From: (No Email available)

Date: 2006-06-23 03:27:42

Comment:

I watched most of loose change and was very disappointed. First of all, the narrator sucks. He needs to get a good night's rest before falling asleep on the microphone he's slouched over.

Secondly, some of the 'facts' are the kinds of things that make me cringe when the narrator  can't rub two neurons together to figure out that something's inaccurate. For instance:
"in 1945, a b-52 crashed into the empire state building" wtf!? for the record it was a b-25, but seriously... He then goes on to compare the fire from that to the wtc and uses this as evidence that there was some kind of bomb in addition to the plane crashes.

What a crock of sh1t! The empire state building pushed the limits of classic steel grid frame design, whereas The wtc towers were like tubes that joined the core to the outside by trusses that weakened in the fire.
This is dumber than fox news covering the "other side" of the global warming "debate".

The #7 bldg was interesting though, and he said it was used to store records for ongoing investigations into wall street crime. What he didn't say was that building collapsed due to a design flaw that was exploited by the fire that burned for 7 hours while fire crews focused on rescue efforts. It burned after it was evacuated, so no one was killed there. The design flaw was a system of hacks to build the thing over an existing power substation. But a new building has gone up in its place, and it's designed to be hugely safe and fire resistant.