From: (No Email available)

Date: 2004-08-18 09:44:48

Comment:

So what can we rely on?  The fucking facts people. Here are two simple ones to get us started.

Sounds fair.

There are no WMD's...

What is implied here? I believe that there is an attempt to mislead or, LIE. According to the Democrats, to be wrong about something or misinformed is to lie. Are you telling us John Kerry was misleading the US about Saddam?s WMD?s that he was 100% certain of last year? Of course the Republicans are the only ones responsible for accuracy. Slick Willie and John Kerry are always right because they both were always on both sides of every issue. In 2003 John Kerry said without a doubt Saddam?s WMDs were a threat to America. He now runs from his statements. The liberal press has also changed the definition of the word. It used to also mean chemical and bio weapons, which WERE found and reported by even the CHINESE press. You sir, are a fool.

Saddam is not Osama...

WOW, you got one right. The guy was still a threat, all intel pointed to a link between him and Bin Laden and you are a fool if you think we were wrong to put a stop to Saddam. But you?re right, ?Saddam is not Osama...?

Let?s look at more(note spelling is not Moore) FACTS:

Clinton had several chances at Bin Laden, but at one time, there was a golf game on. Was told not to disturb him till it was over. All he had to do is say, ?OK.? ?Go for it? ?take the shot?. What instead? A five minute lecture about how he needs his alone time. That?s what the Democrats have to offer.

Another he was ?getting relations?.

In the Sudan he just wasn?t interested. He did kill a bunch of people after the fact in the middle of the night to try to save face. Bin Laden was no where near the factory, just a bunch of workers. Bill Clinton?s own little terrorist attack.

Them?s the facts. Like it or not. The Democrats are usless.