From: (No Email available)

Date: 2006-01-28 08:28:59

Comment:

Get ready for a very long speech, America!

Defining the art of King Kong is as hard as catching fog in a fishing net. If somebody were to describe the movie or the trailer in a single word, they might use violent, or gorey. In the eyes of yours truly, (aka, me!) Kong is an extremely interesting film [process]. Some lines from all of them are from the original 1933 version. The 1972 version gives me the creeps, it was such a horrible failure. And now, here we are, in the 2005 edition. A little violence over-the-top. A little inappropriate for children under 11.(Such as me!) The violence includes a man getting devoured by a Loch Ness like thing that looks slightly like an uncircumcized penis. The nudity/sexuallity is not all that bad. A little kiss here or there, half-nude Adrien Brody, and a stripped woman, let's call her, "Ann Darrow," being dragged through a jungle by a ferocious gorrila. Kong's profanity level is slightly higher than the other versions, an occasional god**** it, what you didn't know could fill a cat's ***, and one kong-sized cuss. The f bomb. The alcohol/drugs in kong are way more intence than the other movies. Jack Black's charecter, overconfident movie producer Carl Denham, seems addicted. (And when I say addicted, I mean it!) By now, you may think that I am a kong fanatic. To those of you who don't believe this can kiss my metal ***.