From: (No Email available)

Date: 2006-06-30 13:53:08

Comment:

You guys can believe all you want, but consider this:
do you REALLY think that in today's day and age that the government could execute such an attack and not have the news find out and harp all over it?  If "Loose Change" were true, it'd be all over every news channel and people would overthrow the government.  I find that most people who support Loose Change are angry Liberals who hate George Bush an d want to find ANYTHING they can to try and get him out of the white house.  The points that Dylan Avery makes in Loose Change aren't even valid.  Planes don't run on strictly kerosene for fuel, and the official explanation for the collapse of the Towers WAS NOT a fire.  It did not MELT the steel, it simply weakened it and the floors sagged.  
Other points that Mr. Avery points out are the windows that are "completely intact" at the pentagon.  Funny, they look pretty broken to me, but also, remember that the Pentagon was build to stay up despite an airplane attack.  Which leads me to this: In the video, Mr. Avery says that the towers were built to withstand collapse from a plane.  This is laughable.  The structures were built so that if a plane were to hit them, they would not just fall over like a stack of blocks, but rather would stay up (in addition to not blowing in the wind, or falling over in heavy storm.)  
As for the explosions that are allegedly bombs set in there, think about it: there were hundreds of countless devices inside there that would explode if debris were to fall on them: heaters, microwaves, computers, any heavy electronics etc.  
Lastly, Avery talksa bout buildings that burned for hours never fell.  OK, true, but the fires were not NEARLY as hot as the fires in WTC.
Personally I don't care what most people think about this, because they are full of hate and ignorance.