From: (No Email available)

Date: 2004-08-18 10:20:13

Comment:

Oh I almost forgot, do you think anyone is actually going to pay to see this film considering the director (who nobody has heard of) a. can't even land an interview with Michael Moore and b. looks like a fat Backstreet Boy?  I don't - I mean sure, it might be more entertaining than White Chicks, but I'm not paying this guy my money if he can't get an interview with Moore.  I'd be more intrigued if the film addressed the footage and facts from Farenheit 9/11.  I don't need to see a film telling me Moore is biased - everyone already fucking knows that.  Would you guys pay to see that?


Are you fucking serious? Facts? Did you take your medication today? Facts are the enemy of Moore. Let?s look at some Mooresk facts.


You said:

?do you think anyone is actually going to pay to see.. Farenheit 9/11? I don't need to see a film telling me Moore is a fat Backstreet Boy?..  Would you guys pay to see an interview with Michael Moore? ?. everyone already fucking knows that I don't? fucking Michael Moore is more entertaining than fucking Chicks.


These are facts. They came right from your own words. These are liberal facts. That?s how moore would relate the facts anyway. And if it weren?t you, you?d believe him.

As far as interveiwing Michael Moore, I'm sure you've seen all the Moore crap where he talks about how everyone is afraid to talk to him. They must have something to hide and that is his big gimmick. You would pay to see it, but only if it is anti american, not if it's pro American and only if it supports your delusion.

Deal with it ..

Get Over it..

Shut up you mental midget.

BY THE WAY it?s Fahrenheit not Farenheit.