46 PM

WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT JET SUCKS. JACKE IS ONLY 9 YEARS OLDER THAN JET. ALSO WHEN JACKIES 60 HE WILL BE ABLE TO DO THINGS THAT JEY COULDNT DO IN HIS 20'S

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 27, 2001 4:47 PM

yall could suck my dick yall suck hehehe.

RE: Jet digs children!   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 28, 2001 3:13 AM

you know what? f*ck you. if you actually understood the movie, you would have thought that it was good. and, i'm a fan of both jet and jackie. jet might not be able to act real well when he is trying to speak english, but his wushu kicks ass. i wanna see you try to act ina chinese movie, or any movie in another language. how good will your acting be? since jackie spent so much time living in canda and the us, he learned some english. his movies are funny because he wants them to be. you should watch one of jackie's real martial arts movies. oh yeah, its in chinese, so are you gonna make fun of him too? f*ck you

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 28, 2001 3:15 AM

so...you gonna laugh at bruce lee too? he couldn't speak english either.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Togethe   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 28, 2001 3:17 AM

jet li would actually beat bruce. jet has learned wushu for 28 years. he knows all the forms for the 18 weapons. jet li has also learned the modern wushu. bruce only knows kung fu, the classic version.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 28, 2001 4:42 AM

yeah..if anyone dont like jet-li, just leave it....its unfair to raise comments on an artist who had really given up his entire life to reach this height. Though, jackie too risked his entire life, i think jet is little more faster in action than jackie..action comedy works out in many places rather than just action...thats why jet did not went to jackie's level. whatsoever, i used to watch all their movies atleast 5 or 6 times..

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 29, 2001 11:38 AM

i guess u never knew jet was the Wushu champion in china for 7 years straight

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 31, 2001 11:24 AM

acually i did but i guess you didnt know it was point fighting (non-contact) and i guess you didnt know jackie was given marine like training since he was 7

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Togethe   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 31, 2001 7:55 PM

I think that Bruce COULD beat Li. Bruce is a street fighter, while Li is a martial artist. There IS a difference. Bruce believes in martial arts without form, while Li competed in forms. In a real fight, maybe Lee could beat Li, but then we'll never know, unless Don King is involved... Don, the bastard that he is, can do arrange any fight.

RE: Once upon a time in China   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 31, 2001 8:12 PM

There IS a IV... and more too. It's a television series. You know, like Seinfeld. The USA doesn't always get first dibbs, kinda like the Playstation. America always gets it last. If you don't believe me... you said III just came out? Check the copyright date on the back.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 31, 2001 8:24 PM

Kissing? sheesh!
Chinese mainstream actors are held to a higher standard than any other nationalities. They are more than just celebrities. They represent their whole country.
Chinese actors are not allowed / choose not to "tongue". They also don't do nude seens. The only ones who do are B-movie actors. They are all VERY single when in their prime. They retire whenever they decide to get married and settle down.
For all of you who are arguing over martial arts... go watch a real tournament. Remember that this is a MOVIE, and they are ACTING.
Did you also think that there are killer alien bugs out in space too? (Starship Troopers)

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 31, 2001 8:30 PM

YOU, my friend, seem to be the only sane person here. Everytime I read this kind of posting, I feel good about myself. There's a lot of idiots out there.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 1, 2001 4:36 PM

this movie is so cool


RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 4, 2001 12:27 PM

All you people need to get lives

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 8, 2001 10:00 AM

that doesn't mean.. jackie is better than Jet li in martial art...
and both made a lot of martial art films in Asia, over 20 years...
And in Asia's point of view, ORIGINALLY JET LI IS better... (It is not my opinon, most of martial artists in Asia admit it)

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Togethe   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 8, 2001 10:09 AM

many people... think that bruce lee is best martial artist.
but not today, bruce lee died before jackie or jet li got famous and well-known in the world.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 9, 2001 7:51 PM

YOU SHOULD WATCH A REAL JAPANESE MOVIE...!!!
YOU SAY THAT CHINESE OR JAPANESE DON'T KNOW HOW TO KISS BECAUSE YOU HAVEN'T SEE ANY CHINESE OR JAPANESE MOVIE EXCEPT HIDDEN DRAGON AND CROUCHING TIGER!!!

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 10, 2001 8:52 PM

Chow yun fat already knew how to speak Mandarin dumbass. He fuking mandarin, people who don't know anything shouldn't even leave the house, nevermind be allowed to speak. He learned his moves in 2 weeks, not the language. And Jet Li has only been speaking english since Romeo Must Die, get it right, or don't get it at all!

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 10, 2001 8:54 PM

Not to put you down or anything, but read up on Jackie Chan more, cause what you just said is BS.

RE: Jet digs children!   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 14, 2001 5:28 AM

You are a moron.....loving pedafile who doesn't know talent if it came out of your arse. Get a life MORON

RE: Jet likes small boys   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 14, 2001 5:37 AM

Oh my god its little pricks that make this world so annoying. Mate grow a brain and go down to the video store and hire one of his movies.....then good will be restored in your pathetic body.

RE: RE:Jet Li eats human feces   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 14, 2001 5:43 AM

You arse clown ..... haha i laugh at your measily critisism ..... coz your not worth it

RE: Jet digs children!   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 14, 2001 6:30 AM

amaw kang dako.... pak u ninyo.... suya lang mo kay sikat si jet li kamo dili...!!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAWHAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!

RE: Jet digs children!   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 15, 2001 8:55 PM

This is a free country you know you dont just  tell some one to act funny like Jackie Chan or chris Tucker , you've got to let him feel comfortable the way he is. Besides Once upon a time does not suck all of Jet Li's classics RULEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE MANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN IN THIS f*ckING PLANET , AND ANY OF U f*ckING FAGETS , DONT KNOW THE TYPE OF ACTION THAT JET LI DOES OVER THE YEARS OF WATCHING HIS FILMS FEEL. LIKE U DUDES, LEAVE THE GUY ALONE LET ACT WHAT EVERY HE FEELS LIKE. FUUUUUUUELLL

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 16, 2001 3:20 AM

A film with both Jet Li and Jackie Chan sounds like an incredible idea, but I was disappointed to hear of the American involvement. Both of these guys made their best films in Hong Kong, and all of the stuff they've done with US directors/companies has paled in comparison. I also hope the film will not feature any lame dubbing.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 16, 2001 9:20 PM

Alright, you people should stop being so immature.  Jackie and Jet are both Martial ARTISTS, meaning of course they know it for real.  And as to Jet not knowing how to act, it's the director's problem, not his.  The director says what he likes and Jet has to comply with it.  Also, it really depends on what kind of movies you like.  If you like comedy, watch Jackie, if you like more serious films watch Jet.  It's just your opinion whether the movie sucks or not.  Don't go yelling at somebody just because they don't agree w/ you.  Oh yea, if you people hate Jet or Jackie so much, just stop watching their movie, duh.  BTW, Wushu just means Martial Arts really, and Kungfu means something of hard work.  Karate means the art of using just hands... etc... Sorry if I'm wrong.  And, just because one time Bruce Lee described something as great KUNGFU, pple start saying it's the art.  But I dunno, maybe it is now.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 17, 2001 4:55 AM

li would infact beat jackie in a no holds bars fight. cos jackie is so messed up from all his accidents, he can't even run properly now and has a hole in his skull! Back in the day the fight would be much closer.

RE: Jet likes small boys   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 17, 2001 8:49 AM

who da f*ck r u mate?........think your a comedian or something coz you sure ain't funny.....

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 19, 2001 9:02 PM

Your not the only martial artist visiting this site.  If you were a genuine martial artist and fighter you would know that Jet-Li's Wushu would kick the crap out of any style Jackie Chan had to offer.  Put them in a street fight and you will see that Jet would drop Jackie in a matter of seconds because his style is more straight to the point and far more aggressive.  
Acting wise, Jackie is a f*cking clown.  have you ever see him play any role but a bumbling idiot?  Has he ever played a bad guy? I dont think so, hes stunts may be real but so what? He plays the same role in all his movies, he couldnt play a bad guy or anything else to show off his so called acting talents.  
Neither of them can talk English properly but if I had to choose i'd say Jet is better, simply because Jacky has been speaking English for much, much longer and he still sounds like a retard. Im sick of seeing the same old sh*t in Jacky's movies, same old stunts and moves.  How boring! Ive been watching him for years but Jet is definitely the "man" over the last few years that I have dscovered his movies.

RE: Once upon a time in China   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 19, 2001 11:15 PM

There is a 'Once upon a time in China IV'  Its acalled once upon a time in china and America... Its got awesome fight scenes and is set in the USA during the wild west.  Its so old I dont understand why people havent heard or seen it.  I thought we were all fans?

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 20, 2001 6:42 AM

you actually need to watch some of jet li's foreign movies which you have obviously not done jack. yeah his hollywood movies have not been doing so well, but when you put jackie chan and jet li up against one another in the hong kong flicks, you will find no equal to jet li. hollywood maybe jackie chan is better. jackie chan in funny, i dont like funny. jet li is serious, thats what i like. i like both, but putting the two together....what a match. by the way.....both of them cant act as well as the hollywood stars we know can.

RE: Jet Bites   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 20, 2001 6:48 AM

get over that we jet li fans have different taste then you. i like jackie chan's movies not because theyre funny (funny is usually dumb!) but because he is a good martial artist and i appreciate the styles he brings to the cinema. but get over it......we like jet li better, you like jackie chan better. get a life because it seems that all you do is sit here and complain.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 20, 2001 7:15 AM

drugs are bad

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 21, 2001 1:15 PM

It's hard for me to understand all of your problems.....can't we all just admit that they are both very talented and not worry which could take who....I am a MAJOR Jet Li fan myself, and perfer him over Jackie any day, but I still respect Jackie Chan a great deal, they both do their jobs well, and the point in this was to announce they will be starring together, they're not fighting each other, so everyone just kool it. Enjoy the fact that this movie will be great for both Jacki Chan and Jet Li fans because it will be starring them both.....everyone just calm down

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 22, 2001 3:14 PM

There is no doubt in my mind that Jet Li is a better fighter. I'm just happy that the two of them are hooking up to do a movie. If you want to see Jet Li really get down, peep out "Fist of Legend."

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 22, 2001 3:17 PM

Yeah that turned out to be the movies problem, Chow Yun Fat was in it!!

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 23, 2001 5:40 AM

For your info, Jet Li was born and raised in China where the official language is Mandarin so the notion that Jet Li did not know how to speak Mandarin is ludicrous. Jacky is a better actor (compare to Jet Li) but he has also stray away from real martial art display not to mention the fact that Jacky learned his kung fu from the opera acrobatic troupe and Jet from the Shaolin Temple.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 24, 2001 3:33 PM

I think if they're was
no Bruce Lee they're
wouldn't be a Jet Li or
Jackie Chan and so on and so on. After all Bruce Lee is a Legand.
He is the true ass kicker,he should get all
the credit.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 24, 2001 3:54 PM

Jet Li is better than That Jackie Chan. Jet Li has good tast in his movies. Jet Li has alot of blood and guts in his movies.Take a look at that movie The BlackMask that had a good piont to it. Besides Jackie is too goofy and clown, and have any of you played his Playstation game:Jackie Chan's StuntMaster,his head was bigger than his body. But even though they still put alot of effort in thier movies. Did you know Jackie broke his leg that movie Rumble in the Brox when he jumped on that huvercraft. Jets better,but thats my opinion.

RE: Jet digs children!   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 29, 2001 1:24 PM

Hey f*ck you man. You suck. "Once Upon A Time In China" was an  outstanding movie, and what do you have that Jet doesn't. I bet you couldn't say any rude remarks in Jets face or he will just have to kick your no good faget ass. "DICK HEAD!"

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 30, 2001 3:43 PM

I read on Jet Li's website that he turned down Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon and The Matrix sequel because of a promise he made to a girl from 10 years ago that if their love was still as strong in 10 years they would get married.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 1, 2001 6:33 AM

Well i am glad to see my two favourite Oriental superstar teaming up. I must say that ever since i seen Drunken Master staring Jacki Chan i have been hooked on martial arts action movies. I only recently seen Jet Li perform. I was in Malaysia on holiday and went to see Fist of Legend. I must say it blew me away. I cant get enough of Jet and he is my no. 1 artist with Jackie a close second. Poor old Bruce Lee comes a mere 5th after Samo and Michelle Yeoh in my book. I have seen Kiss of the Dragon and loved it. Romeo must die was excellent and i  look forward to seeing the results of these two stars.

RE: Jet digs children!   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 1, 2001 11:15 AM

Shut up dude... you obviously don't know anything about Li...

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 1, 2001 11:30 AM

kinda having problems with the English language, huh there chum?
Your information is not correct, Li's reason's for turning down the role in CTHD was not because he didn't who his native language, it's because he made a promise to his wife that he wouldn't make any films during her pregnancy... check is out for yourself: http://www.jetli.com/jetli/jet/jet_film_cthd.php?bw=high

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 15, 2001 11:12 AM

Just to let you know that Jackie Chan didn't exactly have it easy either at the Peking Opera house.  Discpline and punctuality there is reinforced with extreme cannings (beatings).  They learn everything from singing, dancing, to various forms of martial arts from early to late.  No cake walk that's for sure.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 15, 2001 11:31 AM

Remember that Jet Li also endured his own trials while a student at the Shaolin Temple.  That's definitely not an easy ride for anyone.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Togethe   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 15, 2001 11:37 AM

Bruce never got a chance to learn modern Wushu for obvious reasons.  God rest his soul and his striving to bring Asians into the filimng business, direct and indirect.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 15, 2001 11:44 AM

Didn't Bruce Lee die from an allergic reaction from an aspirin that he took during the filing of "Enter the Dragon"?  Also isn't Jackie Chan pushing 50 years anyway or close to it?  Either way he seems to be in good shape for someone his age.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 15, 2001 12:03 PM

Pussy...(SNIFF)...WHOAAA, HOLY sh*t.  ("Mope" by the Bloodhound Gang)

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 15, 2001 12:06 PM

Last thought on the subject.  About time!

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by Sifu (jonisnoddy@yahoo.com.au) on October 30, 2001 3:37 PM

I think that it is stupid for most people here to comment on whether jet Li or jackie chan is better than one another. Being a martial artist myself, I've come to realise that we cannot judge their skill by watching them on the silver screen. For example, Jet Li uses many locks that are practical, and also uses practical wushu. Many say that the wushu he uses is too traditional, but this is not the case. In Kiss of the Dragon he used many practical locks once again, but also attacked his opponents legs more to disable them (tonfa scene). This is practical because it disables an opponent quickest as it destroys their base (legs). HOWEVER, jackie has also shown and proven to be a good fighter in movies. His chineese boxing was superb in Rush hour 2 and films such as Young Master show that his traditional work is also very good. People tend to go fdor Jet li more becuase jackie does not obviously use classical chinese martial arts in his hollywood films, but he actually does. To conclude, my point is that we should not judge an actors martial arts ability from his/her movies. The peking opera company trains in Martial arts very well, perhaps just as well as a wushu coach? (On a personal note, I like Jet li a little better, as I can relate to his martial arts more)

ASIAN Hmong Boys kou vang   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on November 15, 2001 7:39 PM

jet dont listen to what they say because they dont know nothing about kung fu and how you make it to impressed people like us asian like that movie once upon a china it was the best movie ever

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 27, 2002 6:40 PM

JET Li is TITE as HELL, so tf yall talking about!

RE: Jet digs children!   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 29, 2002 2:45 PM

dude but most of jets moovs are all with wires his american moovies are nothin compared to jacky chans

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 11, 2002 7:42 AM

nonsense
bruce lee was bon in Hong-Kong (British Colony) and lives most of is live in america.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 21, 2002 12:12 AM

Hmmm...I was just surfing around for some Jet Li information when I discovered this site.
Every once in a while I find a message board like this one.  One that is infested with what can only be really young,fat, zit covered, closet masturbating, bed wetters like YOU GUY'S!!!!!!!!  People like you fat ass little retards will alway's be f*ck'n goobers and victims who never get laid!  Here are my offerings of pity to you all:  Go on a diet because even your typing skills are slow and fat.  Stop sodomizing your cat and squirting in your sisters panty drawer.  And by all means...eat less.  Your already stupid!  Why be fat to?!

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 9, 2002 5:16 PM

do not use the bad language

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 22, 2002 12:54 PM

Dude, YOU SUCK. JET LI kicks ass man. if u haven't seen his movies, don't speak yet. Li and Chan are very different in acting, and if you think Li's movies are boring, then why attend his movies you fagget. You are a piece of dumb sh*t, so f*ck YOU BIATCH!

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 14, 2002 10:27 PM

I agree with you. Jet Li is a terrible actor and does very bad movies. He's a good martial-artist, but in the movie industry he's terrible.


RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 14, 2002 10:32 PM

Dude, you're wrong. Bruce Lee knew how to speak English better than Jackie Chan and Jet Li put together. He knew how to speak English before he even came to America. His words are clearer.


RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 14, 2002 10:41 PM

I have to agree. I'm a huge Chan fan, one of the biggest, but i'm kind uv a Jet Li fan. Jackie has more talent. Jackie can do acrobatics, martial arts, way better acting, and is funny. Jet Li, all he can do is kick and punch.


RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 14, 2002 10:42 PM

You're so true. Jackie is tight, but Li is boring as hell.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 14, 2002 10:45 PM

I think Jet Li's cool lookig but then i am with you on this Li sucks

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 14, 2002 10:57 PM

Jackie does comedy because people kept on calling him the next Bruce Lee. That's his own style, and that's a talent. And if u don't like comedy, what the hell do u laf at when you're watching a movie!? Also, they both can act but i think Jackie is a better actor than Jet in Hollywood crap. In Hong Kong, i don't really know because it's hard to judge when you can't speak Chinese.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Togethe   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 14, 2002 11:01 PM

The thing about Jet kicking bruces ass while standing up, bull-shhhhhhit

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 14, 2002 11:04 PM

Jet can't be Chan. Chan would whoop his ass. Chan is stronger and has had harder training

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 17, 2002 10:35 PM

Wu-shu does receive acrobatics, but Li can't do jack s*it when it comes to acrobatics. He can't do one flip. He sucks.

What are you people babbling about?   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 15, 2002 3:07 PM

Why don't you just kill each other instead of coming back to this site just to give your keyboards a terrible time!

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 7, 2002 9:33 PM

You guys are pathetic, kung fu has been proven weak against simple things such as boxing and kick-boxing.
In a real fight even on the street jet and chan would probably get there asses raped

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 4, 2002 12:05 PM

First off, they wanted Jet to do the part but he refused because it was a piece of crap!  Second, who cares how fast chow learns languages, the guy is a complete moron who has the worst martial arts skills I have ever seen! Jet Li rules. Crouching Tiger sucked!

RE: RE:Jet Li eats human feces   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 4, 2002 12:15 PM

Dude, get a life you gay freak.  What is your obsession with guys dating each other.  It's kind of sick.  And it was much different when I saw KOD.  First of all, the theater was packed.  Second, the whole theater was silent throughout the whole movie until the end when half of the theater started clapping!  Everyone was coming out the theater saying how cool the movie was.  So obviously you don't know martial arts movies.  Why don't you go watch the Titanic or something you pansy moron.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Togethe   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 4, 2002 12:36 PM

I don't know if it's fair to compare any one to Bruce Lee sense he is DEAD!  I think it would be a very good fight.  I am a huge fan of Lee and Li, but to choose who would win, I don't know.  Sure in his time, I would say bruce was unbeatable, but if he were alive today, he would have a heck of a time beating Jet Li.

RE: Jet digs children!   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 27, 2002 3:44 AM

I agree that jet li sucks.  All his movies have very poor story lines!! If anyone goes to the theatre to watch his movies, you need to bring a pillow along as well, because the sh*t puts you to sleep.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 27, 2002 3:52 AM

This is to the guy who wants everyone to loose weight.  YO, bitch were talkin about jackie and jet. so get "your" fat ass somewhere else and try to loose your fat ass.  OH, one more thing, what else do you do to your sister?  YOU SICK f*ck!

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 27, 2002 3:57 AM

This is to the guy who wants everyone to loose weight.  YO, bitch were talkin about jackie and jet. so get "your" fat ass somewhere else and try to loose your fat ass.  OH, one more thing, what else do you do to your sister?  YOU SICK f*ck!

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 27, 2002 4:04 AM

If anyone who wants to read a fag's comment, read the one about the guy who says everyone is fat and masturbates.  The guy is a complete retard, talking about slow typing skills??? get the f*ck off this site dumb piece of sh*t.  You know what fag? the last time you saw "90210", was on a bathroom scale!

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 28, 2002 10:17 AM

i agree with the guy who wrote that jackie is way better than jet li.  You know what they say about who ever likes jet li, small dicks!! Jackie's martial arts are far better than jet's!  i can not sit through a full movie with jet li in it, his a fag.  he will fight just a couple times in a movie and it won't even be real.  What a joke!! who ever likes jet li, probably likes britney spears and ford focuses!!

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Togethe   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 28, 2002 10:30 AM

for the guy who wrote that jet li would wip bruce lee's ass.  You dumb piece of sh*t!! how could you ever compare bruce to jet!? Buce lee is the best martial artist i have ever seen!  don't talk sh*t about bruce, you obviously have not seen any of his movies.  go back and crawl under your moms cooch and shut the f*ck up!

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 28, 2002 10:40 AM

for the guy that told everyone to not waste his space in the theatre for jets movies.  Jackie is number one!! and jet is sh*t.  You sound talk like a little bitch, so why don't you suck my dick, because thats what little bitches are good for!

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 28, 2002 10:52 AM

heah, would would "YOUR" boyfriend say a--hole.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 28, 2002 11:00 AM

why dont you get a life you homo.  You are an idiot, telling everyone to get a life.  So, what the f*ck are you doing on this site you dumb ass.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 28, 2002 11:05 AM

thats alright, i'll peep out in your moms pussy instead!  JACKIE CHAN RULES.  CHUCK NORRIS IS BETTER THAN JET LI AND I DONT LIKE CHUCK, HE IS A FAG, ALL HE DOES IS KICK.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 28, 2002 11:09 AM

jackie chan is better than jet li!  It is funny to see one person mask himself with different identies and talk sh*t about jackie chan.  Chan would wip jets ass any day.

RE: What are you people babbling about?   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 28, 2002 11:15 AM

Jackie chan could spank jets ass any day.  f*ck jet li, his movies are all fake... do you see romeo must die, the part where he freezes in the air for like five seconds and kicks three guys in the head in a blink of an eye.  thats what i hate about jet li, his sh*t is fake and boring.  go watch drunken master or rumble in the bronx or jackie chans first strike, all excellent movies.  One thing is for sure, even jet li's fans agree that his movies have gone down the toilet. dont believe me, then read the reviews.  JACKIE CHAN RULES FOREVER!

Jet and others   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 9, 2002 5:26 AM

whats with you guys. Always calling the next guy gay. Are you guys homophobic or something? And to the guy who recomended that the other guy go watch titanic - whats your problem? Titanic was an alright moovie.

how about a civilized discussion?   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 14, 2002 11:52 AM

like a lot of people have been saying, jackie and jet both have different styles. jackie is more into props and stuff while jet li is more of a kick-ass kind of guy. personally, i think jet li would beat jackie (in a hands/feet only fight. no weapons) with his superior speed and skill (age would account for jackie's inferiority). i dont see how anyone could compare either of these two to bruce lee though. that guy was amazing. to sum this all up, they both made great movies that appeal to different people. i havent seen any of jackie's chinese movies. any suggestions?

How about this for a civilized discussion?   > reply

Posted by Moose (moose@dtheatre.com) on December 16, 2002 3:44 AM

"Drunken Master" is by far the best. "Snake in Eagle's Shadow" is ....ok..... I guess. You can check them out or buy them here.

Whos better?   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 8, 2003 8:50 AM

honestly, i think Jackie Chan is better.  His movies are amazing.  His martial arts style and the way he fights.  I like Jet Li too.  But when it comes to more real solutions, jackie chan got him beat hands down.  I mean, i dont think jet li could use a latter the way he did(joke).  but honestly, chan's movies are for everyone.  all have action, most have comedy.  He doesnt try and be serious all the time.  I like that in movies.  Jet Li is cool but chan is da man.

RE: Whos better?   > reply

Posted by Moose (moose@dtheatre.com) on February 10, 2003 11:27 AM

Got to agree with you there. Jackies film are much more entertaining.

RE: Jet digs children!   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2003 7:09 PM

Suya lang to sila kay wala man sila sinabi pag abot sa karate!
It is a fact that chinese are the best when it comes to hand to hand combat.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 10, 2003 7:25 PM

i dont think its a good idea to team up jacky and jet in a movie, they're two different artist with diferent style.  Jacky should stick to comedy and jet should work with someone more serious like chow. Kalain daw san resulta kun mag upod sira jacky ngansan jet li kay diri daw klaro kum nano an theme san sine


SHUT UP   > reply

Posted by WHATEVER (No Email) on March 28, 2003 1:43 PM

SHUT UP YOU DUMB HIGH RETARDS(this is only for the ones who have sweared)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

RE: Jet likes small boys   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2003 11:06 PM

What the yeak are you going on about you fale mouth dog
You are just jealous because you actor are for gunag you little f


jack chan and jet i   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 12, 2003 8:36 AM

thes two martial arts experts need all the actionand training they can get.
i love both of these actors and ive always wanted to meet them andf interview them because imthere number ne fan and they deserve a reward and i wold be happy to give it to them and thanks to jackie chan and jet li ima martial arts champion thans guys from your biggest fanjenny.

jackie andjet li   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 12, 2003 8:46 AM

DONT LISTEN TO THEM THERE JUST SAD.
I THINK BECAUSE IMYOUR NUMBER ON FANI THINK YOUR THE BEST ACTION STARS THAT EVER LIVED AND I LOVEYOU BOTH AND I LOVE YOUR FILMS IM JENY AND ID LOVE TO INTERVIEW YOU BOTH AND MEET YOU

JACKIES THE BEST AND ALWAYS WILL BE   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 12, 2003 8:55 AM

IMJACKI CHANS NMBER ONE FAN AND I HAVE HIS GLASSES HIS VIDEOS.
I LIKE JACKEI CHAN BECAUSE IVE LEARNED ALOT ABOUT HIS MOVIES AND HES HELPED ME THAT MUCH THAT IM A CHAMP IN MARTIAL ARTS CLASSES THANKS JACKIE CHAN LOVE YOUR BIGGEST FAN JENNY

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 17, 2003 9:55 PM

Let me set a few things straight:
Bruce Lee was born in San Fransisco, and traveled to China to learn Kung Fu. His English sounds a little funny, just like a Mexican american's does because of his non english speaking parents. As for Jet Li and Jackie Chan, they are both excellent martial artists, but the truth is that Jet is a far superior master at the art. He was the champion of all china at Wushu for many years, and even came to the US in 1974 to represent China and perform in from of the President. Also, don't be silly. Chow Yun Fat did not get the part because Jet Li could not learn Mandarin fast enough. How rediculous is that. And for those of you who believe that, Jet Li actually 'DID' turn down a lead part in The Matrix II. you can look that up on on the web.
any questions? mailto://riquilee@hotmail.com

Jet Li sucks!   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 19, 2003 12:36 AM

Jet Li sucks he can't fight all his stuff is fake. Jackie Chan could kick his ass and Bruce Lee (if he was still alive) could kick it ten times harder. Chan and Lee are the real deal

Jet Li sucks ass   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 19, 2003 12:52 AM

Jet Li is a no-talent, 6th rate fighter that likes to look at his ugly self in the mirror. The Best martial artists are Bruce Lee, Jackie Chan, Frank Dux (probably the best American martial artist with the world record of fastest knockout in less than 3 seconds) and probably some other people.

Jet Li, go screw a donkey all your movies are more fake than your wiener

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 21, 2003 11:06 AM

jackie is the best

RE: RE:Jet Li eats human feces   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 15, 2003 4:03 AM

paly movi

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 2, 2003 8:34 AM

wrong to that remark jet is the grestest and speaks good english unlike chan man jet could kick any ones ass in 3 seconds flat and jet spoke english in lethal weapon 4 dick

RE: Jet is a fighter, not a comedian   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 9, 2003 4:34 PM

don't hate on the fact that jet could kick butt.anyway fighting isn't supposed to be funny,even though jackie can make it look that way.jet is faster than you could even imagine and jackie can use anything to hurt you.this movie should be the #1 action movie out(whenever it comes out).

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 14, 2003 4:14 AM

you are very good fighters and your always pretecting
your bodygaurds.


By Imran

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 14, 2003 4:15 AM

hay jet li & jacki chan can you come over and teach me some moves

Jet's Good!   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 1, 2004 10:56 PM

Alright, I am going to say this straight up front now. Jet Li is good, I also will admit that Bruce Lee was good as well... BUT, you still should remember that Jet has his own fighting style, as does any other Chinese Actor / Fighter, or whatever the hell you want to call it. Jet is talented, and he IS a VERY good actor, despite what some of you say. You can reply to messages like mine, but, like anyone else, I could care less what you say. This place is about opinions right? Well, I've spoken. So, you either except or you don't, but I could care less!

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 9, 2004 3:09 PM

you just shut up jet li is a more serious fighter than jackie chan. I even  on watched an interview with jackie  saying that jet li would make a better fighter than himself while jackies fighting is comical jet li is more original and try and think about that becaues i am a martial artist myself winning 11 tournments and 111 trophes by the way i also trained in one of jet li's techneques (wing cun.)Jackie chan is about using other objects, running and cowarding around the room while jet li uses ground and jumping movement and saves energy whil fighting and keeps his cool loser because i actually met jet li!!!

RE: Jet digs children!   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 9, 2004 3:12 PM

BITCH!!!

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 9, 2004 3:16 PM

oh and another thing jet li is a good actor not by making the audience entertained but acting like a real life martial artist.

RE: Jet digs children!   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 9, 2004 3:22 PM

It,s true that jet li uses wire in some of his movie but he also does his own stunts aswell and jet li likes using wires even though he CAN do what jackie chan does but wires makes the movie more amazing fucking loser!

RE: Jet digs children!   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 9, 2004 3:28 PM

Wanna bet did you even met him no did you get his autograph no did you get trained in one of his techneque no i did, did i mention i have trained in 4 different kung fu techeques (because i was trained in china asshole!!!)

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 9, 2004 3:33 PM

No he was not he was born in china and got his identity changed and had 2 children ihave his life story.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 9, 2004 3:50 PM

kung fu aim the weak points of the human body wich means kickbpxing and boxing is 2 of the weakest fighting skills (considering there sporting techneques)

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 9, 2004 3:55 PM

So i can flip over chaurs and do backflips not to metion martial arts prick

Who's the Martial Artist   > reply

Posted by ChynaStyle (No Email) on January 29, 2004 5:56 PM

I don't know about all you other people, but if you want to watch real Martial Arts action movies, you really got to watch the Chinese ones, not the crappy all-wire, special effects so-called Martial Arts movies made in America.
As far as whose the best amongst Jet Li, Jacky Chan, and Bruce Lee...definitely Bruce Lee is the REAL martial artist. He's like a blackbeltx100. But he's like...a horrible actor...
Jacky Chan is all actor...he might have been pretty good at martial arts, but he is definitely not in the same class as Li and...Lee. He's an actor.
Personally, i think Jet Li is the best.  He's an amazing martial artist - a nation class wushu competitor at the age of 11!, and not to mention 5 consecutive years as China's gold champion in Martial Arts. In movies, he has charisma of a guy in showbiz. But actually, his Chinese movies were definitely better than most of his American one...

RE: Who's the Martial Artist   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 9, 2004 3:11 PM

Jet Li sucks, he is an annoying little midget, even short for a chinaman. All his films where he's the star suck! like KoD, RMD, and he can never beat jackie chan, have you seen some of the stunts he's done? all jet lis done is make he's tough in pathetic unrealistic fight scenes that make me laugh, if he really got into one of those fights he would dead in seconds.

i agree   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 9, 2004 3:14 PM

jet li is a jackie chan wannabe, a little shit who thinks he's great, he sucks balls, all his crap chinese films suck and his hollywood ones are even worse, he ruins every film he's in. Some one please just kill that 4ft tall freak.

RE: Who's the Martial Artist   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 16, 2004 4:01 PM

"Jacky Chan is all actor...he might have been pretty good at martial arts"
do you even know what your saying?
jacki chan is an amazing martial artist.
you should watch some of his older Chinese movies.
Drunken Master is incredible, with the bamboo stick, wow.
not to mention the different styles and stunts that he does. Jacky Chan is the most talented.
jet li is also very good but too few movies to show it.
Fist of Legend, and Once upon a time in China (part 1) are his best.

RE: i agree   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on February 19, 2004 9:59 AM

get fucked, id like to see you learn martial arts and learn another language and do them both really well.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 17, 2004 12:18 PM

you fuck there is a difference between ju-jitsu and jeet kune do ju jitsu is a japanese martial art and jeet kune do is a powerful martial art but it's like a kung fu boxing and jeet kune do stand s for anticipating fist plus ju jitsu is a striking and grappling martial art knowing this being a martial art student home trained by proffensional martial art trainers in 4 different martial arts and trained in china for 3 years and that is an insult because i fight like jet li oh did i mention i am a street fighter with a lot of money ass hole oh and jet li does use wires in some of his movies but he has movies where he did not use wires and he is more careful than jackie chan because he has stunt men to test out the equipment before doing his stunts.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 17, 2004 12:24 PM

you said it so you must be a pretty good fighter. Have you won in tornements and have you won any trophes i have 17. iam also a martial art analyst aswell.

RE: This SHEMP is a liar   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 17, 2004 12:49 PM

You dick i trained in china for three years and i was only eight years old i was a hot head and i still am it does not matter what type of training you reveive you will never change who you are besides it was not like i was raised in china i just went there to train i have won 11 tornements and and have traveled to 8 different countries unlike a diserplined fighter i was raised in the streets where theres whoes on every corner why do you think i am a martial artist with a bad attitude problem and i like it.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 17, 2004 12:53 PM

what the fuck are you talking about you fucking book worm!!

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 17, 2004 1:02 PM

you thnk im lying about going to china i have trpes and certificates to prove it ass wipe.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 17, 2004 1:22 PM

hey dick you should re-think what you said because yes bruce lee did invent many martial arts but he was not the only master remember martial arts go all the way back to 17 centries or even more and if bruce lee did not envent his martial arts some one else would of even as we speak there is many martial arts being created by master as we speak the most focosed and deadly martial art is ninjitsu the art of the ninja and this true because ninjitsu is stealth, offence, defence an is very acrobactic you see i take martial art seriously people who dis martial artist are dissing martial arts and is offending me.

RE: Who's the Martial Artist   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 17, 2004 1:28 PM

you racist bastard!!!!!!

cagate en tu madre   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 25, 2004 6:10 AM

infinito muerete no sabes nada.

johny .d roks:****************   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 25, 2004 5:54 PM

jackie chan is notin compared to johny depp noting at all ya here

johny .d roks:****************   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 28, 2004 8:38 AM

johnys better than jackie chan!!!!!!!!!!:)

jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 12:22 AM

jhonny deep is shit jackie rules

jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 12:26 AM

does jackie chan read this stuff we write

jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 12:26 AM

does jackie chan read this stuff we write

jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 12:26 AM

does jackie chan read this stuff we write

jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 12:26 AM

does jackie chan read this stuff we write

RE: johny .d roks:****************   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 12:46 AM

mofo dont f*ck wit jackie ok

jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 12:50 AM

high piddy where the fuck is ma 50 cent album?

jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 12:52 AM

im at school itsma birth day on saturday april 3rd say high im 16

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 12:59 AM

who do you think you r talkin about jet li and jhonny deep im a rqpper and a stuntman training in hong kong so their


PIP   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 1:00 AM

jay-p you f*ckin puff

RE: cagate en tu madre   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 1:02 AM

french mofo

RE: PIP   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 1:10 AM

r u comming out 2nite what time shall we get matty and joe

PIP   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 1:23 AM

CHRIS PEACE I SHAGED SUE

jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 1:24 AM

dont forget my birth day u better cum down

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by PEACEY (peacey1_5@hotmail.com) on March 29, 2004 1:25 AM

i shag phills mum



RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by PEACEY (peacey1_5@hotmail.com) on March 29, 2004 1:25 AM

i shag phills mum



RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by PEACEY (peacey1_5@hotmail.com) on March 29, 2004 1:25 AM

i shag phills mum



RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by PEACEY (peacey1_5@hotmail.com) on March 29, 2004 1:25 AM

i shag phills mum



RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by PEACEY (peacey1_5@hotmail.com) on March 29, 2004 1:25 AM

i shag phills mum



RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by PEACEY (peacey1_5@hotmail.com) on March 29, 2004 1:25 AM

i shag phills mum



RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by PEACEY (peacey1_5@hotmail.com) on March 29, 2004 1:25 AM

i shag phills mum



RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by PEACEY (peacey1_5@hotmail.com) on March 29, 2004 1:25 AM

i shag phills mum



RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by PEACEY (peacey1_5@hotmail.com) on March 29, 2004 1:25 AM

i shag phills mum



RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by PEACEY (peacey1_5@hotmail.com) on March 29, 2004 1:25 AM

i shag phills mum



RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by PEACEY (peacey1_5@hotmail.com) on March 29, 2004 1:25 AM

i shag phills mum



johny .d roks:****************   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 7:38 AM

Its not johny deep its johny depp gotit and jackie chan is so ugly compared to him gross hi johny;)

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 9:00 AM

phils mum up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 9:00 AM

phils mum up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 9:00 AM

phils mum up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 9:00 AM

phils mum up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 9:00 AM

phils mum up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 9:00 AM

phils mum up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 9:00 AM

phils mum up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 9:00 AM

phils mum up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 9:00 AM

phils mum up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 9:00 AM

phils mum up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 9:00 AM

phils mum up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 29, 2004 9:00 AM

phils mum up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 31, 2004 1:56 AM

shag sue

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 31, 2004 1:56 AM

shag sue

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 31, 2004 1:56 AM

shag sue

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 31, 2004 1:56 AM

shag sue

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 31, 2004 1:56 AM

shag sue

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 31, 2004 1:56 AM

shag sue

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 31, 2004 1:56 AM

shag sue

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 31, 2004 1:56 AM

shag sue

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 31, 2004 1:56 AM

shag sue

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 31, 2004 1:56 AM

shag sue

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 31, 2004 1:56 AM

shag sue

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 31, 2004 1:56 AM

shag sue

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 31, 2004 1:56 AM

shag sue

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 31, 2004 1:56 AM

shag sue

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 31, 2004 1:56 AM

shag sue

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 31, 2004 1:56 AM

shag sue

RE: johny .d roks:****************   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 31, 2004 1:57 AM

you gay cunt

RE: Jet digs children!   > reply

Posted by PIP 1 (No Email) on March 31, 2004 2:15 AM

bullshit nobhead

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:01 AM

shag sue up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:01 AM

shag sue up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:01 AM

shag sue up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:01 AM

shag sue up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:01 AM

shag sue up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:01 AM

shag sue up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:01 AM

shag sue up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:01 AM

shag sue up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:01 AM

shag sue up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:01 AM

shag sue up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:01 AM

shag sue up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:01 AM

shag sue up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:01 AM

shag sue up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:01 AM

shag sue up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:01 AM

shag sue up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:01 AM

shag sue up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:01 AM

shag sue up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:01 AM

shag sue up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:01 AM

shag sue up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:01 AM

shag sue up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:01 AM

shag sue up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:01 AM

shag sue up the bum

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:01 AM

shag sue up the bum

jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:04 AM

Jackie chan jackie chan jackie chan jackie chan jackie chan jackie chan jackie chan jackie chan jackie chan jackie chan jackie chan jackie chan jackie chan jackie chan

tez   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:08 AM

james stop chatin shit u lil' arse wipe you smell of shit u lil' cunt get a bath you scruff

PIP 1   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:09 AM

JET LI IS SHIT JACKIE CHAN IS THE BEST

jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:09 AM

steve-o out of m t v jackass is ace but not as good as jackie chan or brad allan and orlando blum who does his own stunts as well im a stuntman

tez   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:10 AM

phillip you mother-fucker shag your mum

PIP 1   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:11 AM

TEZ U SMELL

RE: PIP 1   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:11 AM

pip tell stuart 2 get on the web or daves gonna kill him............joking

tez   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:12 AM

not as bad as you!!!!!!!!!!

jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:12 AM

tell what v said on that message that she sent u now

RE: tez   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:14 AM

FUCK U I HAVE SHAGED UR MUM


RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:20 AM

HIYA PIP WAT GOIN ON WIV JAMES THEN U THOUGTH OWT MORE BOUT MY TXT I SENT U THEN WHEN HE CALLED ME @ DINNER I WAS IN ASSEMBLEY AND MY FONE STARTED BUZZIN TXT BK V xx


jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:21 AM

pip you better fu**ing tell me now u piece of sh*t!!

jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:23 AM

what message did she send u before that,tell me

RE: STU   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:26 AM

IF DAVE STARTS TODAY LET MATTY HIT HIM

jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:27 AM

dont fickin egnor me pip tell stuart 2 stop callin me names

RE: tez   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:28 AM

rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat ratrat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat rat

RE: STU   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:29 AM

IF DAVE STARTS TODAY LET MATTY HIT HIM

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:30 AM

fuck u fat cunt

RE: STU   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:34 AM

DONT YOU FUCKIN IGNORE ME

RE: STU   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:38 AM

IGNORANT LITTLE FAT CUNT

jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:39 AM

ok im going 2 ma next lesson ive got art its my b-day on saturday dont forget, we'll go ice skating it,ll be wont it fuckin better be u stupid mofo wait for me im commin


RE: STU   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:56 AM

phil what are you doin

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by PIP 1 (No Email) on April 1, 2004 12:57 AM

r they fuck


some rapper   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 2, 2004 2:31 AM

nowa days the oldstuff fades new companys come and change the way please make a place 2 pray amen

jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 2, 2004 2:38 AM

wow u didnt make that

JET LI IS THE BEST   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 16, 2004 7:18 AM

Hi guys, you must have no clue on martial arts to dare to treat Jet Li the way you do!!!
Hum, he was trained for 28 years with the traditional form of wushu, with all the styles and weapons that have been ever used in long chinese martial arts history. Even Bruce Lee couldn't challenge his background. Of course Lee's dead and we cannot make a comparison but still I think that Jet Li would be the best. Sure Lee was more than talented; but martial arts are not only street-fights and Lee lacked of knowledge, depthness and philosophy...that is why I think that Jet would beat him.
And what to say about Jackie Chan!! He is cool and makes us laugh but sorry guys he cannot do anything with his Beijin Opera background against true martial artists,and against the best of them...come on we all know who is that...ALL RISE FOR JET LI

jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on April 17, 2004 9:58 PM

hi jess did u find it this is the website i can go on at school


RE: Jet digs children!   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 1, 2004 6:22 PM

hey man   heyheyhey guys i am thiago i live in Brazil i like jet e jackie


RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 3, 2004 1:47 PM

god u yanks sorry but your all so fake and over the top, shouting yea and woo etc when sumones fighiting we in england and asia arnt liek that god such big yanks!

RE: ASIAN Hmong Boys kou vang   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 3, 2004 1:49 PM

yea people in the west just dont understand a good cult fil mwhen they see one, Jet isnt funny thats not his style like sing lung, but his wu shu is good and screen presence also, hes good!

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 9, 2004 9:41 AM

look you are stuped Jet Li is the Best and K.O.D Is one of his best and no notthing.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 12, 2004 2:30 PM

ok this is a topic about Jet Li and Jackie Chan being in a movie together not comparing whether they are better than each other, we should be happy that after all these years we will get to see two great martial artist finally get the chance to make a movie together(I hope)... I like both Jet and Jackie as actors and martial artist but I like them in there differences, they are not the same and they shouldn't be...Jet is stylist and gracful in his Wu Shu(Jet can be funny too) while Jackie is comedic and acrobatic in his stunts and thats what saparates them from their films and people shouldn't judge whether Jet is better than Jackie or Jackie is better than Jet, they are good at what they do and if you ask both of them they wouldn't say that they are better than each other...so we should be happy that there are two people alive such as Jet and Jackie to entertain us in films...well, who ever said Jet can't act...can eat shiet!! theres nothing wrong in his acting ability...show some respect...Jet Li and Jackie Chan RULES!!!

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 23, 2004 7:38 AM

your a a complet dumb ass. jet li movies arent. jackie chans are. all his fighting looks fake anyhow

RE: Jet digs children!   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on June 27, 2004 10:47 PM

Hey, what the f*ck are you talking about? Jackie Chan is good at his movie: Jackie Chan's first strike. Because Jackie can kick Jet Li hard in the balls!


jet   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on July 1, 2004 9:21 AM

jet rules you faggots, you all suck cock anyway, your all pusseys.

RE: Jet digs children!   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 11, 2004 7:57 AM

FUCK YOU DUDE!!

RE: JET LI IS THE BEST   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on August 28, 2004 10:16 AM

I have to agree with you. JET LI RULES!!!

RE: Jet digs children!   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 16, 2004 4:49 PM

jackie chan is only good at stunts jet li would kick his ass jet ll know wing chun like bruce lee and he can take on 30 people


RE: Jet digs children!   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 21, 2004 4:00 PM

JACKIE CHAN SUCKS!!!

RE: Jet digs children!   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on October 21, 2004 4:02 PM

Dude Shut the Hell UP!!!

Back to the topic   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 31, 2004 5:02 AM

Jet li definitely wins jackie chan. I'm not saying jackie chan is lousy, but it's just that he never really did train his wushu as a major as long as jet did. JC is still cool though, he did take on 6 bikers with his friend and defeat them within 30 secs.

Compare the two in action in "fist of legend" and "legend of the drunken master". As fast as JC is, jet li is still faster(3 consecutive punches in less than 0.7 seconds with the same hand and deadly accuracy+power+reach, and does 4 consecutive kicks with damn good balance/stability within 1 second).

I'm still more towards a JC fan though. Jet li can't act and his movies suck or rock depending on the director. JC personally directs his own movies, giving us a quality assurance. If JC were directing this JC+JL movie, then it would probably rock. But too bad, let's hope this director knows his stuff.

btw jet li first won the national wushu championship when he was 11. It certainly takes a lot of stuff for a kid at 11 to beat other martial artists who are probably much older.

RE: Jet digs children!   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on December 31, 2004 5:05 AM

eh, jet doesn't specialise in wing chun. he does chang quan(long fist). a wushu fighting style that utilised reach and agility, with speed being the only weakness. thing is, jet li did patch up the weakness of changquan with his speed training. that guy's fast

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 30, 2005 5:57 PM

your a friggin idiot, who care whut u think.

RE: JET LI IS THE BEST   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 30, 2005 6:00 PM

there both amazingly talented you dumb fuck. you cant just agree that jet li is better,,, stupid fucker

They are ACTORS!!   > reply

Posted by escapedangel (none) on February 8, 2005 5:18 PM

Hey, I hate to point out the obvious, but it doesn't matter who can kick who's ass.  They are actors.  No one can actually walk on walls either or fly 15 feet without propulsion.  Hollywood can make guys that don't even know how to fight look like they have been doing it all of their lives.  So I wish that you all had something better to do than to curse one another about which actor is better than which.  They are both good at what they do.  End of story.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 6, 2005 5:53 AM

Hey who evr wrote this is the so lloser I ever seen you son of a bitch. What do you know about Martial arts. I think you can stuck up a tissue in your ass moron!!!

By the Jackie and Li will wupp your ass, so mind your ass, asshole.

Good luck to Jackie and Li

RE: Jet Bites   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 6, 2005 5:57 AM

you suck you Jack shit head...


RE: Jet Li kes it from Behind   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 6, 2005 5:59 AM

Hey fatso, shut up before I cut your toes off... boohahahahah...



RE: Jet likes small boys   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 6, 2005 6:03 AM

Your like a sissy boy who had sex with Michael Jackson for free... hehehhe


RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 6, 2005 6:08 AM

Hey jay-p stick it up your little dik up in your ass, son of a bitch...


RE: Jet Li kes it from Behind   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on May 6, 2005 6:13 AM

Hey about Lethatl weapon is a different story you lump noodle, who ever wrote it? Mel Gibson is just an old Freek. ONly the White guys have to win this really? You remember this white boy, dont mess with the cultures of Asia, or any damn country.

By the to the writer you suck like a limp noodle, fatso


Jet Li and Jackic Chan to star together.   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on September 9, 2005 12:57 PM

I think the Vision of both of these Great Fighters would be what weve been waiting to see on the big screen.

RE: i loved it too   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 3, 2006 5:26 PM

Mine is named Pedro. But he is in the hospital right now.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 3, 2006 5:31 PM

I totally agree with you. Except for the part that Jackie Chan can beat Jet Li.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 3, 2006 5:33 PM

I agree too.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 3, 2006 5:35 PM

You are soooo right!

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 3, 2006 5:40 PM

I only have to say one thing for what you said....
YOU ARE SOOO RIGHT!!!!!!!

RE: Jet Bites   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 3, 2006 5:45 PM

Jet might not make very funny movies but I guess you just dont like action movies. Yeah Jackie Chan also does action movies, but he makes them funny.

RE: Jet likes small boys   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 3, 2006 5:48 PM

I really don't mind that people some people don't like Jet Li. That is just the way it is. Oh, but you just crossed the line there. I love Jet and I cant stand when people talk about him that way if they don't know nothing about him.

RE: Jet likes small boys   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 3, 2006 5:50 PM

I really don't mind that people some people don't like Jet Li. That is just the way it is. Oh, but you just crossed the line there. I love Jet and I cant stand when people talk about him that way if they don't know nothing about him. I would say more, but I rather do this in person.

RE: RE:Jet Li eats human feces   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 3, 2006 5:53 PM

Jet might be small, but you got to keep in mind that he is chinese! Most chinese/asian people are small. If you were smart you would know that.

RE: Jet Li kes it from Behind   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 3, 2006 6:03 PM

Man, you are the one that does all that! That's probobly why you're blaming him. You ain't his agent you little liar. Don't be ashamed of being the way you are. I bet Michael Jackson will still like you. You bastard. If there is anyone in the world who fits that discription perfectly, it is you.

RE: Jet Bites   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 3, 2006 6:05 PM

You people SUCK.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 3, 2006 6:09 PM

I don't agree with you. I think that the only thing that move could be is great, awesome, cool, etc.
I think you and I have many things in comon.

RE: Jet Li and Jackie Chan to Star Together   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 3, 2006 6:20 PM

I'm all the way up with you!

RE: jay-p   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 3, 2006 6:42 PM

Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li Jet Li is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! is HOT! I would keep going but I have to go.

RE: PIP 1   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on January 3, 2006 6:45 PM

MAN, YOU'RE SHIT!

The real story   > reply

Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 1, 2008 1:20 PM

This new movie is actually a documentary about Jackie and Jet and how they were asked to try and over power a being that has no equal.  This documentary is going to be so epic not because of Jackie and Jet, but because it's going to show the power and might of a being who has no rival.  This being is so powerful that; it can kill two stones with one bird, can sneeze with its eyes open, can beat a brick wall at a game of tennis, and can slam a revolving door.  A being so spectacular that when it does a push-up, it isn't pushing itself up, but actually pushing the earth down, and is so fast that it can run around the world and punch itself in the back of the head.  A being so fantastic that it doesn't need a watch because it decides what time it is.  This being has been described in physical appearance to resemble a man.  A man named Chuck Norris.  What chance does anyone or anything have against such a power?  I'll tell you.  Absolutely none whatsoever!!!!!!!!!!!!



New Movie Trailers

Conan the Barbarian
 CONAN THE BARBARIAN
Captain America
 CAPTAIN AMERICA
Crazy, Stupid, Love
 CRAZY, STUPID, LOVE
The Smurf
 THE SMURF
Cowboys and Aliens
 COWBOYS AND ALIENS
Bad Teacher
 BAD TEACHER
Mr. Poppers Penguins
 MR. POPPERS PENGUINS
Green Lantern
 GREEN LANTERN

More New Movie Trailers

Recent Dtheatre News

  • http://www.freereversecellphonelookups.com/ - Find People Instantly.
  • How to Get Contact Lens King Promo Codes and redeem the lens.
  • The Benefits of Ab Belt and the Best Ab Belt in the Market.
  • Lucky You DVD Review
  • How to Detoxify Your Body Using Raw Foods
  • Thor - Trailer
  • Types of Lupus (SLE) Therapy
  • Finding a Cure for Lupus
  • Conan the Barbarian movie trailer HD - watch now!
  • Cowboys and Aliens Movie Trailer HD - top rated
  • The Smurfs Movie Trailer HD - Just Released!
  • Crazy, Stupid, Love movie trailer HD - come now! (1)
  • Captain America movie trailer HD: just released!
  • Mr. Poppers Penguins Movie Trailer HD - really cool!
  • Bad Teacher Movie Trailer HD - click here!
  • Green Lantern movie trailer HD - coming now!


Comments are owned by the posters.
The rest © 2000 dTheatre.com and DTMDB.com.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are
owned by their respective owners.
  • Company Info
  • Help
  • Contact Us
  • RSS