From: (No Email available)

Date: 2004-05-13 13:07:49

Comment:

I don't really know what website the dickheads who have run this thread so far think they are visiting but it is supposed to be for reviews of movies (and apparently reviews of reviews of movies).   Take your elementary bullshit "rapping" (as you seem to fool yourselves into thinking it is) and go...well, go work on it for about another one hundred years and maybe, just maybe you might have a legitimate chance at penning a hit.  
Charley- maybe you should have a breathalizer on your computer.  It would serve you well in not repeating the very point you criticize.  Your review is neither original or fresh, simply because you repeat the referencce to spirits in an attempt at clever irony.  Has it been proven that spirits are, in fact, capable of being pissed off anymore than it has been proven that spirits don't need money, wherever they may be?  That I am expected to disregard Clarke's reivew because of something that you recreate in your review, disqualifies you as a credible opinion. In regards to the differences of originality and freshness...don't bring it up as a point of contention, if you aren't willing to draw the line to distinguish them.  Just because you use a disclaimer, by refering to yourself as a "humble being", does not let you off the hook.  For many that line is not obvious or apparent. Especially when they are drunk and sitting in front of their monitors, it seems.
:) late-
p.s. you "rappers" (i feel guilty to hip hop calling you that) really do suck, it almost hurts me to read that shit you typed...you ain't nobody's Eminem, Tupac, or Jay-Z.  get off here and back to your jessica simpson sites.